Re: [PATCH 4/7] spi: pl022: attempt to get sspclk by name

[Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>]

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:21:50AM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 February 2014, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > To me it feels odd to require the last clock in the list (apb_pclk) to
> > be named, and the rest to be in a particular order. For the dt case it
> > seems saner to add new clocks with names as it allows arbitrary subsets
> > of clocks to be wired up and described (though obviously in this case a
> > missing sspclk would be problematic).
> 
> Yes, good point about the missing clocks, and I also agree mixing ordered
> and named clocks in one device is rather odd and can lead to trouble.
> 
> I guess there isn't really a good way out here, and I certainly won't
> ask for it to be done one way or the other if someone else has a 
> good argument which way it should be implemented.

Having thought about it, all dts that for the ssp_pclk must have some
name for the sspclk (though the specific name is arbitrary). I could get
the driver to try each of those before falling back to the index
(perhaps with a helper that takes a list of known aliases), so all
existing dts (that we are aware of) would work with the clock requested
by name.

I assume that for the non-dt case it's possible to name clock inputs to
a device without the clock being associated with the name globally? If
so we could get rid of the index usage entirely in this case.

Does that sound workable?

Thanks,
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html