Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the modules tree

[Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1120 bytes --]

Hi Dan,

On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 08:57:06 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:18:44 -0400 Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:37 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > >
> > > After merging the modules tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> > 
> > that's weird.  Are you sure it failed during allmodconfig?  I can see
> > why it would fail like that if CONFIG_MODULES ins't defined, which
> > I'll send a patch for...
> 
> Pretty sure - and, in any case, I don't do any CONFIG_MODULES=n builds
> between tree merges (only later in the day).  That is why I couldn't
> figure out what went wrong.
> 
> I will apply your patch today and see if that helps.

I built without your patch and it failed again, but applying your patch fixes it.

Rusty, you can consider this

Tested-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>

for "[PATCH] modules: only use mod->param_lock if CONFIG_MODULES"
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]