All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] [PATCH] sched: Add smp_rmb() in task rq locking cycles
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 19:43:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150428174323.GL5029@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <553FBC4F.3070104@ezchip.com>

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 12:58:55PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> On 04/28/2015 12:40 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:53:21AM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> >
> >>The reason we use two 32-bit fields on tilepro is that the only available
> >>atomic instruction is tns (test and set), which sets a 32-bit "1" value
> >>into the target memory and returns the old 32-bit value.
> >And you want a ticket lock as opposed to the test-and-set lock because
> >with 64 tiles starvation under contention is a real worry?
> 
> We see substantial unfairness under load with a plain spinlock,
> basically because nearer cores on the mesh network can exponentially
> crowd out further cores.  The ticket lock avoids that, though we
> have to be careful to do backoff when checking the lock to avoid
> DDoS in the mesh network.

Does your arch have 16bit atomic load/stores ? If so, would something
like the below not make sense?

typedef struct {
	union {
		struct {
			unsigned short head;
			unsigned short tail;
		};
		unsigned int tickets;
	};
	unsigned int lock;
} arch_spinlock_t;

static inline void ___tns_lock(unsigned int *lock)
{
	while (tns(lock))
		cpu_relax();
}

static inline void ___tns_unlock(unsigned int *lock)
{
	WRITE_ONCE(*lock, 0);
}

static inline void arch_spin_lock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
{
	unsigned short head, tail;

	___tns_lock(&lock->lock); /* XXX does the TNS imply a ___sync?  */
	head = lock->head;
	lock->head++;
	___tns_unlock(&lock->lock);

	while (READ_ONCE(lock->tail) != head)
		cpu_relax();
}

static inline void arch_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
{
	/*
	 * can do with regular load/store because the lock owner
	 * is the only one going to do stores to the tail
	 */
	unsigned short tail = READ_ONCE(lock->tail);
	smp_mb(); /* MB is stronger than RELEASE */
	WRITE_ONCE(lock->tail, tail + 1);
}

static inline void arch_spin_unlock_wait(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
{
	union {
		struct {
			unsigned short head;
			unsigned short tail;
		};
		unsigned int tickets;
	} x;

	for (;;) {
		x.tickets = READ_ONCE(lock->tickets);
		if (x.head == x.tail)
			break;
		cpu_relax();
	}
}

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-28 17:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20150217104516.12144.85911.stgit@tkhai>
2015-02-17 10:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] [PATCH] sched: Add smp_rmb() in task rq locking cycles Kirill Tkhai
2015-02-17 12:12   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-17 12:36     ` Kirill Tkhai
2015-02-17 12:45       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-17 13:05     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-17 16:05       ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-17 18:01         ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-17 18:23           ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-17 21:45             ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-18 13:41               ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-17 18:36         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-17 21:52           ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-18 13:47             ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-18 18:43               ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-18 15:53             ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-18 16:11               ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-18 16:32                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-18 19:23                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-18 15:59             ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-18 19:14               ` Manfred Spraul
2015-02-18 22:43                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-19 14:19                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-20 18:28                     ` Manfred Spraul
2015-02-20 18:45                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-20 20:23                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-21 12:54                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-25 19:56                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-04-26 10:52                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-04-28 14:33                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-28 15:53                               ` Chris Metcalf
2015-04-28 16:24                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-28 16:44                                   ` [PATCH] spinlock: clarify doc for raw_spin_unlock_wait() Chris Metcalf
2015-04-29 17:34                                     ` Manfred Spraul
2015-04-28 17:33                                   ` [PATCH 1/2] tile: modify arch_spin_unlock_wait() semantics Chris Metcalf
2015-04-28 17:33                                     ` [PATCH 2/2] tile: use READ_ONCE() in arch_spin_is_locked() Chris Metcalf
2015-04-28 16:40                                 ` [PATCH 2/2] [PATCH] sched: Add smp_rmb() in task rq locking cycles Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-28 16:58                                   ` Chris Metcalf
2015-04-28 17:43                                     ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2015-04-28 18:00                                       ` Chris Metcalf
2015-04-28 18:24                                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-28 18:38                                           ` Chris Metcalf
2015-04-28 14:32                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-28 20:33                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-21  3:26                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-23 18:29                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-18 17:05     ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Clarify ordering between task_rq_lock() and move_queued_task() tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150428174323.GL5029@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=cmetcalf@ezchip.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=ktkhai@parallels.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.