All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [lm-sensors] Kernel Panic when running sensors on new CentOS kernel (3.10.0-229.1.2)
@ 2015-04-08 18:03 Mark Hansen
  2015-04-08 18:27 ` Guenter Roeck
                   ` (5 more replies)
  0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mark Hansen @ 2015-04-08 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lm-sensors

lm-sensors team,

First, thank you very much for all your work providing us with such a useful and necessary
tool.

I've just upgraded my CentOS system from 7.0.1406 to 7.1.1503 (kernel: 3.10.0-229.1.2).

The upgrade seemed to go without any problems, but since then the machine has been rebooting
at what looked like regular intervals. If I boot on the previous kernel (3.10.0-123.20.1),
the problem doesn't occur.

I've narrowed the problem down to what looks like a kernel panic whenever the 'sensors' command
is run (from the lm_sensors-3.3.4-11 package). Note that sensors has been running fine with
this configuration for several months. Only after upgrading the O/S to 7.1 did it start having
this problem. I haven't made any other configuration changes to the sensors package.

Each time this happens, there is a lot of information written to the screen that is gone before
I can get a good look at it. I took a picture of the screen right when I ran the sensors command
and found that the information is also written to the vcore-dmesg.txt file that is left in the
/var/crash/<IP-date-time> directory (along with a vcore file). The last part of the text file
is shown below.

Based on the information (shown below) it seems the sensors command is having a problem when
trying to read the sensor chip on the Radeon display card.

The motherboard in the machine is an ASUS M5A97 R2.0
The display adapter is an "XFX Radeon AMD ONE 1GB 5450 DDR3 HDMI PCIe"

When I run sensors while running on the previous kernel, it does include the following
section:

radeon-pci-0100
Adapter: PCI adapter
temp1:        +49.5°C

so it seems it is trying to read the sensors chip from the display adapter card.

Is there something I need to do to get sensors running with the new kernel?
What other information can I get for you?

Thanks,

Excerpt from the vcore-dmesg.txt file after the kernel panics:

     [  284.171817] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000000001d8
     [  284.171896] IP: [<ffffffffa01a1fd2>] radeon_hwmon_show_temp+0x32/0x70 [radeon]
     [  284.172009] PGD 0
     [  284.172034] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
     [  284.172072] Modules linked in: xt_nat xt_conntrack nf_log_ipv4 nf_log_common xt_LOG iptable_filter nf_nat_ftp iptable_nat 
nf_nat_ipv4 nf_nat nf_conntrack_irc nf_conntrack_ftp nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 nf_conntrack ip_tables it87 hwmon_vid 
eeepc_wmi asus_wmi sparse_keymap rfkill kvm_amd kvm crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul crc32c_intel ghash_clmulni_intel aesni_intel lrw 
gf128mul glue_helper ablk_helper video pcspkr snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_intel 
snd_hda_controller snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq snd_seq_device snd_pcm snd_timer snd sp5100_tco cryptd soundcore serio_raw 
mxm_wmi tpm_infineon k10temp fam15h_power edac_mce_amd edac_core i2c_piix4 shpchp wmi acpi_cpufreq xfs libcrc32c sd_mod sr_mod 
crc_t10dif cdrom crct10dif_common radeon i2c_algo_bit
     [  284.172939]  drm_kms_helper ttm ahci libahci drm libata r8169 i2c_core mii dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod
     [  284.173068] CPU: 3 PID: 2579 Comm: sensors Not tainted 3.10.0-229.1.2.el7.x86_64 #1
     [  284.173133] Hardware name: To be filled by O.E.M. To be filled by O.E.M./M5A97 R2.0, BIOS 2301 01/06/2014
     [  284.173213] task: ffff88022f6038e0 ti: ffff8800b78f8000 task.ti: ffff8800b78f8000
     [  284.173276] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa01a1fd2>]  [<ffffffffa01a1fd2>] radeon_hwmon_show_temp+0x32/0x70 [radeon]
     [  284.173398] RSP: 0018:ffff8800b78fbe88  EFLAGS: 00010246
     [  284.173444] RAX: ffff88022f5b4000 RBX: ffff88022ffd1000 RCX: 0000000000000000
     [  284.173504] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffffa0277460 RDI: ffff88022ee6c400
     [  284.173590] RBP: ffff8800b78fbe90 R08: ffffffff8183c4e0 R09: ffffea0008bff480
     [  284.173649] R10: 0000000000003525 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: ffff8800b78fbf48
     [  284.173709] R13: 0000000000001000 R14: ffff88022d3fa360 R15: ffff88022ee90070
     [  284.173769] FS:  00007f25769fe740(0000) GS:ffff88023ecc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
     [  284.173840] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
     [  284.173888] CR2: 00000000000001d8 CR3: 00000000b78ac000 CR4: 00000000000407e0
     [  284.173948] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
     [  284.174008] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
     [  284.174067] Stack:
     [  284.174087]  ffffffffa0277460 ffff8800b78fbeb0 ffffffff813cec30 ffff8800b78fbeb0
     [  284.174165]  ffff88022d3fa380 ffff8800b78fbf00 ffffffff8123d38a ffff88022ee6c410
     [  284.174242]  ffffffff8168eaf0 00007f25769fc000 ffff880231424500 00007f25769fc000
     [  284.174319] Call Trace:
     [  284.174354]  [<ffffffff813cec30>] dev_attr_show+0x20/0x60
     [  284.174405]  [<ffffffff8123d38a>] sysfs_read_file+0x9a/0x1a0
     [  284.174460]  [<ffffffff811c6acc>] vfs_read+0x9c/0x170
     [  284.174507]  [<ffffffff811c75f8>] SyS_read+0x58/0xb0
     [  284.174555]  [<ffffffff81614a29>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
     [  284.174607] Code: 89 e5 53 48 89 d3 e8 7e 0d 23 e1 f6 80 6b 01 00 00 02 48 8b 50 08 74 0a 8b 92 60 05 00 00 85 d2 75 37 48 
8b 90 e0 16 00 00 31 c9 <48> 8b b2 d8 01 00 00 48 85 f6 74 07 48 89 c7 ff d6 89 c1 48 c7
     [  284.175044] RIP  [<ffffffffa01a1fd2>] radeon_hwmon_show_temp+0x32/0x70 [radeon]
     [  284.175147]  RSP <ffff8800b78fbe88>
     [  284.175178] CR2: 00000000000001d8

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [lm-sensors] Kernel Panic when running sensors on new CentOS kernel (3.10.0-229.1.2)
  2015-04-08 18:03 [lm-sensors] Kernel Panic when running sensors on new CentOS kernel (3.10.0-229.1.2) Mark Hansen
@ 2015-04-08 18:27 ` Guenter Roeck
  2015-04-08 18:52 ` Guenter Roeck
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2015-04-08 18:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lm-sensors

On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 11:03:18AM -0700, Mark Hansen wrote:
> lm-sensors team,
> 
> First, thank you very much for all your work providing us with such a useful and necessary
> tool.
> 
> I've just upgraded my CentOS system from 7.0.1406 to 7.1.1503 (kernel: 3.10.0-229.1.2).
> 
> The upgrade seemed to go without any problems, but since then the machine has been rebooting
> at what looked like regular intervals. If I boot on the previous kernel (3.10.0-123.20.1),
> the problem doesn't occur.
> 
> I've narrowed the problem down to what looks like a kernel panic whenever the 'sensors' command
> is run (from the lm_sensors-3.3.4-11 package). Note that sensors has been running fine with
> this configuration for several months. Only after upgrading the O/S to 7.1 did it start having
> this problem. I haven't made any other configuration changes to the sensors package.
> 
> Each time this happens, there is a lot of information written to the screen that is gone before
> I can get a good look at it. I took a picture of the screen right when I ran the sensors command
> and found that the information is also written to the vcore-dmesg.txt file that is left in the
> /var/crash/<IP-date-time> directory (along with a vcore file). The last part of the text file
> is shown below.
> 
> Based on the information (shown below) it seems the sensors command is having a problem when
> trying to read the sensor chip on the Radeon display card.
> 
> The motherboard in the machine is an ASUS M5A97 R2.0
> The display adapter is an "XFX Radeon AMD ONE 1GB 5450 DDR3 HDMI PCIe"
> 
> When I run sensors while running on the previous kernel, it does include the following
> section:
> 
> radeon-pci-0100
> Adapter: PCI adapter
> temp1:        +49.5°C
> 
> so it seems it is trying to read the sensors chip from the display adapter card.
> 
> Is there something I need to do to get sensors running with the new kernel?
> What other information can I get for you?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Excerpt from the vcore-dmesg.txt file after the kernel panics:
> 
>     [  284.171817] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000000001d8
>     [  284.171896] IP: [<ffffffffa01a1fd2>] radeon_hwmon_show_temp+0x32/0x70 [radeon]
>     [  284.172009] PGD 0
>     [  284.172034] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
>     [  284.172072] Modules linked in: xt_nat xt_conntrack nf_log_ipv4
> nf_log_common xt_LOG iptable_filter nf_nat_ftp iptable_nat nf_nat_ipv4
> nf_nat nf_conntrack_irc nf_conntrack_ftp nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4
> nf_conntrack ip_tables it87 hwmon_vid eeepc_wmi asus_wmi sparse_keymap
> rfkill kvm_amd kvm crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul crc32c_intel
> ghash_clmulni_intel aesni_intel lrw gf128mul glue_helper ablk_helper video
> pcspkr snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic snd_hda_codec_hdmi
> snd_hda_intel snd_hda_controller snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq
> snd_seq_device snd_pcm snd_timer snd sp5100_tco cryptd soundcore serio_raw
> mxm_wmi tpm_infineon k10temp fam15h_power edac_mce_amd edac_core i2c_piix4
> shpchp wmi acpi_cpufreq xfs libcrc32c sd_mod sr_mod crc_t10dif cdrom
> crct10dif_common radeon i2c_algo_bit
>     [  284.172939]  drm_kms_helper ttm ahci libahci drm libata r8169 i2c_core mii dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod
>     [  284.173068] CPU: 3 PID: 2579 Comm: sensors Not tainted 3.10.0-229.1.2.el7.x86_64 #1
>     [  284.173133] Hardware name: To be filled by O.E.M. To be filled by O.E.M./M5A97 R2.0, BIOS 2301 01/06/2014
>     [  284.173213] task: ffff88022f6038e0 ti: ffff8800b78f8000 task.ti: ffff8800b78f8000
>     [  284.173276] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa01a1fd2>]  [<ffffffffa01a1fd2>] radeon_hwmon_show_temp+0x32/0x70 [radeon]
>     [  284.173398] RSP: 0018:ffff8800b78fbe88  EFLAGS: 00010246
>     [  284.173444] RAX: ffff88022f5b4000 RBX: ffff88022ffd1000 RCX: 0000000000000000
>     [  284.173504] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffffa0277460 RDI: ffff88022ee6c400
>     [  284.173590] RBP: ffff8800b78fbe90 R08: ffffffff8183c4e0 R09: ffffea0008bff480
>     [  284.173649] R10: 0000000000003525 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: ffff8800b78fbf48
>     [  284.173709] R13: 0000000000001000 R14: ffff88022d3fa360 R15: ffff88022ee90070
>     [  284.173769] FS:  00007f25769fe740(0000) GS:ffff88023ecc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>     [  284.173840] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>     [  284.173888] CR2: 00000000000001d8 CR3: 00000000b78ac000 CR4: 00000000000407e0
>     [  284.173948] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
>     [  284.174008] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
>     [  284.174067] Stack:
>     [  284.174087]  ffffffffa0277460 ffff8800b78fbeb0 ffffffff813cec30 ffff8800b78fbeb0
>     [  284.174165]  ffff88022d3fa380 ffff8800b78fbf00 ffffffff8123d38a ffff88022ee6c410
>     [  284.174242]  ffffffff8168eaf0 00007f25769fc000 ffff880231424500 00007f25769fc000
>     [  284.174319] Call Trace:
>     [  284.174354]  [<ffffffff813cec30>] dev_attr_show+0x20/0x60
>     [  284.174405]  [<ffffffff8123d38a>] sysfs_read_file+0x9a/0x1a0
>     [  284.174460]  [<ffffffff811c6acc>] vfs_read+0x9c/0x170
>     [  284.174507]  [<ffffffff811c75f8>] SyS_read+0x58/0xb0
>     [  284.174555]  [<ffffffff81614a29>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
>     [  284.174607] Code: 89 e5 53 48 89 d3 e8 7e 0d 23 e1 f6 80 6b 01 00 00
> 02 48 8b 50 08 74 0a 8b 92 60 05 00 00 85 d2 75 37 48 8b 90 e0 16 00 00 31
> c9 <48> 8b b2 d8 01 00 00 48 85 f6 74 07 48 89 c7 ff d6 89 c1 48 c7
>     [  284.175044] RIP  [<ffffffffa01a1fd2>] radeon_hwmon_show_temp+0x32/0x70 [radeon]
>     [  284.175147]  RSP <ffff8800b78fbe88>
>     [  284.175178] CR2: 00000000000001d8
> 
I would guess that some patch from a later kernel version was back-ported,
but is missing a critical part. Do you know if the source code for that kernel
is available somewhere ?

Guenter

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [lm-sensors] Kernel Panic when running sensors on new CentOS kernel (3.10.0-229.1.2)
  2015-04-08 18:03 [lm-sensors] Kernel Panic when running sensors on new CentOS kernel (3.10.0-229.1.2) Mark Hansen
  2015-04-08 18:27 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2015-04-08 18:52 ` Guenter Roeck
  2015-04-08 19:15 ` Mark Hansen
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2015-04-08 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lm-sensors

On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 11:27:05AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 11:03:18AM -0700, Mark Hansen wrote:

[ ... ]
> > 
> I would guess that some patch from a later kernel version was back-ported,
> but is missing a critical part. Do you know if the source code for that kernel
> is available somewhere ?
> 

Never mind, I found the source and had a look. It turns out that the
hardware monitoring code in drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_pm.c (which
is what affects you) is broken in 7.1. You might want to open a case
with the CentOS community (or possibly Fedora / Redhat).

Guenter

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [lm-sensors] Kernel Panic when running sensors on new CentOS kernel (3.10.0-229.1.2)
  2015-04-08 18:03 [lm-sensors] Kernel Panic when running sensors on new CentOS kernel (3.10.0-229.1.2) Mark Hansen
  2015-04-08 18:27 ` Guenter Roeck
  2015-04-08 18:52 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2015-04-08 19:15 ` Mark Hansen
  2015-04-08 19:40 ` Guenter Roeck
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mark Hansen @ 2015-04-08 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lm-sensors

On 4/8/2015 11:52 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 11:27:05AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>  On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 11:03:18AM -0700, Mark Hansen wrote:
>
> [ ... ]
>>  >
>>  I would guess that some patch from a later kernel version was back-ported,
>>  but is missing a critical part. Do you know if the source code for that kernel
>>  is available somewhere ?
>>
>
> Never mind, I found the source and had a look. It turns out that the
> hardware monitoring code in drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_pm.c (which
> is what affects you) is broken in 7.1. You might want to open a case
> with the CentOS community (or possibly Fedora / Redhat).
>
> Guenter
>

Guenter,

Thanks for the quick look. I've had a question posted to the CentOS 7.x forum since the weekend
but not much response there. I can see if I can figure out how to open the case with the CentOS
team. Is there any way you can provide me with what I'll need to tell them, so they know what
is broken, or do you think the information I provided in my initial e-mail here will be enough?

Thanks again,

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [lm-sensors] Kernel Panic when running sensors on new CentOS kernel (3.10.0-229.1.2)
  2015-04-08 18:03 [lm-sensors] Kernel Panic when running sensors on new CentOS kernel (3.10.0-229.1.2) Mark Hansen
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-04-08 19:15 ` Mark Hansen
@ 2015-04-08 19:40 ` Guenter Roeck
  2015-04-09  7:43 ` Jean Delvare
  2015-04-09 16:27 ` Mark Hansen
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2015-04-08 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lm-sensors

On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 12:15:08PM -0700, Mark Hansen wrote:
> On 4/8/2015 11:52 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 11:27:05AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >> On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 11:03:18AM -0700, Mark Hansen wrote:
> >
> >[ ... ]
> >> >
> >> I would guess that some patch from a later kernel version was back-ported,
> >> but is missing a critical part. Do you know if the source code for that kernel
> >> is available somewhere ?
> >>
> >
> >Never mind, I found the source and had a look. It turns out that the
> >hardware monitoring code in drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_pm.c (which
> >is what affects you) is broken in 7.1. You might want to open a case
> >with the CentOS community (or possibly Fedora / Redhat).
> >
> >Guenter
> >
> 
> Guenter,
> 
> Thanks for the quick look. I've had a question posted to the CentOS 7.x forum since the weekend
> but not much response there. I can see if I can figure out how to open the case with the CentOS
> team. Is there any way you can provide me with what I'll need to tell them, so they know what
> is broken, or do you think the information I provided in my initial e-mail here will be enough?
> 
The information you provided should be enough. I don't know how patches
are applied to CentOS, so I don't know exactly what went wrong.

I _suspect_ that someone attempted to back-port commit ec39f64bba34
("drm/radeon/dpm: Convert to use devm_hwmon_register_with_groups"), realized
that the new API is not available in 3.10, and instead of dropping the patch
applied it partially - with the to-be-expected result. That is just a wild
guess, though.

Guenter

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [lm-sensors] Kernel Panic when running sensors on new CentOS kernel (3.10.0-229.1.2)
  2015-04-08 18:03 [lm-sensors] Kernel Panic when running sensors on new CentOS kernel (3.10.0-229.1.2) Mark Hansen
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-04-08 19:40 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2015-04-09  7:43 ` Jean Delvare
  2015-04-09 16:27 ` Mark Hansen
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2015-04-09  7:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lm-sensors

Hi Mark,

You are hijacking an unrelated discussion thread here. This is bad,
please don't do that. You hit the Reply button, changed the subject,
and typed a brand new message. This causes every e-mail client and list
archive to consider your message a reply to the original message, and
thread it appropriately. This is very messy.

What you should have done instead is: start a new message, type the
list address as the recipient, then write your message and send. This
creates a new thread, which is appropriate for a new topic.

Thank you,
-- 
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [lm-sensors] Kernel Panic when running sensors on new CentOS kernel (3.10.0-229.1.2)
  2015-04-08 18:03 [lm-sensors] Kernel Panic when running sensors on new CentOS kernel (3.10.0-229.1.2) Mark Hansen
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-04-09  7:43 ` Jean Delvare
@ 2015-04-09 16:27 ` Mark Hansen
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mark Hansen @ 2015-04-09 16:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lm-sensors

On 4/9/2015 12:43 AM, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> You are hijacking an unrelated discussion thread here. This is bad,
> please don't do that. You hit the Reply button, changed the subject,
> and typed a brand new message. This causes every e-mail client and list
> archive to consider your message a reply to the original message, and
> thread it appropriately. This is very messy.
>
> What you should have done instead is: start a new message, type the
> list address as the recipient, then write your message and send. This
> creates a new thread, which is appropriate for a new topic.
>
> Thank you,

I'm very sorry, Jean. I thought I changed enough of the message to make it new.
I understand what you're saying and will make sure I do it correctly in the future.

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-04-09 16:27 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-04-08 18:03 [lm-sensors] Kernel Panic when running sensors on new CentOS kernel (3.10.0-229.1.2) Mark Hansen
2015-04-08 18:27 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-04-08 18:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-04-08 19:15 ` Mark Hansen
2015-04-08 19:40 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-04-09  7:43 ` Jean Delvare
2015-04-09 16:27 ` Mark Hansen

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.