All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
	"Nicolas Ferre" <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
	"Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard" <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
	"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: "Jonas Andersson" <jonas@microbit.se>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	"Boris Brezillon" <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: at91: pll: fix input range validity check
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 21:37:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150413043725.19585.5717@quantum> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1427594023-9697-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>

Quoting Boris Brezillon (2015-03-28 18:53:43)
> The PLL impose a certain input range to work correctly, but it appears that
> this input range does not apply on the input clock (or parent clock) but
> on the input clock after it has passed the PLL divisor.
> Fix the implementation accordingly.
> 
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.14+
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
> Reported-by: Jonas Andersson <jonas@microbit.se>

Hi Boris,

OK, so this patch along with your two previous submissions kind of
tackle some of items I mentioned earlier today[0].

Does this patch, combined with your two prior patches[1][2] resolve the
issue you brought up in your "Propagating clock rate constraints"
thread[3]?

[0] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/<20150412235021.19585.27431@quantum>
[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/<1427593728-9366-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
[2] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/<1427593533-9019-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
[3] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/<20150327004054.2f6f34ee@bbrezillon>

Regards,
Mike

> ---
>  drivers/clk/at91/clk-pll.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-pll.c
> index 6ec79db..cbbe403 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-pll.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-pll.c
> @@ -173,8 +173,7 @@ static long clk_pll_get_best_div_mul(struct clk_pll *pll, unsigned long rate,
>         int i = 0;
>  
>         /* Check if parent_rate is a valid input rate */
> -       if (parent_rate < characteristics->input.min ||
> -           parent_rate > characteristics->input.max)
> +       if (parent_rate < characteristics->input.min)
>                 return -ERANGE;
>  
>         /*
> @@ -187,6 +186,15 @@ static long clk_pll_get_best_div_mul(struct clk_pll *pll, unsigned long rate,
>         if (!mindiv)
>                 mindiv = 1;
>  
> +       if (parent_rate > characteristics->input.max) {
> +               tmpdiv = DIV_ROUND_UP(parent_rate, characteristics->input.max);
> +               if (tmpdiv > PLL_DIV_MAX)
> +                       return -ERANGE;
> +
> +               if (tmpdiv > mindiv)
> +                       mindiv = tmpdiv;
> +       }
> +
>         /*
>          * Calculate the maximum divider which is limited by PLL register
>          * layout (limited by the MUL or DIV field size).
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: mturquette@linaro.org (Michael Turquette)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] clk: at91: pll: fix input range validity check
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 21:37:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150413043725.19585.5717@quantum> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1427594023-9697-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>

Quoting Boris Brezillon (2015-03-28 18:53:43)
> The PLL impose a certain input range to work correctly, but it appears that
> this input range does not apply on the input clock (or parent clock) but
> on the input clock after it has passed the PLL divisor.
> Fix the implementation accordingly.
> 
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.14+
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
> Reported-by: Jonas Andersson <jonas@microbit.se>

Hi Boris,

OK, so this patch along with your two previous submissions kind of
tackle some of items I mentioned earlier today[0].

Does this patch, combined with your two prior patches[1][2] resolve the
issue you brought up in your "Propagating clock rate constraints"
thread[3]?

[0] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/<20150412235021.19585.27431@quantum>
[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/<1427593728-9366-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
[2] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/<1427593533-9019-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
[3] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/<20150327004054.2f6f34ee@bbrezillon>

Regards,
Mike

> ---
>  drivers/clk/at91/clk-pll.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-pll.c
> index 6ec79db..cbbe403 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-pll.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-pll.c
> @@ -173,8 +173,7 @@ static long clk_pll_get_best_div_mul(struct clk_pll *pll, unsigned long rate,
>         int i = 0;
>  
>         /* Check if parent_rate is a valid input rate */
> -       if (parent_rate < characteristics->input.min ||
> -           parent_rate > characteristics->input.max)
> +       if (parent_rate < characteristics->input.min)
>                 return -ERANGE;
>  
>         /*
> @@ -187,6 +186,15 @@ static long clk_pll_get_best_div_mul(struct clk_pll *pll, unsigned long rate,
>         if (!mindiv)
>                 mindiv = 1;
>  
> +       if (parent_rate > characteristics->input.max) {
> +               tmpdiv = DIV_ROUND_UP(parent_rate, characteristics->input.max);
> +               if (tmpdiv > PLL_DIV_MAX)
> +                       return -ERANGE;
> +
> +               if (tmpdiv > mindiv)
> +                       mindiv = tmpdiv;
> +       }
> +
>         /*
>          * Calculate the maximum divider which is limited by PLL register
>          * layout (limited by the MUL or DIV field size).
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-13  4:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-29  1:53 [PATCH] clk: at91: pll: fix input range validity check Boris Brezillon
2015-03-29  1:53 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-04-13  4:37 ` Michael Turquette [this message]
2015-04-13  4:37   ` Michael Turquette
2015-04-14 17:48   ` Boris Brezillon
2015-04-14 17:48     ` Boris Brezillon
2015-06-18 10:59 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-06-18 10:59   ` Boris Brezillon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150413043725.19585.5717@quantum \
    --to=mturquette@linaro.org \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=jonas@microbit.se \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
    --cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.