From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com> To: "linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: use {readl|writel}_relaxed instead of readl/writel in i2c-designware-core ? Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:54:38 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20140214155438.4f749a79@xhacker> (raw) Hi all, The writel/readl is too expensive especially on Cortex A9 w/ outer L2 cache. This introduce i2c read/write error on Marvell Berlin SoCs when there are L2 cache maintenance operations at the same time. In our internal berlin bsp, we just replaced readl/writel with the relaxed version. But AFAIK, the "relaxed" version doesn't exist on all architectures. How to handle this issue? Any suggestions are appreciated. Thanks in advance, Jisheng
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: jszhang@marvell.com (Jisheng Zhang) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: use {readl|writel}_relaxed instead of readl/writel in i2c-designware-core ? Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:54:38 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20140214155438.4f749a79@xhacker> (raw) Hi all, The writel/readl is too expensive especially on Cortex A9 w/ outer L2 cache. This introduce i2c read/write error on Marvell Berlin SoCs when there are L2 cache maintenance operations at the same time. In our internal berlin bsp, we just replaced readl/writel with the relaxed version. But AFAIK, the "relaxed" version doesn't exist on all architectures. How to handle this issue? Any suggestions are appreciated. Thanks in advance, Jisheng
next reply other threads:[~2014-02-14 7:56 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2014-02-14 7:54 Jisheng Zhang [this message] 2014-02-14 7:54 ` use {readl|writel}_relaxed instead of readl/writel in i2c-designware-core ? Jisheng Zhang 2014-02-14 7:54 ` Jisheng Zhang 2014-02-14 9:09 ` Arnd Bergmann 2014-02-14 9:09 ` Arnd Bergmann 2014-02-14 11:14 ` Jisheng Zhang 2014-02-14 11:14 ` Jisheng Zhang 2014-02-14 11:14 ` Jisheng Zhang
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20140214155438.4f749a79@xhacker \ --to=jszhang@marvell.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.