From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: Defer lookup of supply to regulator_get
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 21:50:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150325045054.GA31311@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1427248565-9680-1-git-send-email-bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 519 bytes --]
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 06:56:05PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> Instead of resolving regulator supplies during registration move this to
> the time of a consumer retrieving a handle. The benefit is that it's
> possible for one driver to register regulators with internal
> dependencies out of order.
This looks basically sensible (as we discussed in person) - I'd like to
poke at this on some systems I've got back home to make sure I'm happy
with the debugging output and so on but I'm not expecting any problems.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: broonie@kernel.org (Mark Brown)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: Defer lookup of supply to regulator_get
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 21:50:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150325045054.GA31311@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1427248565-9680-1-git-send-email-bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com>
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 06:56:05PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> Instead of resolving regulator supplies during registration move this to
> the time of a consumer retrieving a handle. The benefit is that it's
> possible for one driver to register regulators with internal
> dependencies out of order.
This looks basically sensible (as we discussed in person) - I'd like to
poke at this on some systems I've got back home to make sure I'm happy
with the debugging output and so on but I'm not expecting any problems.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20150324/6b134006/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-25 4:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-25 1:56 [PATCH] regulator: Defer lookup of supply to regulator_get Bjorn Andersson
2015-03-25 1:56 ` Bjorn Andersson
2015-03-25 1:56 ` Bjorn Andersson
2015-03-25 4:50 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2015-03-25 4:50 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150325045054.GA31311@sirena.org.uk \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.