All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
	"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PULL gpio-for-next] gpio: make flags mandatory for gpiod_get functions
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 09:51:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150720075129.GQ7013@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdYaY3vMjACCALwk9HNw-XV86Rm1anpCW3wb1Y0-FWwd=A@mail.gmail.com>

Hello Linus,

On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 09:41:09AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Uwe Kleine-König
> <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> > Hello Linus,
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 02:28:25PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > I'm all for taking this into -next ASAP then. Linus has control over
> >> > the tree though, so his action is required.
> >>
> >> I am pushing it today.
> >>
> >> I finally found this message in my messy inbox. I'm a bit up over my
> >> ears in patches...
> > This somehow failed.  My tag is merged in your devel branch, but this
> > contains several commits missing in your for-next. Is this intended?
> 
> No ... :(
> 
> I just pulled it in. If anything is to blame, I hope it's not me, I just
> issued git pull.
> 
> commit 2563606ce45314bfeae811edfa9984b1921fff06
> Merge: 015403145a65 b17d1bf16cc7
> Author: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> Date:   Fri Jul 17 13:44:15 2015 +0200
> 
>     Merge tag 'gpiod-flags-for-4.3' of
> git://git.pengutronix.de/git/ukl/linux into devel
> 
>     The last patch in this series makes the flags parameter for the various
>     gpiod_get* functions mandatory and so allows to remove an ugly cpp hack
>     introduced in commit 39b2bbe3d715 (gpio: add flags argument to gpiod_get*()
>     functions) for v3.17-rc1.
> 
>     The other nine commits fix the last remaining users of these functions that
>     don't pass flags yet. (Only etraxfs-uart wasn't fixed; this
> driver's use of the
>     gpiod functions needs fixing anyhow.)
this is fine. It contains my signed data (you have to do

	git cat-file commit 2563606ce45314bfeae811edfa9984b1921fff06

to see that) and the usual ö-Problem doesn't exist here, because it was
me who created the commits.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-20  7:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-15 21:36 [PATCH] gpio: make flags mandatory for gpiod_get functions Uwe Kleine-König
2015-06-21  6:51 ` Alexandre Courbot
2015-07-06  9:07 ` [PULL gpio-for-next] " Uwe Kleine-König
2015-07-06  9:07   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-07-06  9:09   ` [PATCH gpio-for-next 01/10] drm/msm/dp: use flags argument of devm_gpiod_get to set direction Uwe Kleine-König
2015-07-06  9:09   ` [PATCH gpio-for-next 02/10] drm/tilcdc: panel: make better use of gpiod API Uwe Kleine-König
2015-07-06  9:09   ` [PATCH gpio-for-next 05/10] media: i2c/adp1653: set enable gpio to output Uwe Kleine-König
2015-07-06  9:09   ` [PATCH gpio-for-next 06/10] NFC: nxp-nci_i2c: use flags argument of devm_gpiod_get_index Uwe Kleine-König
2015-07-06  9:09   ` [PATCH gpio-for-next 07/10] phy: tusb1210: make better use of gpiod API Uwe Kleine-König
2015-07-06  9:09   ` [PATCH gpio-for-next 08/10] usb: dwc3: pci: " Uwe Kleine-König
     [not found]   ` <20150706090759.GS11824-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-07-06  9:09     ` [PATCH gpio-for-next 03/10] iio: light: stk3310: use flags argument of devm_gpiod_get Uwe Kleine-König
2015-07-06  9:09       ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-07-06  9:35       ` Breana, Tiberiu A
2015-07-06  9:35         ` Breana, Tiberiu A
2015-07-06  9:09     ` [PATCH gpio-for-next 04/10] iio: magn: bmc150: " Uwe Kleine-König
2015-07-06  9:09       ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-07-06  9:09     ` [PATCH gpio-for-next 09/10] usb: pass flags parameter to gpiod_get functions Uwe Kleine-König
2015-07-06  9:09   ` [PATCH gpio-for-next 10/10] gpio: make flags mandatory for " Uwe Kleine-König
2015-07-08 10:51   ` [PULL gpio-for-next] " Uwe Kleine-König
2015-07-15  6:28     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-07-15  6:39       ` Alexandre Courbot
2015-07-17 12:28         ` Linus Walleij
2015-07-20  6:56           ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-07-20  7:41             ` Linus Walleij
2015-07-20  7:51               ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2015-07-20  8:28             ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150720075129.GQ7013@pengutronix.de \
    --to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.