From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
Cc: ayyappa.ch.linux@gmail.com, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kevin.hilman@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 3/3] arch/arm64: Enable PREEMPT_RT_FULL
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 17:57:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150514155723.GD13442@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1430167990-12333-4-git-send-email-anders.roxell@linaro.org>
* Anders Roxell | 2015-04-27 22:53:10 [+0200]:
>arm64 is missing support for PREEMPT_RT. The main feature which is
>lacking is support for lazy preemption. The arch-specific entry code,
I'm taking this but I am renaming the subject. Lazy preempt is not
required by -RT but supporting it benefits it. That means you could run
arm64 without it.
Sebastian
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: bigeasy@linutronix.de (Sebastian Andrzej Siewior)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv2 3/3] arch/arm64: Enable PREEMPT_RT_FULL
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 17:57:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150514155723.GD13442@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1430167990-12333-4-git-send-email-anders.roxell@linaro.org>
* Anders Roxell | 2015-04-27 22:53:10 [+0200]:
>arm64 is missing support for PREEMPT_RT. The main feature which is
>lacking is support for lazy preemption. The arch-specific entry code,
I'm taking this but I am renaming the subject. Lazy preempt is not
required by -RT but supporting it benefits it. That means you could run
arm64 without it.
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-14 15:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-27 20:53 [PATCHv2 0/3] Enable PREEMPT_RT_FULL on arm64 Anders Roxell
2015-04-27 20:53 ` Anders Roxell
2015-04-27 20:53 ` [PATCHv2 1/3] arm64: Mark PMU interrupt IRQF_NO_THREAD Anders Roxell
2015-04-27 20:53 ` Anders Roxell
2015-05-14 15:39 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-05-14 15:39 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-05-14 15:42 ` Will Deacon
2015-05-14 15:42 ` Will Deacon
2015-05-14 17:09 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-05-14 17:09 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-05-14 17:10 ` Will Deacon
2015-05-14 17:10 ` Will Deacon
2015-05-14 17:19 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-05-14 17:19 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-05-14 17:24 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-14 17:24 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-04-27 20:53 ` [PATCHv2 2/3] arm64: Allow forced irq threading Anders Roxell
2015-04-27 20:53 ` Anders Roxell
2015-05-14 15:40 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-05-14 15:40 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-04-27 20:53 ` [PATCHv2 3/3] arch/arm64: Enable PREEMPT_RT_FULL Anders Roxell
2015-04-27 20:53 ` Anders Roxell
2015-05-14 15:57 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2015-05-14 15:57 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-05-15 12:08 ` Anders Roxell
2015-05-15 12:08 ` Anders Roxell
2015-05-18 7:18 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-05-18 7:18 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150514155723.GD13442@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=anders.roxell@linaro.org \
--cc=ayyappa.ch.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=kevin.hilman@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.