[PATCH] kvm: ioapic: conditionally delay irq delivery duringeoi broadcast

[PATCH] kvm: ioapic: conditionally delay irq delivery duringeoi broadcast

[Zhang Haoyu]

Currently, we call ioapic_service() immediately when we find the irq is still
active during eoi broadcast. But for real hardware, there's some dealy between
the EOI writing and irq delivery (system bus latency?). So we need to emulate
this behavior. Otherwise, for a guest who haven't register a proper irq handler
, it would stay in the interrupt routine as this irq would be re-injected
immediately after guest enables interrupt. This would lead guest can't move
forward and may miss the possibility to get proper irq handler registered (one
example is windows guest resuming from hibernation).

As there's no way to differ the unhandled irq from new raised ones, this patch
solve this problems by scheduling a delayed work when the count of irq injected
during eoi broadcast exceeds a threshold value. After this patch, the guest can
move a little forward when there's no suitable irq handler in case it may
register one very soon and for guest who has a bad irq detection routine ( such
as note_interrupt() in linux ), this bad irq would be recognized soon as in the
past.

Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Haoyu <zhanghy@sangfor.com>
---
 include/trace/events/kvm.h | 20 +++++++++++++++++++
 virt/kvm/ioapic.c          | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 virt/kvm/ioapic.h          |  6 ++++++
 3 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/trace/events/kvm.h b/include/trace/events/kvm.h
index 908925a..ab679c3 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/kvm.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/kvm.h
@@ -95,6 +95,26 @@ TRACE_EVENT(kvm_ioapic_set_irq,
 		  __entry->coalesced ? " (coalesced)" : "")
 );
 
+TRACE_EVENT(kvm_ioapic_delayed_eoi_inj,
+	    TP_PROTO(__u64 e),
+	    TP_ARGS(e),
+
+	TP_STRUCT__entry(
+		__field(	__u64,		e		)
+	),
+
+	TP_fast_assign(
+		__entry->e		= e;
+	),
+
+	TP_printk("dst %x vec=%u (%s|%s|%s%s)",
+		  (u8)(__entry->e >> 56), (u8)__entry->e,
+		  __print_symbolic((__entry->e >> 8 & 0x7), kvm_deliver_mode),
+		  (__entry->e & (1<<11)) ? "logical" : "physical",
+		  (__entry->e & (1<<15)) ? "level" : "edge",
+		  (__entry->e & (1<<16)) ? "|masked" : "")
+);
+
 TRACE_EVENT(kvm_msi_set_irq,
 	    TP_PROTO(__u64 address, __u64 data),
 	    TP_ARGS(address, data),
diff --git a/virt/kvm/ioapic.c b/virt/kvm/ioapic.c
index e8ce34c..8e1dc67 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/ioapic.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/ioapic.c
@@ -405,6 +405,24 @@ void kvm_ioapic_clear_all(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic, int irq_source_id)
 	spin_unlock(&ioapic->lock);
 }
 
+static void kvm_ioapic_eoi_inject_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	int i;
+	struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic = container_of(work, struct kvm_ioapic,
+						 eoi_inject.work);
+	spin_lock(&ioapic->lock);
+	for (i = 0; i < IOAPIC_NUM_PINS; i++) {
+		union kvm_ioapic_redirect_entry *ent = &ioapic->redirtbl[i];
+
+		if (ent->fields.trig_mode != IOAPIC_LEVEL_TRIG)
+			continue;
+
+		if (ioapic->irr & (1 << i) && !ent->fields.remote_irr)
+			ioapic_service(ioapic, i, false);
+	}
+	spin_unlock(&ioapic->lock);
+}
+
 static void __kvm_ioapic_update_eoi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic, int vector, int trigger_mode)
 {
@@ -435,8 +453,32 @@ static void __kvm_ioapic_update_eoi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 
 		ASSERT(ent->fields.trig_mode == IOAPIC_LEVEL_TRIG);
 		ent->fields.remote_irr = 0;
-		if (ioapic->irr & (1 << i))
-			ioapic_service(ioapic, i, false);
+		if (!ent->fields.mask && (ioapic->irr & (1 << i))) {
+			++ioapic->irq_eoi[i];
+			if (ioapic->irq_eoi[i] == IOAPIC_SUCCESSIVE_IRQ_MAX_COUNT) {
+				/*
+				 * Real hardware does not deliver the irq so
+				 * immediately during eoi broadcast, so we need
+				 * to emulate this behavior. Otherwise, for
+				 * guests who has not registered handler of a
+				 * level irq, this irq would be injected
+				 * immediately after guest enables interrupt
+				 * (which happens usually at the end of the
+				 * common interrupt routine). This would lead
+				 * guest can't move forward and may miss the
+				 * possibility to get proper irq handler
+				 * registered. So we need to give some breath to
+				 * guest.
+				 */
+				schedule_delayed_work(&ioapic->eoi_inject, 1);
+				ioapic->irq_eoi[i] = 0;
+				trace_kvm_ioapic_delayed_eoi_inj(ent->bits);
+			} else {
+				ioapic_service(ioapic, i, false);
+			}
+		} else {
+			ioapic->irq_eoi[i] = 0;
+		}
 	}
 }
 
@@ -565,12 +607,14 @@ static void kvm_ioapic_reset(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic)
 {
 	int i;
 
+	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&ioapic->eoi_inject);
 	for (i = 0; i < IOAPIC_NUM_PINS; i++)
 		ioapic->redirtbl[i].fields.mask = 1;
 	ioapic->base_address = IOAPIC_DEFAULT_BASE_ADDRESS;
 	ioapic->ioregsel = 0;
 	ioapic->irr = 0;
 	ioapic->id = 0;
+	memset(ioapic->irq_eoi, 0x00, IOAPIC_NUM_PINS);
 	rtc_irq_eoi_tracking_reset(ioapic);
 	update_handled_vectors(ioapic);
 }
@@ -589,6 +633,7 @@ int kvm_ioapic_init(struct kvm *kvm)
 	if (!ioapic)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	spin_lock_init(&ioapic->lock);
+	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&ioapic->eoi_inject, kvm_ioapic_eoi_inject_work);
 	kvm->arch.vioapic = ioapic;
 	kvm_ioapic_reset(ioapic);
 	kvm_iodevice_init(&ioapic->dev, &ioapic_mmio_ops);
@@ -609,6 +654,7 @@ void kvm_ioapic_destroy(struct kvm *kvm)
 {
 	struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic = kvm->arch.vioapic;
 
+	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&ioapic->eoi_inject);
 	if (ioapic) {
 		kvm_io_bus_unregister_dev(kvm, KVM_MMIO_BUS, &ioapic->dev);
 		kvm->arch.vioapic = NULL;
diff --git a/virt/kvm/ioapic.h b/virt/kvm/ioapic.h
index 90d43e9..260ac0a 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/ioapic.h
+++ b/virt/kvm/ioapic.h
@@ -34,6 +34,10 @@ struct kvm_vcpu;
 #define	IOAPIC_INIT			0x5
 #define	IOAPIC_EXTINT			0x7
 
+/* max successive count of the same irq during ioapic eoi broadcast, if this limitation reached,
+   which can be considered as interrupt storm happened */
+#define IOAPIC_SUCCESSIVE_IRQ_MAX_COUNT 10000
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86
 #define RTC_GSI 8
 #else
@@ -59,6 +63,8 @@ struct kvm_ioapic {
 	spinlock_t lock;
 	DECLARE_BITMAP(handled_vectors, 256);
 	struct rtc_status rtc_status;
+	struct delayed_work eoi_inject;
+	u32 irq_eoi[IOAPIC_NUM_PINS];
 };
 
 #ifdef DEBUG
-- 
1.7.12.4

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] kvm: ioapic: conditionally delay irq delivery duringeoi broadcast

[Zhang Haoyu]

Currently, we call ioapic_service() immediately when we find the irq is still
active during eoi broadcast. But for real hardware, there's some dealy between
the EOI writing and irq delivery (system bus latency?). So we need to emulate
this behavior. Otherwise, for a guest who haven't register a proper irq handler
, it would stay in the interrupt routine as this irq would be re-injected
immediately after guest enables interrupt. This would lead guest can't move
forward and may miss the possibility to get proper irq handler registered (one
example is windows guest resuming from hibernation).

As there's no way to differ the unhandled irq from new raised ones, this patch
solve this problems by scheduling a delayed work when the count of irq injected
during eoi broadcast exceeds a threshold value. After this patch, the guest can
move a little forward when there's no suitable irq handler in case it may
register one very soon and for guest who has a bad irq detection routine ( such
as note_interrupt() in linux ), this bad irq would be recognized soon as in the
past.

Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Haoyu <zhanghy@sangfor.com>
---
 include/trace/events/kvm.h | 20 +++++++++++++++++++
 virt/kvm/ioapic.c          | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 virt/kvm/ioapic.h          |  6 ++++++
 3 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/trace/events/kvm.h b/include/trace/events/kvm.h
index 908925a..ab679c3 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/kvm.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/kvm.h
@@ -95,6 +95,26 @@ TRACE_EVENT(kvm_ioapic_set_irq,
 		  __entry->coalesced ? " (coalesced)" : "")
 );
 
+TRACE_EVENT(kvm_ioapic_delayed_eoi_inj,
+	    TP_PROTO(__u64 e),
+	    TP_ARGS(e),
+
+	TP_STRUCT__entry(
+		__field(	__u64,		e		)
+	),
+
+	TP_fast_assign(
+		__entry->e		= e;
+	),
+
+	TP_printk("dst %x vec=%u (%s|%s|%s%s)",
+		  (u8)(__entry->e >> 56), (u8)__entry->e,
+		  __print_symbolic((__entry->e >> 8 & 0x7), kvm_deliver_mode),
+		  (__entry->e & (1<<11)) ? "logical" : "physical",
+		  (__entry->e & (1<<15)) ? "level" : "edge",
+		  (__entry->e & (1<<16)) ? "|masked" : "")
+);
+
 TRACE_EVENT(kvm_msi_set_irq,
 	    TP_PROTO(__u64 address, __u64 data),
 	    TP_ARGS(address, data),
diff --git a/virt/kvm/ioapic.c b/virt/kvm/ioapic.c
index e8ce34c..8e1dc67 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/ioapic.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/ioapic.c
@@ -405,6 +405,24 @@ void kvm_ioapic_clear_all(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic, int irq_source_id)
 	spin_unlock(&ioapic->lock);
 }
 
+static void kvm_ioapic_eoi_inject_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	int i;
+	struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic = container_of(work, struct kvm_ioapic,
+						 eoi_inject.work);
+	spin_lock(&ioapic->lock);
+	for (i = 0; i < IOAPIC_NUM_PINS; i++) {
+		union kvm_ioapic_redirect_entry *ent = &ioapic->redirtbl[i];
+
+		if (ent->fields.trig_mode != IOAPIC_LEVEL_TRIG)
+			continue;
+
+		if (ioapic->irr & (1 << i) && !ent->fields.remote_irr)
+			ioapic_service(ioapic, i, false);
+	}
+	spin_unlock(&ioapic->lock);
+}
+
 static void __kvm_ioapic_update_eoi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic, int vector, int trigger_mode)
 {
@@ -435,8 +453,32 @@ static void __kvm_ioapic_update_eoi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 
 		ASSERT(ent->fields.trig_mode == IOAPIC_LEVEL_TRIG);
 		ent->fields.remote_irr = 0;
-		if (ioapic->irr & (1 << i))
-			ioapic_service(ioapic, i, false);
+		if (!ent->fields.mask && (ioapic->irr & (1 << i))) {
+			++ioapic->irq_eoi[i];
+			if (ioapic->irq_eoi[i] == IOAPIC_SUCCESSIVE_IRQ_MAX_COUNT) {
+				/*
+				 * Real hardware does not deliver the irq so
+				 * immediately during eoi broadcast, so we need
+				 * to emulate this behavior. Otherwise, for
+				 * guests who has not registered handler of a
+				 * level irq, this irq would be injected
+				 * immediately after guest enables interrupt
+				 * (which happens usually at the end of the
+				 * common interrupt routine). This would lead
+				 * guest can't move forward and may miss the
+				 * possibility to get proper irq handler
+				 * registered. So we need to give some breath to
+				 * guest.
+				 */
+				schedule_delayed_work(&ioapic->eoi_inject, 1);
+				ioapic->irq_eoi[i] = 0;
+				trace_kvm_ioapic_delayed_eoi_inj(ent->bits);
+			} else {
+				ioapic_service(ioapic, i, false);
+			}
+		} else {
+			ioapic->irq_eoi[i] = 0;
+		}
 	}
 }
 
@@ -565,12 +607,14 @@ static void kvm_ioapic_reset(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic)
 {
 	int i;
 
+	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&ioapic->eoi_inject);
 	for (i = 0; i < IOAPIC_NUM_PINS; i++)
 		ioapic->redirtbl[i].fields.mask = 1;
 	ioapic->base_address = IOAPIC_DEFAULT_BASE_ADDRESS;
 	ioapic->ioregsel = 0;
 	ioapic->irr = 0;
 	ioapic->id = 0;
+	memset(ioapic->irq_eoi, 0x00, IOAPIC_NUM_PINS);
 	rtc_irq_eoi_tracking_reset(ioapic);
 	update_handled_vectors(ioapic);
 }
@@ -589,6 +633,7 @@ int kvm_ioapic_init(struct kvm *kvm)
 	if (!ioapic)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	spin_lock_init(&ioapic->lock);
+	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&ioapic->eoi_inject, kvm_ioapic_eoi_inject_work);
 	kvm->arch.vioapic = ioapic;
 	kvm_ioapic_reset(ioapic);
 	kvm_iodevice_init(&ioapic->dev, &ioapic_mmio_ops);
@@ -609,6 +654,7 @@ void kvm_ioapic_destroy(struct kvm *kvm)
 {
 	struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic = kvm->arch.vioapic;
 
+	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&ioapic->eoi_inject);
 	if (ioapic) {
 		kvm_io_bus_unregister_dev(kvm, KVM_MMIO_BUS, &ioapic->dev);
 		kvm->arch.vioapic = NULL;
diff --git a/virt/kvm/ioapic.h b/virt/kvm/ioapic.h
index 90d43e9..260ac0a 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/ioapic.h
+++ b/virt/kvm/ioapic.h
@@ -34,6 +34,10 @@ struct kvm_vcpu;
 #define	IOAPIC_INIT			0x5
 #define	IOAPIC_EXTINT			0x7
 
+/* max successive count of the same irq during ioapic eoi broadcast, if this limitation reached,
+   which can be considered as interrupt storm happened */
+#define IOAPIC_SUCCESSIVE_IRQ_MAX_COUNT 10000
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86
 #define RTC_GSI 8
 #else
@@ -59,6 +63,8 @@ struct kvm_ioapic {
 	spinlock_t lock;
 	DECLARE_BITMAP(handled_vectors, 256);
 	struct rtc_status rtc_status;
+	struct delayed_work eoi_inject;
+	u32 irq_eoi[IOAPIC_NUM_PINS];
 };
 
 #ifdef DEBUG
-- 
1.7.12.4

RE: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] kvm: ioapic: conditionally delay irq delivery duringeoi broadcast

[Gonglei (Arei)]

> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] kvm: ioapic: conditionally delay irq delivery
> duringeoi broadcast
> 
> Currently, we call ioapic_service() immediately when we find the irq is still
> active during eoi broadcast. But for real hardware, there's some dealy between
> the EOI writing and irq delivery (system bus latency?). So we need to emulate
> this behavior. Otherwise, for a guest who haven't register a proper irq handler
> , it would stay in the interrupt routine as this irq would be re-injected
> immediately after guest enables interrupt. This would lead guest can't move
> forward and may miss the possibility to get proper irq handler registered (one
> example is windows guest resuming from hibernation).
> 
> As there's no way to differ the unhandled irq from new raised ones, this patch
> solve this problems by scheduling a delayed work when the count of irq injected
> during eoi broadcast exceeds a threshold value. After this patch, the guest can
> move a little forward when there's no suitable irq handler in case it may
> register one very soon and for guest who has a bad irq detection routine ( such
> as note_interrupt() in linux ), this bad irq would be recognized soon as in the
> past.
> 
> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Haoyu <zhanghy@sangfor.com>
> ---
>  include/trace/events/kvm.h | 20 +++++++++++++++++++
>  virt/kvm/ioapic.c          | 50
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  virt/kvm/ioapic.h          |  6 ++++++
>  3 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
If this is a new version, please add a v2/v3 suffix and describe the changes at
those different versions .

You can get more information from:
http://wiki.qemu.org/Contribute/SubmitAPatch

Best regards,
-Gonglei

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] kvm: ioapic: conditionally delay irq delivery duringeoi broadcast

[Gonglei (Arei)]

> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] kvm: ioapic: conditionally delay irq delivery
> duringeoi broadcast
> 
> Currently, we call ioapic_service() immediately when we find the irq is still
> active during eoi broadcast. But for real hardware, there's some dealy between
> the EOI writing and irq delivery (system bus latency?). So we need to emulate
> this behavior. Otherwise, for a guest who haven't register a proper irq handler
> , it would stay in the interrupt routine as this irq would be re-injected
> immediately after guest enables interrupt. This would lead guest can't move
> forward and may miss the possibility to get proper irq handler registered (one
> example is windows guest resuming from hibernation).
> 
> As there's no way to differ the unhandled irq from new raised ones, this patch
> solve this problems by scheduling a delayed work when the count of irq injected
> during eoi broadcast exceeds a threshold value. After this patch, the guest can
> move a little forward when there's no suitable irq handler in case it may
> register one very soon and for guest who has a bad irq detection routine ( such
> as note_interrupt() in linux ), this bad irq would be recognized soon as in the
> past.
> 
> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Haoyu <zhanghy@sangfor.com>
> ---
>  include/trace/events/kvm.h | 20 +++++++++++++++++++
>  virt/kvm/ioapic.c          | 50
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  virt/kvm/ioapic.h          |  6 ++++++
>  3 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
If this is a new version, please add a v2/v3 suffix and describe the changes at
those different versions .

You can get more information from:
http://wiki.qemu.org/Contribute/SubmitAPatch

Best regards,
-Gonglei

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] kvm: ioapic: conditionally delay irq delivery during eoi broadcast

[Zhang Haoyu]

>> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] kvm: ioapic: conditionally delay irq delivery
>> duringeoi broadcast
>> 
>> Currently, we call ioapic_service() immediately when we find the irq is still
>> active during eoi broadcast. But for real hardware, there's some dealy between
>> the EOI writing and irq delivery (system bus latency?). So we need to emulate
>> this behavior. Otherwise, for a guest who haven't register a proper irq handler
>> , it would stay in the interrupt routine as this irq would be re-injected
>> immediately after guest enables interrupt. This would lead guest can't move
>> forward and may miss the possibility to get proper irq handler registered (one
>> example is windows guest resuming from hibernation).
>> 
>> As there's no way to differ the unhandled irq from new raised ones, this patch
>> solve this problems by scheduling a delayed work when the count of irq injected
>> during eoi broadcast exceeds a threshold value. After this patch, the guest can
>> move a little forward when there's no suitable irq handler in case it may
>> register one very soon and for guest who has a bad irq detection routine ( such
>> as note_interrupt() in linux ), this bad irq would be recognized soon as in the
>> past.
>> 
>> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhang Haoyu <zhanghy@sangfor.com>
>> ---
>>  include/trace/events/kvm.h | 20 +++++++++++++++++++
>>  virt/kvm/ioapic.c          | 50
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>  virt/kvm/ioapic.h          |  6 ++++++
>>  3 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> 
>If this is a new version, please add a v2/v3 suffix and describe the changes at
>those different versions .
>
>You can get more information from:
>http://wiki.qemu.org/Contribute/SubmitAPatch
>
Okay, thanks.

>Best regards,
>-Gonglei

Re: [PATCH] kvm: ioapic: conditionally delay irq delivery duringeoi broadcast

[Paolo Bonzini]

Il 11/09/2014 10:47, Zhang Haoyu ha scritto:
> Currently, we call ioapic_service() immediately when we find the irq is still
> active during eoi broadcast. But for real hardware, there's some dealy between
> the EOI writing and irq delivery (system bus latency?). So we need to emulate
> this behavior. Otherwise, for a guest who haven't register a proper irq handler
> , it would stay in the interrupt routine as this irq would be re-injected
> immediately after guest enables interrupt. This would lead guest can't move
> forward and may miss the possibility to get proper irq handler registered (one
> example is windows guest resuming from hibernation).
> 
> As there's no way to differ the unhandled irq from new raised ones, this patch
> solve this problems by scheduling a delayed work when the count of irq injected
> during eoi broadcast exceeds a threshold value. After this patch, the guest can
> move a little forward when there's no suitable irq handler in case it may
> register one very soon and for guest who has a bad irq detection routine ( such
> as note_interrupt() in linux ), this bad irq would be recognized soon as in the
> past.
> 
> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Haoyu <zhanghy@sangfor.com>
> ---
>  include/trace/events/kvm.h | 20 +++++++++++++++++++
>  virt/kvm/ioapic.c          | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  virt/kvm/ioapic.h          |  6 ++++++
>  3 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/trace/events/kvm.h b/include/trace/events/kvm.h
> index 908925a..ab679c3 100644
> --- a/include/trace/events/kvm.h
> +++ b/include/trace/events/kvm.h
> @@ -95,6 +95,26 @@ TRACE_EVENT(kvm_ioapic_set_irq,
>  		  __entry->coalesced ? " (coalesced)" : "")
>  );
>  
> +TRACE_EVENT(kvm_ioapic_delayed_eoi_inj,
> +	    TP_PROTO(__u64 e),
> +	    TP_ARGS(e),
> +
> +	TP_STRUCT__entry(
> +		__field(	__u64,		e		)
> +	),
> +
> +	TP_fast_assign(
> +		__entry->e		= e;
> +	),
> +
> +	TP_printk("dst %x vec=%u (%s|%s|%s%s)",
> +		  (u8)(__entry->e >> 56), (u8)__entry->e,
> +		  __print_symbolic((__entry->e >> 8 & 0x7), kvm_deliver_mode),
> +		  (__entry->e & (1<<11)) ? "logical" : "physical",
> +		  (__entry->e & (1<<15)) ? "level" : "edge",
> +		  (__entry->e & (1<<16)) ? "|masked" : "")
> +);
> +
>  TRACE_EVENT(kvm_msi_set_irq,
>  	    TP_PROTO(__u64 address, __u64 data),
>  	    TP_ARGS(address, data),
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/ioapic.c b/virt/kvm/ioapic.c
> index e8ce34c..8e1dc67 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/ioapic.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/ioapic.c
> @@ -405,6 +405,24 @@ void kvm_ioapic_clear_all(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic, int irq_source_id)
>  	spin_unlock(&ioapic->lock);
>  }
>  
> +static void kvm_ioapic_eoi_inject_work(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +	struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic = container_of(work, struct kvm_ioapic,
> +						 eoi_inject.work);
> +	spin_lock(&ioapic->lock);
> +	for (i = 0; i < IOAPIC_NUM_PINS; i++) {
> +		union kvm_ioapic_redirect_entry *ent = &ioapic->redirtbl[i];
> +
> +		if (ent->fields.trig_mode != IOAPIC_LEVEL_TRIG)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		if (ioapic->irr & (1 << i) && !ent->fields.remote_irr)
> +			ioapic_service(ioapic, i, false);
> +	}
> +	spin_unlock(&ioapic->lock);
> +}
> +
>  static void __kvm_ioapic_update_eoi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  			struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic, int vector, int trigger_mode)
>  {
> @@ -435,8 +453,32 @@ static void __kvm_ioapic_update_eoi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  
>  		ASSERT(ent->fields.trig_mode == IOAPIC_LEVEL_TRIG);
>  		ent->fields.remote_irr = 0;
> -		if (ioapic->irr & (1 << i))
> -			ioapic_service(ioapic, i, false);
> +		if (!ent->fields.mask && (ioapic->irr & (1 << i))) {
> +			++ioapic->irq_eoi[i];
> +			if (ioapic->irq_eoi[i] == IOAPIC_SUCCESSIVE_IRQ_MAX_COUNT) {
> +				/*
> +				 * Real hardware does not deliver the irq so
> +				 * immediately during eoi broadcast, so we need
> +				 * to emulate this behavior. Otherwise, for
> +				 * guests who has not registered handler of a
> +				 * level irq, this irq would be injected
> +				 * immediately after guest enables interrupt
> +				 * (which happens usually at the end of the
> +				 * common interrupt routine). This would lead
> +				 * guest can't move forward and may miss the
> +				 * possibility to get proper irq handler
> +				 * registered. So we need to give some breath to
> +				 * guest.
> +				 */
> +				schedule_delayed_work(&ioapic->eoi_inject, 1);
> +				ioapic->irq_eoi[i] = 0;
> +				trace_kvm_ioapic_delayed_eoi_inj(ent->bits);
> +			} else {
> +				ioapic_service(ioapic, i, false);
> +			}
> +		} else {
> +			ioapic->irq_eoi[i] = 0;
> +		}
>  	}
>  }
>  
> @@ -565,12 +607,14 @@ static void kvm_ioapic_reset(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic)
>  {
>  	int i;
>  
> +	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&ioapic->eoi_inject);
>  	for (i = 0; i < IOAPIC_NUM_PINS; i++)
>  		ioapic->redirtbl[i].fields.mask = 1;
>  	ioapic->base_address = IOAPIC_DEFAULT_BASE_ADDRESS;
>  	ioapic->ioregsel = 0;
>  	ioapic->irr = 0;
>  	ioapic->id = 0;
> +	memset(ioapic->irq_eoi, 0x00, IOAPIC_NUM_PINS);
>  	rtc_irq_eoi_tracking_reset(ioapic);
>  	update_handled_vectors(ioapic);
>  }
> @@ -589,6 +633,7 @@ int kvm_ioapic_init(struct kvm *kvm)
>  	if (!ioapic)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	spin_lock_init(&ioapic->lock);
> +	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&ioapic->eoi_inject, kvm_ioapic_eoi_inject_work);
>  	kvm->arch.vioapic = ioapic;
>  	kvm_ioapic_reset(ioapic);
>  	kvm_iodevice_init(&ioapic->dev, &ioapic_mmio_ops);
> @@ -609,6 +654,7 @@ void kvm_ioapic_destroy(struct kvm *kvm)
>  {
>  	struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic = kvm->arch.vioapic;
>  
> +	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&ioapic->eoi_inject);
>  	if (ioapic) {
>  		kvm_io_bus_unregister_dev(kvm, KVM_MMIO_BUS, &ioapic->dev);
>  		kvm->arch.vioapic = NULL;
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/ioapic.h b/virt/kvm/ioapic.h
> index 90d43e9..260ac0a 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/ioapic.h
> +++ b/virt/kvm/ioapic.h
> @@ -34,6 +34,10 @@ struct kvm_vcpu;
>  #define	IOAPIC_INIT			0x5
>  #define	IOAPIC_EXTINT			0x7
>  
> +/* max successive count of the same irq during ioapic eoi broadcast, if this limitation reached,
> +   which can be considered as interrupt storm happened */
> +#define IOAPIC_SUCCESSIVE_IRQ_MAX_COUNT 10000
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86
>  #define RTC_GSI 8
>  #else
> @@ -59,6 +63,8 @@ struct kvm_ioapic {
>  	spinlock_t lock;
>  	DECLARE_BITMAP(handled_vectors, 256);
>  	struct rtc_status rtc_status;
> +	struct delayed_work eoi_inject;
> +	u32 irq_eoi[IOAPIC_NUM_PINS];
>  };
>  
>  #ifdef DEBUG
> 

Thanks, I'll apply the patch for 3.18.  I've edited a bit the comments
for English.

Paolo

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] kvm: ioapic: conditionally delay irq delivery duringeoi broadcast

[Paolo Bonzini]

Il 11/09/2014 10:47, Zhang Haoyu ha scritto:
> Currently, we call ioapic_service() immediately when we find the irq is still
> active during eoi broadcast. But for real hardware, there's some dealy between
> the EOI writing and irq delivery (system bus latency?). So we need to emulate
> this behavior. Otherwise, for a guest who haven't register a proper irq handler
> , it would stay in the interrupt routine as this irq would be re-injected
> immediately after guest enables interrupt. This would lead guest can't move
> forward and may miss the possibility to get proper irq handler registered (one
> example is windows guest resuming from hibernation).
> 
> As there's no way to differ the unhandled irq from new raised ones, this patch
> solve this problems by scheduling a delayed work when the count of irq injected
> during eoi broadcast exceeds a threshold value. After this patch, the guest can
> move a little forward when there's no suitable irq handler in case it may
> register one very soon and for guest who has a bad irq detection routine ( such
> as note_interrupt() in linux ), this bad irq would be recognized soon as in the
> past.
> 
> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Haoyu <zhanghy@sangfor.com>
> ---
>  include/trace/events/kvm.h | 20 +++++++++++++++++++
>  virt/kvm/ioapic.c          | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  virt/kvm/ioapic.h          |  6 ++++++
>  3 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/trace/events/kvm.h b/include/trace/events/kvm.h
> index 908925a..ab679c3 100644
> --- a/include/trace/events/kvm.h
> +++ b/include/trace/events/kvm.h
> @@ -95,6 +95,26 @@ TRACE_EVENT(kvm_ioapic_set_irq,
>  		  __entry->coalesced ? " (coalesced)" : "")
>  );
>  
> +TRACE_EVENT(kvm_ioapic_delayed_eoi_inj,
> +	    TP_PROTO(__u64 e),
> +	    TP_ARGS(e),
> +
> +	TP_STRUCT__entry(
> +		__field(	__u64,		e		)
> +	),
> +
> +	TP_fast_assign(
> +		__entry->e		= e;
> +	),
> +
> +	TP_printk("dst %x vec=%u (%s|%s|%s%s)",
> +		  (u8)(__entry->e >> 56), (u8)__entry->e,
> +		  __print_symbolic((__entry->e >> 8 & 0x7), kvm_deliver_mode),
> +		  (__entry->e & (1<<11)) ? "logical" : "physical",
> +		  (__entry->e & (1<<15)) ? "level" : "edge",
> +		  (__entry->e & (1<<16)) ? "|masked" : "")
> +);
> +
>  TRACE_EVENT(kvm_msi_set_irq,
>  	    TP_PROTO(__u64 address, __u64 data),
>  	    TP_ARGS(address, data),
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/ioapic.c b/virt/kvm/ioapic.c
> index e8ce34c..8e1dc67 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/ioapic.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/ioapic.c
> @@ -405,6 +405,24 @@ void kvm_ioapic_clear_all(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic, int irq_source_id)
>  	spin_unlock(&ioapic->lock);
>  }
>  
> +static void kvm_ioapic_eoi_inject_work(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +	struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic = container_of(work, struct kvm_ioapic,
> +						 eoi_inject.work);
> +	spin_lock(&ioapic->lock);
> +	for (i = 0; i < IOAPIC_NUM_PINS; i++) {
> +		union kvm_ioapic_redirect_entry *ent = &ioapic->redirtbl[i];
> +
> +		if (ent->fields.trig_mode != IOAPIC_LEVEL_TRIG)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		if (ioapic->irr & (1 << i) && !ent->fields.remote_irr)
> +			ioapic_service(ioapic, i, false);
> +	}
> +	spin_unlock(&ioapic->lock);
> +}
> +
>  static void __kvm_ioapic_update_eoi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  			struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic, int vector, int trigger_mode)
>  {
> @@ -435,8 +453,32 @@ static void __kvm_ioapic_update_eoi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  
>  		ASSERT(ent->fields.trig_mode == IOAPIC_LEVEL_TRIG);
>  		ent->fields.remote_irr = 0;
> -		if (ioapic->irr & (1 << i))
> -			ioapic_service(ioapic, i, false);
> +		if (!ent->fields.mask && (ioapic->irr & (1 << i))) {
> +			++ioapic->irq_eoi[i];
> +			if (ioapic->irq_eoi[i] == IOAPIC_SUCCESSIVE_IRQ_MAX_COUNT) {
> +				/*
> +				 * Real hardware does not deliver the irq so
> +				 * immediately during eoi broadcast, so we need
> +				 * to emulate this behavior. Otherwise, for
> +				 * guests who has not registered handler of a
> +				 * level irq, this irq would be injected
> +				 * immediately after guest enables interrupt
> +				 * (which happens usually at the end of the
> +				 * common interrupt routine). This would lead
> +				 * guest can't move forward and may miss the
> +				 * possibility to get proper irq handler
> +				 * registered. So we need to give some breath to
> +				 * guest.
> +				 */
> +				schedule_delayed_work(&ioapic->eoi_inject, 1);
> +				ioapic->irq_eoi[i] = 0;
> +				trace_kvm_ioapic_delayed_eoi_inj(ent->bits);
> +			} else {
> +				ioapic_service(ioapic, i, false);
> +			}
> +		} else {
> +			ioapic->irq_eoi[i] = 0;
> +		}
>  	}
>  }
>  
> @@ -565,12 +607,14 @@ static void kvm_ioapic_reset(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic)
>  {
>  	int i;
>  
> +	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&ioapic->eoi_inject);
>  	for (i = 0; i < IOAPIC_NUM_PINS; i++)
>  		ioapic->redirtbl[i].fields.mask = 1;
>  	ioapic->base_address = IOAPIC_DEFAULT_BASE_ADDRESS;
>  	ioapic->ioregsel = 0;
>  	ioapic->irr = 0;
>  	ioapic->id = 0;
> +	memset(ioapic->irq_eoi, 0x00, IOAPIC_NUM_PINS);
>  	rtc_irq_eoi_tracking_reset(ioapic);
>  	update_handled_vectors(ioapic);
>  }
> @@ -589,6 +633,7 @@ int kvm_ioapic_init(struct kvm *kvm)
>  	if (!ioapic)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	spin_lock_init(&ioapic->lock);
> +	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&ioapic->eoi_inject, kvm_ioapic_eoi_inject_work);
>  	kvm->arch.vioapic = ioapic;
>  	kvm_ioapic_reset(ioapic);
>  	kvm_iodevice_init(&ioapic->dev, &ioapic_mmio_ops);
> @@ -609,6 +654,7 @@ void kvm_ioapic_destroy(struct kvm *kvm)
>  {
>  	struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic = kvm->arch.vioapic;
>  
> +	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&ioapic->eoi_inject);
>  	if (ioapic) {
>  		kvm_io_bus_unregister_dev(kvm, KVM_MMIO_BUS, &ioapic->dev);
>  		kvm->arch.vioapic = NULL;
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/ioapic.h b/virt/kvm/ioapic.h
> index 90d43e9..260ac0a 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/ioapic.h
> +++ b/virt/kvm/ioapic.h
> @@ -34,6 +34,10 @@ struct kvm_vcpu;
>  #define	IOAPIC_INIT			0x5
>  #define	IOAPIC_EXTINT			0x7
>  
> +/* max successive count of the same irq during ioapic eoi broadcast, if this limitation reached,
> +   which can be considered as interrupt storm happened */
> +#define IOAPIC_SUCCESSIVE_IRQ_MAX_COUNT 10000
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86
>  #define RTC_GSI 8
>  #else
> @@ -59,6 +63,8 @@ struct kvm_ioapic {
>  	spinlock_t lock;
>  	DECLARE_BITMAP(handled_vectors, 256);
>  	struct rtc_status rtc_status;
> +	struct delayed_work eoi_inject;
> +	u32 irq_eoi[IOAPIC_NUM_PINS];
>  };
>  
>  #ifdef DEBUG
> 

Thanks, I'll apply the patch for 3.18.  I've edited a bit the comments
for English.

Paolo

Re: [PATCH] kvm: ioapic: conditionally delay irq delivery duringeoi broadcast

[Zhang Haoyu]

>> Currently, we call ioapic_service() immediately when we find the irq is still
>> active during eoi broadcast. But for real hardware, there's some dealy between
>> the EOI writing and irq delivery (system bus latency?). So we need to emulate
>> this behavior. Otherwise, for a guest who haven't register a proper irq handler
>> , it would stay in the interrupt routine as this irq would be re-injected
>> immediately after guest enables interrupt. This would lead guest can't move
>> forward and may miss the possibility to get proper irq handler registered (one
>> example is windows guest resuming from hibernation).
>> 
>> As there's no way to differ the unhandled irq from new raised ones, this patch
>> solve this problems by scheduling a delayed work when the count of irq injected
>> during eoi broadcast exceeds a threshold value. After this patch, the guest can
>> move a little forward when there's no suitable irq handler in case it may
>> register one very soon and for guest who has a bad irq detection routine ( such
>> as note_interrupt() in linux ), this bad irq would be recognized soon as in the
>> past.
>> 
>> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhang Haoyu <zhanghy@sangfor.com>
>> ---
>>  include/trace/events/kvm.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++
>>  virt/kvm/ioapic.c          | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>  virt/kvm/ioapic.h          |  6 ++++++
>>  3 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/include/trace/events/kvm.h b/include/trace/events/kvm.h
>> index 908925a..b05f688 100644
>> --- a/include/trace/events/kvm.h
>> +++ b/include/trace/events/kvm.h
>> @@ -95,6 +95,26 @@ TRACE_EVENT(kvm_ioapic_set_irq,
>>  		  __entry->coalesced ? " (coalesced)" : "")
>>  );
>>  
>> +TRACE_EVENT(kvm_ioapic_delayed_eoi_inj,
>> +	    TP_PROTO(__u64 e),
>> +	    TP_ARGS(e),
>> +
>> +	TP_STRUCT__entry(
>> +		__field(	__u64,		e		)
>> +	),
>> +
>> +	TP_fast_assign(
>> +		__entry->e		= e;
>> +	),
>> +
>> +	TP_printk("dst %x vec=%u (%s|%s|%s%s)",
>> +		  (u8)(__entry->e >> 56), (u8)__entry->e,
>> +		  __print_symbolic((__entry->e >> 8 & 0x7), kvm_deliver_mode),
>> +		  (__entry->e & (1<<11)) ? "logical" : "physical",
>> +		  (__entry->e & (1<<15)) ? "level" : "edge",
>> +		  (__entry->e & (1<<16)) ? "|masked" : "")
>> +);
>> +
>>  TRACE_EVENT(kvm_msi_set_irq,
>>  	    TP_PROTO(__u64 address, __u64 data),
>>  	    TP_ARGS(address, data),
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/ioapic.c b/virt/kvm/ioapic.c
>> index e8ce34c..a36c4c4 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/ioapic.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/ioapic.c
>> @@ -405,6 +405,24 @@ void kvm_ioapic_clear_all(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic, int irq_source_id)
>>  	spin_unlock(&ioapic->lock);
>>  }
>>  
>> +static void kvm_ioapic_eoi_inject_work(struct work_struct *work)
>> +{
>> +	int i;
>> +	struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic = container_of(work, struct kvm_ioapic,
>> +						 eoi_inject.work);
>> +	spin_lock(&ioapic->lock);
>> +	for (i = 0; i < IOAPIC_NUM_PINS; i++) {
>> +		union kvm_ioapic_redirect_entry *ent = &ioapic->redirtbl[i];
>> +
>> +		if (ent->fields.trig_mode != IOAPIC_LEVEL_TRIG)
>> +			continue;
>> +
>> +		if (ioapic->irr & (1 << i) && !ent->fields.remote_irr)
>> +			ioapic_service(ioapic, i, false);
>> +	}
>> +	spin_unlock(&ioapic->lock);
>> +}
>> +
>>  static void __kvm_ioapic_update_eoi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>  			struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic, int vector, int trigger_mode)
>>  {
>> @@ -435,8 +453,33 @@ static void __kvm_ioapic_update_eoi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>  
>>  		ASSERT(ent->fields.trig_mode == IOAPIC_LEVEL_TRIG);
>>  		ent->fields.remote_irr = 0;
>> -		if (ioapic->irr & (1 << i))
>> -			ioapic_service(ioapic, i, false);
>> +		if (!ent->fields.mask && (ioapic->irr & (1 << i))) {
>
>The mask check is new - why now? You don't check it in the work handler
>as well.
>
The mask check is to avoid incrementing ioapic->irq_eoi[i] when this irq is masked, the count should be zeroed,
but needless to check it in the work handler, the check will be performed in ioapic_service().

>> +			++ioapic->irq_eoi[i];
>> +			if (ioapic->irq_eoi[i] == IOAPIC_SUCCESSIVE_IRQ_MAX_COUNT) {
>> +				/*
>> +				 * Real hardware does not deliver the irq so
>> +				 * immediately during eoi broadcast, so we need
>> +				 * to emulate this behavior. Otherwise, for
>> +				 * guests who has not registered handler of a
>> +				 * level irq, this irq would be injected
>> +				 * immediately after guest enables interrupt
>> +				 * (which happens usually at the end of the
>> +				 * common interrupt routine). This would lead
>> +				 * guest can't move forward and may miss the
>> +				 * possibility to get proper irq handler
>> +				 * registered. So we need to give some breath to
>> +				 * guest. TODO: 1 is too long?
>
>TODO should be clarify. Maybe also translate the "1" into something
>HZ-derived.
>
I will delete the TODO comment, now the risk of "1 is too long" can be ignored, 
because "if (ioapic->irq_eoi[i] == IOAPIC_SUCCESSIVE_IRQ_MAX_COUNT)" cannot be true except interrupt storm happened from the the angle of probability.

>> +				 */
>> +				schedule_delayed_work(&ioapic->eoi_inject, 1);
>> +				ioapic->irq_eoi[i] = 0;
>> +				trace_kvm_ioapic_delayed_eoi_inj(ent->bits);
>> +			}
>> +			else {
>
>I think it's the desired kernel style to do "} else {" here, but I'm not
>totally sure if that rule exists.
>
I read CodingStyle, you are right.
>> +				ioapic_service(ioapic, i, false);
>> +			}
>> +		else {
>
>I strongly suspect this version of the patch wasn't built... ;)
>
I backported it on my host linux-3.10, and built it okay.
And this time I build it on upstream, failed,
no matched "}" for if (ioapic->irq_eoi[i] == IOAPIC_SUCCESSIVE_IRQ_MAX_COUNT).
So sorry for my careless.
I will post a new patch.

>> +			ioapic->irq_eoi[i] = 0;
>> +		}
>>  	}
>>  }
>>  
>> @@ -565,12 +608,14 @@ static void kvm_ioapic_reset(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic)
>>  {
>>  	int i;
>>  
>> +	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&ioapic->eoi_inject);
>>  	for (i = 0; i < IOAPIC_NUM_PINS; i++)
>>  		ioapic->redirtbl[i].fields.mask = 1;
>>  	ioapic->base_address = IOAPIC_DEFAULT_BASE_ADDRESS;
>>  	ioapic->ioregsel = 0;
>>  	ioapic->irr = 0;
>>  	ioapic->id = 0;
>> +	memset(ioapic->irq_eoi, 0x00, IOAPIC_NUM_PINS);
>>  	rtc_irq_eoi_tracking_reset(ioapic);
>>  	update_handled_vectors(ioapic);
>>  }
>> @@ -589,6 +634,7 @@ int kvm_ioapic_init(struct kvm *kvm)
>>  	if (!ioapic)
>>  		return -ENOMEM;
>>  	spin_lock_init(&ioapic->lock);
>> +	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&ioapic->eoi_inject, kvm_ioapic_eoi_inject_work);
>>  	kvm->arch.vioapic = ioapic;
>>  	kvm_ioapic_reset(ioapic);
>>  	kvm_iodevice_init(&ioapic->dev, &ioapic_mmio_ops);
>> @@ -609,6 +655,7 @@ void kvm_ioapic_destroy(struct kvm *kvm)
>>  {
>>  	struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic = kvm->arch.vioapic;
>>  
>> +	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&ioapic->eoi_inject);
>>  	if (ioapic) {
>>  		kvm_io_bus_unregister_dev(kvm, KVM_MMIO_BUS, &ioapic->dev);
>>  		kvm->arch.vioapic = NULL;
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/ioapic.h b/virt/kvm/ioapic.h
>> index 90d43e9..260ac0a 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/ioapic.h
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/ioapic.h
>> @@ -34,6 +34,10 @@ struct kvm_vcpu;
>>  #define	IOAPIC_INIT			0x5
>>  #define	IOAPIC_EXTINT			0x7
>>  
>> +/* max successive count of the same irq during ioapic eoi broadcast, if this limitation reached,
>> +   which can be considered as interrupt storm happened */
>> +#define IOAPIC_SUCCESSIVE_IRQ_MAX_COUNT 10000
>> +
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86
>>  #define RTC_GSI 8
>>  #else
>> @@ -59,6 +63,8 @@ struct kvm_ioapic {
>>  	spinlock_t lock;
>>  	DECLARE_BITMAP(handled_vectors, 256);
>>  	struct rtc_status rtc_status;
>> +	struct delayed_work eoi_inject;
>> +	u32 irq_eoi[IOAPIC_NUM_PINS];
>>  };
>>  
>>  #ifdef DEBUG
>> 
>
>The general approach looks sane to me. I was first concerned the delay
>could affect non-broken guests as well, but the loop counter prevents
>this effectively.
>

>Jan