All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 -next 0/9] CMA: generalize CMA reserved area management code
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 13:51:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140618135144.297c785260f9e2aebead867c@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140617012507.GA6825@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE>

On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 10:25:07 +0900 Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> wrote:

> > >v2:
> > >   - Although this patchset looks very different with v1, the end result,
> > >   that is, mm/cma.c is same with v1's one. So I carry Ack to patch 6-7.
> > >
> > >This patchset is based on linux-next 20140610.
> > 
> > Thanks for taking care of this. I will test it with my setup and if
> > everything goes well, I will take it to my -next tree. If any branch
> > is required for anyone to continue his works on top of those patches,
> > let me know, I will also prepare it.
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I'm glad to hear that. :)
> But, there is one concern. As you already know, I am preparing further
> patches (Aggressively allocate the pages on CMA reserved memory). It
> may be highly related to MM branch and also slightly depends on this CMA
> changes. In this case, what is the best strategy to merge this
> patchset? IMHO, Anrew's tree is more appropriate branch. If there is
> no issue in this case, I am willing to develope further patches based
> on your tree.

That's probably easier.  Marek, I'll merge these into -mm (and hence
-next and git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mhocko/mm.git)
and shall hold them pending you review/ack/test/etc, OK?

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 -next 0/9] CMA: generalize CMA reserved area management code
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 13:51:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140618135144.297c785260f9e2aebead867c@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140617012507.GA6825@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE>

On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 10:25:07 +0900 Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> wrote:

> > >v2:
> > >   - Although this patchset looks very different with v1, the end result,
> > >   that is, mm/cma.c is same with v1's one. So I carry Ack to patch 6-7.
> > >
> > >This patchset is based on linux-next 20140610.
> > 
> > Thanks for taking care of this. I will test it with my setup and if
> > everything goes well, I will take it to my -next tree. If any branch
> > is required for anyone to continue his works on top of those patches,
> > let me know, I will also prepare it.
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I'm glad to hear that. :)
> But, there is one concern. As you already know, I am preparing further
> patches (Aggressively allocate the pages on CMA reserved memory). It
> may be highly related to MM branch and also slightly depends on this CMA
> changes. In this case, what is the best strategy to merge this
> patchset? IMHO, Anrew's tree is more appropriate branch. If there is
> no issue in this case, I am willing to develope further patches based
> on your tree.

That's probably easier.  Marek, I'll merge these into -mm (and hence
-next and git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mhocko/mm.git)
and shall hold them pending you review/ack/test/etc, OK?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
	Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 -next 0/9] CMA: generalize CMA reserved area management code
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 13:51:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140618135144.297c785260f9e2aebead867c@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140617012507.GA6825@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE>

On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 10:25:07 +0900 Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> wrote:

> > >v2:
> > >   - Although this patchset looks very different with v1, the end result,
> > >   that is, mm/cma.c is same with v1's one. So I carry Ack to patch 6-7.
> > >
> > >This patchset is based on linux-next 20140610.
> > 
> > Thanks for taking care of this. I will test it with my setup and if
> > everything goes well, I will take it to my -next tree. If any branch
> > is required for anyone to continue his works on top of those patches,
> > let me know, I will also prepare it.
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I'm glad to hear that. :)
> But, there is one concern. As you already know, I am preparing further
> patches (Aggressively allocate the pages on CMA reserved memory). It
> may be highly related to MM branch and also slightly depends on this CMA
> changes. In this case, what is the best strategy to merge this
> patchset? IMHO, Anrew's tree is more appropriate branch. If there is
> no issue in this case, I am willing to develope further patches based
> on your tree.

That's probably easier.  Marek, I'll merge these into -mm (and hence
-next and git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mhocko/mm.git)
and shall hold them pending you review/ack/test/etc, OK?

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: akpm@linux-foundation.org (Andrew Morton)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 -next 0/9] CMA: generalize CMA reserved area management code
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 13:51:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140618135144.297c785260f9e2aebead867c@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140617012507.GA6825@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE>

On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 10:25:07 +0900 Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> wrote:

> > >v2:
> > >   - Although this patchset looks very different with v1, the end result,
> > >   that is, mm/cma.c is same with v1's one. So I carry Ack to patch 6-7.
> > >
> > >This patchset is based on linux-next 20140610.
> > 
> > Thanks for taking care of this. I will test it with my setup and if
> > everything goes well, I will take it to my -next tree. If any branch
> > is required for anyone to continue his works on top of those patches,
> > let me know, I will also prepare it.
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I'm glad to hear that. :)
> But, there is one concern. As you already know, I am preparing further
> patches (Aggressively allocate the pages on CMA reserved memory). It
> may be highly related to MM branch and also slightly depends on this CMA
> changes. In this case, what is the best strategy to merge this
> patchset? IMHO, Anrew's tree is more appropriate branch. If there is
> no issue in this case, I am willing to develope further patches based
> on your tree.

That's probably easier.  Marek, I'll merge these into -mm (and hence
-next and git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mhocko/mm.git)
and shall hold them pending you review/ack/test/etc, OK?

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 -next 0/9] CMA: generalize CMA reserved area management code
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 20:51:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140618135144.297c785260f9e2aebead867c@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140617012507.GA6825@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE>

On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 10:25:07 +0900 Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> wrote:

> > >v2:
> > >   - Although this patchset looks very different with v1, the end result,
> > >   that is, mm/cma.c is same with v1's one. So I carry Ack to patch 6-7.
> > >
> > >This patchset is based on linux-next 20140610.
> > 
> > Thanks for taking care of this. I will test it with my setup and if
> > everything goes well, I will take it to my -next tree. If any branch
> > is required for anyone to continue his works on top of those patches,
> > let me know, I will also prepare it.
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I'm glad to hear that. :)
> But, there is one concern. As you already know, I am preparing further
> patches (Aggressively allocate the pages on CMA reserved memory). It
> may be highly related to MM branch and also slightly depends on this CMA
> changes. In this case, what is the best strategy to merge this
> patchset? IMHO, Anrew's tree is more appropriate branch. If there is
> no issue in this case, I am willing to develope further patches based
> on your tree.

That's probably easier.  Marek, I'll merge these into -mm (and hence
-next and git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mhocko/mm.git)
and shall hold them pending you review/ack/test/etc, OK?

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-18 20:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 120+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-16  5:40 [PATCH v3 -next 0/9] CMA: generalize CMA reserved area management code Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40 ` [PATCH v3 -next 1/9] DMA, CMA: fix possible memory leak Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  6:27   ` Minchan Kim
2014-06-16  6:27     ` Minchan Kim
2014-06-16  6:27     ` Minchan Kim
2014-06-16  6:27     ` Minchan Kim
2014-06-16  6:27     ` Minchan Kim
2014-06-17  1:33     ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-17  1:33       ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-17  1:33       ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-17  1:33       ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-17  1:33       ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40 ` [PATCH v3 -next 2/9] DMA, CMA: separate core CMA management codes from DMA APIs Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40 ` [PATCH v3 -next 3/9] DMA, CMA: support alignment constraint on CMA region Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40 ` [PATCH v3 -next 4/9] DMA, CMA: support arbitrary bitmap granularity Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-18 20:48   ` Andrew Morton
2014-06-18 20:48     ` Andrew Morton
2014-06-18 20:48     ` Andrew Morton
2014-06-18 20:48     ` Andrew Morton
2014-06-18 20:48     ` Andrew Morton
2014-06-19  8:18     ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-19  8:18       ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-19  8:18       ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-19  8:18       ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-19  8:18       ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40 ` [PATCH v3 -next 5/9] CMA: generalize CMA reserved area management functionality Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-07-17  8:52   ` Marek Szyprowski
2014-07-17  8:52     ` Marek Szyprowski
2014-07-17  8:52     ` Marek Szyprowski
2014-07-17  8:52     ` Marek Szyprowski
2014-07-17  8:52     ` Marek Szyprowski
2014-07-17  9:36     ` [PATCH] CMA: generalize CMA reserved area management functionality (fixup) Marek Szyprowski
2014-07-17  9:36       ` Marek Szyprowski
2014-07-17  9:36       ` Marek Szyprowski
2014-07-17  9:36       ` Marek Szyprowski
2014-07-17  9:36       ` Marek Szyprowski
2014-07-17 22:06       ` Andrew Morton
2014-07-17 22:06         ` Andrew Morton
2014-07-17 22:06         ` Andrew Morton
2014-07-17 22:06         ` Andrew Morton
2014-07-17 22:06         ` Andrew Morton
2014-07-18  7:33         ` Marek Szyprowski
2014-07-18  7:33           ` Marek Szyprowski
2014-07-18  7:33           ` Marek Szyprowski
2014-07-18  7:33           ` Marek Szyprowski
2014-07-18  7:33           ` Marek Szyprowski
2014-06-16  5:40 ` [PATCH v3 -next 6/9] PPC, KVM, CMA: use general CMA reserved area management framework Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40 ` [PATCH v3 -next 7/9] mm, CMA: clean-up CMA allocation error path Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40 ` [PATCH v3 -next 8/9] mm, CMA: change cma_declare_contiguous() to obey coding convention Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40 ` [PATCH v3 -next 9/9] mm, CMA: clean-up log message Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  5:40   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-16  9:11 ` [PATCH v3 -next 0/9] CMA: generalize CMA reserved area management code Marek Szyprowski
2014-06-16  9:11   ` Marek Szyprowski
2014-06-16  9:11   ` Marek Szyprowski
2014-06-16  9:11   ` Marek Szyprowski
2014-06-16  9:11   ` Marek Szyprowski
2014-06-17  1:25   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-17  1:25     ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-17  1:25     ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-17  1:25     ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-17  1:25     ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-18 20:51     ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2014-06-18 20:51       ` Andrew Morton
2014-06-18 20:51       ` Andrew Morton
2014-06-18 20:51       ` Andrew Morton
2014-06-18 20:51       ` Andrew Morton
2014-06-24  7:52       ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-24  7:52         ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-24  7:52         ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-24  7:52         ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-24  7:52         ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-25 12:33       ` Marek Szyprowski
2014-06-25 12:33         ` Marek Szyprowski
2014-06-25 12:33         ` Marek Szyprowski
2014-06-25 12:33         ` Marek Szyprowski
2014-06-25 12:33         ` Marek Szyprowski
2014-06-25 20:04         ` Andrew Morton
2014-06-25 20:04           ` Andrew Morton
2014-06-25 20:04           ` Andrew Morton
2014-06-25 20:04           ` Andrew Morton
2014-06-25 20:04           ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140618135144.297c785260f9e2aebead867c@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=gleb@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=mina86@mina86.com \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.