From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Dustin Byford <dustin@cumulusnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] i2c: Revert back to old device naming for ACPI enumerated I2C slaves
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 18:22:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150825162214.GA8229@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150825161850.GA8118@katana>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 328 bytes --]
> > So I am not surprised that this only shows up now.
>
> I am, to be honest. It shows running lm-sensors with ACPI on a kernel
> newer than 18 months. Not a rare scenario, so I thought.
And thanks to Mark's recent post I understand now that this is only
relevant for ACPI5 enumerated devices. I lost that detail.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Dustin Byford <dustin@cumulusnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [RFC] i2c: Revert back to old device naming for ACPI enumerated I2C slaves
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 16:22:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150825162214.GA8229@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150825161850.GA8118@katana>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 328 bytes --]
> > So I am not surprised that this only shows up now.
>
> I am, to be honest. It shows running lm-sensors with ACPI on a kernel
> newer than 18 months. Not a rare scenario, so I thought.
And thanks to Mark's recent post I understand now that this is only
relevant for ACPI5 enumerated devices. I lost that detail.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 153 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-25 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-24 10:52 [RFC] i2c: Revert back to old device naming for ACPI enumerated I2C slaves Jarkko Nikula
2015-08-24 10:52 ` [lm-sensors] " Jarkko Nikula
[not found] ` <1440413522-7855-1-git-send-email-jarkko.nikula-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2015-08-24 13:26 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-08-24 13:26 ` [lm-sensors] " Wolfram Sang
2015-08-25 0:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-08-25 0:19 ` [lm-sensors] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-08-25 14:59 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-08-25 14:59 ` [lm-sensors] " Wolfram Sang
2015-08-25 5:03 ` Dustin Byford
2015-08-25 5:03 ` [lm-sensors] " Dustin Byford
[not found] ` <20150825050306.GB21569-qUQiAmfTcIp+XZJcv9eMoEEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
2015-08-25 14:50 ` Jarkko Nikula
2015-08-25 14:50 ` [lm-sensors] " Jarkko Nikula
2015-08-25 5:25 ` Mark Brown
2015-08-25 5:25 ` [lm-sensors] " Mark Brown
2015-08-25 14:57 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-08-25 14:57 ` [lm-sensors] " Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20150825145756.GA4066-oo5tB6JMkjKRinMKxDlMNPwbnWRJjS81@public.gmane.org>
2015-08-25 15:18 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-08-25 15:18 ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
[not found] ` <55DC8746.1060809-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-08-25 16:18 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-08-25 16:18 ` [lm-sensors] " Wolfram Sang
2015-08-25 16:22 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2015-08-25 16:22 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-08-25 17:12 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-08-25 17:12 ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2015-08-25 16:14 ` Mark Brown
2015-08-25 16:14 ` [lm-sensors] " Mark Brown
2015-10-01 20:37 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-10-02 9:27 ` Jarkko Nikula
2015-10-09 21:47 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-10-12 8:32 ` Jarkko Nikula
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150825162214.GA8229@katana \
--to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=dustin@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.