[Buildroot] [PATCH v2 0/3] Adding support for graphite to buildroot gcc toolchain

[Buildroot] [PATCH v2 0/3] Adding support for graphite to buildroot gcc toolchain

[Steve Thomas]

Thanks for pointing me to the buildroot patch submission site. Lets try again :)

This patchset add support for the graphite optimisation to the buildroot toolchain.
Graphite has been around for quite some time and is almost standard is some distributions

The patchset consists of two new packages and a new flag in the supported gcc toolchains.
I have omitted support for 4.5 as this might not work with the more recent version of 
cloog and isl, and if memory serves me correctly there was a transition from cloog-ppl
to cloog around that time.

The impact is minimal as the flag is ordinarily disabled.

Cheers

Thomo

Steve Thomas (3):
  isl: new package
  cloog: new package
  Add an BR2_GCC_ENABLE_GRAPHITE flag for the buildroot toolchain

 package/Config.in                 |  2 ++
 package/cloog/Config.in           |  8 ++++++++
 package/cloog/cloog.mk            | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 package/gcc/Config.in.host        | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 package/gcc/gcc.mk                |  9 +++++++++
 package/isl/Config.in             |  7 +++++++
 package/isl/isl-000-libtool.patch | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 package/isl/isl.mk                | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 8 files changed, 104 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 package/cloog/Config.in
 create mode 100644 package/cloog/cloog.mk
 create mode 100644 package/isl/Config.in
 create mode 100644 package/isl/isl-000-libtool.patch
 create mode 100644 package/isl/isl.mk

-- 
1.9.3

[Buildroot] [PATCH v2 0/3] Adding support for graphite to buildroot gcc toolchain

[Thomas Petazzoni]

Dear Steve Thomas,

On Mon, 19 May 2014 10:09:06 +0000, Steve Thomas wrote:

> Thanks for pointing me to the buildroot patch submission site. Lets try again :)

Looks better, thanks. Though there is still one weird thing: normally
git format-patch/send-email make the patch e-mails answers to the cover
letter e-mail, so that they nicely appear as threaded.

Also, you still haven't taken into account the comments I made on your
first version. Can you look at the entire e-mails
http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2014-May/096954.html and
http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2014-May/096955.html ? I
suspect you overlooked the comments I made inline, in the various parts
of your patch.

Thanks,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com