All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Waiman.Long@hp.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@kernel.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	paolo.bonzini@gmail.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com,
	paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, riel@redhat.com,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	david.vrabel@citrix.com, oleg@redhat.com, gleb@redhat.com,
	scott.norton@hp.com, chegu_vinod@hp.com,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] qspinlock: Extract out the exchange of tail code word
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 16:55:25 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140617205525.GB29634@laptop.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140615130153.376621956@chello.nl>

On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 02:47:01PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> From: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>
> 
> This patch extracts the logic for the exchange of new and previous tail
> code words into a new xchg_tail() function which can be optimized in a
> later patch.

And also adds a third try on acquiring the lock. That I think should
be a seperate patch.

And instead of saying 'later patch' you should spell out the name
of the patch. Especially as this might not be obvious from somebody
doing git bisection.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> ---
>  include/asm-generic/qspinlock_types.h |    2 +
>  kernel/locking/qspinlock.c            |   58 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/include/asm-generic/qspinlock_types.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/qspinlock_types.h
> @@ -61,6 +61,8 @@ typedef struct qspinlock {
>  #define _Q_TAIL_CPU_BITS	(32 - _Q_TAIL_CPU_OFFSET)
>  #define _Q_TAIL_CPU_MASK	_Q_SET_MASK(TAIL_CPU)
>  
> +#define _Q_TAIL_MASK		(_Q_TAIL_IDX_MASK | _Q_TAIL_CPU_MASK)
> +
>  #define _Q_LOCKED_VAL		(1U << _Q_LOCKED_OFFSET)
>  #define _Q_PENDING_VAL		(1U << _Q_PENDING_OFFSET)
>  
> --- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
> @@ -86,6 +86,31 @@ static inline struct mcs_spinlock *decod
>  #define _Q_LOCKED_PENDING_MASK	(_Q_LOCKED_MASK | _Q_PENDING_MASK)
>  
>  /**
> + * xchg_tail - Put in the new queue tail code word & retrieve previous one
> + * @lock : Pointer to queue spinlock structure
> + * @tail : The new queue tail code word
> + * Return: The previous queue tail code word
> + *
> + * xchg(lock, tail)
> + *
> + * p,*,* -> n,*,* ; prev = xchg(lock, node)
> + */
> +static __always_inline u32 xchg_tail(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 tail)
> +{
> +	u32 old, new, val = atomic_read(&lock->val);
> +
> +	for (;;) {
> +		new = (val & _Q_LOCKED_PENDING_MASK) | tail;
> +		old = atomic_cmpxchg(&lock->val, val, new);
> +		if (old == val)
> +			break;
> +
> +		val = old;
> +	}
> +	return old;
> +}
> +
> +/**
>   * queue_spin_lock_slowpath - acquire the queue spinlock
>   * @lock: Pointer to queue spinlock structure
>   * @val: Current value of the queue spinlock 32-bit word
> @@ -182,36 +207,25 @@ void queue_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qsp
>  	node->next = NULL;
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * we already touched the queueing cacheline; don't bother with pending
> -	 * stuff.
> -	 *
> -	 * trylock || xchg(lock, node)
> -	 *
> -	 * 0,0,0 -> 0,0,1 ; trylock
> -	 * p,y,x -> n,y,x ; prev = xchg(lock, node)
> +	 * We touched a (possibly) cold cacheline in the per-cpu queue node;
> +	 * attempt the trylock once more in the hope someone let go while we
> +	 * weren't watching.
>  	 */
> -	for (;;) {
> -		new = _Q_LOCKED_VAL;
> -		if (val)
> -			new = tail | (val & _Q_LOCKED_PENDING_MASK);
> -
> -		old = atomic_cmpxchg(&lock->val, val, new);
> -		if (old == val)
> -			break;
> -
> -		val = old;
> -	}
> +	if (queue_spin_trylock(lock))
> +		goto release;

So now are three of them? One in queue_spin_lock, then at the start
of this function when checking for the pending bit, and the once more
here. And that is because the local cache line might be cold for the
'mcs_index' struct?

That all seems to be a bit of experimental. But then we are already
in the slowpath so we could as well do:

for (i = 0; i < 10; i++)
	if (queue_spin_trylock(lock))
		goto release;

And would have the same effect.


>  
>  	/*
> -	 * we won the trylock; forget about queueing.
> +	 * we already touched the queueing cacheline; don't bother with pending
> +	 * stuff.

I guess we could also just erase the pending bit if we wanted too. The
optimistic spinning will still hit go to the queue label as lock->val will
have the tail value.

> +	 *
> +	 * p,*,* -> n,*,*
>  	 */
> -	if (new == _Q_LOCKED_VAL)
> -		goto release;
> +	old = xchg_tail(lock, tail);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * if there was a previous node; link it and wait.
>  	 */
> -	if (old & ~_Q_LOCKED_PENDING_MASK) {
> +	if (old & _Q_TAIL_MASK) {
>  		prev = decode_tail(old);
>  		ACCESS_ONCE(prev->next) = node;
>  
> 
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Waiman.Long@hp.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, riel@redhat.com,
	gleb@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com,
	scott.norton@hp.com, raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	paolo.bonzini@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	chegu_vinod@hp.com, david.vrabel@citrix.com, oleg@redhat.com,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	mingo@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] qspinlock: Extract out the exchange of tail code word
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 16:55:25 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140617205525.GB29634@laptop.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140615130153.376621956@chello.nl>

On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 02:47:01PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> From: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>
> 
> This patch extracts the logic for the exchange of new and previous tail
> code words into a new xchg_tail() function which can be optimized in a
> later patch.

And also adds a third try on acquiring the lock. That I think should
be a seperate patch.

And instead of saying 'later patch' you should spell out the name
of the patch. Especially as this might not be obvious from somebody
doing git bisection.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> ---
>  include/asm-generic/qspinlock_types.h |    2 +
>  kernel/locking/qspinlock.c            |   58 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/include/asm-generic/qspinlock_types.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/qspinlock_types.h
> @@ -61,6 +61,8 @@ typedef struct qspinlock {
>  #define _Q_TAIL_CPU_BITS	(32 - _Q_TAIL_CPU_OFFSET)
>  #define _Q_TAIL_CPU_MASK	_Q_SET_MASK(TAIL_CPU)
>  
> +#define _Q_TAIL_MASK		(_Q_TAIL_IDX_MASK | _Q_TAIL_CPU_MASK)
> +
>  #define _Q_LOCKED_VAL		(1U << _Q_LOCKED_OFFSET)
>  #define _Q_PENDING_VAL		(1U << _Q_PENDING_OFFSET)
>  
> --- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
> @@ -86,6 +86,31 @@ static inline struct mcs_spinlock *decod
>  #define _Q_LOCKED_PENDING_MASK	(_Q_LOCKED_MASK | _Q_PENDING_MASK)
>  
>  /**
> + * xchg_tail - Put in the new queue tail code word & retrieve previous one
> + * @lock : Pointer to queue spinlock structure
> + * @tail : The new queue tail code word
> + * Return: The previous queue tail code word
> + *
> + * xchg(lock, tail)
> + *
> + * p,*,* -> n,*,* ; prev = xchg(lock, node)
> + */
> +static __always_inline u32 xchg_tail(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 tail)
> +{
> +	u32 old, new, val = atomic_read(&lock->val);
> +
> +	for (;;) {
> +		new = (val & _Q_LOCKED_PENDING_MASK) | tail;
> +		old = atomic_cmpxchg(&lock->val, val, new);
> +		if (old == val)
> +			break;
> +
> +		val = old;
> +	}
> +	return old;
> +}
> +
> +/**
>   * queue_spin_lock_slowpath - acquire the queue spinlock
>   * @lock: Pointer to queue spinlock structure
>   * @val: Current value of the queue spinlock 32-bit word
> @@ -182,36 +207,25 @@ void queue_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qsp
>  	node->next = NULL;
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * we already touched the queueing cacheline; don't bother with pending
> -	 * stuff.
> -	 *
> -	 * trylock || xchg(lock, node)
> -	 *
> -	 * 0,0,0 -> 0,0,1 ; trylock
> -	 * p,y,x -> n,y,x ; prev = xchg(lock, node)
> +	 * We touched a (possibly) cold cacheline in the per-cpu queue node;
> +	 * attempt the trylock once more in the hope someone let go while we
> +	 * weren't watching.
>  	 */
> -	for (;;) {
> -		new = _Q_LOCKED_VAL;
> -		if (val)
> -			new = tail | (val & _Q_LOCKED_PENDING_MASK);
> -
> -		old = atomic_cmpxchg(&lock->val, val, new);
> -		if (old == val)
> -			break;
> -
> -		val = old;
> -	}
> +	if (queue_spin_trylock(lock))
> +		goto release;

So now are three of them? One in queue_spin_lock, then at the start
of this function when checking for the pending bit, and the once more
here. And that is because the local cache line might be cold for the
'mcs_index' struct?

That all seems to be a bit of experimental. But then we are already
in the slowpath so we could as well do:

for (i = 0; i < 10; i++)
	if (queue_spin_trylock(lock))
		goto release;

And would have the same effect.


>  
>  	/*
> -	 * we won the trylock; forget about queueing.
> +	 * we already touched the queueing cacheline; don't bother with pending
> +	 * stuff.

I guess we could also just erase the pending bit if we wanted too. The
optimistic spinning will still hit go to the queue label as lock->val will
have the tail value.

> +	 *
> +	 * p,*,* -> n,*,*
>  	 */
> -	if (new == _Q_LOCKED_VAL)
> -		goto release;
> +	old = xchg_tail(lock, tail);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * if there was a previous node; link it and wait.
>  	 */
> -	if (old & ~_Q_LOCKED_PENDING_MASK) {
> +	if (old & _Q_TAIL_MASK) {
>  		prev = decode_tail(old);
>  		ACCESS_ONCE(prev->next) = node;
>  
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-17 20:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 191+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-15 12:46 [PATCH 00/11] qspinlock with paravirt support Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:46 ` [PATCH 01/11] qspinlock: A simple generic 4-byte queue spinlock Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:46   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-16 20:49   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-16 20:49   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-16 20:49     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-17 20:03     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-17 20:03       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-17 20:03       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-17 20:03       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-23 16:12       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-23 16:12       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-23 16:12         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-23 16:20         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-23 16:20         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-23 16:20           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-17 20:03     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-23 15:56     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-23 15:56     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-23 15:56     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-23 16:16       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-23 16:16         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-23 16:16       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-17 20:05   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-17 20:05     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-17 20:05     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-17 20:05     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-23 16:26     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-23 16:26       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-23 16:45       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-23 16:45         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-23 16:45       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-23 16:26     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-17 20:05   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-15 12:46 ` [PATCH 02/11] qspinlock, x86: Enable x86-64 to use " Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:47 ` [PATCH 03/11] qspinlock: Add pending bit Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:47   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-17 20:36   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-17 20:36   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-17 20:36     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-17 20:51     ` Waiman Long
2014-06-17 20:51     ` Waiman Long
2014-06-17 20:51       ` Waiman Long
2014-06-17 21:07       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-17 21:07       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-17 21:07         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-17 21:10         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-17 21:10           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-17 22:25           ` Waiman Long
2014-06-17 22:25             ` Waiman Long
2014-06-17 22:25           ` Waiman Long
2014-06-17 21:10         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-24  8:24         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-24  8:24           ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-24  8:24         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-18 11:29     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-18 11:29     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-18 11:29       ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-18 13:36       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-18 13:36       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-18 13:36         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-23 16:35     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-23 16:35     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-23 16:35       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:47 ` [PATCH 04/11] qspinlock: Extract out the exchange of tail code word Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-17 20:55   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2014-06-17 20:55     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-18 11:37     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-18 11:37     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-18 11:37       ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-18 13:50       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-18 13:50       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-18 13:50         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-18 15:46         ` Waiman Long
2014-06-18 15:46           ` Waiman Long
2014-06-18 15:49           ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-18 15:49             ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-18 15:49           ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-18 16:02           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-18 16:02           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-18 16:02             ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-18 15:46         ` Waiman Long
2014-06-24 10:47       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-24 10:47         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-24 10:47       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-17 20:55   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-15 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:47 ` [PATCH 05/11] qspinlock: Optimize for smaller NR_CPUS Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:47   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-18 11:39   ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-18 11:39   ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-18 11:39     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-07 14:35     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-07 14:35     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-07 14:35       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-07 15:08       ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-07 15:08       ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-07 15:08       ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-07 15:35         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-07 15:35           ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-07 16:10           ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-07 16:10             ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-07 16:10           ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-07 15:35         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-18 15:57   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-18 15:57     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-07 14:33     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-07 14:33     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-07 14:33       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-18 15:57   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-15 12:47 ` [PATCH 06/11] qspinlock: Optimize pending bit Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-18 11:42   ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-18 11:42   ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-18 11:42     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-15 12:47 ` [PATCH 07/11] qspinlock: Use a simple write to grab the lock, if applicable Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:47   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-18 16:36   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-18 16:36   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-18 16:36     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-07 14:51     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-07 14:51     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-07 14:51       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:47 ` [PATCH 08/11] qspinlock: Revert to test-and-set on hypervisors Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:47   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-16 21:57   ` Waiman Long
2014-06-16 21:57   ` Waiman Long
2014-06-16 21:57   ` Waiman Long
2014-06-18 16:40   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-18 16:40   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-18 16:40     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-15 12:47 ` [PATCH 09/11] pvqspinlock, x86: Rename paravirt_ticketlocks_enabled Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-18 16:43   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-18 16:43   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-18 16:43     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-15 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:47 ` [PATCH 10/11] qspinlock: Paravirt support Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:47   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-16 22:08   ` Waiman Long
2014-06-18 12:03     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-18 12:03       ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-18 15:26       ` Waiman Long
2014-06-18 15:26       ` Waiman Long
2014-06-18 15:26         ` Waiman Long
2014-07-07 15:20       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-07 15:20       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-07 15:20         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-18 12:03     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-07 15:20     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-07 15:20     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-07 15:20       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-16 22:08   ` Waiman Long
2014-06-17  0:53   ` Waiman Long
2014-06-17  0:53     ` Waiman Long
2014-06-17  0:53   ` Waiman Long
2014-06-18 12:04   ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-18 12:04   ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-18 12:04     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-20 13:46   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-20 13:46   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-20 13:46     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-07 15:27     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-15 14:23       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-15 14:23       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-15 14:23         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-07 15:27     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-07 15:27     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:47 ` [PATCH 11/11] qspinlock, kvm: Add paravirt support Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-22 16:36   ` Raghavendra K T
2014-06-22 16:36     ` Raghavendra K T
2014-07-07 15:23     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-07 15:23       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-07 15:23     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-22 16:36   ` Raghavendra K T
2014-06-15 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-16 20:52 ` [PATCH 00/11] qspinlock with " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-16 20:52   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-16 20:52 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140617205525.GB29634@laptop.dumpdata.com \
    --to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=Waiman.Long@hp.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=chegu_vinod@hp.com \
    --cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paolo.bonzini@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.