[Query] Direction of adding arm64 support to PCIe designware driver

[Query] Direction of adding arm64 support to PCIe designware driver

[Jisheng Zhang]

Hi all,

Currently, the pci designware driver still lacks of arm64 support and I noticed
that many works are done to achieve this goal.

Some patches are merged and some are under discussion. And Per my understanding, 
even w/ these patches merged, the driver still doesn't support arm64. Could you
please kindly point out the direction to add arm64 support to the PCIe
designware driver?

Thanks in advance,
Jisheng

[Query] Direction of adding arm64 support to PCIe designware driver

[Jisheng Zhang]

Hi all,

Currently, the pci designware driver still lacks of arm64 support and I noticed
that many works are done to achieve this goal.

Some patches are merged and some are under discussion. And Per my understanding, 
even w/ these patches merged, the driver still doesn't support arm64. Could you
please kindly point out the direction to add arm64 support to the PCIe
designware driver?

Thanks in advance,
Jisheng

Re: [Query] Direction of adding arm64 support to PCIe designware driver

[Lorenzo Pieralisi]

Hi Jisheng,

On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 10:46:21AM +0100, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Currently, the pci designware driver still lacks of arm64 support and I noticed
> that many works are done to achieve this goal.
> 
> Some patches are merged and some are under discussion. And Per my understanding, 
> even w/ these patches merged, the driver still doesn't support arm64. Could you
> please kindly point out the direction to add arm64 support to the PCIe
> designware driver?

We should remove pci_sys_data dependency since ARM depends on that.
I removed it from a couple of places already (eg pci_mmap_page_range).

Now, pcibios_align_resource and pcibios_msi_controller need patching.

I have a patch for pcibios_align_resource() (I am waiting for Yijing
Wang series to get merged so that we can move the align_resource
function pointer in the host bridge):

https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/3/171

For MSI, code converted to use CONFIG_PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN should
not need pcibios_msi_controller ARM function, but if we still compile
that function in we do need pci_sys_data on ARM, so we have to have
it even if it can be dead code in some platforms, I have to vet all
ARM PCI host controllers to check, but removing it would break MSI
support.

Does it help ? MSIs are the most important change required,
align_resource() pointer can be sorted out easily once Yijing's
code gets in.

Lorenzo

[Query] Direction of adding arm64 support to PCIe designware driver

[Lorenzo Pieralisi]

Hi Jisheng,

On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 10:46:21AM +0100, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Currently, the pci designware driver still lacks of arm64 support and I noticed
> that many works are done to achieve this goal.
> 
> Some patches are merged and some are under discussion. And Per my understanding, 
> even w/ these patches merged, the driver still doesn't support arm64. Could you
> please kindly point out the direction to add arm64 support to the PCIe
> designware driver?

We should remove pci_sys_data dependency since ARM depends on that.
I removed it from a couple of places already (eg pci_mmap_page_range).

Now, pcibios_align_resource and pcibios_msi_controller need patching.

I have a patch for pcibios_align_resource() (I am waiting for Yijing
Wang series to get merged so that we can move the align_resource
function pointer in the host bridge):

https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/3/171

For MSI, code converted to use CONFIG_PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN should
not need pcibios_msi_controller ARM function, but if we still compile
that function in we do need pci_sys_data on ARM, so we have to have
it even if it can be dead code in some platforms, I have to vet all
ARM PCI host controllers to check, but removing it would break MSI
support.

Does it help ? MSIs are the most important change required,
align_resource() pointer can be sorted out easily once Yijing's
code gets in.

Lorenzo

Re: [Query] Direction of adding arm64 support to PCIe designware driver

[Jaehoon Chung]

Hi.

On 04/08/2015 07:32 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> Hi Jisheng,
> 
> On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 10:46:21AM +0100, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Currently, the pci designware driver still lacks of arm64 support and I noticed
>> that many works are done to achieve this goal.
>>
>> Some patches are merged and some are under discussion. And Per my understanding, 
>> even w/ these patches merged, the driver still doesn't support arm64. Could you
>> please kindly point out the direction to add arm64 support to the PCIe
>> designware driver?
> 
> We should remove pci_sys_data dependency since ARM depends on that.
> I removed it from a couple of places already (eg pci_mmap_page_range).
> 
> Now, pcibios_align_resource and pcibios_msi_controller need patching.
> 
> I have a patch for pcibios_align_resource() (I am waiting for Yijing
> Wang series to get merged so that we can move the align_resource
> function pointer in the host bridge):
> 
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/3/171
> 
> For MSI, code converted to use CONFIG_PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN should
> not need pcibios_msi_controller ARM function, but if we still compile
> that function in we do need pci_sys_data on ARM, so we have to have
> it even if it can be dead code in some platforms, I have to vet all
> ARM PCI host controllers to check, but removing it would break MSI
> support.
> 
> Does it help ? MSIs are the most important change required,
> align_resource() pointer can be sorted out easily once Yijing's
> code gets in.

I'm not sure whether my working is right..I used the pcie_port instead of pci_sys_data.

static inline struct *sys_to_pcie(struct pci_sys_data *sys)
-> static inline struct *sys_to_pcie(struct pcie_port *pp)

And add "struct list_head resources" as member of pcie_port.

diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h
index 91484a9..1cde583 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h
+++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h
@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ struct pcie_port {
        struct irq_domain       *irq_domain;
        unsigned long           msi_data;
        DECLARE_BITMAP(msi_irq_in_use, MAX_MSI_IRQS);
+       struct list_head        resources;
 };

and just used pci_scan_root_bus(). (before call this, it's added the offset of resources..)
So i got the below message.

[    2.396822] exynos-pcie 156b0000.pcie: Link up!
[    2.397011] exynos-pcie 156b0000.pcie: PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00
[    2.397021] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [io  0x1000-0xffff]
[    2.397026] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x0c011000-0x0ffffffe]
[    2.397033] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [bus 00-ff]
[    2.409000] pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 8: assigned [mem 0x0c200000-0x0c7fffff]
[    2.409009] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 2: assigned [mem 0x0c400000-0x0c7fffff 64bit]
[    2.409509] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0x0c200000-0x0c207fff 64bit]
[    2.410008] pci 0000:00:00.0: PCI bridge to [bus 01]
[    2.410027] pci 0000:00:00.0:   bridge window [mem 0x0c200000-0x0c7fffff]

Well, i needs to work more and get the knowledge for pcie. (It's not working completely.)
If somebody is working this, it's great..otherwise I will send the RFC patch to get comment for my code.

If i'm missing something, let me know, plz.

Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung

> 
> Lorenzo
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> 

[Query] Direction of adding arm64 support to PCIe designware driver

[Jaehoon Chung]

Hi.

On 04/08/2015 07:32 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> Hi Jisheng,
> 
> On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 10:46:21AM +0100, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Currently, the pci designware driver still lacks of arm64 support and I noticed
>> that many works are done to achieve this goal.
>>
>> Some patches are merged and some are under discussion. And Per my understanding, 
>> even w/ these patches merged, the driver still doesn't support arm64. Could you
>> please kindly point out the direction to add arm64 support to the PCIe
>> designware driver?
> 
> We should remove pci_sys_data dependency since ARM depends on that.
> I removed it from a couple of places already (eg pci_mmap_page_range).
> 
> Now, pcibios_align_resource and pcibios_msi_controller need patching.
> 
> I have a patch for pcibios_align_resource() (I am waiting for Yijing
> Wang series to get merged so that we can move the align_resource
> function pointer in the host bridge):
> 
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/3/171
> 
> For MSI, code converted to use CONFIG_PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN should
> not need pcibios_msi_controller ARM function, but if we still compile
> that function in we do need pci_sys_data on ARM, so we have to have
> it even if it can be dead code in some platforms, I have to vet all
> ARM PCI host controllers to check, but removing it would break MSI
> support.
> 
> Does it help ? MSIs are the most important change required,
> align_resource() pointer can be sorted out easily once Yijing's
> code gets in.

I'm not sure whether my working is right..I used the pcie_port instead of pci_sys_data.

static inline struct *sys_to_pcie(struct pci_sys_data *sys)
-> static inline struct *sys_to_pcie(struct pcie_port *pp)

And add "struct list_head resources" as member of pcie_port.

diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h
index 91484a9..1cde583 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h
+++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h
@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ struct pcie_port {
        struct irq_domain       *irq_domain;
        unsigned long           msi_data;
        DECLARE_BITMAP(msi_irq_in_use, MAX_MSI_IRQS);
+       struct list_head        resources;
 };

and just used pci_scan_root_bus(). (before call this, it's added the offset of resources..)
So i got the below message.

[    2.396822] exynos-pcie 156b0000.pcie: Link up!
[    2.397011] exynos-pcie 156b0000.pcie: PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00
[    2.397021] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [io  0x1000-0xffff]
[    2.397026] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x0c011000-0x0ffffffe]
[    2.397033] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [bus 00-ff]
[    2.409000] pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 8: assigned [mem 0x0c200000-0x0c7fffff]
[    2.409009] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 2: assigned [mem 0x0c400000-0x0c7fffff 64bit]
[    2.409509] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0x0c200000-0x0c207fff 64bit]
[    2.410008] pci 0000:00:00.0: PCI bridge to [bus 01]
[    2.410027] pci 0000:00:00.0:   bridge window [mem 0x0c200000-0x0c7fffff]

Well, i needs to work more and get the knowledge for pcie. (It's not working completely.)
If somebody is working this, it's great..otherwise I will send the RFC patch to get comment for my code.

If i'm missing something, let me know, plz.

Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung

> 
> Lorenzo
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> 

Re: [Query] Direction of adding arm64 support to PCIe designware driver

[Jisheng Zhang]

Hi Lorenzo, Jaehoon

On Wed, 8 Apr 2015 18:36:09 -0700
Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com> wrote:

> Hi.
> 
> On 04/08/2015 07:32 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > Hi Jisheng,
> > 
> > On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 10:46:21AM +0100, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Currently, the pci designware driver still lacks of arm64 support and I noticed
> >> that many works are done to achieve this goal.
> >>
> >> Some patches are merged and some are under discussion. And Per my understanding, 
> >> even w/ these patches merged, the driver still doesn't support arm64. Could you
> >> please kindly point out the direction to add arm64 support to the PCIe
> >> designware driver?
> > 
> > We should remove pci_sys_data dependency since ARM depends on that.
> > I removed it from a couple of places already (eg pci_mmap_page_range).
> > 
> > Now, pcibios_align_resource and pcibios_msi_controller need patching.
> > 
> > I have a patch for pcibios_align_resource() (I am waiting for Yijing
> > Wang series to get merged so that we can move the align_resource
> > function pointer in the host bridge):
> > 
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/3/171
> > 
> > For MSI, code converted to use CONFIG_PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN should
> > not need pcibios_msi_controller ARM function, but if we still compile
> > that function in we do need pci_sys_data on ARM, so we have to have
> > it even if it can be dead code in some platforms, I have to vet all
> > ARM PCI host controllers to check, but removing it would break MSI
> > support.
> > 
> > Does it help ? MSIs are the most important change required,
> > align_resource() pointer can be sorted out easily once Yijing's
> > code gets in.

I haven't go to that deeper, and didn't fully understand the pcibios_align_resource()
does.

> 
> I'm not sure whether my working is right..I used the pcie_port instead of pci_sys_data.
> 
> static inline struct *sys_to_pcie(struct pci_sys_data *sys)
> -> static inline struct *sys_to_pcie(struct pcie_port *pp)
> 
> And add "struct list_head resources" as member of pcie_port.
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h
> index 91484a9..1cde583 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h
> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ struct pcie_port {
>         struct irq_domain       *irq_domain;
>         unsigned long           msi_data;
>         DECLARE_BITMAP(msi_irq_in_use, MAX_MSI_IRQS);
> +       struct list_head        resources;
>  };
> 
> and just used pci_scan_root_bus(). (before call this, it's added the offset of resources..)
> So i got the below message.
> 
> [    2.396822] exynos-pcie 156b0000.pcie: Link up!
> [    2.397011] exynos-pcie 156b0000.pcie: PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00
> [    2.397021] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [io  0x1000-0xffff]
> [    2.397026] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x0c011000-0x0ffffffe]
> [    2.397033] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [bus 00-ff]
> [    2.409000] pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 8: assigned [mem 0x0c200000-0x0c7fffff]
> [    2.409009] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 2: assigned [mem 0x0c400000-0x0c7fffff 64bit]
> [    2.409509] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0x0c200000-0x0c207fff 64bit]
> [    2.410008] pci 0000:00:00.0: PCI bridge to [bus 01]
> [    2.410027] pci 0000:00:00.0:   bridge window [mem 0x0c200000-0x0c7fffff]
> 
> Well, i needs to work more and get the knowledge for pcie. (It's not working completely.)
> If somebody is working this, it's great..otherwise I will send the RFC patch to get comment for my code.
> 

I'm doing based on Lorenzo's patches to port the designware driver to new DT parsing API

http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-January/314008.html

Then modify the driver as drivers/pci/host/pci-versatile.c does to remove pci_sys_data

I'm not sure my direction is correct or not, that's why I sent out this email a few days ago.

And I still dunno are there other changes necessary to remove pci_sys_data from
the desginware driver.

Thanks for all your hints,
Jisheng

[Query] Direction of adding arm64 support to PCIe designware driver

[Jisheng Zhang]

Hi Lorenzo, Jaehoon

On Wed, 8 Apr 2015 18:36:09 -0700
Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com> wrote:

> Hi.
> 
> On 04/08/2015 07:32 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > Hi Jisheng,
> > 
> > On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 10:46:21AM +0100, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Currently, the pci designware driver still lacks of arm64 support and I noticed
> >> that many works are done to achieve this goal.
> >>
> >> Some patches are merged and some are under discussion. And Per my understanding, 
> >> even w/ these patches merged, the driver still doesn't support arm64. Could you
> >> please kindly point out the direction to add arm64 support to the PCIe
> >> designware driver?
> > 
> > We should remove pci_sys_data dependency since ARM depends on that.
> > I removed it from a couple of places already (eg pci_mmap_page_range).
> > 
> > Now, pcibios_align_resource and pcibios_msi_controller need patching.
> > 
> > I have a patch for pcibios_align_resource() (I am waiting for Yijing
> > Wang series to get merged so that we can move the align_resource
> > function pointer in the host bridge):
> > 
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/3/171
> > 
> > For MSI, code converted to use CONFIG_PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN should
> > not need pcibios_msi_controller ARM function, but if we still compile
> > that function in we do need pci_sys_data on ARM, so we have to have
> > it even if it can be dead code in some platforms, I have to vet all
> > ARM PCI host controllers to check, but removing it would break MSI
> > support.
> > 
> > Does it help ? MSIs are the most important change required,
> > align_resource() pointer can be sorted out easily once Yijing's
> > code gets in.

I haven't go to that deeper, and didn't fully understand the pcibios_align_resource()
does.

> 
> I'm not sure whether my working is right..I used the pcie_port instead of pci_sys_data.
> 
> static inline struct *sys_to_pcie(struct pci_sys_data *sys)
> -> static inline struct *sys_to_pcie(struct pcie_port *pp)
> 
> And add "struct list_head resources" as member of pcie_port.
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h
> index 91484a9..1cde583 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h
> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ struct pcie_port {
>         struct irq_domain       *irq_domain;
>         unsigned long           msi_data;
>         DECLARE_BITMAP(msi_irq_in_use, MAX_MSI_IRQS);
> +       struct list_head        resources;
>  };
> 
> and just used pci_scan_root_bus(). (before call this, it's added the offset of resources..)
> So i got the below message.
> 
> [    2.396822] exynos-pcie 156b0000.pcie: Link up!
> [    2.397011] exynos-pcie 156b0000.pcie: PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00
> [    2.397021] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [io  0x1000-0xffff]
> [    2.397026] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x0c011000-0x0ffffffe]
> [    2.397033] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [bus 00-ff]
> [    2.409000] pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 8: assigned [mem 0x0c200000-0x0c7fffff]
> [    2.409009] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 2: assigned [mem 0x0c400000-0x0c7fffff 64bit]
> [    2.409509] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0x0c200000-0x0c207fff 64bit]
> [    2.410008] pci 0000:00:00.0: PCI bridge to [bus 01]
> [    2.410027] pci 0000:00:00.0:   bridge window [mem 0x0c200000-0x0c7fffff]
> 
> Well, i needs to work more and get the knowledge for pcie. (It's not working completely.)
> If somebody is working this, it's great..otherwise I will send the RFC patch to get comment for my code.
> 

I'm doing based on Lorenzo's patches to port the designware driver to new DT parsing API

http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-January/314008.html

Then modify the driver as drivers/pci/host/pci-versatile.c does to remove pci_sys_data

I'm not sure my direction is correct or not, that's why I sent out this email a few days ago.

And I still dunno are there other changes necessary to remove pci_sys_data from
the desginware driver.

Thanks for all your hints,
Jisheng

RE: [Query] Direction of adding arm64 support to PCIe designware driver

[Minghuan.Lian]

Hi All,

I have submitted the related patches to add support pci designware for arm64 and arm32.
The code has been tested on our boards ls1021 arm32  and ls2085 arm64.

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/454241/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/454246/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/454247/

For MSI, 
I would like to add the code like the following:
static void dw_pcie_msi_init(struct dw_pcie_port *pp)
{
	struct device_node *msi_node;

	msi_node = of_parse_phandle(pp->dev->of_node, "msi-parent", 0);
	if (msi_node)
		pp->msi_chip = of_pci_find_msi_chip_by_node(msi_node);
}

MSI driver should be implemented in a separate file added to  drivers/irqchip


> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-arm-kernel [mailto:linux-arm-kernel-
> bounces@lists.infradead.org] On Behalf Of Jaehoon Chung
> Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 9:36 AM
> To: Lorenzo Pieralisi; Jisheng Zhang
> Cc: robh@kernel.org; arnd@arndb.de; linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; Liviu
> Dudau; CPGS; bhelgaas@google.com; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [Query] Direction of adding arm64 support to PCIe designware
> driver
> 
> Hi.
> 
> On 04/08/2015 07:32 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > Hi Jisheng,
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 10:46:21AM +0100, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Currently, the pci designware driver still lacks of arm64 support and
> >> I noticed that many works are done to achieve this goal.
> >>
> >> Some patches are merged and some are under discussion. And Per my
> >> understanding, even w/ these patches merged, the driver still doesn't
> >> support arm64. Could you please kindly point out the direction to add
> >> arm64 support to the PCIe designware driver?
> >
> > We should remove pci_sys_data dependency since ARM depends on that.
> > I removed it from a couple of places already (eg pci_mmap_page_range).
> >
> > Now, pcibios_align_resource and pcibios_msi_controller need patching.
> >
> > I have a patch for pcibios_align_resource() (I am waiting for Yijing
> > Wang series to get merged so that we can move the align_resource
> > function pointer in the host bridge):
> >
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/3/171
> >
> > For MSI, code converted to use CONFIG_PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN should
> not
> > need pcibios_msi_controller ARM function, but if we still compile that
> > function in we do need pci_sys_data on ARM, so we have to have it even
> > if it can be dead code in some platforms, I have to vet all ARM PCI
> > host controllers to check, but removing it would break MSI support.
> >
> > Does it help ? MSIs are the most important change required,
> > align_resource() pointer can be sorted out easily once Yijing's code
> > gets in.
> 
> I'm not sure whether my working is right..I used the pcie_port instead of
> pci_sys_data.
> 
> static inline struct *sys_to_pcie(struct pci_sys_data *sys)
> -> static inline struct *sys_to_pcie(struct pcie_port *pp)
> 
> And add "struct list_head resources" as member of pcie_port.
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-
> designware.h
> index 91484a9..1cde583 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h
> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ struct pcie_port {
>         struct irq_domain       *irq_domain;
>         unsigned long           msi_data;
>         DECLARE_BITMAP(msi_irq_in_use, MAX_MSI_IRQS);
> +       struct list_head        resources;
>  };
> 
> and just used pci_scan_root_bus(). (before call this, it's added the offset of
> resources..) So i got the below message.
> 
> [    2.396822] exynos-pcie 156b0000.pcie: Link up!
> [    2.397011] exynos-pcie 156b0000.pcie: PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00
> [    2.397021] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [io  0x1000-0xffff]
> [    2.397026] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x0c011000-0x0ffffffe]
> [    2.397033] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [bus 00-ff]
> [    2.409000] pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 8: assigned [mem 0x0c200000-0x0c7fffff]
> [    2.409009] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 2: assigned [mem 0x0c400000-0x0c7fffff
> 64bit]
> [    2.409509] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0x0c200000-0x0c207fff
> 64bit]
> [    2.410008] pci 0000:00:00.0: PCI bridge to [bus 01]
> [    2.410027] pci 0000:00:00.0:   bridge window [mem 0x0c200000-0x0c7fffff]
> 
> Well, i needs to work more and get the knowledge for pcie. (It's not working
> completely.) If somebody is working this, it's great..otherwise I will send the
> RFC patch to get comment for my code.
> 
> If i'm missing something, let me know, plz.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Jaehoon Chung
> 
> >
> > Lorenzo
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[Query] Direction of adding arm64 support to PCIe designware driver

[Minghuan.Lian at freescale.com]

Hi All,

I have submitted the related patches to add support pci designware for arm64 and arm32.
The code has been tested on our boards ls1021 arm32  and ls2085 arm64.

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/454241/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/454246/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/454247/

For MSI, 
I would like to add the code like the following:
static void dw_pcie_msi_init(struct dw_pcie_port *pp)
{
	struct device_node *msi_node;

	msi_node = of_parse_phandle(pp->dev->of_node, "msi-parent", 0);
	if (msi_node)
		pp->msi_chip = of_pci_find_msi_chip_by_node(msi_node);
}

MSI driver should be implemented in a separate file added to  drivers/irqchip


> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-arm-kernel [mailto:linux-arm-kernel-
> bounces at lists.infradead.org] On Behalf Of Jaehoon Chung
> Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 9:36 AM
> To: Lorenzo Pieralisi; Jisheng Zhang
> Cc: robh at kernel.org; arnd at arndb.de; linux-pci at vger.kernel.org; Liviu
> Dudau; CPGS; bhelgaas at google.com; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [Query] Direction of adding arm64 support to PCIe designware
> driver
> 
> Hi.
> 
> On 04/08/2015 07:32 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > Hi Jisheng,
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 10:46:21AM +0100, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Currently, the pci designware driver still lacks of arm64 support and
> >> I noticed that many works are done to achieve this goal.
> >>
> >> Some patches are merged and some are under discussion. And Per my
> >> understanding, even w/ these patches merged, the driver still doesn't
> >> support arm64. Could you please kindly point out the direction to add
> >> arm64 support to the PCIe designware driver?
> >
> > We should remove pci_sys_data dependency since ARM depends on that.
> > I removed it from a couple of places already (eg pci_mmap_page_range).
> >
> > Now, pcibios_align_resource and pcibios_msi_controller need patching.
> >
> > I have a patch for pcibios_align_resource() (I am waiting for Yijing
> > Wang series to get merged so that we can move the align_resource
> > function pointer in the host bridge):
> >
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/3/171
> >
> > For MSI, code converted to use CONFIG_PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN should
> not
> > need pcibios_msi_controller ARM function, but if we still compile that
> > function in we do need pci_sys_data on ARM, so we have to have it even
> > if it can be dead code in some platforms, I have to vet all ARM PCI
> > host controllers to check, but removing it would break MSI support.
> >
> > Does it help ? MSIs are the most important change required,
> > align_resource() pointer can be sorted out easily once Yijing's code
> > gets in.
> 
> I'm not sure whether my working is right..I used the pcie_port instead of
> pci_sys_data.
> 
> static inline struct *sys_to_pcie(struct pci_sys_data *sys)
> -> static inline struct *sys_to_pcie(struct pcie_port *pp)
> 
> And add "struct list_head resources" as member of pcie_port.
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-
> designware.h
> index 91484a9..1cde583 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h
> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ struct pcie_port {
>         struct irq_domain       *irq_domain;
>         unsigned long           msi_data;
>         DECLARE_BITMAP(msi_irq_in_use, MAX_MSI_IRQS);
> +       struct list_head        resources;
>  };
> 
> and just used pci_scan_root_bus(). (before call this, it's added the offset of
> resources..) So i got the below message.
> 
> [    2.396822] exynos-pcie 156b0000.pcie: Link up!
> [    2.397011] exynos-pcie 156b0000.pcie: PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00
> [    2.397021] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [io  0x1000-0xffff]
> [    2.397026] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x0c011000-0x0ffffffe]
> [    2.397033] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [bus 00-ff]
> [    2.409000] pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 8: assigned [mem 0x0c200000-0x0c7fffff]
> [    2.409009] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 2: assigned [mem 0x0c400000-0x0c7fffff
> 64bit]
> [    2.409509] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0x0c200000-0x0c207fff
> 64bit]
> [    2.410008] pci 0000:00:00.0: PCI bridge to [bus 01]
> [    2.410027] pci 0000:00:00.0:   bridge window [mem 0x0c200000-0x0c7fffff]
> 
> Well, i needs to work more and get the knowledge for pcie. (It's not working
> completely.) If somebody is working this, it's great..otherwise I will send the
> RFC patch to get comment for my code.
> 
> If i'm missing something, let me know, plz.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Jaehoon Chung
> 
> >
> > Lorenzo
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [Query] Direction of adding arm64 support to PCIe designware driver

[Jisheng Zhang]

Hi Minghua,

On Wed, 8 Apr 2015 19:47:28 -0700
"Minghuan.Lian@freescale.com" <Minghuan.Lian@freescale.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
> 
> I have submitted the related patches to add support pci designware for arm64 and arm32.
> The code has been tested on our boards ls1021 arm32  and ls2085 arm64.
> 
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/454241/
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/454246/
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/454247/

To be honest, my code is similar as yours, but I modified the dw_pcie_host_init() and
removed pci_sys_data totally in the driver.
so in the end, the dw_pcie_host_init() looks similar as your dw_pcie_port_init().
That's to say all arm32 and arm64 users shares the same init entry: dw_pcie_host_init()

Thanks,
Jisheng


> 
> For MSI, 
> I would like to add the code like the following:
> static void dw_pcie_msi_init(struct dw_pcie_port *pp)
> {
> 	struct device_node *msi_node;
> 
> 	msi_node = of_parse_phandle(pp->dev->of_node, "msi-parent", 0);
> 	if (msi_node)
> 		pp->msi_chip = of_pci_find_msi_chip_by_node(msi_node);
> }
> 
> MSI driver should be implemented in a separate file added to  drivers/irqchip
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: linux-arm-kernel [mailto:linux-arm-kernel-
> > bounces@lists.infradead.org] On Behalf Of Jaehoon Chung
> > Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 9:36 AM
> > To: Lorenzo Pieralisi; Jisheng Zhang
> > Cc: robh@kernel.org; arnd@arndb.de; linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; Liviu
> > Dudau; CPGS; bhelgaas@google.com; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> > Subject: Re: [Query] Direction of adding arm64 support to PCIe designware
> > driver
> > 
> > Hi.
> > 
> > On 04/08/2015 07:32 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > > Hi Jisheng,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 10:46:21AM +0100, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> Currently, the pci designware driver still lacks of arm64 support and
> > >> I noticed that many works are done to achieve this goal.
> > >>
> > >> Some patches are merged and some are under discussion. And Per my
> > >> understanding, even w/ these patches merged, the driver still doesn't
> > >> support arm64. Could you please kindly point out the direction to add
> > >> arm64 support to the PCIe designware driver?
> > >
> > > We should remove pci_sys_data dependency since ARM depends on that.
> > > I removed it from a couple of places already (eg pci_mmap_page_range).
> > >
> > > Now, pcibios_align_resource and pcibios_msi_controller need patching.
> > >
> > > I have a patch for pcibios_align_resource() (I am waiting for Yijing
> > > Wang series to get merged so that we can move the align_resource
> > > function pointer in the host bridge):
> > >
> > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/3/171
> > >
> > > For MSI, code converted to use CONFIG_PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN should
> > not
> > > need pcibios_msi_controller ARM function, but if we still compile that
> > > function in we do need pci_sys_data on ARM, so we have to have it even
> > > if it can be dead code in some platforms, I have to vet all ARM PCI
> > > host controllers to check, but removing it would break MSI support.
> > >
> > > Does it help ? MSIs are the most important change required,
> > > align_resource() pointer can be sorted out easily once Yijing's code
> > > gets in.
> > 
> > I'm not sure whether my working is right..I used the pcie_port instead of
> > pci_sys_data.
> > 
> > static inline struct *sys_to_pcie(struct pci_sys_data *sys)
> > -> static inline struct *sys_to_pcie(struct pcie_port *pp)
> > 
> > And add "struct list_head resources" as member of pcie_port.
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-
> > designware.h
> > index 91484a9..1cde583 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h
> > @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ struct pcie_port {
> >         struct irq_domain       *irq_domain;
> >         unsigned long           msi_data;
> >         DECLARE_BITMAP(msi_irq_in_use, MAX_MSI_IRQS);
> > +       struct list_head        resources;
> >  };
> > 
> > and just used pci_scan_root_bus(). (before call this, it's added the offset of
> > resources..) So i got the below message.
> > 
> > [    2.396822] exynos-pcie 156b0000.pcie: Link up!
> > [    2.397011] exynos-pcie 156b0000.pcie: PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00
> > [    2.397021] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [io  0x1000-0xffff]
> > [    2.397026] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x0c011000-0x0ffffffe]
> > [    2.397033] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [bus 00-ff]
> > [    2.409000] pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 8: assigned [mem 0x0c200000-0x0c7fffff]
> > [    2.409009] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 2: assigned [mem 0x0c400000-0x0c7fffff
> > 64bit]
> > [    2.409509] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0x0c200000-0x0c207fff
> > 64bit]
> > [    2.410008] pci 0000:00:00.0: PCI bridge to [bus 01]
> > [    2.410027] pci 0000:00:00.0:   bridge window [mem 0x0c200000-0x0c7fffff]
> > 
> > Well, i needs to work more and get the knowledge for pcie. (It's not working
> > completely.) If somebody is working this, it's great..otherwise I will send the
> > RFC patch to get comment for my code.
> > 
> > If i'm missing something, let me know, plz.
> > 
> > Best Regards,
> > Jaehoon Chung
> > 
> > >
> > > Lorenzo
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[Query] Direction of adding arm64 support to PCIe designware driver

[Jisheng Zhang]

Hi Minghua,

On Wed, 8 Apr 2015 19:47:28 -0700
"Minghuan.Lian at freescale.com" <Minghuan.Lian@freescale.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
> 
> I have submitted the related patches to add support pci designware for arm64 and arm32.
> The code has been tested on our boards ls1021 arm32  and ls2085 arm64.
> 
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/454241/
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/454246/
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/454247/

To be honest, my code is similar as yours, but I modified the dw_pcie_host_init() and
removed pci_sys_data totally in the driver.
so in the end, the dw_pcie_host_init() looks similar as your dw_pcie_port_init().
That's to say all arm32 and arm64 users shares the same init entry: dw_pcie_host_init()

Thanks,
Jisheng


> 
> For MSI, 
> I would like to add the code like the following:
> static void dw_pcie_msi_init(struct dw_pcie_port *pp)
> {
> 	struct device_node *msi_node;
> 
> 	msi_node = of_parse_phandle(pp->dev->of_node, "msi-parent", 0);
> 	if (msi_node)
> 		pp->msi_chip = of_pci_find_msi_chip_by_node(msi_node);
> }
> 
> MSI driver should be implemented in a separate file added to  drivers/irqchip
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: linux-arm-kernel [mailto:linux-arm-kernel-
> > bounces at lists.infradead.org] On Behalf Of Jaehoon Chung
> > Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 9:36 AM
> > To: Lorenzo Pieralisi; Jisheng Zhang
> > Cc: robh at kernel.org; arnd at arndb.de; linux-pci at vger.kernel.org; Liviu
> > Dudau; CPGS; bhelgaas at google.com; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> > Subject: Re: [Query] Direction of adding arm64 support to PCIe designware
> > driver
> > 
> > Hi.
> > 
> > On 04/08/2015 07:32 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > > Hi Jisheng,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 10:46:21AM +0100, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> Currently, the pci designware driver still lacks of arm64 support and
> > >> I noticed that many works are done to achieve this goal.
> > >>
> > >> Some patches are merged and some are under discussion. And Per my
> > >> understanding, even w/ these patches merged, the driver still doesn't
> > >> support arm64. Could you please kindly point out the direction to add
> > >> arm64 support to the PCIe designware driver?
> > >
> > > We should remove pci_sys_data dependency since ARM depends on that.
> > > I removed it from a couple of places already (eg pci_mmap_page_range).
> > >
> > > Now, pcibios_align_resource and pcibios_msi_controller need patching.
> > >
> > > I have a patch for pcibios_align_resource() (I am waiting for Yijing
> > > Wang series to get merged so that we can move the align_resource
> > > function pointer in the host bridge):
> > >
> > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/3/171
> > >
> > > For MSI, code converted to use CONFIG_PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN should
> > not
> > > need pcibios_msi_controller ARM function, but if we still compile that
> > > function in we do need pci_sys_data on ARM, so we have to have it even
> > > if it can be dead code in some platforms, I have to vet all ARM PCI
> > > host controllers to check, but removing it would break MSI support.
> > >
> > > Does it help ? MSIs are the most important change required,
> > > align_resource() pointer can be sorted out easily once Yijing's code
> > > gets in.
> > 
> > I'm not sure whether my working is right..I used the pcie_port instead of
> > pci_sys_data.
> > 
> > static inline struct *sys_to_pcie(struct pci_sys_data *sys)
> > -> static inline struct *sys_to_pcie(struct pcie_port *pp)
> > 
> > And add "struct list_head resources" as member of pcie_port.
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-
> > designware.h
> > index 91484a9..1cde583 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h
> > @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ struct pcie_port {
> >         struct irq_domain       *irq_domain;
> >         unsigned long           msi_data;
> >         DECLARE_BITMAP(msi_irq_in_use, MAX_MSI_IRQS);
> > +       struct list_head        resources;
> >  };
> > 
> > and just used pci_scan_root_bus(). (before call this, it's added the offset of
> > resources..) So i got the below message.
> > 
> > [    2.396822] exynos-pcie 156b0000.pcie: Link up!
> > [    2.397011] exynos-pcie 156b0000.pcie: PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00
> > [    2.397021] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [io  0x1000-0xffff]
> > [    2.397026] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x0c011000-0x0ffffffe]
> > [    2.397033] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [bus 00-ff]
> > [    2.409000] pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 8: assigned [mem 0x0c200000-0x0c7fffff]
> > [    2.409009] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 2: assigned [mem 0x0c400000-0x0c7fffff
> > 64bit]
> > [    2.409509] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0x0c200000-0x0c207fff
> > 64bit]
> > [    2.410008] pci 0000:00:00.0: PCI bridge to [bus 01]
> > [    2.410027] pci 0000:00:00.0:   bridge window [mem 0x0c200000-0x0c7fffff]
> > 
> > Well, i needs to work more and get the knowledge for pcie. (It's not working
> > completely.) If somebody is working this, it's great..otherwise I will send the
> > RFC patch to get comment for my code.
> > 
> > If i'm missing something, let me know, plz.
> > 
> > Best Regards,
> > Jaehoon Chung
> > 
> > >
> > > Lorenzo
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > > linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [Query] Direction of adding arm64 support to PCIe designware driver

[Liviu Dudau]

On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 10:46:21AM +0100, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Currently, the pci designware driver still lacks of arm64 support and I noticed
> that many works are done to achieve this goal.
> 
> Some patches are merged and some are under discussion. And Per my understanding, 
> even w/ these patches merged, the driver still doesn't support arm64. Could you
> please kindly point out the direction to add arm64 support to the PCIe
> designware driver?
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> Jisheng
> 

Hi Jisheng,

Sorry for my delay in answering, I was on holiday.

AFAIK there is no ready made version of the designware driver that will work for
arm64. Depending on your actual IP implementation, if is is SBSA compliant then
it should work with the generic host bridge driver rather than using the current
designware driver. If that doesn't fit your requirements then you will have to
update the existing driver to use the generic pci framework that arm64 needs.

Best regards,
Liviu

-- 
====================
| I would like to |
| fix the world,  |
| but they're not |
| giving me the   |
 \ source code!  /
  ---------------
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[Query] Direction of adding arm64 support to PCIe designware driver

[Liviu Dudau]

On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 10:46:21AM +0100, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Currently, the pci designware driver still lacks of arm64 support and I noticed
> that many works are done to achieve this goal.
> 
> Some patches are merged and some are under discussion. And Per my understanding, 
> even w/ these patches merged, the driver still doesn't support arm64. Could you
> please kindly point out the direction to add arm64 support to the PCIe
> designware driver?
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> Jisheng
> 

Hi Jisheng,

Sorry for my delay in answering, I was on holiday.

AFAIK there is no ready made version of the designware driver that will work for
arm64. Depending on your actual IP implementation, if is is SBSA compliant then
it should work with the generic host bridge driver rather than using the current
designware driver. If that doesn't fit your requirements then you will have to
update the existing driver to use the generic pci framework that arm64 needs.

Best regards,
Liviu

-- 
====================
| I would like to |
| fix the world,  |
| but they're not |
| giving me the   |
 \ source code!  /
  ---------------
    ?\_(?)_/?