From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch v2] mm: memcontrol: convert reclaim iterator to simple css refcounting Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 12:01:30 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20140925100130.GC12090@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20140924171653.GA10082@cmpxchg.org> On Wed 24-09-14 13:16:53, Johannes Weiner wrote: > On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 06:47:39PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Fri 19-09-14 17:28:43, Johannes Weiner wrote: [...] > > > - memcg = __mem_cgroup_iter_next(root, last_visited); > > > + do { > > > + pos = ACCESS_ONCE(mz->reclaim_iter[priority]); > > > + } while (pos && !css_tryget(&pos->css)); > > > > This is a bit confusing. AFAIU css_tryget fails only when the current > > ref count is zero already. When do we keep cached memcg with zero count > > behind? We always do css_get after cmpxchg. > > > > Hmm, there is a small window between cmpxchg and css_get when we store > > the current memcg into the reclaim_iter[priority]. If the current memcg > > is root then we do not take any css reference before cmpxchg and so it > > might drop down to zero in the mean time so other CPU might see zero I > > guess. But I do not see how css_get after cmpxchg on such css works. > > I guess I should go and check the css reference counting again. > > It's not about root or the newly stored memcg, it's that you might > read the position right before it's replaced and css_put(), at which OK, got it CPU0 CPU1 pos = reclaim_iter[priority] cmpxchg(reclaim_iter[priority], pos, memcg) css_put(pos) # -> 0 css_tryget(pos) Thanks! -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch v2] mm: memcontrol: convert reclaim iterator to simple css refcounting Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 12:01:30 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20140925100130.GC12090@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20140924171653.GA10082@cmpxchg.org> On Wed 24-09-14 13:16:53, Johannes Weiner wrote: > On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 06:47:39PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Fri 19-09-14 17:28:43, Johannes Weiner wrote: [...] > > > - memcg = __mem_cgroup_iter_next(root, last_visited); > > > + do { > > > + pos = ACCESS_ONCE(mz->reclaim_iter[priority]); > > > + } while (pos && !css_tryget(&pos->css)); > > > > This is a bit confusing. AFAIU css_tryget fails only when the current > > ref count is zero already. When do we keep cached memcg with zero count > > behind? We always do css_get after cmpxchg. > > > > Hmm, there is a small window between cmpxchg and css_get when we store > > the current memcg into the reclaim_iter[priority]. If the current memcg > > is root then we do not take any css reference before cmpxchg and so it > > might drop down to zero in the mean time so other CPU might see zero I > > guess. But I do not see how css_get after cmpxchg on such css works. > > I guess I should go and check the css reference counting again. > > It's not about root or the newly stored memcg, it's that you might > read the position right before it's replaced and css_put(), at which OK, got it CPU0 CPU1 pos = reclaim_iter[priority] cmpxchg(reclaim_iter[priority], pos, memcg) css_put(pos) # -> 0 css_tryget(pos) Thanks! -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-25 10:01 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2014-09-19 21:10 [patch] mm: memcontrol: convert reclaim iterator to simple css refcounting Johannes Weiner 2014-09-19 21:10 ` Johannes Weiner 2014-09-19 21:28 ` [patch v2] " Johannes Weiner 2014-09-19 21:28 ` Johannes Weiner 2014-09-22 9:53 ` Vladimir Davydov 2014-09-22 9:53 ` Vladimir Davydov 2014-09-22 9:53 ` Vladimir Davydov 2014-09-24 16:47 ` Michal Hocko 2014-09-24 16:47 ` Michal Hocko 2014-09-24 17:16 ` Johannes Weiner 2014-09-24 17:16 ` Johannes Weiner 2014-09-25 1:29 ` Tejun Heo 2014-09-25 1:29 ` Tejun Heo 2014-09-25 10:01 ` Michal Hocko [this message] 2014-09-25 10:01 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20140925100130.GC12090@dhcp22.suse.cz \ --to=mhocko@suse.cz \ --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \ --cc=tj@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.