All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2] arm: improve non-section-aligned low memory mapping
@ 2015-04-26  8:47 ` Min-Hua Chen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Min-Hua Chen @ 2015-04-26  8:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Russell King, Kees Cook, Nicolas Pitre, Jungseung Lee, Catalin Marinas
  Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, Min-Hua Chen

Fix space errors.

In current design, the memblock.current_limit is set to
a section-aligned value in sanity_check_meminfo().

However, the section-aligned memblock may become non-section-aligned
after arm_memblock_init(). For example, the first section-aligned
memblock is 0x00000000-0x01000000 and sanity_check_meminfo sets
current_limit to 0x01000000. After arm_memblock_init, two memory blocks
[0x00c00000 - 0x00d00000] and [0x00ff0000 - 0x01000000] are reserved
by memblock_reserve() and make the original memory block
[0x00000000-0x01000000] becomes:

[0x00000000-0x00c00000]
[0x00d00000-0x00ff0000]

When creating the low memory mapping for [0x00d00000-0x00ff0000],
since the memory block is non-section-aligned, it will need to create
a second level page table. But the current_limit is set to 0x01000000,
and it's possible to allocate a unmapped memory block.

call flow:

setup_arch
 + sanity_check_meminfo
 + arm_memblock_init
 + paging_init
    + map_lowmem
    + bootmem_init

Move the memblock_set_current_limit logic to map_lowmem(), we point
the memblock current_limit to the first section-aligned memblock block.
Since map_lowmem() is called after arm_memblock_init(), there is no way to
change memblock layout. So we can say that the first section-aligned limit
is valid during map_lowmem(). Hence fix the problem described above.

Another change is change the implementation of find_limits().
In commit: 1c2f87c22566cd057bc8cde10c37ae9da1a1bb76, the max_low is
set by memblock_get_current_limit(). However memblock.current_limit
can be changed by memblock_set_current_limit() anypoint before
find_limits().

It's better to use arm_lowmem_limit to be max_lowmem in two ways:
First, arm_lowmem_limit cannot be changed by a public API. Second, the
high_memory is set by arm_lowmem_limit and is a natural limit of
low memory area in bootmem_init().

thanks,
Min-Hua

Signed-off-by: Min-Hua Chen <orca.chen@gmail.com>
---
 arch/arm/mm/init.c |    2 +-
 arch/arm/mm/mmu.c  |   44 ++++++++++----------------------------------
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/init.c b/arch/arm/mm/init.c
index 2495c8c..6a618f9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/init.c
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ void show_mem(unsigned int filter)
 static void __init find_limits(unsigned long *min, unsigned long *max_low,
 			       unsigned long *max_high)
 {
-	*max_low = PFN_DOWN(memblock_get_current_limit());
+	*max_low = PFN_DOWN(arm_lowmem_limit);
 	*min = PFN_UP(memblock_start_of_DRAM());
 	*max_high = PFN_DOWN(memblock_end_of_DRAM());
 }
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
index 4e6ef89..dbc484d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
@@ -1068,7 +1068,6 @@ phys_addr_t arm_lowmem_limit __initdata = 0;
 
 void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void)
 {
-	phys_addr_t memblock_limit = 0;
 	int highmem = 0;
 	phys_addr_t vmalloc_limit = __pa(vmalloc_min - 1) + 1;
 	struct memblock_region *reg;
@@ -1110,43 +1109,10 @@ void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void)
 				else
 					arm_lowmem_limit = block_end;
 			}
-
-			/*
-			 * Find the first non-section-aligned page, and point
-			 * memblock_limit at it. This relies on rounding the
-			 * limit down to be section-aligned, which happens at
-			 * the end of this function.
-			 *
-			 * With this algorithm, the start or end of almost any
-			 * bank can be non-section-aligned. The only exception
-			 * is that the start of the bank 0 must be section-
-			 * aligned, since otherwise memory would need to be
-			 * allocated when mapping the start of bank 0, which
-			 * occurs before any free memory is mapped.
-			 */
-			if (!memblock_limit) {
-				if (!IS_ALIGNED(block_start, SECTION_SIZE))
-					memblock_limit = block_start;
-				else if (!IS_ALIGNED(block_end, SECTION_SIZE))
-					memblock_limit = arm_lowmem_limit;
-			}
-
 		}
 	}
 
 	high_memory = __va(arm_lowmem_limit - 1) + 1;
-
-	/*
-	 * Round the memblock limit down to a section size.  This
-	 * helps to ensure that we will allocate memory from the
-	 * last full section, which should be mapped.
-	 */
-	if (memblock_limit)
-		memblock_limit = round_down(memblock_limit, SECTION_SIZE);
-	if (!memblock_limit)
-		memblock_limit = arm_lowmem_limit;
-
-	memblock_set_current_limit(memblock_limit);
 }
 
 static inline void prepare_page_table(void)
@@ -1331,6 +1297,7 @@ static void __init map_lowmem(void)
 	struct memblock_region *reg;
 	phys_addr_t kernel_x_start = round_down(__pa(_stext), SECTION_SIZE);
 	phys_addr_t kernel_x_end = round_up(__pa(__init_end), SECTION_SIZE);
+	phys_addr_t section_block_limit = 0;
 
 	/* Map all the lowmem memory banks. */
 	for_each_memblock(memory, reg) {
@@ -1384,6 +1351,15 @@ static void __init map_lowmem(void)
 				create_mapping(&map);
 			}
 		}
+
+		/*
+		 * Find the first section-aligned memblock and set
+		 * memblock_limit at it.
+		 */
+		if (!section_memblock_limit && !(end & ~SECTION_MASK)) {
+			section_memblock_limit = end;
+			memblock_set_current_limit(section_memblock_limit);
+		}
 	}
 }
 
-- 
1.7.10.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2] arm: improve non-section-aligned low memory mapping
@ 2015-04-26  8:47 ` Min-Hua Chen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Min-Hua Chen @ 2015-04-26  8:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

Fix space errors.

In current design, the memblock.current_limit is set to
a section-aligned value in sanity_check_meminfo().

However, the section-aligned memblock may become non-section-aligned
after arm_memblock_init(). For example, the first section-aligned
memblock is 0x00000000-0x01000000 and sanity_check_meminfo sets
current_limit to 0x01000000. After arm_memblock_init, two memory blocks
[0x00c00000 - 0x00d00000] and [0x00ff0000 - 0x01000000] are reserved
by memblock_reserve() and make the original memory block
[0x00000000-0x01000000] becomes:

[0x00000000-0x00c00000]
[0x00d00000-0x00ff0000]

When creating the low memory mapping for [0x00d00000-0x00ff0000],
since the memory block is non-section-aligned, it will need to create
a second level page table. But the current_limit is set to 0x01000000,
and it's possible to allocate a unmapped memory block.

call flow:

setup_arch
 + sanity_check_meminfo
 + arm_memblock_init
 + paging_init
    + map_lowmem
    + bootmem_init

Move the memblock_set_current_limit logic to map_lowmem(), we point
the memblock current_limit to the first section-aligned memblock block.
Since map_lowmem() is called after arm_memblock_init(), there is no way to
change memblock layout. So we can say that the first section-aligned limit
is valid during map_lowmem(). Hence fix the problem described above.

Another change is change the implementation of find_limits().
In commit: 1c2f87c22566cd057bc8cde10c37ae9da1a1bb76, the max_low is
set by memblock_get_current_limit(). However memblock.current_limit
can be changed by memblock_set_current_limit() anypoint before
find_limits().

It's better to use arm_lowmem_limit to be max_lowmem in two ways:
First, arm_lowmem_limit cannot be changed by a public API. Second, the
high_memory is set by arm_lowmem_limit and is a natural limit of
low memory area in bootmem_init().

thanks,
Min-Hua

Signed-off-by: Min-Hua Chen <orca.chen@gmail.com>
---
 arch/arm/mm/init.c |    2 +-
 arch/arm/mm/mmu.c  |   44 ++++++++++----------------------------------
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/init.c b/arch/arm/mm/init.c
index 2495c8c..6a618f9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/init.c
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ void show_mem(unsigned int filter)
 static void __init find_limits(unsigned long *min, unsigned long *max_low,
 			       unsigned long *max_high)
 {
-	*max_low = PFN_DOWN(memblock_get_current_limit());
+	*max_low = PFN_DOWN(arm_lowmem_limit);
 	*min = PFN_UP(memblock_start_of_DRAM());
 	*max_high = PFN_DOWN(memblock_end_of_DRAM());
 }
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
index 4e6ef89..dbc484d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
@@ -1068,7 +1068,6 @@ phys_addr_t arm_lowmem_limit __initdata = 0;
 
 void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void)
 {
-	phys_addr_t memblock_limit = 0;
 	int highmem = 0;
 	phys_addr_t vmalloc_limit = __pa(vmalloc_min - 1) + 1;
 	struct memblock_region *reg;
@@ -1110,43 +1109,10 @@ void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void)
 				else
 					arm_lowmem_limit = block_end;
 			}
-
-			/*
-			 * Find the first non-section-aligned page, and point
-			 * memblock_limit at it. This relies on rounding the
-			 * limit down to be section-aligned, which happens at
-			 * the end of this function.
-			 *
-			 * With this algorithm, the start or end of almost any
-			 * bank can be non-section-aligned. The only exception
-			 * is that the start of the bank 0 must be section-
-			 * aligned, since otherwise memory would need to be
-			 * allocated when mapping the start of bank 0, which
-			 * occurs before any free memory is mapped.
-			 */
-			if (!memblock_limit) {
-				if (!IS_ALIGNED(block_start, SECTION_SIZE))
-					memblock_limit = block_start;
-				else if (!IS_ALIGNED(block_end, SECTION_SIZE))
-					memblock_limit = arm_lowmem_limit;
-			}
-
 		}
 	}
 
 	high_memory = __va(arm_lowmem_limit - 1) + 1;
-
-	/*
-	 * Round the memblock limit down to a section size.  This
-	 * helps to ensure that we will allocate memory from the
-	 * last full section, which should be mapped.
-	 */
-	if (memblock_limit)
-		memblock_limit = round_down(memblock_limit, SECTION_SIZE);
-	if (!memblock_limit)
-		memblock_limit = arm_lowmem_limit;
-
-	memblock_set_current_limit(memblock_limit);
 }
 
 static inline void prepare_page_table(void)
@@ -1331,6 +1297,7 @@ static void __init map_lowmem(void)
 	struct memblock_region *reg;
 	phys_addr_t kernel_x_start = round_down(__pa(_stext), SECTION_SIZE);
 	phys_addr_t kernel_x_end = round_up(__pa(__init_end), SECTION_SIZE);
+	phys_addr_t section_block_limit = 0;
 
 	/* Map all the lowmem memory banks. */
 	for_each_memblock(memory, reg) {
@@ -1384,6 +1351,15 @@ static void __init map_lowmem(void)
 				create_mapping(&map);
 			}
 		}
+
+		/*
+		 * Find the first section-aligned memblock and set
+		 * memblock_limit at it.
+		 */
+		if (!section_memblock_limit && !(end & ~SECTION_MASK)) {
+			section_memblock_limit = end;
+			memblock_set_current_limit(section_memblock_limit);
+		}
 	}
 }
 
-- 
1.7.10.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] arm: improve non-section-aligned low memory mapping
  2015-04-26  8:47 ` Min-Hua Chen
@ 2015-05-06 10:32   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Russell King - ARM Linux @ 2015-05-06 10:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Min-Hua Chen
  Cc: Kees Cook, Nicolas Pitre, Jungseung Lee, Catalin Marinas,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel

On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 04:47:08PM +0800, Min-Hua Chen wrote:
> @@ -1384,6 +1351,15 @@ static void __init map_lowmem(void)
>  				create_mapping(&map);
>  			}
>  		}
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Find the first section-aligned memblock and set
> +		 * memblock_limit at it.
> +		 */
> +		if (!section_memblock_limit && !(end & ~SECTION_MASK)) {
> +			section_memblock_limit = end;
> +			memblock_set_current_limit(section_memblock_limit);
> +		}

I've suggested an alternative solution to this (which just means changing
the alignment of the memblock limit to 2x SECTION_SIZE).

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2] arm: improve non-section-aligned low memory mapping
@ 2015-05-06 10:32   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Russell King - ARM Linux @ 2015-05-06 10:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 04:47:08PM +0800, Min-Hua Chen wrote:
> @@ -1384,6 +1351,15 @@ static void __init map_lowmem(void)
>  				create_mapping(&map);
>  			}
>  		}
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Find the first section-aligned memblock and set
> +		 * memblock_limit at it.
> +		 */
> +		if (!section_memblock_limit && !(end & ~SECTION_MASK)) {
> +			section_memblock_limit = end;
> +			memblock_set_current_limit(section_memblock_limit);
> +		}

I've suggested an alternative solution to this (which just means changing
the alignment of the memblock limit to 2x SECTION_SIZE).

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] arm: improve non-section-aligned low memory mapping
  2015-05-06 10:32   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
@ 2015-05-07 16:20     ` Min-Hua Chen
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Min-Hua Chen @ 2015-05-07 16:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Russell King - ARM Linux; +Cc: Catalin Marinas, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel

On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 11:32:49AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 04:47:08PM +0800, Min-Hua Chen wrote:
> > @@ -1384,6 +1351,15 @@ static void __init map_lowmem(void)
> >  				create_mapping(&map);
> >  			}
> >  		}
> > +
> > +		/*
> > +		 * Find the first section-aligned memblock and set
> > +		 * memblock_limit at it.
> > +		 */
> > +		if (!section_memblock_limit && !(end & ~SECTION_MASK)) {
> > +			section_memblock_limit = end;
> > +			memblock_set_current_limit(section_memblock_limit);
> > +		}
> 
> I've suggested an alternative solution to this (which just means changing
> the alignment of the memblock limit to 2x SECTION_SIZE).

Sorry I do not understand your suggestion very well. Do you mean the 
alignment check should be 2X SECTION_SIZE?

	if (!section_memblock_limit && !(end & (2 * SECTION_SIZE - 1))) {

I found that this solution is based on the fact that the first memory block is 
always SECTION_SIZE-aligned. So we do not have to check the
alignment of the first memblock:

	if (!section_memblock_limit)) {
		section_memblock_limit = end;
		memblock_set_current_limit(section_memblock_limit);
	}
 
> -- 
> FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
> according to speedtest.net.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2] arm: improve non-section-aligned low memory mapping
@ 2015-05-07 16:20     ` Min-Hua Chen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Min-Hua Chen @ 2015-05-07 16:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 11:32:49AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 04:47:08PM +0800, Min-Hua Chen wrote:
> > @@ -1384,6 +1351,15 @@ static void __init map_lowmem(void)
> >  				create_mapping(&map);
> >  			}
> >  		}
> > +
> > +		/*
> > +		 * Find the first section-aligned memblock and set
> > +		 * memblock_limit at it.
> > +		 */
> > +		if (!section_memblock_limit && !(end & ~SECTION_MASK)) {
> > +			section_memblock_limit = end;
> > +			memblock_set_current_limit(section_memblock_limit);
> > +		}
> 
> I've suggested an alternative solution to this (which just means changing
> the alignment of the memblock limit to 2x SECTION_SIZE).

Sorry I do not understand your suggestion very well. Do you mean the 
alignment check should be 2X SECTION_SIZE?

	if (!section_memblock_limit && !(end & (2 * SECTION_SIZE - 1))) {

I found that this solution is based on the fact that the first memory block is 
always SECTION_SIZE-aligned. So we do not have to check the
alignment of the first memblock:

	if (!section_memblock_limit)) {
		section_memblock_limit = end;
		memblock_set_current_limit(section_memblock_limit);
	}
 
> -- 
> FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
> according to speedtest.net.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-05-07 16:20 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-04-26  8:47 [PATCH v2] arm: improve non-section-aligned low memory mapping Min-Hua Chen
2015-04-26  8:47 ` Min-Hua Chen
2015-05-06 10:32 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-05-06 10:32   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-05-07 16:20   ` Min-Hua Chen
2015-05-07 16:20     ` Min-Hua Chen

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.