All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [RFC] arm64: kgdb: fix single stepping
@ 2014-09-05  9:47 ` AKASHI Takahiro
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: AKASHI Takahiro @ 2014-09-05  9:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: catalin.marinas, will.deacon
  Cc: dsaxena, Vijaya.Kumar, linux-arm-kernel, linaro-kernel,
	linux-kernel, AKASHI Takahiro

I tried to verify kgdb in vanilla kernel on fast model, but it seems that
the single stepping with kgdb doesn't work correctly since its first
appearance at v3.15.

On v3.15, 'stepi' command after breaking the kernel at some breakpoint
steps forward to the next instruction, but the succeeding 'stepi' never
goes beyond that.
On v3.16, 'stepi' moves forward to the second instruction just after call of
do_debug_execption() in el1_dbg, and never goes beyond that. This variance
of behavior seems to come in with the following patch in v3.16:

    commit 2a2830703a23 ("arm64: debug: avoid accessing mdscr_el1 on fault
    paths where possible")

I cannot deny the possibility that this migh be a bug of fast model, but
this patch works for me better than vanilla, and hopefully will help you
see what's happening behind this issue.

Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h |    7 +++++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S          |    4 ++--
 arch/arm64/kernel/kgdb.c           |   15 ++++++---------
 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
index 5901480..a345973 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
@@ -87,6 +87,13 @@
 9990:
 	.endm
 
+	.macro  enable_dbg_if_not_stepping, tmp
+	mrs     \tmp, mdscr_el1
+	tbnz    \tmp, #0, 9990f
+	enable_dbg
+9990:
+	.endm
+
 /*
  * Enable both debug exceptions and interrupts. This is likely to be
  * faster than two daifclr operations, since writes to this register
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
index d5eb447..b882f5d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ el1_dbg:
 	mrs	x0, far_el1
 	mov	x2, sp				// struct pt_regs
 	bl	do_debug_exception
-	enable_dbg
+	enable_dbg_if_not_stepping x2
 	kernel_exit 1
 el1_inv:
 	// TODO: add support for undefined instructions in kernel mode
@@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ ENDPROC(el1_sync)
 	.align	6
 el1_irq:
 	kernel_entry 1
-	enable_dbg
+	enable_dbg_if_not_stepping x2
 #ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
 	bl	trace_hardirqs_off
 #endif
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/kgdb.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/kgdb.c
index 75c9cf1..bbc085f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/kgdb.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/kgdb.c
@@ -176,14 +176,6 @@ int kgdb_arch_handle_exception(int exception_vector, int signo,
 		 * over and over again.
 		 */
 		kgdb_arch_update_addr(linux_regs, remcom_in_buffer);
-		atomic_set(&kgdb_cpu_doing_single_step, -1);
-		kgdb_single_step =  0;
-
-		/*
-		 * Received continue command, disable single step
-		 */
-		if (kernel_active_single_step())
-			kernel_disable_single_step();
 
 		err = 0;
 		break;
@@ -198,13 +190,13 @@ int kgdb_arch_handle_exception(int exception_vector, int signo,
 		 */
 		kgdb_arch_update_addr(linux_regs, remcom_in_buffer);
 		atomic_set(&kgdb_cpu_doing_single_step, raw_smp_processor_id());
-		kgdb_single_step =  1;
 
 		/*
 		 * Enable single step handling
 		 */
 		if (!kernel_active_single_step())
 			kernel_enable_single_step(linux_regs);
+
 		err = 0;
 		break;
 	default:
@@ -229,7 +221,12 @@ static int kgdb_compiled_brk_fn(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr)
 
 static int kgdb_step_brk_fn(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr)
 {
+	kernel_disable_single_step();
+
 	kgdb_handle_exception(1, SIGTRAP, 0, regs);
+
+	atomic_set(&kgdb_cpu_doing_single_step, -1);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
1.7.9.5


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [RFC] arm64: kgdb: fix single stepping
@ 2014-09-05  9:47 ` AKASHI Takahiro
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: AKASHI Takahiro @ 2014-09-05  9:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

I tried to verify kgdb in vanilla kernel on fast model, but it seems that
the single stepping with kgdb doesn't work correctly since its first
appearance at v3.15.

On v3.15, 'stepi' command after breaking the kernel at some breakpoint
steps forward to the next instruction, but the succeeding 'stepi' never
goes beyond that.
On v3.16, 'stepi' moves forward to the second instruction just after call of
do_debug_execption() in el1_dbg, and never goes beyond that. This variance
of behavior seems to come in with the following patch in v3.16:

    commit 2a2830703a23 ("arm64: debug: avoid accessing mdscr_el1 on fault
    paths where possible")

I cannot deny the possibility that this migh be a bug of fast model, but
this patch works for me better than vanilla, and hopefully will help you
see what's happening behind this issue.

Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h |    7 +++++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S          |    4 ++--
 arch/arm64/kernel/kgdb.c           |   15 ++++++---------
 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
index 5901480..a345973 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
@@ -87,6 +87,13 @@
 9990:
 	.endm
 
+	.macro  enable_dbg_if_not_stepping, tmp
+	mrs     \tmp, mdscr_el1
+	tbnz    \tmp, #0, 9990f
+	enable_dbg
+9990:
+	.endm
+
 /*
  * Enable both debug exceptions and interrupts. This is likely to be
  * faster than two daifclr operations, since writes to this register
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
index d5eb447..b882f5d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ el1_dbg:
 	mrs	x0, far_el1
 	mov	x2, sp				// struct pt_regs
 	bl	do_debug_exception
-	enable_dbg
+	enable_dbg_if_not_stepping x2
 	kernel_exit 1
 el1_inv:
 	// TODO: add support for undefined instructions in kernel mode
@@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ ENDPROC(el1_sync)
 	.align	6
 el1_irq:
 	kernel_entry 1
-	enable_dbg
+	enable_dbg_if_not_stepping x2
 #ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
 	bl	trace_hardirqs_off
 #endif
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/kgdb.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/kgdb.c
index 75c9cf1..bbc085f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/kgdb.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/kgdb.c
@@ -176,14 +176,6 @@ int kgdb_arch_handle_exception(int exception_vector, int signo,
 		 * over and over again.
 		 */
 		kgdb_arch_update_addr(linux_regs, remcom_in_buffer);
-		atomic_set(&kgdb_cpu_doing_single_step, -1);
-		kgdb_single_step =  0;
-
-		/*
-		 * Received continue command, disable single step
-		 */
-		if (kernel_active_single_step())
-			kernel_disable_single_step();
 
 		err = 0;
 		break;
@@ -198,13 +190,13 @@ int kgdb_arch_handle_exception(int exception_vector, int signo,
 		 */
 		kgdb_arch_update_addr(linux_regs, remcom_in_buffer);
 		atomic_set(&kgdb_cpu_doing_single_step, raw_smp_processor_id());
-		kgdb_single_step =  1;
 
 		/*
 		 * Enable single step handling
 		 */
 		if (!kernel_active_single_step())
 			kernel_enable_single_step(linux_regs);
+
 		err = 0;
 		break;
 	default:
@@ -229,7 +221,12 @@ static int kgdb_compiled_brk_fn(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr)
 
 static int kgdb_step_brk_fn(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr)
 {
+	kernel_disable_single_step();
+
 	kgdb_handle_exception(1, SIGTRAP, 0, regs);
+
+	atomic_set(&kgdb_cpu_doing_single_step, -1);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
1.7.9.5

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC] arm64: kgdb: fix single stepping
  2014-09-05  9:47 ` AKASHI Takahiro
@ 2014-09-05 10:00   ` Will Deacon
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2014-09-05 10:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: AKASHI Takahiro
  Cc: Catalin Marinas, dsaxena, Vijaya.Kumar, linux-arm-kernel,
	linaro-kernel, linux-kernel

On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 10:47:43AM +0100, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> I tried to verify kgdb in vanilla kernel on fast model, but it seems that
> the single stepping with kgdb doesn't work correctly since its first
> appearance at v3.15.
> 
> On v3.15, 'stepi' command after breaking the kernel at some breakpoint
> steps forward to the next instruction, but the succeeding 'stepi' never
> goes beyond that.
> On v3.16, 'stepi' moves forward to the second instruction just after call of
> do_debug_execption() in el1_dbg, and never goes beyond that. This variance
> of behavior seems to come in with the following patch in v3.16:
> 
>     commit 2a2830703a23 ("arm64: debug: avoid accessing mdscr_el1 on fault
>     paths where possible")

I don't think you should worry about this change -- from what you're saying,
the code has never worked.

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
> index 5901480..a345973 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
> @@ -87,6 +87,13 @@
>  9990:
>  	.endm
>  
> +	.macro  enable_dbg_if_not_stepping, tmp
> +	mrs     \tmp, mdscr_el1
> +	tbnz    \tmp, #0, 9990f
> +	enable_dbg
> +9990:
> +	.endm

We really don't want to bring this back, as it makes KVM guests extremely
slow (the mdscr access traps to the hypervisor).

It sounds more to me like kgdb is expecting step to remain active, but
that's not the case unless you explicit rewind the state machine (like we do
for ptrace). Can you try issuing the call to set_regs_spsr_ss in
single_step_handler, even when the step hook claims to have handled the
exception?

Will

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [RFC] arm64: kgdb: fix single stepping
@ 2014-09-05 10:00   ` Will Deacon
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2014-09-05 10:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 10:47:43AM +0100, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> I tried to verify kgdb in vanilla kernel on fast model, but it seems that
> the single stepping with kgdb doesn't work correctly since its first
> appearance at v3.15.
> 
> On v3.15, 'stepi' command after breaking the kernel at some breakpoint
> steps forward to the next instruction, but the succeeding 'stepi' never
> goes beyond that.
> On v3.16, 'stepi' moves forward to the second instruction just after call of
> do_debug_execption() in el1_dbg, and never goes beyond that. This variance
> of behavior seems to come in with the following patch in v3.16:
> 
>     commit 2a2830703a23 ("arm64: debug: avoid accessing mdscr_el1 on fault
>     paths where possible")

I don't think you should worry about this change -- from what you're saying,
the code has never worked.

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
> index 5901480..a345973 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
> @@ -87,6 +87,13 @@
>  9990:
>  	.endm
>  
> +	.macro  enable_dbg_if_not_stepping, tmp
> +	mrs     \tmp, mdscr_el1
> +	tbnz    \tmp, #0, 9990f
> +	enable_dbg
> +9990:
> +	.endm

We really don't want to bring this back, as it makes KVM guests extremely
slow (the mdscr access traps to the hypervisor).

It sounds more to me like kgdb is expecting step to remain active, but
that's not the case unless you explicit rewind the state machine (like we do
for ptrace). Can you try issuing the call to set_regs_spsr_ss in
single_step_handler, even when the step hook claims to have handled the
exception?

Will

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-09-05 10:02 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-09-05  9:47 [RFC] arm64: kgdb: fix single stepping AKASHI Takahiro
2014-09-05  9:47 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2014-09-05 10:00 ` Will Deacon
2014-09-05 10:00   ` Will Deacon

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.