[PATCH 0/8] of_find_matching_node/of_match_node -> of_find_matching_node_and_match

[PATCH 0/8] of_find_matching_node/of_match_node -> of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Josh Cartwright]

This patchset updates users of the of_find_matching_node()/of_match_node() pair
to leverage of_find_matching_node_and_match(), which only requires one walk
through the match table.  This functionality was added by Stephen Warren[1], and
landed in v3.8.

Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>

1: 50c8af4cf9 (of: introduce for_each_matching_node_and_match())

Josh Cartwright (8):
  bus: arm-cci: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match
  bus: mvebu-mbus: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match
  ARM: at91: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match
  ARM: mvebu: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match
  ARM: prima2: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match
  ARM: l2x0: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match
  C6X: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match
  cpufreq: ppc: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

 arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c              | 16 ++++------------
 arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c |  9 ++++-----
 arch/arm/mach-prima2/l2x0.c             |  7 ++++---
 arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c                |  5 +++--
 arch/c6x/platforms/plldata.c            |  7 +++----
 drivers/bus/arm-cci.c                   |  5 +++--
 drivers/bus/mvebu-mbus.c                |  3 +--
 drivers/cpufreq/ppc-corenet-cpufreq.c   |  3 +--
 8 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

[PATCH 0/8] of_find_matching_node/of_match_node -> of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Josh Cartwright]

This patchset updates users of the of_find_matching_node()/of_match_node() pair
to leverage of_find_matching_node_and_match(), which only requires one walk
through the match table.  This functionality was added by Stephen Warren[1], and
landed in v3.8.

Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>

1: 50c8af4cf9 (of: introduce for_each_matching_node_and_match())

Josh Cartwright (8):
  bus: arm-cci: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match
  bus: mvebu-mbus: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match
  ARM: at91: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match
  ARM: mvebu: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match
  ARM: prima2: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match
  ARM: l2x0: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match
  C6X: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match
  cpufreq: ppc: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

 arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c              | 16 ++++------------
 arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c |  9 ++++-----
 arch/arm/mach-prima2/l2x0.c             |  7 ++++---
 arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c                |  5 +++--
 arch/c6x/platforms/plldata.c            |  7 +++----
 drivers/bus/arm-cci.c                   |  5 +++--
 drivers/bus/mvebu-mbus.c                |  3 +--
 drivers/cpufreq/ppc-corenet-cpufreq.c   |  3 +--
 8 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

[PATCH 1/8] bus: arm-cci: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Josh Cartwright]

Instead of the of_find_matching_node()/of_match_node() pair, which requires two
iterations through the match table, make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match(),
which only iterates through the table once.

This also has the side effect of fixing the following following error hit
during randconfig testing:

  drivers/bus/arm-cci.c: In function ‘cci_probe’:
  drivers/bus/arm-cci.c:976:49: warning: dereferencing ‘void *’ pointer [enabled by default]
    cci_config = of_match_node(arm_cci_matches, np)->data;
                                                   ^
  drivers/bus/arm-cci.c:976:49: error: request for member ‘data’ in something not a structure or union

Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/bus/arm-cci.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
index 962fd35..e249cdb2 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
@@ -962,6 +962,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id arm_cci_ctrl_if_matches[] = {
 
 static int cci_probe(void)
 {
+	const struct of_device_id *match;
 	struct cci_nb_ports const *cci_config;
 	int ret, i, nb_ace = 0, nb_ace_lite = 0;
 	struct device_node *np, *cp;
@@ -969,11 +970,11 @@ static int cci_probe(void)
 	const char *match_str;
 	bool is_ace;
 
-	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, arm_cci_matches);
+	np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, arm_cci_matches, &match);
 	if (!np)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
-	cci_config = of_match_node(arm_cci_matches, np)->data;
+	cci_config = match->data;
 	if (!cci_config)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

[PATCH 1/8] bus: arm-cci: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Josh Cartwright]

Instead of the of_find_matching_node()/of_match_node() pair, which requires two
iterations through the match table, make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match(),
which only iterates through the table once.

This also has the side effect of fixing the following following error hit
during randconfig testing:

  drivers/bus/arm-cci.c: In function ?cci_probe?:
  drivers/bus/arm-cci.c:976:49: warning: dereferencing ?void *? pointer [enabled by default]
    cci_config = of_match_node(arm_cci_matches, np)->data;
                                                   ^
  drivers/bus/arm-cci.c:976:49: error: request for member ?data? in something not a structure or union

Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/bus/arm-cci.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
index 962fd35..e249cdb2 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
@@ -962,6 +962,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id arm_cci_ctrl_if_matches[] = {
 
 static int cci_probe(void)
 {
+	const struct of_device_id *match;
 	struct cci_nb_ports const *cci_config;
 	int ret, i, nb_ace = 0, nb_ace_lite = 0;
 	struct device_node *np, *cp;
@@ -969,11 +970,11 @@ static int cci_probe(void)
 	const char *match_str;
 	bool is_ace;
 
-	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, arm_cci_matches);
+	np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, arm_cci_matches, &match);
 	if (!np)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
-	cci_config = of_match_node(arm_cci_matches, np)->data;
+	cci_config = match->data;
 	if (!cci_config)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

[PATCH 1/8] bus: arm-cci: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Josh Cartwright]

Instead of the of_find_matching_node()/of_match_node() pair, which requires two
iterations through the match table, make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match(),
which only iterates through the table once.

This also has the side effect of fixing the following following error hit
during randconfig testing:

  drivers/bus/arm-cci.c: In function ‘cci_probe’:
  drivers/bus/arm-cci.c:976:49: warning: dereferencing ‘void *’ pointer [enabled by default]
    cci_config = of_match_node(arm_cci_matches, np)->data;
                                                   ^
  drivers/bus/arm-cci.c:976:49: error: request for member ‘data’ in something not a structure or union

Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <joshc-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
---
 drivers/bus/arm-cci.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
index 962fd35..e249cdb2 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
@@ -962,6 +962,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id arm_cci_ctrl_if_matches[] = {
 
 static int cci_probe(void)
 {
+	const struct of_device_id *match;
 	struct cci_nb_ports const *cci_config;
 	int ret, i, nb_ace = 0, nb_ace_lite = 0;
 	struct device_node *np, *cp;
@@ -969,11 +970,11 @@ static int cci_probe(void)
 	const char *match_str;
 	bool is_ace;
 
-	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, arm_cci_matches);
+	np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, arm_cci_matches, &match);
 	if (!np)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
-	cci_config = of_match_node(arm_cci_matches, np)->data;
+	cci_config = match->data;
 	if (!cci_config)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH 2/8] bus: mvebu-mbus: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Josh Cartwright]

Instead of the of_find_matching_node()/of_match_node() pair, which requires two
iterations through the match table, make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match(),
which only iterates through the table once.

Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/bus/mvebu-mbus.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/bus/mvebu-mbus.c b/drivers/bus/mvebu-mbus.c
index 725c461..31f2c80 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/mvebu-mbus.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/mvebu-mbus.c
@@ -890,13 +890,12 @@ int __init mvebu_mbus_dt_init(void)
 	const __be32 *prop;
 	int ret;
 
-	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, of_mvebu_mbus_ids);
+	np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, of_mvebu_mbus_ids, &of_id);
 	if (!np) {
 		pr_err("could not find a matching SoC family\n");
 		return -ENODEV;
 	}
 
-	of_id = of_match_node(of_mvebu_mbus_ids, np);
 	mbus_state.soc = of_id->data;
 
 	prop = of_get_property(np, "controller", NULL);
-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

[PATCH 2/8] bus: mvebu-mbus: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Josh Cartwright]

Instead of the of_find_matching_node()/of_match_node() pair, which requires two
iterations through the match table, make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match(),
which only iterates through the table once.

Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/bus/mvebu-mbus.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/bus/mvebu-mbus.c b/drivers/bus/mvebu-mbus.c
index 725c461..31f2c80 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/mvebu-mbus.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/mvebu-mbus.c
@@ -890,13 +890,12 @@ int __init mvebu_mbus_dt_init(void)
 	const __be32 *prop;
 	int ret;
 
-	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, of_mvebu_mbus_ids);
+	np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, of_mvebu_mbus_ids, &of_id);
 	if (!np) {
 		pr_err("could not find a matching SoC family\n");
 		return -ENODEV;
 	}
 
-	of_id = of_match_node(of_mvebu_mbus_ids, np);
 	mbus_state.soc = of_id->data;
 
 	prop = of_get_property(np, "controller", NULL);
-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

Re: [PATCH 2/8] bus: mvebu-mbus: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Jason Cooper]

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:24:00AM -0600, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> Instead of the of_find_matching_node()/of_match_node() pair, which requires two
> iterations through the match table, make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match(),
> which only iterates through the table once.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/bus/mvebu-mbus.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>

thx,

Jason.

[PATCH 2/8] bus: mvebu-mbus: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Jason Cooper]

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:24:00AM -0600, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> Instead of the of_find_matching_node()/of_match_node() pair, which requires two
> iterations through the match table, make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match(),
> which only iterates through the table once.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/bus/mvebu-mbus.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>

thx,

Jason.

Re: [PATCH 2/8] bus: mvebu-mbus: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Jason Cooper]

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:24:00AM -0600, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> Instead of the of_find_matching_node()/of_match_node() pair, which requires two
> iterations through the match table, make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match(),
> which only iterates through the table once.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <joshc-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>  drivers/bus/mvebu-mbus.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason-NLaQJdtUoK4Be96aLqz0jA@public.gmane.org>

thx,

Jason.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH 2/8] bus: mvebu-mbus: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Jason Cooper]

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:24:00AM -0600, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> Instead of the of_find_matching_node()/of_match_node() pair, which requires two
> iterations through the match table, make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match(),
> which only iterates through the table once.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/bus/mvebu-mbus.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

Applied to mvebu/drivers

thx,

Jason.

[PATCH 2/8] bus: mvebu-mbus: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Jason Cooper]

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:24:00AM -0600, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> Instead of the of_find_matching_node()/of_match_node() pair, which requires two
> iterations through the match table, make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match(),
> which only iterates through the table once.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/bus/mvebu-mbus.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

Applied to mvebu/drivers

thx,

Jason.

[PATCH 3/8] ARM: at91: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Josh Cartwright]

Instead of the of_find_matching_node()/of_match_node() pair, which requires two
iterations through the match table, make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match(),
which only iterates through the table once.

While we're here, mark the rtsc id table const.

Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org>
---
 arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c | 16 ++++------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c
index f7ca97b..e884de8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c
@@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ void __init at91_ioremap_matrix(u32 base_addr)
 }
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_OF)
-static struct of_device_id rstc_ids[] = {
+static const struct of_device_id rstc_ids[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9260-rstc", .data = at91sam9_alt_restart },
 	{ .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g45-rstc", .data = at91sam9g45_restart },
 	{ /*sentinel*/ }
@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ static void at91_dt_rstc(void)
 	struct device_node *np;
 	const struct of_device_id *of_id;
 
-	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, rstc_ids);
+	np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, rstc_ids, &of_id);
 	if (!np)
 		panic("unable to find compatible rstc node in dtb\n");
 
@@ -371,10 +371,6 @@ static void at91_dt_rstc(void)
 	if (!at91_rstc_base)
 		panic("unable to map rstc cpu registers\n");
 
-	of_id = of_match_node(rstc_ids, np);
-	if (!of_id)
-		panic("AT91: rtsc no restart function available\n");
-
 	arm_pm_restart = of_id->data;
 
 	of_node_put(np);
@@ -392,7 +388,7 @@ static void at91_dt_ramc(void)
 	struct device_node *np;
 	const struct of_device_id *of_id;
 
-	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, ramc_ids);
+	np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, ramc_ids, &of_id);
 	if (!np)
 		panic("unable to find compatible ram controller node in dtb\n");
 
@@ -402,11 +398,7 @@ static void at91_dt_ramc(void)
 	/* the controller may have 2 banks */
 	at91_ramc_base[1] = of_iomap(np, 1);
 
-	of_id = of_match_node(ramc_ids, np);
-	if (!of_id)
-		pr_warn("AT91: ramc no standby function available\n");
-	else
-		at91_pm_set_standby(of_id->data);
+	at91_pm_set_standby(of_id->data);
 
 	of_node_put(np);
 }
-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

[PATCH 3/8] ARM: at91: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Josh Cartwright]

Instead of the of_find_matching_node()/of_match_node() pair, which requires two
iterations through the match table, make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match(),
which only iterates through the table once.

While we're here, mark the rtsc id table const.

Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org>
---
 arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c | 16 ++++------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c
index f7ca97b..e884de8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c
@@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ void __init at91_ioremap_matrix(u32 base_addr)
 }
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_OF)
-static struct of_device_id rstc_ids[] = {
+static const struct of_device_id rstc_ids[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9260-rstc", .data = at91sam9_alt_restart },
 	{ .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g45-rstc", .data = at91sam9g45_restart },
 	{ /*sentinel*/ }
@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ static void at91_dt_rstc(void)
 	struct device_node *np;
 	const struct of_device_id *of_id;
 
-	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, rstc_ids);
+	np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, rstc_ids, &of_id);
 	if (!np)
 		panic("unable to find compatible rstc node in dtb\n");
 
@@ -371,10 +371,6 @@ static void at91_dt_rstc(void)
 	if (!at91_rstc_base)
 		panic("unable to map rstc cpu registers\n");
 
-	of_id = of_match_node(rstc_ids, np);
-	if (!of_id)
-		panic("AT91: rtsc no restart function available\n");
-
 	arm_pm_restart = of_id->data;
 
 	of_node_put(np);
@@ -392,7 +388,7 @@ static void at91_dt_ramc(void)
 	struct device_node *np;
 	const struct of_device_id *of_id;
 
-	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, ramc_ids);
+	np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, ramc_ids, &of_id);
 	if (!np)
 		panic("unable to find compatible ram controller node in dtb\n");
 
@@ -402,11 +398,7 @@ static void at91_dt_ramc(void)
 	/* the controller may have 2 banks */
 	at91_ramc_base[1] = of_iomap(np, 1);
 
-	of_id = of_match_node(ramc_ids, np);
-	if (!of_id)
-		pr_warn("AT91: ramc no standby function available\n");
-	else
-		at91_pm_set_standby(of_id->data);
+	at91_pm_set_standby(of_id->data);
 
 	of_node_put(np);
 }
-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

Re: [PATCH 3/8] ARM: at91: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Nicolas Ferre]

On 11/02/2014 17:24, Josh Cartwright :
> Instead of the of_find_matching_node()/of_match_node() pair, which requires two
> iterations through the match table, make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match(),
> which only iterates through the table once.
> 
> While we're here, mark the rtsc id table const.

Well, I might remove this one, just because other id tables are not
marked as "const" in the same file... So it can be good to change all of
them in a raw.


> Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c | 16 ++++------------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c
> index f7ca97b..e884de8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c
> @@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ void __init at91_ioremap_matrix(u32 base_addr)
>  }
>  
>  #if defined(CONFIG_OF)
> -static struct of_device_id rstc_ids[] = {
> +static const struct of_device_id rstc_ids[] = {
>  	{ .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9260-rstc", .data = at91sam9_alt_restart },
>  	{ .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g45-rstc", .data = at91sam9g45_restart },
>  	{ /*sentinel*/ }
> @@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ static void at91_dt_rstc(void)
>  	struct device_node *np;
>  	const struct of_device_id *of_id;
>  
> -	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, rstc_ids);
> +	np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, rstc_ids, &of_id);
>  	if (!np)
>  		panic("unable to find compatible rstc node in dtb\n");
>  
> @@ -371,10 +371,6 @@ static void at91_dt_rstc(void)
>  	if (!at91_rstc_base)
>  		panic("unable to map rstc cpu registers\n");
>  
> -	of_id = of_match_node(rstc_ids, np);
> -	if (!of_id)
> -		panic("AT91: rtsc no restart function available\n");
> -
>  	arm_pm_restart = of_id->data;
>  
>  	of_node_put(np);
> @@ -392,7 +388,7 @@ static void at91_dt_ramc(void)
>  	struct device_node *np;
>  	const struct of_device_id *of_id;
>  
> -	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, ramc_ids);
> +	np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, ramc_ids, &of_id);
>  	if (!np)
>  		panic("unable to find compatible ram controller node in dtb\n");
>  
> @@ -402,11 +398,7 @@ static void at91_dt_ramc(void)
>  	/* the controller may have 2 banks */
>  	at91_ramc_base[1] = of_iomap(np, 1);
>  
> -	of_id = of_match_node(ramc_ids, np);
> -	if (!of_id)
> -		pr_warn("AT91: ramc no standby function available\n");
> -	else
> -		at91_pm_set_standby(of_id->data);
> +	at91_pm_set_standby(of_id->data);

Even if it changes the strict behavior of the function, I do not see any
advantage in keeping the pr_warn() path instead of a simple panic()
protecting the "find" and "match" together...

So, without the "const" modification, it ends up with a:

Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>

=> if you want, I can take the patch with me through arm-soc with at91
material for 3.15 and complete your "const" modification. What do you
think about that?

>  
>  	of_node_put(np);
>  }
> 

Thanks for having taking care of this file, bye,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre

[PATCH 3/8] ARM: at91: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Nicolas Ferre]

On 11/02/2014 17:24, Josh Cartwright :
> Instead of the of_find_matching_node()/of_match_node() pair, which requires two
> iterations through the match table, make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match(),
> which only iterates through the table once.
> 
> While we're here, mark the rtsc id table const.

Well, I might remove this one, just because other id tables are not
marked as "const" in the same file... So it can be good to change all of
them in a raw.


> Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c | 16 ++++------------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c
> index f7ca97b..e884de8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c
> @@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ void __init at91_ioremap_matrix(u32 base_addr)
>  }
>  
>  #if defined(CONFIG_OF)
> -static struct of_device_id rstc_ids[] = {
> +static const struct of_device_id rstc_ids[] = {
>  	{ .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9260-rstc", .data = at91sam9_alt_restart },
>  	{ .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g45-rstc", .data = at91sam9g45_restart },
>  	{ /*sentinel*/ }
> @@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ static void at91_dt_rstc(void)
>  	struct device_node *np;
>  	const struct of_device_id *of_id;
>  
> -	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, rstc_ids);
> +	np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, rstc_ids, &of_id);
>  	if (!np)
>  		panic("unable to find compatible rstc node in dtb\n");
>  
> @@ -371,10 +371,6 @@ static void at91_dt_rstc(void)
>  	if (!at91_rstc_base)
>  		panic("unable to map rstc cpu registers\n");
>  
> -	of_id = of_match_node(rstc_ids, np);
> -	if (!of_id)
> -		panic("AT91: rtsc no restart function available\n");
> -
>  	arm_pm_restart = of_id->data;
>  
>  	of_node_put(np);
> @@ -392,7 +388,7 @@ static void at91_dt_ramc(void)
>  	struct device_node *np;
>  	const struct of_device_id *of_id;
>  
> -	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, ramc_ids);
> +	np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, ramc_ids, &of_id);
>  	if (!np)
>  		panic("unable to find compatible ram controller node in dtb\n");
>  
> @@ -402,11 +398,7 @@ static void at91_dt_ramc(void)
>  	/* the controller may have 2 banks */
>  	at91_ramc_base[1] = of_iomap(np, 1);
>  
> -	of_id = of_match_node(ramc_ids, np);
> -	if (!of_id)
> -		pr_warn("AT91: ramc no standby function available\n");
> -	else
> -		at91_pm_set_standby(of_id->data);
> +	at91_pm_set_standby(of_id->data);

Even if it changes the strict behavior of the function, I do not see any
advantage in keeping the pr_warn() path instead of a simple panic()
protecting the "find" and "match" together...

So, without the "const" modification, it ends up with a:

Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>

=> if you want, I can take the patch with me through arm-soc with at91
material for 3.15 and complete your "const" modification. What do you
think about that?

>  
>  	of_node_put(np);
>  }
> 

Thanks for having taking care of this file, bye,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre

Re: [PATCH 3/8] ARM: at91: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Nicolas Ferre]

On 11/02/2014 17:24, Josh Cartwright :
> Instead of the of_find_matching_node()/of_match_node() pair, which requires two
> iterations through the match table, make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match(),
> which only iterates through the table once.
> 
> While we're here, mark the rtsc id table const.

Well, I might remove this one, just because other id tables are not
marked as "const" in the same file... So it can be good to change all of
them in a raw.


> Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c | 16 ++++------------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c
> index f7ca97b..e884de8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c
> @@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ void __init at91_ioremap_matrix(u32 base_addr)
>  }
>  
>  #if defined(CONFIG_OF)
> -static struct of_device_id rstc_ids[] = {
> +static const struct of_device_id rstc_ids[] = {
>  	{ .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9260-rstc", .data = at91sam9_alt_restart },
>  	{ .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g45-rstc", .data = at91sam9g45_restart },
>  	{ /*sentinel*/ }
> @@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ static void at91_dt_rstc(void)
>  	struct device_node *np;
>  	const struct of_device_id *of_id;
>  
> -	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, rstc_ids);
> +	np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, rstc_ids, &of_id);
>  	if (!np)
>  		panic("unable to find compatible rstc node in dtb\n");
>  
> @@ -371,10 +371,6 @@ static void at91_dt_rstc(void)
>  	if (!at91_rstc_base)
>  		panic("unable to map rstc cpu registers\n");
>  
> -	of_id = of_match_node(rstc_ids, np);
> -	if (!of_id)
> -		panic("AT91: rtsc no restart function available\n");
> -
>  	arm_pm_restart = of_id->data;
>  
>  	of_node_put(np);
> @@ -392,7 +388,7 @@ static void at91_dt_ramc(void)
>  	struct device_node *np;
>  	const struct of_device_id *of_id;
>  
> -	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, ramc_ids);
> +	np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, ramc_ids, &of_id);
>  	if (!np)
>  		panic("unable to find compatible ram controller node in dtb\n");
>  
> @@ -402,11 +398,7 @@ static void at91_dt_ramc(void)
>  	/* the controller may have 2 banks */
>  	at91_ramc_base[1] = of_iomap(np, 1);
>  
> -	of_id = of_match_node(ramc_ids, np);
> -	if (!of_id)
> -		pr_warn("AT91: ramc no standby function available\n");
> -	else
> -		at91_pm_set_standby(of_id->data);
> +	at91_pm_set_standby(of_id->data);

Even if it changes the strict behavior of the function, I do not see any
advantage in keeping the pr_warn() path instead of a simple panic()
protecting the "find" and "match" together...

So, without the "const" modification, it ends up with a:

Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>

=> if you want, I can take the patch with me through arm-soc with at91
material for 3.15 and complete your "const" modification. What do you
think about that?

>  
>  	of_node_put(np);
>  }
> 

Thanks for having taking care of this file, bye,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre

Re: [PATCH 3/8] ARM: at91: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Josh Cartwright]

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 06:46:28PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> On 11/02/2014 17:24, Josh Cartwright :
> > Instead of the of_find_matching_node()/of_match_node() pair, which requires two
> > iterations through the match table, make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match(),
> > which only iterates through the table once.
> > 
> > While we're here, mark the rtsc id table const.
> 
> Well, I might remove this one, just because other id tables are not
> marked as "const" in the same file... So it can be good to change all of
> them in a raw.

Indeed, I was only looking for a specific pattern.

[..]
> => if you want, I can take the patch with me through arm-soc with at91
> material for 3.15 and complete your "const" modification. What do you
> think about that?

Yes, this sounds good.

Thanks,
   Josh

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

[PATCH 3/8] ARM: at91: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Josh Cartwright]

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 06:46:28PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> On 11/02/2014 17:24, Josh Cartwright :
> > Instead of the of_find_matching_node()/of_match_node() pair, which requires two
> > iterations through the match table, make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match(),
> > which only iterates through the table once.
> > 
> > While we're here, mark the rtsc id table const.
> 
> Well, I might remove this one, just because other id tables are not
> marked as "const" in the same file... So it can be good to change all of
> them in a raw.

Indeed, I was only looking for a specific pattern.

[..]
> => if you want, I can take the patch with me through arm-soc with at91
> material for 3.15 and complete your "const" modification. What do you
> think about that?

Yes, this sounds good.

Thanks,
   Josh

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

Re: [PATCH 3/8] ARM: at91: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Josh Cartwright]

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 06:46:28PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> On 11/02/2014 17:24, Josh Cartwright :
> > Instead of the of_find_matching_node()/of_match_node() pair, which requires two
> > iterations through the match table, make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match(),
> > which only iterates through the table once.
> > 
> > While we're here, mark the rtsc id table const.
> 
> Well, I might remove this one, just because other id tables are not
> marked as "const" in the same file... So it can be good to change all of
> them in a raw.

Indeed, I was only looking for a specific pattern.

[..]
> => if you want, I can take the patch with me through arm-soc with at91
> material for 3.15 and complete your "const" modification. What do you
> think about that?

Yes, this sounds good.

Thanks,
   Josh

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH 4/8] ARM: mvebu: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Josh Cartwright]

Instead of the of_find_matching_node()/of_match_node() pair, which requires two
iterations through the match table, make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match(),
which only iterates through the table once.

While we're here, mark the of_system_controller table const.

Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org>
---
 arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c | 9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c
index a7fb89a..e6e300a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static const struct mvebu_system_controller orion_system_controller = {
 	.system_soft_reset = 0x1,
 };
 
-static struct of_device_id of_system_controller_table[] = {
+static const struct of_device_id of_system_controller_table[] = {
 	{
 		.compatible = "marvell,orion-system-controller",
 		.data = (void *) &orion_system_controller,
@@ -90,13 +90,12 @@ void mvebu_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd)
 
 static int __init mvebu_system_controller_init(void)
 {
+	const struct of_device_id *match;
 	struct device_node *np;
 
-	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, of_system_controller_table);
+	np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, of_system_controller_table,
+					     &match);
 	if (np) {
-		const struct of_device_id *match =
-		    of_match_node(of_system_controller_table, np);
-		BUG_ON(!match);
 		system_controller_base = of_iomap(np, 0);
 		mvebu_sc = (struct mvebu_system_controller *)match->data;
 		of_node_put(np);
-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

[PATCH 4/8] ARM: mvebu: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Josh Cartwright]

Instead of the of_find_matching_node()/of_match_node() pair, which requires two
iterations through the match table, make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match(),
which only iterates through the table once.

While we're here, mark the of_system_controller table const.

Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org>
---
 arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c | 9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c
index a7fb89a..e6e300a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static const struct mvebu_system_controller orion_system_controller = {
 	.system_soft_reset = 0x1,
 };
 
-static struct of_device_id of_system_controller_table[] = {
+static const struct of_device_id of_system_controller_table[] = {
 	{
 		.compatible = "marvell,orion-system-controller",
 		.data = (void *) &orion_system_controller,
@@ -90,13 +90,12 @@ void mvebu_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd)
 
 static int __init mvebu_system_controller_init(void)
 {
+	const struct of_device_id *match;
 	struct device_node *np;
 
-	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, of_system_controller_table);
+	np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, of_system_controller_table,
+					     &match);
 	if (np) {
-		const struct of_device_id *match =
-		    of_match_node(of_system_controller_table, np);
-		BUG_ON(!match);
 		system_controller_base = of_iomap(np, 0);
 		mvebu_sc = (struct mvebu_system_controller *)match->data;
 		of_node_put(np);
-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

[PATCH 4/8] ARM: mvebu: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Josh Cartwright]

Instead of the of_find_matching_node()/of_match_node() pair, which requires two
iterations through the match table, make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match(),
which only iterates through the table once.

While we're here, mark the of_system_controller table const.

Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org>
---
 arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c | 9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c
index a7fb89a..e6e300a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static const struct mvebu_system_controller orion_system_controller = {
 	.system_soft_reset = 0x1,
 };
 
-static struct of_device_id of_system_controller_table[] = {
+static const struct of_device_id of_system_controller_table[] = {
 	{
 		.compatible = "marvell,orion-system-controller",
 		.data = (void *) &orion_system_controller,
@@ -90,13 +90,12 @@ void mvebu_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd)
 
 static int __init mvebu_system_controller_init(void)
 {
+	const struct of_device_id *match;
 	struct device_node *np;
 
-	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, of_system_controller_table);
+	np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, of_system_controller_table,
+					     &match);
 	if (np) {
-		const struct of_device_id *match =
-		    of_match_node(of_system_controller_table, np);
-		BUG_ON(!match);
 		system_controller_base = of_iomap(np, 0);
 		mvebu_sc = (struct mvebu_system_controller *)match->data;
 		of_node_put(np);
-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

Re: [PATCH 4/8] ARM: mvebu: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Thomas Petazzoni]

Dear Josh Cartwright,

On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:24:02 -0600, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> Instead of the of_find_matching_node()/of_match_node() pair, which requires two
> iterations through the match table, make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match(),
> which only iterates through the table once.
> 
> While we're here, mark the of_system_controller table const.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c | 9 ++++-----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

[PATCH 4/8] ARM: mvebu: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Thomas Petazzoni]

Dear Josh Cartwright,

On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:24:02 -0600, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> Instead of the of_find_matching_node()/of_match_node() pair, which requires two
> iterations through the match table, make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match(),
> which only iterates through the table once.
> 
> While we're here, mark the of_system_controller table const.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c | 9 ++++-----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Re: [PATCH 4/8] ARM: mvebu: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Thomas Petazzoni]

Dear Josh Cartwright,

On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:24:02 -0600, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> Instead of the of_find_matching_node()/of_match_node() pair, which requires two
> iterations through the match table, make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match(),
> which only iterates through the table once.
> 
> While we're here, mark the of_system_controller table const.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <joshc-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c | 9 ++++-----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH 4/8] ARM: mvebu: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Jason Cooper]

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:24:02AM -0600, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> Instead of the of_find_matching_node()/of_match_node() pair, which requires two
> iterations through the match table, make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match(),
> which only iterates through the table once.
> 
> While we're here, mark the of_system_controller table const.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c | 9 ++++-----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c
> index a7fb89a..e6e300a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c
> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static const struct mvebu_system_controller orion_system_controller = {
>  	.system_soft_reset = 0x1,
>  };
>  
> -static struct of_device_id of_system_controller_table[] = {
> +static const struct of_device_id of_system_controller_table[] = {
>  	{
>  		.compatible = "marvell,orion-system-controller",
>  		.data = (void *) &orion_system_controller,
> @@ -90,13 +90,12 @@ void mvebu_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd)
>  
>  static int __init mvebu_system_controller_init(void)
>  {
> +	const struct of_device_id *match;
>  	struct device_node *np;
>  
> -	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, of_system_controller_table);
> +	np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, of_system_controller_table,
> +					     &match);
>  	if (np) {
> -		const struct of_device_id *match =
> -		    of_match_node(of_system_controller_table, np);


> -		BUG_ON(!match);

Gregory, is it ok to remove this?  It was added with the original code
submission for mach-mvebu.  mvebu_restart() will handle this
gracefully...

>  		system_controller_base = of_iomap(np, 0);
>  		mvebu_sc = (struct mvebu_system_controller *)match->data;
>  		of_node_put(np);

thx,

Jason.

[PATCH 4/8] ARM: mvebu: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Jason Cooper]

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:24:02AM -0600, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> Instead of the of_find_matching_node()/of_match_node() pair, which requires two
> iterations through the match table, make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match(),
> which only iterates through the table once.
> 
> While we're here, mark the of_system_controller table const.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c | 9 ++++-----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c
> index a7fb89a..e6e300a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c
> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static const struct mvebu_system_controller orion_system_controller = {
>  	.system_soft_reset = 0x1,
>  };
>  
> -static struct of_device_id of_system_controller_table[] = {
> +static const struct of_device_id of_system_controller_table[] = {
>  	{
>  		.compatible = "marvell,orion-system-controller",
>  		.data = (void *) &orion_system_controller,
> @@ -90,13 +90,12 @@ void mvebu_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd)
>  
>  static int __init mvebu_system_controller_init(void)
>  {
> +	const struct of_device_id *match;
>  	struct device_node *np;
>  
> -	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, of_system_controller_table);
> +	np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, of_system_controller_table,
> +					     &match);
>  	if (np) {
> -		const struct of_device_id *match =
> -		    of_match_node(of_system_controller_table, np);


> -		BUG_ON(!match);

Gregory, is it ok to remove this?  It was added with the original code
submission for mach-mvebu.  mvebu_restart() will handle this
gracefully...

>  		system_controller_base = of_iomap(np, 0);
>  		mvebu_sc = (struct mvebu_system_controller *)match->data;
>  		of_node_put(np);

thx,

Jason.

Re: [PATCH 4/8] ARM: mvebu: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Jason Cooper]

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:24:02AM -0600, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> Instead of the of_find_matching_node()/of_match_node() pair, which requires two
> iterations through the match table, make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match(),
> which only iterates through the table once.
> 
> While we're here, mark the of_system_controller table const.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <joshc-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c | 9 ++++-----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c
> index a7fb89a..e6e300a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c
> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static const struct mvebu_system_controller orion_system_controller = {
>  	.system_soft_reset = 0x1,
>  };
>  
> -static struct of_device_id of_system_controller_table[] = {
> +static const struct of_device_id of_system_controller_table[] = {
>  	{
>  		.compatible = "marvell,orion-system-controller",
>  		.data = (void *) &orion_system_controller,
> @@ -90,13 +90,12 @@ void mvebu_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd)
>  
>  static int __init mvebu_system_controller_init(void)
>  {
> +	const struct of_device_id *match;
>  	struct device_node *np;
>  
> -	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, of_system_controller_table);
> +	np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, of_system_controller_table,
> +					     &match);
>  	if (np) {
> -		const struct of_device_id *match =
> -		    of_match_node(of_system_controller_table, np);


> -		BUG_ON(!match);

Gregory, is it ok to remove this?  It was added with the original code
submission for mach-mvebu.  mvebu_restart() will handle this
gracefully...

>  		system_controller_base = of_iomap(np, 0);
>  		mvebu_sc = (struct mvebu_system_controller *)match->data;
>  		of_node_put(np);

thx,

Jason.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH 4/8] ARM: mvebu: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Thomas Petazzoni]

Dear Jason Cooper,

On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:53:14 -0500, Jason Cooper wrote:

> > -	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, of_system_controller_table);
> > +	np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, of_system_controller_table,
> > +					     &match);
> >  	if (np) {
> > -		const struct of_device_id *match =
> > -		    of_match_node(of_system_controller_table, np);
> 
> 
> > -		BUG_ON(!match);
> 
> Gregory, is it ok to remove this?  It was added with the original code
> submission for mach-mvebu.  mvebu_restart() will handle this
> gracefully...

The BUG_ON here can normally never be reached. If
of_find_matching_node() returns a non-NULL result, then of_match_node()
should also return a non-NULL result.

Or I'm missing something :)

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

[PATCH 4/8] ARM: mvebu: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Thomas Petazzoni]

Dear Jason Cooper,

On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:53:14 -0500, Jason Cooper wrote:

> > -	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, of_system_controller_table);
> > +	np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, of_system_controller_table,
> > +					     &match);
> >  	if (np) {
> > -		const struct of_device_id *match =
> > -		    of_match_node(of_system_controller_table, np);
> 
> 
> > -		BUG_ON(!match);
> 
> Gregory, is it ok to remove this?  It was added with the original code
> submission for mach-mvebu.  mvebu_restart() will handle this
> gracefully...

The BUG_ON here can normally never be reached. If
of_find_matching_node() returns a non-NULL result, then of_match_node()
should also return a non-NULL result.

Or I'm missing something :)

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Re: [PATCH 4/8] ARM: mvebu: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Thomas Petazzoni]

Dear Jason Cooper,

On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:53:14 -0500, Jason Cooper wrote:

> > -	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, of_system_controller_table);
> > +	np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, of_system_controller_table,
> > +					     &match);
> >  	if (np) {
> > -		const struct of_device_id *match =
> > -		    of_match_node(of_system_controller_table, np);
> 
> 
> > -		BUG_ON(!match);
> 
> Gregory, is it ok to remove this?  It was added with the original code
> submission for mach-mvebu.  mvebu_restart() will handle this
> gracefully...

The BUG_ON here can normally never be reached. If
of_find_matching_node() returns a non-NULL result, then of_match_node()
should also return a non-NULL result.

Or I'm missing something :)

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH 4/8] ARM: mvebu: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Gregory CLEMENT]

On 11/02/2014 18:10, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Dear Jason Cooper,
> 
> On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:53:14 -0500, Jason Cooper wrote:
> 
>>> -	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, of_system_controller_table);
>>> +	np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, of_system_controller_table,
>>> +					     &match);
>>>  	if (np) {
>>> -		const struct of_device_id *match =
>>> -		    of_match_node(of_system_controller_table, np);
>>
>>
>>> -		BUG_ON(!match);
>>
>> Gregory, is it ok to remove this?  It was added with the original code
>> submission for mach-mvebu.  mvebu_restart() will handle this
>> gracefully...
> 
> The BUG_ON here can normally never be reached. If
> of_find_matching_node() returns a non-NULL result, then of_match_node()
> should also return a non-NULL result.
> 
> Or I'm missing something :)

No you're almost right!

The only case we can get it, would be if we were declaring something like:

static struct of_device_id of_system_controller_table[] = {
	{
		.compatible = "foo,bar-controller",
	},
[...]

instead of

static struct of_device_id of_system_controller_table[] = {
	{
		.compatible = "foo,bar",
		.data = (void *) &bar_controller,
	},
[...]

This test is very paranoid, so I agree to remove it.


Acked-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>


Thanks,

Gregory


> 
> Thomas
> 


-- 
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com

[PATCH 4/8] ARM: mvebu: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Gregory CLEMENT]

On 11/02/2014 18:10, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Dear Jason Cooper,
> 
> On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:53:14 -0500, Jason Cooper wrote:
> 
>>> -	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, of_system_controller_table);
>>> +	np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, of_system_controller_table,
>>> +					     &match);
>>>  	if (np) {
>>> -		const struct of_device_id *match =
>>> -		    of_match_node(of_system_controller_table, np);
>>
>>
>>> -		BUG_ON(!match);
>>
>> Gregory, is it ok to remove this?  It was added with the original code
>> submission for mach-mvebu.  mvebu_restart() will handle this
>> gracefully...
> 
> The BUG_ON here can normally never be reached. If
> of_find_matching_node() returns a non-NULL result, then of_match_node()
> should also return a non-NULL result.
> 
> Or I'm missing something :)

No you're almost right!

The only case we can get it, would be if we were declaring something like:

static struct of_device_id of_system_controller_table[] = {
	{
		.compatible = "foo,bar-controller",
	},
[...]

instead of

static struct of_device_id of_system_controller_table[] = {
	{
		.compatible = "foo,bar",
		.data = (void *) &bar_controller,
	},
[...]

This test is very paranoid, so I agree to remove it.


Acked-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>


Thanks,

Gregory


> 
> Thomas
> 


-- 
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com

Re: [PATCH 4/8] ARM: mvebu: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Gregory CLEMENT]

On 11/02/2014 18:10, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Dear Jason Cooper,
> 
> On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:53:14 -0500, Jason Cooper wrote:
> 
>>> -	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, of_system_controller_table);
>>> +	np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, of_system_controller_table,
>>> +					     &match);
>>>  	if (np) {
>>> -		const struct of_device_id *match =
>>> -		    of_match_node(of_system_controller_table, np);
>>
>>
>>> -		BUG_ON(!match);
>>
>> Gregory, is it ok to remove this?  It was added with the original code
>> submission for mach-mvebu.  mvebu_restart() will handle this
>> gracefully...
> 
> The BUG_ON here can normally never be reached. If
> of_find_matching_node() returns a non-NULL result, then of_match_node()
> should also return a non-NULL result.
> 
> Or I'm missing something :)

No you're almost right!

The only case we can get it, would be if we were declaring something like:

static struct of_device_id of_system_controller_table[] = {
	{
		.compatible = "foo,bar-controller",
	},
[...]

instead of

static struct of_device_id of_system_controller_table[] = {
	{
		.compatible = "foo,bar",
		.data = (void *) &bar_controller,
	},
[...]

This test is very paranoid, so I agree to remove it.


Acked-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>


Thanks,

Gregory


> 
> Thomas
> 


-- 
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH 4/8] ARM: mvebu: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Jason Cooper]

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 06:31:33PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> On 11/02/2014 18:10, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > Dear Jason Cooper,
> > 
> > On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:53:14 -0500, Jason Cooper wrote:
> > 
> >>> -	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, of_system_controller_table);
> >>> +	np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, of_system_controller_table,
> >>> +					     &match);
> >>>  	if (np) {
> >>> -		const struct of_device_id *match =
> >>> -		    of_match_node(of_system_controller_table, np);
> >>
> >>
> >>> -		BUG_ON(!match);
> >>
> >> Gregory, is it ok to remove this?  It was added with the original code
> >> submission for mach-mvebu.  mvebu_restart() will handle this
> >> gracefully...
> > 
> > The BUG_ON here can normally never be reached. If
> > of_find_matching_node() returns a non-NULL result, then of_match_node()
> > should also return a non-NULL result.
> > 
> > Or I'm missing something :)
> 
> No you're almost right!
> 
> The only case we can get it, would be if we were declaring something like:
> 
> static struct of_device_id of_system_controller_table[] = {
> 	{
> 		.compatible = "foo,bar-controller",
> 	},
> [...]
> 
> instead of
> 
> static struct of_device_id of_system_controller_table[] = {
> 	{
> 		.compatible = "foo,bar",
> 		.data = (void *) &bar_controller,
> 	},
> [...]
> 
> This test is very paranoid, so I agree to remove it.
> 
> 
> Acked-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>

Ok, great!  Josh, do you want us to take the two mvebu patches through
mvebu/arm-soc?  Or would you prefer to take them?

thx,

Jason.

[PATCH 4/8] ARM: mvebu: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Jason Cooper]

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 06:31:33PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> On 11/02/2014 18:10, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > Dear Jason Cooper,
> > 
> > On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:53:14 -0500, Jason Cooper wrote:
> > 
> >>> -	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, of_system_controller_table);
> >>> +	np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, of_system_controller_table,
> >>> +					     &match);
> >>>  	if (np) {
> >>> -		const struct of_device_id *match =
> >>> -		    of_match_node(of_system_controller_table, np);
> >>
> >>
> >>> -		BUG_ON(!match);
> >>
> >> Gregory, is it ok to remove this?  It was added with the original code
> >> submission for mach-mvebu.  mvebu_restart() will handle this
> >> gracefully...
> > 
> > The BUG_ON here can normally never be reached. If
> > of_find_matching_node() returns a non-NULL result, then of_match_node()
> > should also return a non-NULL result.
> > 
> > Or I'm missing something :)
> 
> No you're almost right!
> 
> The only case we can get it, would be if we were declaring something like:
> 
> static struct of_device_id of_system_controller_table[] = {
> 	{
> 		.compatible = "foo,bar-controller",
> 	},
> [...]
> 
> instead of
> 
> static struct of_device_id of_system_controller_table[] = {
> 	{
> 		.compatible = "foo,bar",
> 		.data = (void *) &bar_controller,
> 	},
> [...]
> 
> This test is very paranoid, so I agree to remove it.
> 
> 
> Acked-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>

Ok, great!  Josh, do you want us to take the two mvebu patches through
mvebu/arm-soc?  Or would you prefer to take them?

thx,

Jason.

Re: [PATCH 4/8] ARM: mvebu: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Jason Cooper]

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 06:31:33PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> On 11/02/2014 18:10, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > Dear Jason Cooper,
> > 
> > On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:53:14 -0500, Jason Cooper wrote:
> > 
> >>> -	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, of_system_controller_table);
> >>> +	np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, of_system_controller_table,
> >>> +					     &match);
> >>>  	if (np) {
> >>> -		const struct of_device_id *match =
> >>> -		    of_match_node(of_system_controller_table, np);
> >>
> >>
> >>> -		BUG_ON(!match);
> >>
> >> Gregory, is it ok to remove this?  It was added with the original code
> >> submission for mach-mvebu.  mvebu_restart() will handle this
> >> gracefully...
> > 
> > The BUG_ON here can normally never be reached. If
> > of_find_matching_node() returns a non-NULL result, then of_match_node()
> > should also return a non-NULL result.
> > 
> > Or I'm missing something :)
> 
> No you're almost right!
> 
> The only case we can get it, would be if we were declaring something like:
> 
> static struct of_device_id of_system_controller_table[] = {
> 	{
> 		.compatible = "foo,bar-controller",
> 	},
> [...]
> 
> instead of
> 
> static struct of_device_id of_system_controller_table[] = {
> 	{
> 		.compatible = "foo,bar",
> 		.data = (void *) &bar_controller,
> 	},
> [...]
> 
> This test is very paranoid, so I agree to remove it.
> 
> 
> Acked-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>

Ok, great!  Josh, do you want us to take the two mvebu patches through
mvebu/arm-soc?  Or would you prefer to take them?

thx,

Jason.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH 4/8] ARM: mvebu: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Josh Cartwright]

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:34:46PM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote:
> 
> Ok, great!  Josh, do you want us to take the two mvebu patches through
> mvebu/arm-soc?  Or would you prefer to take them?

Please, take them through the mvebu tree.

Thanks,
  Josh

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

[PATCH 4/8] ARM: mvebu: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Josh Cartwright]

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:34:46PM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote:
> 
> Ok, great!  Josh, do you want us to take the two mvebu patches through
> mvebu/arm-soc?  Or would you prefer to take them?

Please, take them through the mvebu tree.

Thanks,
  Josh

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

Re: [PATCH 4/8] ARM: mvebu: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Jason Cooper]

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:24:02AM -0600, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> Instead of the of_find_matching_node()/of_match_node() pair, which requires two
> iterations through the match table, make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match(),
> which only iterates through the table once.
> 
> While we're here, mark the of_system_controller table const.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c | 9 ++++-----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Applied to mvebu/soc with Thomas' Reviewed-by, and Gregory's Ack.

thx,

Jason.

[PATCH 4/8] ARM: mvebu: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Jason Cooper]

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:24:02AM -0600, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> Instead of the of_find_matching_node()/of_match_node() pair, which requires two
> iterations through the match table, make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match(),
> which only iterates through the table once.
> 
> While we're here, mark the of_system_controller table const.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c | 9 ++++-----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Applied to mvebu/soc with Thomas' Reviewed-by, and Gregory's Ack.

thx,

Jason.

[PATCH 5/8] ARM: prima2: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Josh Cartwright]

Instead of the of_find_matching_node()/of_match_node() pair, which requires two
iterations through the match table, make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match(),
which only iterates through the table once.

While we're here, mark the prima2_l2x0 table const.

Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org>
---
 arch/arm/mach-prima2/l2x0.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-prima2/l2x0.c b/arch/arm/mach-prima2/l2x0.c
index cbcbe9c..982b0b6 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-prima2/l2x0.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-prima2/l2x0.c
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ static struct l2x0_aux marco_l2x0_aux __initconst = {
 	.mask = L2X0_AUX_CTRL_MASK,
 };
 
-static struct of_device_id sirf_l2x0_ids[] __initconst = {
+static const struct of_device_id sirf_l2x0_ids[] __initconst = {
 	{ .compatible = "sirf,prima2-pl310-cache", .data = &prima2_l2x0_aux, },
 	{ .compatible = "sirf,marco-pl310-cache", .data = &marco_l2x0_aux, },
 	{},
@@ -36,12 +36,13 @@ static struct of_device_id sirf_l2x0_ids[] __initconst = {
 
 static int __init sirfsoc_l2x0_init(void)
 {
+	const struct of_device_id *match;
 	struct device_node *np;
 	const struct l2x0_aux *aux;
 
-	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, sirf_l2x0_ids);
+	np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, sirf_l2x0_ids, &match);
 	if (np) {
-		aux = of_match_node(sirf_l2x0_ids, np)->data;
+		aux = match->data;
 		return l2x0_of_init(aux->val, aux->mask);
 	}
 
-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

[PATCH 5/8] ARM: prima2: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Josh Cartwright]

Instead of the of_find_matching_node()/of_match_node() pair, which requires two
iterations through the match table, make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match(),
which only iterates through the table once.

While we're here, mark the prima2_l2x0 table const.

Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org>
---
 arch/arm/mach-prima2/l2x0.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-prima2/l2x0.c b/arch/arm/mach-prima2/l2x0.c
index cbcbe9c..982b0b6 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-prima2/l2x0.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-prima2/l2x0.c
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ static struct l2x0_aux marco_l2x0_aux __initconst = {
 	.mask = L2X0_AUX_CTRL_MASK,
 };
 
-static struct of_device_id sirf_l2x0_ids[] __initconst = {
+static const struct of_device_id sirf_l2x0_ids[] __initconst = {
 	{ .compatible = "sirf,prima2-pl310-cache", .data = &prima2_l2x0_aux, },
 	{ .compatible = "sirf,marco-pl310-cache", .data = &marco_l2x0_aux, },
 	{},
@@ -36,12 +36,13 @@ static struct of_device_id sirf_l2x0_ids[] __initconst = {
 
 static int __init sirfsoc_l2x0_init(void)
 {
+	const struct of_device_id *match;
 	struct device_node *np;
 	const struct l2x0_aux *aux;
 
-	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, sirf_l2x0_ids);
+	np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, sirf_l2x0_ids, &match);
 	if (np) {
-		aux = of_match_node(sirf_l2x0_ids, np)->data;
+		aux = match->data;
 		return l2x0_of_init(aux->val, aux->mask);
 	}
 
-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

[PATCH 6/8] ARM: l2x0: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Josh Cartwright]

Instead of the of_find_matching_node()/of_match_node() pair, which requires two
iterations through the match table, make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match(),
which only iterates through the table once.

Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org>
---
 arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c b/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c
index 7abde2c..e35fff3 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c
@@ -970,11 +970,12 @@ static const struct of_device_id l2x0_ids[] __initconst = {
 
 int __init l2x0_of_init(u32 aux_val, u32 aux_mask)
 {
+	const struct of_device_id *match;
 	struct device_node *np;
 	const struct l2x0_of_data *data;
 	struct resource res;
 
-	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, l2x0_ids);
+	np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, l2x0_ids, &match);
 	if (!np)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
@@ -987,7 +988,7 @@ int __init l2x0_of_init(u32 aux_val, u32 aux_mask)
 
 	l2x0_saved_regs.phy_base = res.start;
 
-	data = of_match_node(l2x0_ids, np)->data;
+	data = match->data;
 
 	/* L2 configuration can only be changed if the cache is disabled */
 	if (!(readl_relaxed(l2x0_base + L2X0_CTRL) & L2X0_CTRL_EN)) {
-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

[PATCH 6/8] ARM: l2x0: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Josh Cartwright]

Instead of the of_find_matching_node()/of_match_node() pair, which requires two
iterations through the match table, make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match(),
which only iterates through the table once.

Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org>
---
 arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c b/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c
index 7abde2c..e35fff3 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c
@@ -970,11 +970,12 @@ static const struct of_device_id l2x0_ids[] __initconst = {
 
 int __init l2x0_of_init(u32 aux_val, u32 aux_mask)
 {
+	const struct of_device_id *match;
 	struct device_node *np;
 	const struct l2x0_of_data *data;
 	struct resource res;
 
-	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, l2x0_ids);
+	np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, l2x0_ids, &match);
 	if (!np)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
@@ -987,7 +988,7 @@ int __init l2x0_of_init(u32 aux_val, u32 aux_mask)
 
 	l2x0_saved_regs.phy_base = res.start;
 
-	data = of_match_node(l2x0_ids, np)->data;
+	data = match->data;
 
 	/* L2 configuration can only be changed if the cache is disabled */
 	if (!(readl_relaxed(l2x0_base + L2X0_CTRL) & L2X0_CTRL_EN)) {
-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

[PATCH 7/8] C6X: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Josh Cartwright]

Instead of the of_find_matching_node()/of_match_node() pair, which requires two
iterations through the match table, make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match(),
which only iterates through the table once.

Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org>
---
 arch/c6x/platforms/plldata.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/c6x/platforms/plldata.c b/arch/c6x/platforms/plldata.c
index 755359e..8fddc46 100644
--- a/arch/c6x/platforms/plldata.c
+++ b/arch/c6x/platforms/plldata.c
@@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ static void __init c6678_setup_clocks(struct device_node *node)
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_SOC_TMS320C6678 */
 
-static struct of_device_id c6x_clkc_match[] __initdata = {
+static const struct of_device_id c6x_clkc_match[] __initdata = {
 #ifdef CONFIG_SOC_TMS320C6455
 	{ .compatible = "ti,c6455-pll", .data = c6455_setup_clocks },
 #endif
@@ -426,7 +426,7 @@ void __init c64x_setup_clocks(void)
 	int err;
 	u32 val;
 
-	node = of_find_matching_node(NULL, c6x_clkc_match);
+	node = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, c6x_clkc_match, &id);
 	if (!node)
 		return;
 
@@ -458,8 +458,7 @@ void __init c64x_setup_clocks(void)
 	pll->lock_delay = val;
 
 	/* id->data is a pointer to SoC-specific setup */
-	id = of_match_node(c6x_clkc_match, node);
-	if (id && id->data) {
+	if (id->data) {
 		__setup_clocks = id->data;
 		__setup_clocks(node);
 	}
-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

[PATCH 8/8] cpufreq: ppc: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Josh Cartwright]

Instead of the of_find_matching_node()/of_match_node() pair, which requires two
iterations through the match table, make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match(),
which only iterates through the table once.

Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/ppc-corenet-cpufreq.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/ppc-corenet-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/ppc-corenet-cpufreq.c
index 051000f..041ef3a 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/ppc-corenet-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/ppc-corenet-cpufreq.c
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ static int __init ppc_corenet_cpufreq_init(void)
 	const struct soc_data *data;
 	unsigned int cpu;
 
-	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, node_matches);
+	np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, node_matches, &match);
 	if (!np)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
@@ -288,7 +288,6 @@ static int __init ppc_corenet_cpufreq_init(void)
 		cpumask_copy(per_cpu(cpu_mask, cpu), cpu_core_mask(cpu));
 	}
 
-	match = of_match_node(node_matches, np);
 	data = match->data;
 	if (data) {
 		if (data->flag)
-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

Re: [PATCH 8/8] cpufreq: ppc: make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match

[Viresh Kumar]

On 11 February 2014 21:54, Josh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> Instead of the of_find_matching_node()/of_match_node() pair, which requires two
> iterations through the match table, make use of of_find_matching_node_and_match(),
> which only iterates through the table once.
>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/ppc-corenet-cpufreq.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/ppc-corenet-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/ppc-corenet-cpufreq.c
> index 051000f..041ef3a 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/ppc-corenet-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/ppc-corenet-cpufreq.c
> @@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ static int __init ppc_corenet_cpufreq_init(void)
>         const struct soc_data *data;
>         unsigned int cpu;
>
> -       np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, node_matches);
> +       np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, node_matches, &match);
>         if (!np)
>                 return -ENODEV;
>
> @@ -288,7 +288,6 @@ static int __init ppc_corenet_cpufreq_init(void)
>                 cpumask_copy(per_cpu(cpu_mask, cpu), cpu_core_mask(cpu));
>         }
>
> -       match = of_match_node(node_matches, np);
>         data = match->data;
>         if (data) {
>                 if (data->flag)

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>