All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
To: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik@marvell.com>,
	Nadav Haklai <nadavh@marvell.com>,
	Lior Amsalem <alior@marvell.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
	Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip: irq-armada-370-xp: fix regression by clearing IRQ_NOAUTOEN
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 14:41:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151021144110.GH3953@io.lakedaemon.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1445435295-19956-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>

Hey Thomas-i, Thomases, :)

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 03:48:15PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Commit d17cab4451df1 ("irqchip: Kill off set_irq_flags usage") changed
> the code of armada_370_xp_mpic_irq_map() from using set_irq_flags() to
> irq_set_probe().
> 
> While the commit log seems to imply that there are no functional
> changes, there are indeed functional changes introduced by this
> commit: the IRQ_NOAUTOEN flag is no longer cleared. This functional
> change causes a regression on Armada XP, which no longer works
> properly after suspend/resume because per-CPU interrupts remain
> disabled.
> 
> Due to how the hardware registers work, the irq-armada-370-xp cannot
> simply save/restore a bunch of registers at suspend/resume to make
> sure that the interrupts remain in the same state after
> resuming. Therefore, it relies on the kernel to say whether the
> interrupt is disabled or not, using the irqd_irq_disabled()
> function. This was all working fine while the IRQ_NOAUTOEN flag was
> cleared.
> 
> With the change introduced by Rob Herring in d17cab4451df1, the
> IRQ_NOAUTOEN flag is now set for all interrupts. irqd_irq_disabled()
> returns false for per-CPU interrupts, and therefore our per-CPU
> interrupts are no longer re-enabled after resume.
> 
> This commit works around this problem by clearing again the
> IRQ_NOAUTOEN flags, so that we are back to the situation we had before
> commit d17cab4451df1. This work around is proposed as a minimal fix
> for the problem, while a better long-term solution is being worked on.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
> ---
> Here is the one-line minimal change that tglx said would be more
> acceptable to have in 4.3.
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-armada-370-xp.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Applied to irqchip/urgent with minor tweaking of the subject line.  I
trust at this point it's ok to pull in -rc2.

thx,

Jason.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: jason@lakedaemon.net (Jason Cooper)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] irqchip: irq-armada-370-xp: fix regression by clearing IRQ_NOAUTOEN
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 14:41:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151021144110.GH3953@io.lakedaemon.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1445435295-19956-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>

Hey Thomas-i, Thomases, :)

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 03:48:15PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Commit d17cab4451df1 ("irqchip: Kill off set_irq_flags usage") changed
> the code of armada_370_xp_mpic_irq_map() from using set_irq_flags() to
> irq_set_probe().
> 
> While the commit log seems to imply that there are no functional
> changes, there are indeed functional changes introduced by this
> commit: the IRQ_NOAUTOEN flag is no longer cleared. This functional
> change causes a regression on Armada XP, which no longer works
> properly after suspend/resume because per-CPU interrupts remain
> disabled.
> 
> Due to how the hardware registers work, the irq-armada-370-xp cannot
> simply save/restore a bunch of registers at suspend/resume to make
> sure that the interrupts remain in the same state after
> resuming. Therefore, it relies on the kernel to say whether the
> interrupt is disabled or not, using the irqd_irq_disabled()
> function. This was all working fine while the IRQ_NOAUTOEN flag was
> cleared.
> 
> With the change introduced by Rob Herring in d17cab4451df1, the
> IRQ_NOAUTOEN flag is now set for all interrupts. irqd_irq_disabled()
> returns false for per-CPU interrupts, and therefore our per-CPU
> interrupts are no longer re-enabled after resume.
> 
> This commit works around this problem by clearing again the
> IRQ_NOAUTOEN flags, so that we are back to the situation we had before
> commit d17cab4451df1. This work around is proposed as a minimal fix
> for the problem, while a better long-term solution is being worked on.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
> ---
> Here is the one-line minimal change that tglx said would be more
> acceptable to have in 4.3.
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-armada-370-xp.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Applied to irqchip/urgent with minor tweaking of the subject line.  I
trust at this point it's ok to pull in -rc2.

thx,

Jason.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-21 14:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-20 13:23 [PATCH 0/5] Fix regression introduced by set_irq_flags() removal Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-20 13:23 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-20 13:23 ` [PATCH 1/5] kernel: irq: implement is_enabled_percpu_irq() Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-20 13:23   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-12-08 11:57   ` [tip:irq/core] genirq: Implement irq_percpu_is_enabled() tip-bot for Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-20 13:23 ` [PATCH 2/5] irqchip: armada-370-xp: prepare additions to armada_xp_mpic_secondary_init() Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-20 13:23   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-20 14:00   ` Gregory CLEMENT
2015-10-20 14:00     ` Gregory CLEMENT
2015-10-20 13:23 ` [PATCH 3/5] irqchip: armada-370-xp: re-enable per-CPU interrupts at resume time Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-20 13:23   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-20 13:46   ` Gregory CLEMENT
2015-10-20 13:46     ` Gregory CLEMENT
2015-10-20 13:50     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-20 13:50       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-25 21:22   ` Marcin Wojtas
2015-10-25 21:22     ` Marcin Wojtas
2015-10-26  0:10     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-26  0:10       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-26  4:35       ` Marcin Wojtas
2015-10-26  4:35         ` Marcin Wojtas
2015-10-26  5:09         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-26  5:09           ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-26  7:06           ` Marcin Wojtas
2015-10-26  7:06             ` Marcin Wojtas
2015-10-26  8:27             ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-26  8:27               ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-20 13:23 ` [PATCH 4/5] irqchip: armada-370-xp: re-order register definitions Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-20 13:23   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-20 13:55   ` Gregory CLEMENT
2015-10-20 13:55     ` Gregory CLEMENT
2015-10-20 13:23 ` [PATCH 5/5] irqchip: armada-370-xp: document the overall driver logic Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-20 13:23   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-20 13:59   ` Gregory CLEMENT
2015-10-20 13:59     ` Gregory CLEMENT
2015-10-20 14:00   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-20 14:00     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-20 14:07     ` Jason Cooper
2015-10-20 14:07       ` Jason Cooper
2015-10-20 14:04 ` [PATCH 0/5] Fix regression introduced by set_irq_flags() removal Jason Cooper
2015-10-20 14:04   ` Jason Cooper
2015-10-20 14:08   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-20 14:08     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-20 14:17     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-20 14:17       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-20 14:23       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-20 14:23         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-20 19:24       ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-20 19:24         ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-22  8:01         ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-22  8:01           ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-20 19:23     ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-20 19:23       ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-21 13:48       ` [PATCH] irqchip: irq-armada-370-xp: fix regression by clearing IRQ_NOAUTOEN Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-21 13:48         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-21 14:41         ` Jason Cooper [this message]
2015-10-21 14:41           ` Jason Cooper
2015-10-21 13:49       ` [PATCH 0/5] Fix regression introduced by set_irq_flags() removal Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-21 13:49         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-11-11  8:26       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-11-11  8:26         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-11-13 20:11         ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-11-13 20:11           ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-12-04 11:03           ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-12-04 11:03             ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-12-05 17:24             ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-12-05 17:24               ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-12-06  9:28               ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-12-06  9:28                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-12-08  8:58                 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-12-08  8:58                   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-12-08 10:54                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-12-08 10:54                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-02-24 16:56                     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-02-24 16:56                       ` Thomas Petazzoni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151021144110.GH3953@io.lakedaemon.net \
    --to=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=alior@marvell.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=nadavh@marvell.com \
    --cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
    --cc=tawfik@marvell.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.