* [Buildroot] [PATCH] boot/uboot: add hash for 2012.07
@ 2015-04-26 19:56 Vincent Stehle
2015-04-26 20:27 ` Thomas Petazzoni
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Vincent Stehle @ 2015-04-26 19:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
From: Vincent Stehl? <vincent.stehle@laposte.net>
To repair the build of pandaboard_defconfig.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Stehl? <vincent.stehle@laposte.net>
---
boot/uboot/uboot.hash | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/boot/uboot/uboot.hash b/boot/uboot/uboot.hash
index 9cc96f6..9def045 100644
--- a/boot/uboot/uboot.hash
+++ b/boot/uboot/uboot.hash
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
# Locally computed:
+sha256 e08e20a6979bfca6eebb9a2b0e42aa4416af3d796332fd63a3470495a089d496 u-boot-2012.07.tar.bz2
sha256 0a1a70df586655f527befa6f12e184e96ed61b126e5a567382321b17200f5d60 u-boot-2015.04.tar.bz2
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH] boot/uboot: add hash for 2012.07
2015-04-26 19:56 [Buildroot] [PATCH] boot/uboot: add hash for 2012.07 Vincent Stehle
@ 2015-04-26 20:27 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-04-26 21:33 ` Yann E. MORIN
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2015-04-26 20:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Vincent, Yann,
On Sun, 26 Apr 2015 21:56:12 +0200, Vincent Stehle wrote:
> From: Vincent Stehl? <vincent.stehle@laposte.net>
>
> To repair the build of pandaboard_defconfig.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Stehl? <vincent.stehle@laposte.net>
> ---
> boot/uboot/uboot.hash | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/boot/uboot/uboot.hash b/boot/uboot/uboot.hash
> index 9cc96f6..9def045 100644
> --- a/boot/uboot/uboot.hash
> +++ b/boot/uboot/uboot.hash
> @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
> # Locally computed:
> +sha256 e08e20a6979bfca6eebb9a2b0e42aa4416af3d796332fd63a3470495a089d496 u-boot-2012.07.tar.bz2
> sha256 0a1a70df586655f527befa6f12e184e96ed61b126e5a567382321b17200f5d60 u-boot-2015.04.tar.bz2
The problem indeed exists, but this is not the right solution. The
right solution is to use BR_NO_CHECK_HASH_FOR. Yann, can you look at
all the packages that may use custom versions (U-Boot, Barebox,
kernel, etc.) and do the necessary BR_NO_CHECK_HASH_FOR handling?
Thanks a lot!
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH] boot/uboot: add hash for 2012.07
2015-04-26 20:27 ` Thomas Petazzoni
@ 2015-04-26 21:33 ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-04-28 8:03 ` Thomas Petazzoni
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Yann E. MORIN @ 2015-04-26 21:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Thomas, Vincent, All,
On 2015-04-26 22:27 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni spake thusly:
> On Sun, 26 Apr 2015 21:56:12 +0200, Vincent Stehle wrote:
> > From: Vincent Stehl? <vincent.stehle@laposte.net>
> >
> > To repair the build of pandaboard_defconfig.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vincent Stehl? <vincent.stehle@laposte.net>
> > ---
> > boot/uboot/uboot.hash | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/boot/uboot/uboot.hash b/boot/uboot/uboot.hash
> > index 9cc96f6..9def045 100644
> > --- a/boot/uboot/uboot.hash
> > +++ b/boot/uboot/uboot.hash
> > @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
> > # Locally computed:
> > +sha256 e08e20a6979bfca6eebb9a2b0e42aa4416af3d796332fd63a3470495a089d496 u-boot-2012.07.tar.bz2
> > sha256 0a1a70df586655f527befa6f12e184e96ed61b126e5a567382321b17200f5d60 u-boot-2015.04.tar.bz2
>
> The problem indeed exists, but this is not the right solution. The
> right solution is to use BR_NO_CHECK_HASH_FOR. Yann, can you look at
> all the packages that may use custom versions (U-Boot, Barebox,
> kernel, etc.) and do the necessary BR_NO_CHECK_HASH_FOR handling?
I'll have a look.
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
--
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
| Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ |
| +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH] boot/uboot: add hash for 2012.07
2015-04-26 21:33 ` Yann E. MORIN
@ 2015-04-28 8:03 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-04-28 9:52 ` Yann E. MORIN
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2015-04-28 8:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Dear Yann E. MORIN,
On Sun, 26 Apr 2015 23:33:41 +0200, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> > The problem indeed exists, but this is not the right solution. The
> > right solution is to use BR_NO_CHECK_HASH_FOR. Yann, can you look at
> > all the packages that may use custom versions (U-Boot, Barebox,
> > kernel, etc.) and do the necessary BR_NO_CHECK_HASH_FOR handling?
>
> I'll have a look.
Any updates on this? One quick option I see is to remove uboot.hash for
now.
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH] boot/uboot: add hash for 2012.07
2015-04-28 8:03 ` Thomas Petazzoni
@ 2015-04-28 9:52 ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-04-28 14:58 ` Thomas Petazzoni
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Yann E. MORIN @ 2015-04-28 9:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
On April 28, 2015 10:03:57 AM GMT+02:00, Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> wrote:
>Dear Yann E. MORIN,
>
>On Sun, 26 Apr 2015 23:33:41 +0200, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
>
>> > The problem indeed exists, but this is not the right solution. The
>> > right solution is to use BR_NO_CHECK_HASH_FOR. Yann, can you look
>at
>> > all the packages that may use custom versions (U-Boot, Barebox,
>> > kernel, etc.) and do the necessary BR_NO_CHECK_HASH_FOR handling?
>>
>> I'll have a look.
>
>Any updates on this? One quick option I see is to remove uboot.hash for
>now.
>
>Thomas
>--
>Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
>Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
>http://free-electrons.com
Thomas, all,
Just a quick answer: yes, I have changes for a bunch of packages
that I'll submit this evening when back home.
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20150428/99785a2c/attachment.html>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH] boot/uboot: add hash for 2012.07
2015-04-28 9:52 ` Yann E. MORIN
@ 2015-04-28 14:58 ` Thomas Petazzoni
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2015-04-28 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Hello,
> >Any updates on this? One quick option I see is to remove uboot.hash for
> >now.
> Just a quick answer: yes, I have changes for a bunch of packages
> that I'll submit this evening when back home.
Great, thanks!
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-04-28 14:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-04-26 19:56 [Buildroot] [PATCH] boot/uboot: add hash for 2012.07 Vincent Stehle
2015-04-26 20:27 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-04-26 21:33 ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-04-28 8:03 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-04-28 9:52 ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-04-28 14:58 ` Thomas Petazzoni
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.