From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com> To: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>, Han Pingtian <hanpt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>, Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>, Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 11:11:31 -0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20140206191131.GB7845@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAAmzW4PXkdpNi5pZ=4BzdXNvqTEAhcuw-x0pWidqrxzdePxXxA@mail.gmail.com> On 06.02.2014 [19:29:16 +0900], Joonsoo Kim wrote: > 2014-02-06 David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>: > > On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > > >> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> > >> > > > > I may be misunderstanding this patch and there's no help because there's > > no changelog. > > Sorry about that. > I made this patch just for testing. :) > Thanks for looking this. > > >> diff --git a/include/linux/topology.h b/include/linux/topology.h > >> index 12ae6ce..a6d5438 100644 > >> --- a/include/linux/topology.h > >> +++ b/include/linux/topology.h > >> @@ -233,11 +233,20 @@ static inline int numa_node_id(void) > >> * Use the accessor functions set_numa_mem(), numa_mem_id() and cpu_to_mem(). > >> */ > >> DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, _numa_mem_); > >> +int _node_numa_mem_[MAX_NUMNODES]; > >> > >> #ifndef set_numa_mem > >> static inline void set_numa_mem(int node) > >> { > >> this_cpu_write(_numa_mem_, node); > >> + _node_numa_mem_[numa_node_id()] = node; > >> +} > >> +#endif > >> + > >> +#ifndef get_numa_mem > >> +static inline int get_numa_mem(int node) > >> +{ > >> + return _node_numa_mem_[node]; > >> } > >> #endif > >> > >> @@ -260,6 +269,7 @@ static inline int cpu_to_mem(int cpu) > >> static inline void set_cpu_numa_mem(int cpu, int node) > >> { > >> per_cpu(_numa_mem_, cpu) = node; > >> + _node_numa_mem_[numa_node_id()] = node; > > > > The intention seems to be that _node_numa_mem_[X] for a node X will return > > a node Y with memory that has the nearest distance? In other words, > > caching the value returned by local_memory_node(X)? > > Yes, you are right. > > > That doesn't seem to be what it's doing since numa_node_id() is the node > > of the cpu that current is running on so this ends up getting initialized > > to whatever local_memory_node(cpu_to_node(cpu)) is for the last bit set in > > cpu_possible_mask. > > Yes, I made a mistake. > Thanks for pointer. > I fix it and attach v2. > Now I'm out of office, so I'm not sure this second version is correct :( > > Thanks. > > ----------8<-------------- > From bf691e7eb07f966e3aed251eaeb18f229ee32d1f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 17:07:05 +0900 > Subject: [RFC PATCH 2/3 v2] topology: support node_numa_mem() for > determining the > fallback node > > We need to determine the fallback node in slub allocator if the allocation > target node is memoryless node. Without it, the SLUB wrongly select > the node which has no memory and can't use a partial slab, because of node > mismatch. Introduced function, node_numa_mem(X), will return > a node Y with memory that has the nearest distance. If X is memoryless > node, it will return nearest distance node, but, if > X is normal node, it will return itself. > > We will use this function in following patch to determine the fallback > node. > > Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> > > diff --git a/include/linux/topology.h b/include/linux/topology.h > index 12ae6ce..66b19b8 100644 > --- a/include/linux/topology.h > +++ b/include/linux/topology.h > @@ -233,11 +233,20 @@ static inline int numa_node_id(void) > * Use the accessor functions set_numa_mem(), numa_mem_id() and cpu_to_mem(). > */ > DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, _numa_mem_); > +int _node_numa_mem_[MAX_NUMNODES]; Should be static, I think? > > #ifndef set_numa_mem > static inline void set_numa_mem(int node) > { > this_cpu_write(_numa_mem_, node); > + _node_numa_mem_[numa_node_id()] = node; > +} > +#endif > + > +#ifndef get_numa_mem > +static inline int get_numa_mem(int node) > +{ > + return _node_numa_mem_[node]; > } > #endif > > @@ -260,6 +269,7 @@ static inline int cpu_to_mem(int cpu) > static inline void set_cpu_numa_mem(int cpu, int node) > { > per_cpu(_numa_mem_, cpu) = node; > + _node_numa_mem_[cpu_to_node(cpu)] = node; > } > #endif > > @@ -273,6 +283,13 @@ static inline int numa_mem_id(void) > } > #endif > > +#ifndef get_numa_mem > +static inline int get_numa_mem(int node) > +{ > + return node; > +} > +#endif > + > #ifndef cpu_to_mem > static inline int cpu_to_mem(int cpu) > { > -- > 1.7.9.5 > -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com> To: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com> Cc: Han Pingtian <hanpt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>, Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>, Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 11:11:31 -0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20140206191131.GB7845@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAAmzW4PXkdpNi5pZ=4BzdXNvqTEAhcuw-x0pWidqrxzdePxXxA@mail.gmail.com> On 06.02.2014 [19:29:16 +0900], Joonsoo Kim wrote: > 2014-02-06 David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>: > > On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > > >> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> > >> > > > > I may be misunderstanding this patch and there's no help because there's > > no changelog. > > Sorry about that. > I made this patch just for testing. :) > Thanks for looking this. > > >> diff --git a/include/linux/topology.h b/include/linux/topology.h > >> index 12ae6ce..a6d5438 100644 > >> --- a/include/linux/topology.h > >> +++ b/include/linux/topology.h > >> @@ -233,11 +233,20 @@ static inline int numa_node_id(void) > >> * Use the accessor functions set_numa_mem(), numa_mem_id() and cpu_to_mem(). > >> */ > >> DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, _numa_mem_); > >> +int _node_numa_mem_[MAX_NUMNODES]; > >> > >> #ifndef set_numa_mem > >> static inline void set_numa_mem(int node) > >> { > >> this_cpu_write(_numa_mem_, node); > >> + _node_numa_mem_[numa_node_id()] = node; > >> +} > >> +#endif > >> + > >> +#ifndef get_numa_mem > >> +static inline int get_numa_mem(int node) > >> +{ > >> + return _node_numa_mem_[node]; > >> } > >> #endif > >> > >> @@ -260,6 +269,7 @@ static inline int cpu_to_mem(int cpu) > >> static inline void set_cpu_numa_mem(int cpu, int node) > >> { > >> per_cpu(_numa_mem_, cpu) = node; > >> + _node_numa_mem_[numa_node_id()] = node; > > > > The intention seems to be that _node_numa_mem_[X] for a node X will return > > a node Y with memory that has the nearest distance? In other words, > > caching the value returned by local_memory_node(X)? > > Yes, you are right. > > > That doesn't seem to be what it's doing since numa_node_id() is the node > > of the cpu that current is running on so this ends up getting initialized > > to whatever local_memory_node(cpu_to_node(cpu)) is for the last bit set in > > cpu_possible_mask. > > Yes, I made a mistake. > Thanks for pointer. > I fix it and attach v2. > Now I'm out of office, so I'm not sure this second version is correct :( > > Thanks. > > ----------8<-------------- > From bf691e7eb07f966e3aed251eaeb18f229ee32d1f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 17:07:05 +0900 > Subject: [RFC PATCH 2/3 v2] topology: support node_numa_mem() for > determining the > fallback node > > We need to determine the fallback node in slub allocator if the allocation > target node is memoryless node. Without it, the SLUB wrongly select > the node which has no memory and can't use a partial slab, because of node > mismatch. Introduced function, node_numa_mem(X), will return > a node Y with memory that has the nearest distance. If X is memoryless > node, it will return nearest distance node, but, if > X is normal node, it will return itself. > > We will use this function in following patch to determine the fallback > node. > > Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> > > diff --git a/include/linux/topology.h b/include/linux/topology.h > index 12ae6ce..66b19b8 100644 > --- a/include/linux/topology.h > +++ b/include/linux/topology.h > @@ -233,11 +233,20 @@ static inline int numa_node_id(void) > * Use the accessor functions set_numa_mem(), numa_mem_id() and cpu_to_mem(). > */ > DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, _numa_mem_); > +int _node_numa_mem_[MAX_NUMNODES]; Should be static, I think? > > #ifndef set_numa_mem > static inline void set_numa_mem(int node) > { > this_cpu_write(_numa_mem_, node); > + _node_numa_mem_[numa_node_id()] = node; > +} > +#endif > + > +#ifndef get_numa_mem > +static inline int get_numa_mem(int node) > +{ > + return _node_numa_mem_[node]; > } > #endif > > @@ -260,6 +269,7 @@ static inline int cpu_to_mem(int cpu) > static inline void set_cpu_numa_mem(int cpu, int node) > { > per_cpu(_numa_mem_, cpu) = node; > + _node_numa_mem_[cpu_to_node(cpu)] = node; > } > #endif > > @@ -273,6 +283,13 @@ static inline int numa_mem_id(void) > } > #endif > > +#ifndef get_numa_mem > +static inline int get_numa_mem(int node) > +{ > + return node; > +} > +#endif > + > #ifndef cpu_to_mem > static inline int cpu_to_mem(int cpu) > { > -- > 1.7.9.5 >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-06 23:23 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 229+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2014-01-07 2:21 [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory Anton Blanchard 2014-01-07 2:21 ` Anton Blanchard 2014-01-07 4:19 ` Wanpeng Li 2014-01-07 4:19 ` Wanpeng Li 2014-01-07 4:19 ` Wanpeng Li 2014-01-08 14:17 ` Anton Blanchard 2014-01-08 14:17 ` Anton Blanchard 2014-01-07 4:19 ` Wanpeng Li 2014-01-07 6:49 ` Andi Kleen 2014-01-07 6:49 ` Andi Kleen 2014-01-08 14:03 ` Anton Blanchard 2014-01-08 14:03 ` Anton Blanchard 2014-01-07 7:41 ` Joonsoo Kim 2014-01-07 7:41 ` Joonsoo Kim 2014-01-07 8:48 ` Wanpeng Li 2014-01-07 8:48 ` Wanpeng Li 2014-01-07 8:48 ` Wanpeng Li 2014-01-07 8:48 ` Wanpeng Li 2014-01-07 9:10 ` Joonsoo Kim 2014-01-07 9:10 ` Joonsoo Kim 2014-01-07 9:21 ` Wanpeng Li 2014-01-07 9:21 ` Wanpeng Li 2014-01-07 9:31 ` Joonsoo Kim 2014-01-07 9:31 ` Joonsoo Kim 2014-01-07 9:49 ` Wanpeng Li 2014-01-07 9:49 ` Wanpeng Li 2014-01-07 9:49 ` Wanpeng Li 2014-01-07 9:49 ` Wanpeng Li 2014-01-07 9:21 ` Wanpeng Li 2014-01-07 9:21 ` Wanpeng Li 2014-01-07 9:52 ` Wanpeng Li 2014-01-07 9:52 ` Wanpeng Li 2014-01-07 9:52 ` Wanpeng Li 2014-01-09 0:20 ` Joonsoo Kim 2014-01-09 0:20 ` Joonsoo Kim 2014-01-07 9:52 ` Wanpeng Li 2014-01-20 9:10 ` Wanpeng Li 2014-01-20 9:10 ` Wanpeng Li 2014-01-20 9:10 ` Wanpeng Li 2014-01-20 9:10 ` Wanpeng Li [not found] ` <52dce7fe.e5e6420a.5ff6.ffff84a0SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> 2014-01-20 22:13 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-01-20 22:13 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-01-21 2:20 ` Wanpeng Li 2014-01-21 2:20 ` Wanpeng Li 2014-01-21 2:20 ` Wanpeng Li 2014-01-21 2:20 ` Wanpeng Li 2014-01-24 3:09 ` Wanpeng Li 2014-01-24 3:09 ` Wanpeng Li 2014-01-24 3:09 ` Wanpeng Li 2014-01-24 3:09 ` Wanpeng Li 2014-01-24 3:14 ` Wanpeng Li 2014-01-24 3:14 ` Wanpeng Li 2014-01-24 3:14 ` Wanpeng Li 2014-01-24 3:14 ` Wanpeng Li [not found] ` <52e1da8f.86f7440a.120f.25f3SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> 2014-01-24 15:50 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-01-24 15:50 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-01-24 21:03 ` David Rientjes 2014-01-24 21:03 ` David Rientjes 2014-01-24 22:19 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-01-24 22:19 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-01-24 23:29 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-01-24 23:29 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-01-24 23:49 ` David Rientjes 2014-01-24 23:49 ` David Rientjes 2014-01-25 0:16 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-01-25 0:16 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-01-25 0:25 ` David Rientjes 2014-01-25 0:25 ` David Rientjes 2014-01-25 1:10 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-01-25 1:10 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-01-27 5:58 ` Joonsoo Kim 2014-01-27 5:58 ` Joonsoo Kim 2014-01-28 18:29 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-01-28 18:29 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-01-29 15:54 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-01-29 15:54 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-01-29 22:36 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-01-29 22:36 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-01-30 16:26 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-01-30 16:26 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-02-03 23:00 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-02-03 23:00 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-02-04 3:38 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-02-04 3:38 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-02-04 7:26 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-02-04 7:26 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-02-04 20:39 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-02-04 20:39 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-02-05 0:13 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-02-05 0:13 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-02-05 19:28 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-02-05 19:28 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-02-06 2:08 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-02-06 2:08 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-02-06 17:25 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-02-06 17:25 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-01-27 16:18 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-01-27 16:18 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-02-06 2:07 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-02-06 2:07 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-02-06 8:04 ` Joonsoo Kim 2014-02-06 8:04 ` Joonsoo Kim [not found] ` <20140206185955.GA7845@linux.vnet.ibm.com> 2014-02-06 19:28 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-02-06 19:28 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-02-07 8:03 ` Joonsoo Kim 2014-02-07 8:03 ` Joonsoo Kim 2014-02-06 8:07 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] slub: search partial list on numa_mem_id(), instead of numa_node_id() Joonsoo Kim 2014-02-06 8:07 ` Joonsoo Kim 2014-02-06 8:07 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node Joonsoo Kim 2014-02-06 8:07 ` Joonsoo Kim 2014-02-06 8:52 ` David Rientjes 2014-02-06 8:52 ` David Rientjes 2014-02-06 10:29 ` Joonsoo Kim 2014-02-06 10:29 ` Joonsoo Kim 2014-02-06 19:11 ` Nishanth Aravamudan [this message] 2014-02-06 19:11 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-02-07 5:42 ` Joonsoo Kim 2014-02-07 5:42 ` Joonsoo Kim 2014-02-06 20:52 ` David Rientjes 2014-02-06 20:52 ` David Rientjes 2014-02-07 5:48 ` Joonsoo Kim 2014-02-07 5:48 ` Joonsoo Kim 2014-02-07 17:53 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-02-07 17:53 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-02-07 18:51 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-02-07 18:51 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-02-07 21:38 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-02-07 21:38 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-02-10 1:15 ` Joonsoo Kim 2014-02-10 1:15 ` Joonsoo Kim 2014-02-10 1:29 ` Joonsoo Kim 2014-02-10 1:29 ` Joonsoo Kim 2014-02-11 18:45 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-02-11 18:45 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-02-10 19:13 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-02-10 19:13 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-02-11 7:42 ` Joonsoo Kim 2014-02-11 7:42 ` Joonsoo Kim 2014-02-12 22:16 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-02-12 22:16 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-02-13 3:53 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-02-13 3:53 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-02-17 6:52 ` Joonsoo Kim 2014-02-17 6:52 ` Joonsoo Kim 2014-02-18 16:38 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-02-18 16:38 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-02-19 22:04 ` David Rientjes 2014-02-19 22:04 ` David Rientjes 2014-02-20 16:02 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-02-20 16:02 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-02-24 5:08 ` Joonsoo Kim 2014-02-24 5:08 ` Joonsoo Kim 2014-02-24 19:54 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-02-24 19:54 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-03-13 16:51 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-03-13 16:51 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-02-18 17:22 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-02-18 17:22 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-02-13 6:51 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-02-13 6:51 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-02-17 7:00 ` Joonsoo Kim 2014-02-17 7:00 ` Joonsoo Kim 2014-02-18 16:57 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-02-18 16:57 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-02-18 17:28 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-02-18 17:28 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-02-18 19:58 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-02-18 19:58 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-02-18 21:09 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-02-18 21:09 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-02-18 21:49 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-02-18 21:49 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-02-18 22:22 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-02-18 22:22 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-02-19 16:11 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-02-19 16:11 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-02-19 22:03 ` David Rientjes 2014-02-19 22:03 ` David Rientjes 2014-02-08 9:57 ` David Rientjes 2014-02-08 9:57 ` David Rientjes 2014-02-10 1:09 ` Joonsoo Kim 2014-02-10 1:09 ` Joonsoo Kim 2014-07-22 1:03 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-07-22 1:03 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-07-22 1:16 ` David Rientjes 2014-07-22 1:16 ` David Rientjes 2014-07-22 21:43 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-07-22 21:43 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-07-22 21:49 ` Tejun Heo 2014-07-22 21:49 ` Tejun Heo 2014-07-22 23:47 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-07-22 23:47 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-07-23 0:43 ` David Rientjes 2014-07-23 0:43 ` David Rientjes 2014-02-06 8:07 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] slub: fallback to get_numa_mem() node if we want to allocate on memoryless node Joonsoo Kim 2014-02-06 8:07 ` Joonsoo Kim 2014-02-06 17:30 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-02-06 17:30 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-02-07 5:41 ` Joonsoo Kim 2014-02-07 5:41 ` Joonsoo Kim 2014-02-07 17:49 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-02-07 17:49 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-02-10 1:22 ` Joonsoo Kim 2014-02-10 1:22 ` Joonsoo Kim 2014-02-06 8:37 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] slub: search partial list on numa_mem_id(), instead of numa_node_id() David Rientjes 2014-02-06 8:37 ` David Rientjes 2014-02-06 17:31 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-02-06 17:31 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-02-06 17:26 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-02-06 17:26 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-05-16 23:37 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-05-16 23:37 ` Nishanth Aravamudan 2014-05-19 2:41 ` Joonsoo Kim 2014-05-19 2:41 ` Joonsoo Kim 2014-06-05 0:13 ` [RESEND PATCH] " David Rientjes 2014-06-05 0:13 ` David Rientjes 2014-06-05 0:13 ` David Rientjes 2014-01-27 16:24 ` [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory Christoph Lameter 2014-01-27 16:24 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-01-27 16:16 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-01-27 16:16 ` Christoph Lameter 2014-01-07 9:42 ` David Laight 2014-01-07 9:42 ` David Laight 2014-01-08 14:14 ` Anton Blanchard 2014-01-08 14:14 ` Anton Blanchard 2014-01-07 10:28 ` Wanpeng Li 2014-01-07 10:28 ` Wanpeng Li 2014-01-07 10:28 ` Wanpeng Li 2014-01-07 10:28 ` Wanpeng Li
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20140206191131.GB7845@linux.vnet.ibm.com \ --to=nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \ --cc=anton@samba.org \ --cc=cl@linux.com \ --cc=hanpt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \ --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \ --cc=js1304@gmail.com \ --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \ --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \ --cc=liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com \ --cc=mpm@selenic.com \ --cc=paulus@samba.org \ --cc=penberg@kernel.org \ --cc=rientjes@google.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.