All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: madvise: Ignore repeated MADV_DONTNEED hints
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 14:05:06 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150202140506.392ff6920743f19ea44cff59@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150202165525.GM2395@suse.de>

On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 16:55:25 +0000 Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> wrote:

> glibc malloc changed behaviour in glibc 2.10 to have per-thread arenas
> instead of creating new areans if the existing ones were contended.
> The decision appears to have been made so the allocator scales better but the
> downside is that madvise(MADV_DONTNEED) is now called for these per-thread
> areans during free. This tears down pages that would have previously
> remained. There is nothing wrong with this decision from a functional point
> of view but any threaded application that frequently allocates/frees the
> same-sized region is going to incur the full teardown and refault costs.

MADV_DONTNEED has been there for many years.  How could this problem
not have been noticed during glibc 2.10 development/testing?  Is there
some more recent kernel change which is triggering this?

> This patch identifies when a thread is frequently calling MADV_DONTNEED
> on the same region of memory and starts ignoring the hint.

That's pretty nasty-looking :(

And presumably there are all sorts of behaviours which will still
trigger the problem but which will avoid the start/end equality test in
ignore_madvise_hint()?

Really, this is a glibc problem and only a glibc problem. 
MADV_DONTNEED is unavoidably expensive and glibc is calling
MADV_DONTNEED for a region which it *does* need.  Is there something
preventing this from being addressed within glibc?


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: madvise: Ignore repeated MADV_DONTNEED hints
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 14:05:06 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150202140506.392ff6920743f19ea44cff59@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150202165525.GM2395@suse.de>

On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 16:55:25 +0000 Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> wrote:

> glibc malloc changed behaviour in glibc 2.10 to have per-thread arenas
> instead of creating new areans if the existing ones were contended.
> The decision appears to have been made so the allocator scales better but the
> downside is that madvise(MADV_DONTNEED) is now called for these per-thread
> areans during free. This tears down pages that would have previously
> remained. There is nothing wrong with this decision from a functional point
> of view but any threaded application that frequently allocates/frees the
> same-sized region is going to incur the full teardown and refault costs.

MADV_DONTNEED has been there for many years.  How could this problem
not have been noticed during glibc 2.10 development/testing?  Is there
some more recent kernel change which is triggering this?

> This patch identifies when a thread is frequently calling MADV_DONTNEED
> on the same region of memory and starts ignoring the hint.

That's pretty nasty-looking :(

And presumably there are all sorts of behaviours which will still
trigger the problem but which will avoid the start/end equality test in
ignore_madvise_hint()?

Really, this is a glibc problem and only a glibc problem. 
MADV_DONTNEED is unavoidably expensive and glibc is calling
MADV_DONTNEED for a region which it *does* need.  Is there something
preventing this from being addressed within glibc?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-02-02 22:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-02 16:55 [RFC PATCH] mm: madvise: Ignore repeated MADV_DONTNEED hints Mel Gorman
2015-02-02 16:55 ` Mel Gorman
2015-02-02 22:05 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2015-02-02 22:05   ` Andrew Morton
2015-02-02 22:18   ` Mel Gorman
2015-02-02 22:18     ` Mel Gorman
2015-02-02 22:35     ` Andrew Morton
2015-02-02 22:35       ` Andrew Morton
2015-02-03  0:26       ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-02-03  0:26         ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-02-03 10:50       ` Mel Gorman
2015-02-03 10:50         ` Mel Gorman
2015-02-05 21:44     ` Rik van Riel
2015-02-05 21:44       ` Rik van Riel
2015-02-02 22:22 ` Dave Hansen
2015-02-02 22:22   ` Dave Hansen
2015-02-03  8:19   ` MADV_DONTNEED semantics? Was: " Vlastimil Babka
2015-02-03  8:19     ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-02-03 10:53     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2015-02-03 10:53       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2015-02-03 10:53       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2015-02-03 11:42       ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-02-03 11:42         ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-02-03 16:20         ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-02-03 16:20           ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-02-04 13:46           ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-02-04 13:46             ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-02-04 13:46             ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-02-04 14:00             ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-02-04 14:00               ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-02-04 14:00               ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-02-04 17:02               ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-02-04 17:02                 ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-02-04 19:24                 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-02-04 19:24                   ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-02-04 19:24                   ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-02-05  1:07                   ` Minchan Kim
2015-02-05  1:07                     ` Minchan Kim
2015-02-05  1:07                     ` Minchan Kim
2015-02-06 15:41                     ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-02-06 15:41                       ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-02-06 15:41                       ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-02-09  6:46                       ` Minchan Kim
2015-02-09  6:46                         ` Minchan Kim
2015-02-09  6:46                         ` Minchan Kim
2015-02-09  9:13                         ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-02-09  9:13                           ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-02-05 15:41                   ` Michal Hocko
2015-02-05 15:41                     ` Michal Hocko
2015-02-05 15:41                     ` Michal Hocko
2015-02-06 15:57                     ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-02-06 15:57                       ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-02-06 15:57                       ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-02-06 20:45                       ` Michal Hocko
2015-02-06 20:45                         ` Michal Hocko
2015-02-06 20:45                         ` Michal Hocko
2015-02-09  6:50                       ` Minchan Kim
2015-02-09  6:50                         ` Minchan Kim
2015-02-09  6:50                         ` Minchan Kim
2015-02-04  0:09         ` Minchan Kim
2015-02-04  0:09           ` Minchan Kim
2015-02-04  0:09           ` Minchan Kim
2015-02-03 11:16     ` Mel Gorman
2015-02-03 11:16       ` Mel Gorman
2015-02-03 15:21       ` Michal Hocko
2015-02-03 15:21         ` Michal Hocko
2015-02-03 15:21         ` Michal Hocko
2015-02-03 16:25         ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-02-03 16:25           ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-02-03 16:25           ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-02-03  9:47   ` Mel Gorman
2015-02-03  9:47     ` Mel Gorman
2015-02-03 10:47     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2015-02-03 10:47       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2015-02-03 11:21       ` Mel Gorman
2015-02-03 11:21         ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150202140506.392ff6920743f19ea44cff59@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.