[PATCH 0/2] faultaround updates

[PATCH 0/2] faultaround updates

[Kirill A. Shutemov]

One fix and one tweak for faultaround code.

As alternative, we could just drop debugfs interface and make
fault_around_bytes constant.

Kirill A. Shutemov (2):
  mm: close race between do_fault_around() and fault_around_bytes_set()
  mm: mark fault_around_bytes __read_mostly

 mm/memory.c | 24 +++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

-- 
2.0.1

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

[PATCHv2 1/2] mm: close race between do_fault_around() and fault_around_bytes_set()

[Kirill A. Shutemov]

Things can go wrong if fault_around_bytes will be changed under
do_fault_around(): between fault_around_mask() and fault_around_pages().

Let's read fault_around_bytes only once during do_fault_around() and
calculate mask based on the reading.

Note: fault_around_bytes can only be updated via debug interface. Also
I've tried but was not able to trigger a bad behaviour without the
patch. So I would not consider this patch as urgent.

Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
---
 mm/memory.c | 21 +++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 6ea15ed23ec4..be43fd9606db 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -2770,16 +2770,6 @@ void do_set_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
 
 static unsigned long fault_around_bytes = rounddown_pow_of_two(65536);
 
-static inline unsigned long fault_around_pages(void)
-{
-	return fault_around_bytes >> PAGE_SHIFT;
-}
-
-static inline unsigned long fault_around_mask(void)
-{
-	return ~(fault_around_bytes - 1) & PAGE_MASK;
-}
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
 static int fault_around_bytes_get(void *data, u64 *val)
 {
@@ -2844,12 +2834,15 @@ late_initcall(fault_around_debugfs);
 static void do_fault_around(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
 		pte_t *pte, pgoff_t pgoff, unsigned int flags)
 {
-	unsigned long start_addr;
+	unsigned long start_addr, nr_pages, mask;
 	pgoff_t max_pgoff;
 	struct vm_fault vmf;
 	int off;
 
-	start_addr = max(address & fault_around_mask(), vma->vm_start);
+	nr_pages = ACCESS_ONCE(fault_around_bytes) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+	mask = ~(nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE - 1) & PAGE_MASK;
+
+	start_addr = max(address & mask, vma->vm_start);
 	off = ((address - start_addr) >> PAGE_SHIFT) & (PTRS_PER_PTE - 1);
 	pte -= off;
 	pgoff -= off;
@@ -2861,7 +2854,7 @@ static void do_fault_around(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
 	max_pgoff = pgoff - ((start_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT) & (PTRS_PER_PTE - 1)) +
 		PTRS_PER_PTE - 1;
 	max_pgoff = min3(max_pgoff, vma_pages(vma) + vma->vm_pgoff - 1,
-			pgoff + fault_around_pages() - 1);
+			pgoff + nr_pages - 1);
 
 	/* Check if it makes any sense to call ->map_pages */
 	while (!pte_none(*pte)) {
@@ -2896,7 +2889,7 @@ static int do_read_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 	 * something).
 	 */
 	if (vma->vm_ops->map_pages && !(flags & FAULT_FLAG_NONLINEAR) &&
-	    fault_around_pages() > 1) {
+	    fault_around_bytes >> PAGE_SHIFT > 1) {
 		pte = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, address, &ptl);
 		do_fault_around(vma, address, pte, pgoff, flags);
 		if (!pte_same(*pte, orig_pte))
-- 
2.0.1

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

[PATCH 2/2] mm: mark fault_around_bytes __read_mostly

[Kirill A. Shutemov]

fault_around_bytes can only be changed via debugfs. Let's mark it
read-mostly.

Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Suggested-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
---
 mm/memory.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index be43fd9606db..281556eb4e62 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -2768,7 +2768,8 @@ void do_set_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
 	update_mmu_cache(vma, address, pte);
 }
 
-static unsigned long fault_around_bytes = rounddown_pow_of_two(65536);
+static unsigned long fault_around_bytes __read_mostly =
+	rounddown_pow_of_two(65536);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
 static int fault_around_bytes_get(void *data, u64 *val)
-- 
2.0.1

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH 0/2] faultaround updates

[David Rientjes]

On Fri, 1 Aug 2014, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:

> One fix and one tweak for faultaround code.
> 
> As alternative, we could just drop debugfs interface and make
> fault_around_bytes constant.
> 

If we can remove the debugfs interface, then it seems better than 
continuing to support it.  Any objections to removing it?

> Kirill A. Shutemov (2):
>   mm: close race between do_fault_around() and fault_around_bytes_set()
>   mm: mark fault_around_bytes __read_mostly
> 
>  mm/memory.c | 24 +++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCHv2 1/2] mm: close race between do_fault_around() and fault_around_bytes_set()

[Naoya Horiguchi]

On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 02:51:08PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> Things can go wrong if fault_around_bytes will be changed under
> do_fault_around(): between fault_around_mask() and fault_around_pages().
> 
> Let's read fault_around_bytes only once during do_fault_around() and
> calculate mask based on the reading.
> 
> Note: fault_around_bytes can only be updated via debug interface. Also
> I've tried but was not able to trigger a bad behaviour without the
> patch. So I would not consider this patch as urgent.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  mm/memory.c | 21 +++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index 6ea15ed23ec4..be43fd9606db 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -2770,16 +2770,6 @@ void do_set_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>  
>  static unsigned long fault_around_bytes = rounddown_pow_of_two(65536);
>  
> -static inline unsigned long fault_around_pages(void)
> -{
> -	return fault_around_bytes >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> -}
> -
> -static inline unsigned long fault_around_mask(void)
> -{
> -	return ~(fault_around_bytes - 1) & PAGE_MASK;
> -}
> -
>  #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
>  static int fault_around_bytes_get(void *data, u64 *val)
>  {
> @@ -2844,12 +2834,15 @@ late_initcall(fault_around_debugfs);
>  static void do_fault_around(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>  		pte_t *pte, pgoff_t pgoff, unsigned int flags)
>  {
> -	unsigned long start_addr;
> +	unsigned long start_addr, nr_pages, mask;
>  	pgoff_t max_pgoff;
>  	struct vm_fault vmf;
>  	int off;
>  
> -	start_addr = max(address & fault_around_mask(), vma->vm_start);
> +	nr_pages = ACCESS_ONCE(fault_around_bytes) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +	mask = ~(nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE - 1) & PAGE_MASK;

If nr_pages never becomes 0, don't we need to do (& PAGE_MASK) ?

Thanks,
Naoya Horiguchi

> +
> +	start_addr = max(address & mask, vma->vm_start);
>  	off = ((address - start_addr) >> PAGE_SHIFT) & (PTRS_PER_PTE - 1);
>  	pte -= off;
>  	pgoff -= off;
> @@ -2861,7 +2854,7 @@ static void do_fault_around(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>  	max_pgoff = pgoff - ((start_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT) & (PTRS_PER_PTE - 1)) +
>  		PTRS_PER_PTE - 1;
>  	max_pgoff = min3(max_pgoff, vma_pages(vma) + vma->vm_pgoff - 1,
> -			pgoff + fault_around_pages() - 1);
> +			pgoff + nr_pages - 1);
>  
>  	/* Check if it makes any sense to call ->map_pages */
>  	while (!pte_none(*pte)) {
> @@ -2896,7 +2889,7 @@ static int do_read_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  	 * something).
>  	 */
>  	if (vma->vm_ops->map_pages && !(flags & FAULT_FLAG_NONLINEAR) &&
> -	    fault_around_pages() > 1) {
> +	    fault_around_bytes >> PAGE_SHIFT > 1) {
>  		pte = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, address, &ptl);
>  		do_fault_around(vma, address, pte, pgoff, flags);
>  		if (!pte_same(*pte, orig_pte))
> -- 
> 2.0.1
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
> 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH 0/2] faultaround updates

[Kirill A. Shutemov]

On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 02:32:36PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Aug 2014, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> 
> > One fix and one tweak for faultaround code.
> > 
> > As alternative, we could just drop debugfs interface and make
> > fault_around_bytes constant.
> > 
> 
> If we can remove the debugfs interface, then it seems better than 
> continuing to support it.  Any objections to removing it?

Andrew asked it initially. Up to him.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH 0/2] faultaround updates

[Andrew Morton]

On Sat, 2 Aug 2014 11:39:29 +0300 "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 02:32:36PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> > On Fri, 1 Aug 2014, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > 
> > > One fix and one tweak for faultaround code.
> > > 
> > > As alternative, we could just drop debugfs interface and make
> > > fault_around_bytes constant.
> > > 
> > 
> > If we can remove the debugfs interface, then it seems better than 
> > continuing to support it.  Any objections to removing it?
> 
> Andrew asked it initially. Up to him.

Well, we had a bunch of magic constants in there which may not be
optimized.  The idea is to make them tunable so that interested parties
can determine the best settings without having to rebuild the kernel. 
Once that's all done we can remove the tunable (because it's debugfs)
and hard-wire the optimised constants.

But I don't think anyone has done this tuning work yet.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

[PATCH 0/2] faultaround updates

[Kirill A. Shutemov]

One fix and one tweak for faultaround code.

As alternative, we could just drop debugfs interface and make
fault_around_bytes constant.

Kirill A. Shutemov (2):
  mm: close race between do_fault_around() and fault_around_bytes_set()
  mm: mark fault_around_bytes __read_mostly

 mm/memory.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

-- 
2.0.1

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>