[PATCH v2] dma: imx-sdma: clarify firmare not found warning

[PATCH v2] dma: imx-sdma: clarify firmare not found warning

[Sascha Hauer]

When a firmware cannot be found for the SDMA engine then we can
continue with the inernal ROM firmware.

The meaning of this message is frequently asked for, so make clear
that the driver still works with the internal ROM firmware and reduce
the loglevel from err to info.

Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
---

changes since v1:
- instead of removing the message make it more clear

 drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
index c75679d..d79eaad 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
@@ -1259,7 +1259,10 @@ static void sdma_load_firmware(const struct firmware *fw, void *context)
 	unsigned short *ram_code;
 
 	if (!fw) {
-		dev_err(sdma->dev, "firmware not found\n");
+		dev_info(sdma->dev, "external firmware not found, using ROM firmware\n");
+		/*
+		 * In this case we just use the ROM firmware.
+		 */
 		return;
 	}
 
-- 
1.8.5.2

[PATCH v2] dma: imx-sdma: clarify firmare not found warning

[Lothar Waßmann]

Hi,

Sascha Hauer wrote:
> When a firmware cannot be found for the SDMA engine then we can
> continue with the inernal ROM firmware.
> 
> The meaning of this message is frequently asked for, so make clear
> that the driver still works with the internal ROM firmware and reduce
> the loglevel from err to info.
> 
In case user space firmware loading 
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
> ---
> 
> changes since v1:
> - instead of removing the message make it more clear
> 
>  drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> index c75679d..d79eaad 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> @@ -1259,7 +1259,10 @@ static void sdma_load_firmware(const struct firmware *fw, void *context)
>  	unsigned short *ram_code;
>  
>  	if (!fw) {
> -		dev_err(sdma->dev, "firmware not found\n");
> +		dev_info(sdma->dev, "external firmware not found, using ROM firmware\n");
> +		/*
> +		 * In this case we just use the ROM firmware.
> +		 */
>  		return;
>  	}
>  


-- 
___________________________________________________________

Ka-Ro electronics GmbH | Pascalstra?e 22 | D - 52076 Aachen
Phone: +49 2408 1402-0 | Fax: +49 2408 1402-10
Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Matthias Kaussen
Handelsregistereintrag: Amtsgericht Aachen, HRB 4996

www.karo-electronics.de | info at karo-electronics.de
___________________________________________________________

[PATCH v2] dma: imx-sdma: clarify firmare not found warning

[Lothar Waßmann]

Hi,

Lothar Wa?mann wrote:
> Hi,
> 
erroneously pressed the 'Send' button...

> Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > When a firmware cannot be found for the SDMA engine then we can
> > continue with the inernal ROM firmware.
> > 
> > The meaning of this message is frequently asked for, so make clear
> > that the driver still works with the internal ROM firmware and reduce
> > the loglevel from err to info.
> > 
In case user space firmware loading support (CONFIG_FW_LOADER) is
enabled, this message may still be inadequate, since the firmware may
very well be loaded lateron.


Lothar Wa?mann
-- 
___________________________________________________________

Ka-Ro electronics GmbH | Pascalstra?e 22 | D - 52076 Aachen
Phone: +49 2408 1402-0 | Fax: +49 2408 1402-10
Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Matthias Kaussen
Handelsregistereintrag: Amtsgericht Aachen, HRB 4996

www.karo-electronics.de | info at karo-electronics.de
___________________________________________________________

[PATCH v2] dma: imx-sdma: clarify firmare not found warning

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:36:27PM +0100, Lothar Wa?mann wrote:
> In case user space firmware loading support (CONFIG_FW_LOADER) is
> enabled, this message may still be inadequate, since the firmware may
> very well be loaded lateron.

I haven't worked out whether that's actually possible - I saw no way to
re-trigger the firmware request, and once the firmware request expires,
there seems to be no way for userspace to say "okay, the firmware is now
available, please load it".

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: 5.8Mbps down 500kbps up.  Estimation
in database were 13.1 to 19Mbit for a good line, about 7.5+ for a bad.
Estimate before purchase was "up to 13.2Mbit".

[PATCH v2] dma: imx-sdma: clarify firmare not found warning

[Vinod Koul]

On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:38:50PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:36:27PM +0100, Lothar Wa?mann wrote:
> > In case user space firmware loading support (CONFIG_FW_LOADER) is
> > enabled, this message may still be inadequate, since the firmware may
> > very well be loaded lateron.
> 
> I haven't worked out whether that's actually possible - I saw no way to
> re-trigger the firmware request, and once the firmware request expires,
> there seems to be no way for userspace to say "okay, the firmware is now
> available, please load it".
In that case why don't we use async version and wait till the userspace is
availble and firmware is loaded. 

So request_firmware_nowait() seems to do the job, I have used in a device where
I call it in probe() so that not to slow booting and make firmware bloc availble
userpsace is availble.

Sounds too good, did I miss anything obvious for this case here?

-- 
~Vinod

[PATCH v2] dma: imx-sdma: clarify firmare not found warning

[Sascha Hauer]

On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 05:29:20PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:38:50PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:36:27PM +0100, Lothar Wa?mann wrote:
> > > In case user space firmware loading support (CONFIG_FW_LOADER) is
> > > enabled, this message may still be inadequate, since the firmware may
> > > very well be loaded lateron.
> > 
> > I haven't worked out whether that's actually possible - I saw no way to
> > re-trigger the firmware request, and once the firmware request expires,
> > there seems to be no way for userspace to say "okay, the firmware is now
> > available, please load it".
> In that case why don't we use async version and wait till the userspace is
> availble and firmware is loaded. 
> 
> So request_firmware_nowait() seems to do the job, I have used in a device where
> I call it in probe() so that not to slow booting and make firmware bloc availble
> userpsace is availble.
> 
> Sounds too good, did I miss anything obvious for this case here?

Been there, done that. This would make the RAM Firmware mandatory.

The Linux firmware loading mechanism is not very suitable for the SDMA
engine. The firmware loading mechanism expects that a driver cannot work
without a firmware. Normally this is true, but The SDMA engine can run
with the ROM firmware or a RAM firmware loaded during runtime. In fact
the firmware consists of Program code, so the SDMA engine could even run
with a combination of the ROM firmware and 0..n dynamically loaded
firmware modules.

Maybe using the firmware loading mechanism for the SDMA engine was the
wrong approach from the start.

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

[PATCH v2] dma: imx-sdma: clarify firmare not found warning

[Lothar Waßmann]

Hi,

Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:36:27PM +0100, Lothar Wa?mann wrote:
> > In case user space firmware loading support (CONFIG_FW_LOADER) is
> > enabled, this message may still be inadequate, since the firmware may
> > very well be loaded lateron.
> 
> I haven't worked out whether that's actually possible - I saw no way to
> re-trigger the firmware request, and once the firmware request expires,
> there seems to be no way for userspace to say "okay, the firmware is now
> available, please load it".
> 
I can confirm that it does work, since I'm using it.
I have the following in my /etc/init.d/mdev.sh script:
|        [ "$VERBOSE" = no ] || echo -n "Triggering firmware load"
|        for dir in $(find /sys/class/firmware/ -type l);do
|            echo add > "$dir/uevent"
|        done


Lothar
-- 
___________________________________________________________

Ka-Ro electronics GmbH | Pascalstra?e 22 | D - 52076 Aachen
Phone: +49 2408 1402-0 | Fax: +49 2408 1402-10
Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Matthias Kaussen
Handelsregistereintrag: Amtsgericht Aachen, HRB 4996

www.karo-electronics.de | info at karo-electronics.de
___________________________________________________________

[PATCH v2] dma: imx-sdma: clarify firmare not found warning

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 03:09:02PM +0100, Lothar Wa?mann wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:36:27PM +0100, Lothar Wa?mann wrote:
> > > In case user space firmware loading support (CONFIG_FW_LOADER) is
> > > enabled, this message may still be inadequate, since the firmware may
> > > very well be loaded lateron.
> > 
> > I haven't worked out whether that's actually possible - I saw no way to
> > re-trigger the firmware request, and once the firmware request expires,
> > there seems to be no way for userspace to say "okay, the firmware is now
> > available, please load it".
> > 
> I can confirm that it does work, since I'm using it.
> I have the following in my /etc/init.d/mdev.sh script:
> |        [ "$VERBOSE" = no ] || echo -n "Triggering firmware load"
> |        for dir in $(find /sys/class/firmware/ -type l);do
> |            echo add > "$dir/uevent"
> |        done

I can't check on iMX6 at the moment, but I did look in that directory
after the iMX6 SDMA reported that it hadn't found any firmware, and
it was empty apart from the "timeout" file.

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: 5.8Mbps down 500kbps up.  Estimation
in database were 13.1 to 19Mbit for a good line, about 7.5+ for a bad.
Estimate before purchase was "up to 13.2Mbit".

[PATCH v2] dma: imx-sdma: clarify firmare not found warning

[Lothar Waßmann]

Hi,

Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 03:09:02PM +0100, Lothar Wa?mann wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:36:27PM +0100, Lothar Wa?mann wrote:
> > > > In case user space firmware loading support (CONFIG_FW_LOADER) is
> > > > enabled, this message may still be inadequate, since the firmware may
> > > > very well be loaded lateron.
> > > 
> > > I haven't worked out whether that's actually possible - I saw no way to
> > > re-trigger the firmware request, and once the firmware request expires,
> > > there seems to be no way for userspace to say "okay, the firmware is now
> > > available, please load it".
> > > 
> > I can confirm that it does work, since I'm using it.
> > I have the following in my /etc/init.d/mdev.sh script:
> > |        [ "$VERBOSE" = no ] || echo -n "Triggering firmware load"
> > |        for dir in $(find /sys/class/firmware/ -type l);do
> > |            echo add > "$dir/uevent"
> > |        done
> 
> I can't check on iMX6 at the moment, but I did look in that directory
> after the iMX6 SDMA reported that it hadn't found any firmware, and
> it was empty apart from the "timeout" file.
> 
The file is automatically removed after the timeout has expired (or
the frimware has been loaded).
Thus you must check for it within the timeout period during boot.


Lothar Wa?mann
-- 
___________________________________________________________

Ka-Ro electronics GmbH | Pascalstra?e 22 | D - 52076 Aachen
Phone: +49 2408 1402-0 | Fax: +49 2408 1402-10
Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Matthias Kaussen
Handelsregistereintrag: Amtsgericht Aachen, HRB 4996

www.karo-electronics.de | info at karo-electronics.de
___________________________________________________________

[PATCH v2] dma: imx-sdma: clarify firmare not found warning

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 07:59:22AM +0100, Lothar Wa?mann wrote:
> The file is automatically removed after the timeout has expired (or
> the frimware has been loaded).
> Thus you must check for it within the timeout period during boot.

... which is impossible if imx-sdma is built into the kernel - it
expires while the initramfs has only just started running, giving a
very narrow window for userspace to load firmware.

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: 5.8Mbps down 500kbps up.  Estimation
in database were 13.1 to 19Mbit for a good line, about 7.5+ for a bad.
Estimate before purchase was "up to 13.2Mbit".

[PATCH v2] dma: imx-sdma: clarify firmare not found warning

[Lothar Waßmann]

Hi,

Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 07:59:22AM +0100, Lothar Wa?mann wrote:
> > The file is automatically removed after the timeout has expired (or
> > the frimware has been loaded).
> > Thus you must check for it within the timeout period during boot.
> 
> ... which is impossible if imx-sdma is built into the kernel - it
> expires while the initramfs has only just started running, giving a
> very narrow window for userspace to load firmware.
> 
It works for me, but I'm not using initramfs.


Lothar Wa?mann
-- 
___________________________________________________________

Ka-Ro electronics GmbH | Pascalstra?e 22 | D - 52076 Aachen
Phone: +49 2408 1402-0 | Fax: +49 2408 1402-10
Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Matthias Kaussen
Handelsregistereintrag: Amtsgericht Aachen, HRB 4996

www.karo-electronics.de | info at karo-electronics.de
___________________________________________________________

[PATCH v2] dma: imx-sdma: clarify firmare not found warning

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 12:52:00PM +0100, Lothar Wa?mann wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 07:59:22AM +0100, Lothar Wa?mann wrote:
> > > The file is automatically removed after the timeout has expired (or
> > > the frimware has been loaded).
> > > Thus you must check for it within the timeout period during boot.
> > 
> > ... which is impossible if imx-sdma is built into the kernel - it
> > expires while the initramfs has only just started running, giving a
> > very narrow window for userspace to load firmware.
> > 
> It works for me, but I'm not using initramfs.

You can take my email as a report of "it doesn't work for everyone."  The
*only* way I can get firmware to load is to build imx-sdma as a module.
Building it in is a hopeless case here.

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: 5.8Mbps down 500kbps up.  Estimation
in database were 13.1 to 19Mbit for a good line, about 7.5+ for a bad.
Estimate before purchase was "up to 13.2Mbit".

[PATCH v2] dma: imx-sdma: clarify firmare not found warning

[Lothar Waßmann]

Hi,

Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 12:52:00PM +0100, Lothar Wa?mann wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 07:59:22AM +0100, Lothar Wa?mann wrote:
> > > > The file is automatically removed after the timeout has expired (or
> > > > the frimware has been loaded).
> > > > Thus you must check for it within the timeout period during boot.
> > > 
> > > ... which is impossible if imx-sdma is built into the kernel - it
> > > expires while the initramfs has only just started running, giving a
> > > very narrow window for userspace to load firmware.
> > > 
> > It works for me, but I'm not using initramfs.
> 
> You can take my email as a report of "it doesn't work for everyone."  The
> *only* way I can get firmware to load is to build imx-sdma as a module.
> Building it in is a hopeless case here.
> 
You could change the timeout from your initramfs as soon as sysfs has
been mounted by writing the number of seconds to
/sys/class/firmware/timeout. A timeout of '0' means 'wait forever' which
should be long enough for any boot case. ;)


Lothar Wa?mann
-- 
___________________________________________________________

Ka-Ro electronics GmbH | Pascalstra?e 22 | D - 52076 Aachen
Phone: +49 2408 1402-0 | Fax: +49 2408 1402-10
Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Matthias Kaussen
Handelsregistereintrag: Amtsgericht Aachen, HRB 4996

www.karo-electronics.de | info at karo-electronics.de
___________________________________________________________

[PATCH v2] dma: imx-sdma: clarify firmare not found warning

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 02:36:56PM +0100, Lothar Wa?mann wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 12:52:00PM +0100, Lothar Wa?mann wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 07:59:22AM +0100, Lothar Wa?mann wrote:
> > > > > The file is automatically removed after the timeout has expired (or
> > > > > the frimware has been loaded).
> > > > > Thus you must check for it within the timeout period during boot.
> > > > 
> > > > ... which is impossible if imx-sdma is built into the kernel - it
> > > > expires while the initramfs has only just started running, giving a
> > > > very narrow window for userspace to load firmware.
> > > > 
> > > It works for me, but I'm not using initramfs.
> > 
> > You can take my email as a report of "it doesn't work for everyone."  The
> > *only* way I can get firmware to load is to build imx-sdma as a module.
> > Building it in is a hopeless case here.
> > 
> You could change the timeout from your initramfs as soon as sysfs has
> been mounted by writing the number of seconds to
> /sys/class/firmware/timeout. A timeout of '0' means 'wait forever' which
> should be long enough for any boot case. ;)

Err, no.  Let's walk through the code, shall we?

imx-sdma calls request_firmware_nowait() for the firmware.

request_firmware_nowait() allocates a work structure, saves all the
details, puts it on a queue, and triggers a workqueue to process this.

When the work structure is dequeued, request_firmware_work_func() is
called.  This calls _request_firmware() with the appropriate parameters,
including nowait = true.

_request_firmware() reads the timeout, and then calls
usermodehelper_read_lock_wait() with it.  (Once this has happened,
changing the timeout has no effect.)  This waits for the requisit amount
of time for usermodehelper_disabled.

Once that happens, fw_get_filesystem_firmware() is called by
_request_firmware(), which attempts to read the file from the mounted
filesystem.

If that fails, the kernel falls back to fw_load_from_user_helper()
to invoke a usermode helper to load the firmware.

This creates a file in /sys/class/firmware, and issues a uevent, sets
a timeout using the timeout value read above, and waits either for the
request to be satisfied or a timeout to happen.

So... increasing the timeout can _only_ have an effect if it is done
before the request is created - which, if imx-sdma is built into the
kernel will be impossible to achieve.

What I suspect is happening is that ubuntu's initramfs doesn't contain
the firmware, but it unblocks the user helper (since it contains and
runs udev) which also fails to find the firmware - and there's no
provision for the firmware to be included in ubuntu's initramfs.

So, let's go back to the point I've been making.  If you build imx-sdma
into the kernel, there are situations where it is impossible to load
replacement firmware, because the attempt to load firmware expires long
before there is any chance for it to be loaded.

Maybe you don't personally care about ubuntu.  Good for you, that's your
personal choice.  That has absolutely no bearing on this issue though.

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: 5.8Mbps down 500kbps up.  Estimation
in database were 13.1 to 19Mbit for a good line, about 7.5+ for a bad.
Estimate before purchase was "up to 13.2Mbit".

[PATCH v2] dma: imx-sdma: clarify firmare not found warning

[Sascha Hauer]

Hi Lothar,

On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:36:27PM +0100, Lothar Wa?mann wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Lothar Wa?mann wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> erroneously pressed the 'Send' button...
> 
> > Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > > When a firmware cannot be found for the SDMA engine then we can
> > > continue with the inernal ROM firmware.
> > > 
> > > The meaning of this message is frequently asked for, so make clear
> > > that the driver still works with the internal ROM firmware and reduce
> > > the loglevel from err to info.
> > > 
> In case user space firmware loading support (CONFIG_FW_LOADER) is
> enabled, this message may still be inadequate, since the firmware may
> very well be loaded lateron.

Then at least until the RAM firmware is loaded the message is still adequate,
no? We could add an addional message when the firmware is loaded if you
like.

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

[PATCH v2] dma: imx-sdma: clarify firmare not found warning

[Lothar Waßmann]

Hi,

Sascha Hauer wrote:
> Hi Lothar,
> 
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:36:27PM +0100, Lothar Wa?mann wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Lothar Wa?mann wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > erroneously pressed the 'Send' button...
> > 
> > > Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > > > When a firmware cannot be found for the SDMA engine then we can
> > > > continue with the inernal ROM firmware.
> > > > 
> > > > The meaning of this message is frequently asked for, so make clear
> > > > that the driver still works with the internal ROM firmware and reduce
> > > > the loglevel from err to info.
> > > > 
> > In case user space firmware loading support (CONFIG_FW_LOADER) is
> > enabled, this message may still be inadequate, since the firmware may
> > very well be loaded lateron.
> 
> Then at least until the RAM firmware is loaded the message is still adequate,
> no? We could add an addional message when the firmware is loaded if you
> like.
> 
There is already a message printed upon successful firmware load:
|imx-sdma 63fb0000.sdma: loaded firmware 1.1

But one message saying 'firmware load failed' and another saying the
opposite is a bit confusing. There actually is also a message saying
'firmware not found' when the timeout expires without any firmware
being loaded. Thus at least in case CONFIG_FW_LOADER is enabled the
message 'Direct firmware load failed' could be omitted.


Lothar Wa?mann
-- 
___________________________________________________________

Ka-Ro electronics GmbH | Pascalstra?e 22 | D - 52076 Aachen
Phone: +49 2408 1402-0 | Fax: +49 2408 1402-10
Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Matthias Kaussen
Handelsregistereintrag: Amtsgericht Aachen, HRB 4996

www.karo-electronics.de | info at karo-electronics.de
___________________________________________________________

[PATCH v2] dma: imx-sdma: clarify firmare not found warning

[Fabio Estevam]

On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> When a firmware cannot be found for the SDMA engine then we can
> continue with the inernal ROM firmware.
>
> The meaning of this message is frequently asked for, so make clear
> that the driver still works with the internal ROM firmware and reduce
> the loglevel from err to info.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
> ---
>
> changes since v1:
> - instead of removing the message make it more clear

I know this has been posted a long time ago and agree that it would be
useful to change this dev_err code into dev_info:

Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>

>
>  drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> index c75679d..d79eaad 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> @@ -1259,7 +1259,10 @@ static void sdma_load_firmware(const struct firmware *fw, void *context)
>         unsigned short *ram_code;
>
>         if (!fw) {
> -               dev_err(sdma->dev, "firmware not found\n");
> +               dev_info(sdma->dev, "external firmware not found, using ROM firmware\n");
> +               /*
> +                * In this case we just use the ROM firmware.
> +                */
>                 return;
>         }
>
> --
> 1.8.5.2

[PATCH v2] dma: imx-sdma: clarify firmare not found warning

[Vinod Koul]

On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 10:28:15AM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> > When a firmware cannot be found for the SDMA engine then we can
> > continue with the inernal ROM firmware.
> >
> > The meaning of this message is frequently asked for, so make clear
> > that the driver still works with the internal ROM firmware and reduce
> > the loglevel from err to info.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> > Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
> > Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> > Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >
> > changes since v1:
> > - instead of removing the message make it more clear
> 
> I know this has been posted a long time ago and agree that it would be
> useful to change this dev_err code into dev_info:
In that case cn someone pls repost this...

-- 
~Vinod

> 
> Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
> 
> >
> >  drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c | 5 ++++-
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> > index c75679d..d79eaad 100644
> > --- a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> > @@ -1259,7 +1259,10 @@ static void sdma_load_firmware(const struct firmware *fw, void *context)
> >         unsigned short *ram_code;
> >
> >         if (!fw) {
> > -               dev_err(sdma->dev, "firmware not found\n");
> > +               dev_info(sdma->dev, "external firmware not found, using ROM firmware\n");
> > +               /*
> > +                * In this case we just use the ROM firmware.
> > +                */
> >                 return;
> >         }
> >
> > --
> > 1.8.5.2

-- 

[PATCH v2] dma: imx-sdma: clarify firmare not found warning

[Fabio Estevam]

On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> wrote:

> In that case cn someone pls repost this...

Sure, just resent it. Thanks