All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: arnd@arndb.de, olof@lixom.net, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
	thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: Marvell: Remove init cpus function
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 22:30:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150119213028.GB2938@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1421686381-12397-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>

On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 05:52:59PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> With the next patches, the init cpus function will be changed to be factored
> out.
> 
> The function 'armada_xp_smp_init_cpus' does nothing more than a sanity check
> after the DT has been parsed. Even if this code is valid, it does not give a
> real benefit as the DT should be correctly filled.
> 
> Remove this callback.

Hi Daniel

What is your plan for getting these merged? Do you want me to take the
mvebu patch? Or are you thinking of sending the complete series to the
arm-soc maintainers?

Thanks
	Andrew

> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-mvebu/platsmp.c | 11 -----------
>  1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/platsmp.c
> index 58cc8c1..3e93422 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/platsmp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/platsmp.c
> @@ -30,8 +30,6 @@
>  #include "pmsu.h"
>  #include "coherency.h"
>  
> -#define ARMADA_XP_MAX_CPUS 4
> -
>  #define AXP_BOOTROM_BASE 0xfff00000
>  #define AXP_BOOTROM_SIZE 0x100000
>  
> @@ -114,14 +112,6 @@ static void armada_xp_secondary_init(unsigned int cpu)
>  	mvebu_v7_pmsu_idle_exit();
>  }
>  
> -static void __init armada_xp_smp_init_cpus(void)
> -{
> -	unsigned int ncores = num_possible_cpus();
> -
> -	if (ncores == 0 || ncores > ARMADA_XP_MAX_CPUS)
> -		panic("Invalid number of CPUs in DT\n");
> -}
> -
>  static void __init armada_xp_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
>  {
>  	struct device_node *node;
> @@ -171,7 +161,6 @@ static int armada_xp_cpu_kill(unsigned int cpu)
>  #endif
>  
>  struct smp_operations armada_xp_smp_ops __initdata = {
> -	.smp_init_cpus		= armada_xp_smp_init_cpus,
>  	.smp_prepare_cpus	= armada_xp_smp_prepare_cpus,
>  	.smp_boot_secondary	= armada_xp_boot_secondary,
>  	.smp_secondary_init     = armada_xp_secondary_init,
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: andrew@lunn.ch (Andrew Lunn)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: Marvell: Remove init cpus function
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 22:30:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150119213028.GB2938@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1421686381-12397-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>

On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 05:52:59PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> With the next patches, the init cpus function will be changed to be factored
> out.
> 
> The function 'armada_xp_smp_init_cpus' does nothing more than a sanity check
> after the DT has been parsed. Even if this code is valid, it does not give a
> real benefit as the DT should be correctly filled.
> 
> Remove this callback.

Hi Daniel

What is your plan for getting these merged? Do you want me to take the
mvebu patch? Or are you thinking of sending the complete series to the
arm-soc maintainers?

Thanks
	Andrew

> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-mvebu/platsmp.c | 11 -----------
>  1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/platsmp.c
> index 58cc8c1..3e93422 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/platsmp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/platsmp.c
> @@ -30,8 +30,6 @@
>  #include "pmsu.h"
>  #include "coherency.h"
>  
> -#define ARMADA_XP_MAX_CPUS 4
> -
>  #define AXP_BOOTROM_BASE 0xfff00000
>  #define AXP_BOOTROM_SIZE 0x100000
>  
> @@ -114,14 +112,6 @@ static void armada_xp_secondary_init(unsigned int cpu)
>  	mvebu_v7_pmsu_idle_exit();
>  }
>  
> -static void __init armada_xp_smp_init_cpus(void)
> -{
> -	unsigned int ncores = num_possible_cpus();
> -
> -	if (ncores == 0 || ncores > ARMADA_XP_MAX_CPUS)
> -		panic("Invalid number of CPUs in DT\n");
> -}
> -
>  static void __init armada_xp_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
>  {
>  	struct device_node *node;
> @@ -171,7 +161,6 @@ static int armada_xp_cpu_kill(unsigned int cpu)
>  #endif
>  
>  struct smp_operations armada_xp_smp_ops __initdata = {
> -	.smp_init_cpus		= armada_xp_smp_init_cpus,
>  	.smp_prepare_cpus	= armada_xp_smp_prepare_cpus,
>  	.smp_boot_secondary	= armada_xp_boot_secondary,
>  	.smp_secondary_init     = armada_xp_secondary_init,
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-01-19 21:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-19 16:52 [PATCH 1/3] ARM: Marvell: Remove init cpus function Daniel Lezcano
2015-01-19 16:52 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-01-19 16:53 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: Make smp_init_cpus to return the number of cores Daniel Lezcano
2015-01-19 16:53   ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-01-19 16:53 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: Factor out the smp_init_cpus function Daniel Lezcano
2015-01-19 16:53   ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-01-19 17:53 ` [PATCH 1/3] ARM: Marvell: Remove init cpus function Gregory CLEMENT
2015-01-19 17:53   ` Gregory CLEMENT
2015-01-19 21:30 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2015-01-19 21:30   ` Andrew Lunn
2015-01-19 22:02   ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-01-19 22:02     ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-01-23 13:15 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-01-23 13:15   ` Daniel Lezcano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150119213028.GB2938@lunn.ch \
    --to=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.