All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@stlinux.com, "Gupta,
	Pekon\"" <pekon@ti.com>,
	Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Boris BREZILLON <b.brezillon.dev@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: nand: stm_nand_bch: add new driver
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 11:26:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140806102641.GB10136@lee--X1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140703002237.GM3599@ld-irv-0074>

On Wed, 02 Jul 2014, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:20:05AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:

[...]

> > +	if (((unsigned int)buf & (NANDI_BCH_DMA_ALIGNMENT - 1)) ||
> > +	    (!virt_addr_valid(buf))) /* vmalloc'd buffer! */
> > +		bounce = true;
> > +
> > +	p = bounce ? nandi->page_buf : buf;
> 
> It looks like you're reimplementing NAND_USE_BOUNCE_BUFFER. Can you try
> using that flag? (You may need to extend it to account for your DMA
> alignment, too.)

NAND_USE_BOUNCE_BUFFER won't work for us unless we can guarantee that
the bounce buffer will always be 64 Byte aligned, which I don't think
we can.  Another way to do it would be to assign all of our own
buffers, but I'm really not comfortable fiddling with those as there
are a lot of controller specific intricacies which a) I'm not familiar
with and b) no longer have Angus to fire questions off to and/or
review.

So if you don't mind, I'd really rather use Angus' implementation.
It's only an extra couple of lines and Angus has already tested it to
a high level.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Boris BREZILLON <b.brezillon.dev@gmail.com>,
	kernel@stlinux.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, "Gupta, Pekon\"" <pekon@ti.com>,
	Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: nand: stm_nand_bch: add new driver
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 11:26:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140806102641.GB10136@lee--X1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140703002237.GM3599@ld-irv-0074>

On Wed, 02 Jul 2014, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:20:05AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:

[...]

> > +	if (((unsigned int)buf & (NANDI_BCH_DMA_ALIGNMENT - 1)) ||
> > +	    (!virt_addr_valid(buf))) /* vmalloc'd buffer! */
> > +		bounce = true;
> > +
> > +	p = bounce ? nandi->page_buf : buf;
> 
> It looks like you're reimplementing NAND_USE_BOUNCE_BUFFER. Can you try
> using that flag? (You may need to extend it to account for your DMA
> alignment, too.)

NAND_USE_BOUNCE_BUFFER won't work for us unless we can guarantee that
the bounce buffer will always be 64 Byte aligned, which I don't think
we can.  Another way to do it would be to assign all of our own
buffers, but I'm really not comfortable fiddling with those as there
are a lot of controller specific intricacies which a) I'm not familiar
with and b) no longer have Angus to fire questions off to and/or
review.

So if you don't mind, I'd really rather use Angus' implementation.
It's only an extra couple of lines and Angus has already tested it to
a high level.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] mtd: nand: stm_nand_bch: add new driver
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 11:26:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140806102641.GB10136@lee--X1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140703002237.GM3599@ld-irv-0074>

On Wed, 02 Jul 2014, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:20:05AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:

[...]

> > +	if (((unsigned int)buf & (NANDI_BCH_DMA_ALIGNMENT - 1)) ||
> > +	    (!virt_addr_valid(buf))) /* vmalloc'd buffer! */
> > +		bounce = true;
> > +
> > +	p = bounce ? nandi->page_buf : buf;
> 
> It looks like you're reimplementing NAND_USE_BOUNCE_BUFFER. Can you try
> using that flag? (You may need to extend it to account for your DMA
> alignment, too.)

NAND_USE_BOUNCE_BUFFER won't work for us unless we can guarantee that
the bounce buffer will always be 64 Byte aligned, which I don't think
we can.  Another way to do it would be to assign all of our own
buffers, but I'm really not comfortable fiddling with those as there
are a lot of controller specific intricacies which a) I'm not familiar
with and b) no longer have Angus to fire questions off to and/or
review.

So if you don't mind, I'd really rather use Angus' implementation.
It's only an extra couple of lines and Angus has already tested it to
a high level.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-08-06 10:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-28  9:20 [PATCH] mtd: nand: stm_nand_bch: add new driver Lee Jones
2014-05-28  9:20 ` Lee Jones
2014-05-28  9:20 ` Lee Jones
2014-07-03  0:22 ` Brian Norris
2014-07-03  0:22   ` Brian Norris
2014-07-03  0:22   ` Brian Norris
2014-07-03  8:05   ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-07-03  8:05     ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-07-03  8:05     ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-07-07 23:52     ` Brian Norris
2014-07-07 23:52       ` Brian Norris
2014-07-07 23:52       ` Brian Norris
2014-07-07 23:52       ` Brian Norris
2014-07-08  7:58       ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-07-08  7:58         ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-07-08  7:58         ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-07-09 17:22         ` Brian Norris
2014-07-09 17:22           ` Brian Norris
2014-07-09 17:22           ` Brian Norris
2014-07-09 17:22           ` Brian Norris
2014-07-03  9:09   ` Gupta, Pekon
2014-07-03  9:09     ` Gupta, Pekon
2014-07-03  9:09     ` Gupta, Pekon
2014-07-08  0:16     ` Brian Norris
2014-07-08  0:16       ` Brian Norris
2014-07-08  0:16       ` Brian Norris
2014-07-08  0:16       ` Brian Norris
2014-08-05 14:23     ` Lee Jones
2014-08-05 14:23       ` Lee Jones
2014-08-05 14:23       ` Lee Jones
2014-08-05 14:23       ` Lee Jones
2014-08-05 21:02       ` pekon
2014-08-05 21:02         ` pekon at pek-sem.com
2014-08-05 21:02         ` pekon
2014-08-19  2:12         ` Brian Norris
2014-08-19  2:12           ` Brian Norris
2014-08-19  2:12           ` Brian Norris
2014-08-19  2:12           ` Brian Norris
2014-08-20 18:02           ` pekon
2014-08-20 18:02             ` pekon
2014-08-20 18:02             ` pekon
2014-07-31 16:47   ` Lee Jones
2014-07-31 16:47     ` Lee Jones
2014-07-31 16:47     ` Lee Jones
2014-07-31 17:54     ` Brian Norris
2014-07-31 17:54       ` Brian Norris
2014-07-31 17:54       ` Brian Norris
2014-07-31 17:54       ` Brian Norris
2014-08-01  9:27       ` Lee Jones
2014-08-01  9:27         ` Lee Jones
2014-08-01  9:27         ` Lee Jones
2014-08-19  2:42         ` Brian Norris
2014-08-19  2:42           ` Brian Norris
2014-08-19  2:42           ` Brian Norris
2014-08-19  2:42           ` Brian Norris
2014-08-06 10:44     ` Lee Jones
2014-08-06 10:44       ` Lee Jones
2014-08-06 10:44       ` Lee Jones
2014-08-06 10:26   ` Lee Jones [this message]
2014-08-06 10:26     ` Lee Jones
2014-08-06 10:26     ` Lee Jones
2014-07-03  0:50 ` Brian Norris
2014-07-03  0:50   ` Brian Norris
2014-07-03  0:50   ` Brian Norris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140806102641.GB10136@lee--X1 \
    --to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=b.brezillon.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=kernel@stlinux.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=pekon@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.