All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: slab: Only move management objects off-slab for sizes larger than KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 05:31:39 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151105053139.e38214a9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1446724235-31400-1-git-send-email-catalin.marinas@arm.com>

On Thu,  5 Nov 2015 11:50:35 +0000 Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote:

> Commit 8fc9cf420b36 ("slab: make more slab management structure off the
> slab") enables off-slab management objects for sizes starting with
> PAGE_SIZE >> 5. This means 128 bytes for a 4KB page configuration.
> However, on systems with a KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE of 128 (arm64 in 4.4), such
> optimisation does not make sense since the slab management allocation
> would take 128 bytes anyway (even though freelist_size is 32) with the
> additional overhead of another allocation.
> 
> This patch introduces an OFF_SLAB_MIN_SIZE macro which takes
> KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE into account. It also solves a slab bug on arm64 where
> the first kmalloc_cache to be initialised after slab_early_init = 0,
> "kmalloc-128", fails to allocate off-slab management objects from the
> same "kmalloc-128" cache.

That all seems to be quite minor stuff.

> Fixes: 8fc9cf420b36 ("slab: make more slab management structure off the slab")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.15+

Yet you believe the fix should be backported.

So, the usual refrain: when fixing a bug, please describe the end-user
visible effects of that bug.


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: slab: Only move management objects off-slab for sizes larger than KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 05:31:39 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151105053139.e38214a9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1446724235-31400-1-git-send-email-catalin.marinas@arm.com>

On Thu,  5 Nov 2015 11:50:35 +0000 Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote:

> Commit 8fc9cf420b36 ("slab: make more slab management structure off the
> slab") enables off-slab management objects for sizes starting with
> PAGE_SIZE >> 5. This means 128 bytes for a 4KB page configuration.
> However, on systems with a KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE of 128 (arm64 in 4.4), such
> optimisation does not make sense since the slab management allocation
> would take 128 bytes anyway (even though freelist_size is 32) with the
> additional overhead of another allocation.
> 
> This patch introduces an OFF_SLAB_MIN_SIZE macro which takes
> KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE into account. It also solves a slab bug on arm64 where
> the first kmalloc_cache to be initialised after slab_early_init = 0,
> "kmalloc-128", fails to allocate off-slab management objects from the
> same "kmalloc-128" cache.

That all seems to be quite minor stuff.

> Fixes: 8fc9cf420b36 ("slab: make more slab management structure off the slab")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.15+

Yet you believe the fix should be backported.

So, the usual refrain: when fixing a bug, please describe the end-user
visible effects of that bug.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: akpm@linux-foundation.org (Andrew Morton)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] mm: slab: Only move management objects off-slab for sizes larger than KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 05:31:39 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151105053139.e38214a9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1446724235-31400-1-git-send-email-catalin.marinas@arm.com>

On Thu,  5 Nov 2015 11:50:35 +0000 Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote:

> Commit 8fc9cf420b36 ("slab: make more slab management structure off the
> slab") enables off-slab management objects for sizes starting with
> PAGE_SIZE >> 5. This means 128 bytes for a 4KB page configuration.
> However, on systems with a KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE of 128 (arm64 in 4.4), such
> optimisation does not make sense since the slab management allocation
> would take 128 bytes anyway (even though freelist_size is 32) with the
> additional overhead of another allocation.
> 
> This patch introduces an OFF_SLAB_MIN_SIZE macro which takes
> KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE into account. It also solves a slab bug on arm64 where
> the first kmalloc_cache to be initialised after slab_early_init = 0,
> "kmalloc-128", fails to allocate off-slab management objects from the
> same "kmalloc-128" cache.

That all seems to be quite minor stuff.

> Fixes: 8fc9cf420b36 ("slab: make more slab management structure off the slab")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.15+

Yet you believe the fix should be backported.

So, the usual refrain: when fixing a bug, please describe the end-user
visible effects of that bug.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-05 13:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-22 17:59 [PATCH] arm64: Increase the max granular size Robert Richter
2015-09-22 17:59 ` Robert Richter
2015-09-22 18:29 ` Will Deacon
2015-09-22 18:29   ` Will Deacon
2015-09-25 14:45   ` Robert Richter
2015-09-25 14:45     ` Robert Richter
2015-09-25 16:31     ` Tirumalesh Chalamarla
2015-09-25 16:31       ` Tirumalesh Chalamarla
2015-10-10 17:39 ` Timur Tabi
2015-10-10 17:39   ` Timur Tabi
2015-10-12  9:16   ` Will Deacon
2015-10-12  9:16     ` Will Deacon
2015-10-16 19:57 ` Timur Tabi
2015-10-16 19:57   ` Timur Tabi
2015-10-28 19:09 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-10-28 19:09   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-03 11:07   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-11-03 12:05     ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-03 12:05       ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-03 12:05       ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-03 14:38       ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-03 14:38         ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-03 14:38         ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-03 14:55         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-11-03 14:55           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-11-03 14:55           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-11-03 18:50           ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-03 18:50             ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-03 18:50             ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-03 23:33             ` Christoph Lameter
2015-11-03 23:33               ` Christoph Lameter
2015-11-03 23:33               ` Christoph Lameter
2015-11-04 12:36               ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-04 12:36                 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-04 12:36                 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-04 12:36                 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-04 13:53                 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-11-04 13:53                   ` Christoph Lameter
2015-11-04 13:53                   ` Christoph Lameter
2015-11-04 13:53                   ` Christoph Lameter
2015-11-04 14:54                   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-04 14:54                     ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-04 14:54                     ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-04 14:54                     ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-04 15:28                     ` Christoph Lameter
2015-11-04 15:28                       ` Christoph Lameter
2015-11-04 15:28                       ` Christoph Lameter
2015-11-04 15:28                       ` Christoph Lameter
2015-11-04 15:39                       ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-04 15:39                         ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-04 15:39                         ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-04 15:39                         ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-05  4:31                         ` Joonsoo Kim
2015-11-05  4:31                           ` Joonsoo Kim
2015-11-05  4:31                           ` Joonsoo Kim
2015-11-05  4:31                           ` Joonsoo Kim
2015-11-05 11:50                           ` [PATCH] mm: slab: Only move management objects off-slab for sizes larger than KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE Catalin Marinas
2015-11-05 11:50                             ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-05 11:50                             ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-05 13:31                             ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2015-11-05 13:31                               ` Andrew Morton
2015-11-05 13:31                               ` Andrew Morton
2015-11-05 16:08                               ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-05 16:08                                 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-05 16:08                                 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-06 13:00                                 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-11-06 13:00                                   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-11-06 13:00                                   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-11-05 17:39                             ` Christoph Lameter
2015-11-05 17:39                               ` Christoph Lameter
2015-11-05 17:39                               ` Christoph Lameter
2015-11-05  4:40 ` [PATCH] arm64: Increase the max granular size Joonsoo Kim
2015-11-05  4:40   ` Joonsoo Kim
2015-11-05 10:32   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-05 10:32     ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-05 11:45     ` Joonsoo Kim
2015-11-05 11:45       ` Joonsoo Kim
2015-11-05 12:17       ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-05 12:17         ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-09  7:41         ` Joonsoo Kim
2015-11-09  7:41           ` Joonsoo Kim
2015-11-09 18:36           ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-09 18:36             ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-10  0:19             ` Joonsoo Kim
2015-11-10  0:19               ` Joonsoo Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151105053139.e38214a9.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.