All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@glider.be>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] input: adxl34x: Add OF match support
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 08:21:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141218082151.GA1038@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1418868923-13411-1-git-send-email-laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1246 bytes --]

On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 04:15:23AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> The I2C subsystem can match devices without explicit OF support based on
> the part of their compatible property after the comma. However, this
> mechanism uses the first compatible value only. For adxl34x OF device
> nodes the compatible property should list the more specific
> "adi,adxl345" or "adi,adxl346" value first and the "adi,adxl34x"
> fallback value second. This prevents the device node from being matched
> with the adxl34x driver.
> 
> Fix this by adding an OF match table with an "adi,adxl34x" compatible
> entry.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
> ---
>  drivers/input/misc/adxl34x-i2c.c | 11 +++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> 
> Another option would have been to add "adxl325" and "adxl326" entries to the
> adxl34x_id I2C match table, but it would have had the drawback of requiring a
> driver update for every new device.

AFAIK this is even required for compatible entries, to be as specific as
possible. I think this makes sense. With platform_ids, we already had
the problem that pca954x was too generic and was used for both GPIO
extenders and I2C muxers (IIRC).


[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@glider.be>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] input: adxl34x: Add OF match support
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 09:21:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141218082151.GA1038@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1418868923-13411-1-git-send-email-laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1246 bytes --]

On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 04:15:23AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> The I2C subsystem can match devices without explicit OF support based on
> the part of their compatible property after the comma. However, this
> mechanism uses the first compatible value only. For adxl34x OF device
> nodes the compatible property should list the more specific
> "adi,adxl345" or "adi,adxl346" value first and the "adi,adxl34x"
> fallback value second. This prevents the device node from being matched
> with the adxl34x driver.
> 
> Fix this by adding an OF match table with an "adi,adxl34x" compatible
> entry.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
> ---
>  drivers/input/misc/adxl34x-i2c.c | 11 +++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> 
> Another option would have been to add "adxl325" and "adxl326" entries to the
> adxl34x_id I2C match table, but it would have had the drawback of requiring a
> driver update for every new device.

AFAIK this is even required for compatible entries, to be as specific as
possible. I think this makes sense. With platform_ids, we already had
the problem that pca954x was too generic and was used for both GPIO
extenders and I2C muxers (IIRC).


[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-18  8:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-18  2:15 [PATCH] input: adxl34x: Add OF match support Laurent Pinchart
2014-12-18  2:15 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-12-18  8:21 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2014-12-18  8:21   ` Wolfram Sang
2014-12-18 12:49   ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-12-18 12:49     ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-12-18 13:03     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-12-18 13:03       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
     [not found]       ` <CAMuHMdXcfe0JQhZzGSAoqjKR346-QJrvyi=afHF7cAaHKa56pw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2014-12-18 19:23         ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-12-18 19:23           ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-01-05  8:27           ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-01-05  8:27             ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-01-06 13:28           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-01-06 13:28             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-01-15 12:53     ` Wolfram Sang
2015-01-15 12:53       ` Wolfram Sang
2015-01-15 13:03       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-01-15 13:03         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-01-15 14:19       ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-01-15 14:19         ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-01-15 14:23         ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-01-15 14:23           ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-01-15 14:36           ` Wolfram Sang
2015-01-15 14:36             ` Wolfram Sang
2015-01-15 14:38             ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-01-15 14:38               ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-01-15 14:23         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-01-15 14:23           ` Geert Uytterhoeven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141218082151.GA1038@katana \
    --to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    --cc=geert@glider.be \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.