All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, arnd@arndb.de, will.deacon@arm.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
	hanjun.guo@linaro.org, okaya@codeaurora.org,
	jiang.liu@linux.intel.com, Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com,
	robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com, mw@semihalf.com,
	Liviu.Dudau@arm.com, ddaney@caviumnetworks.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, wangyijing@huawei.com,
	Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com, msalter@redhat.com,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org, jchandra@broadcom.com,
	jcm@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 19/21] pci, acpi: Support for ACPI based generic PCI host controller init
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 11:58:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160119115815.GC5276@red-moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1452691267-32240-20-git-send-email-tn@semihalf.com>

On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 02:21:05PM +0100, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
> Because of two patch series:
> 1. Jiang Liu's common interface to support PCI host controller init
> 2. MMCONFIG refactoring (part of this patch set)
> now we can think about generic ACPI based PCI host controller init
> implementation out of arch/ directory.
> 
> These calls use information from MCFG table (PCI config space regions)
> and _CRS method (IO/irq resources) to initialize PCI hostbridge.
> 
> TBD: We are still not sure whether we should reassign resources
> after PCI bus enumeration or trust firmware to do all that work for
> us properly.

We should claim resources and assign unassigned ones. I put together a
patch for resource claiming instead of reinventing the wheel, waiting
for feedback:

https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/545669/

If we merge the code with no resources claiming, we may end up in
situations where claiming can trigger regressions so we won't be able
to do it anymore.

> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
> CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> CC: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> CC: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
> CC: Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>
> CC: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> Tested-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
> Tested-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/Kconfig    |   5 ++
>  drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 131 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 136 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> index c3664be..e315061 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> @@ -335,6 +335,11 @@ config ACPI_PCI_SLOT
>  	  i.e., segment/bus/device/function tuples, with physical slots in
>  	  the system.  If you are unsure, say N.
>  
> +config ACPI_PCI_HOST_GENERIC
> +	bool "Generic ACPI PCI host controller"
> +	help
> +	  Say Y here if you want to support generic ACPI PCI host controller.

You should add a proper description here.

> +
>  config X86_PM_TIMER
>  	bool "Power Management Timer Support" if EXPERT
>  	depends on X86
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> index a65c8c2..d483e2a 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
>  #include <linux/init.h>
>  #include <linux/types.h>
>  #include <linux/mutex.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>

We should move the IO space management to PCI core instead of having
it in OF core, code carrying out PIO mapping does not depend on OF
as far as I can see.

>  #include <linux/pm.h>
>  #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>  #include <linux/pci.h>
> @@ -514,6 +515,136 @@ static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_PCI_HOST_GENERIC
> +static int pcibios_map_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, u8 slot, u8 pin)
> +{
> +	if (pci_dev_msi_enabled(dev))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	acpi_pci_irq_enable(dev);
> +	return dev->irq;
> +}
> +
> +static void pci_mcfg_release_info(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci)
> +{
> +	pci_mmcfg_teardown_map(ci);
> +	kfree(ci);
> +}
> +
> +static int pci_acpi_root_prepare_resources(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci)
> +{
> +	struct list_head *list = &ci->resources;
> +	struct acpi_device *device = ci->bridge;
> +	struct resource_entry *entry, *tmp;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	flags = IORESOURCE_IO | IORESOURCE_MEM;
> +	ret = acpi_dev_get_resources(device, list,
> +				     acpi_dev_filter_resource_type_cb,
> +				     (void *)flags);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		dev_warn(&device->dev,
> +			 "failed to parse _CRS method, error code %d\n", ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	} else if (ret == 0)
> +		dev_dbg(&device->dev,
> +			"no IO and memory resources present in _CRS\n");
		^^^^
		what's the point in carrying on then ?

> +
> +	resource_list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, tmp, &ci->resources) {
> +		resource_size_t cpu_addr, length;
> +		struct resource *res = entry->res;
> +
> +		if (entry->res->flags & IORESOURCE_DISABLED)
> +			resource_list_destroy_entry(entry);
> +		else
> +			res->name = ci->name;
> +
> +		/* PCI -> CPU space translation */
> +		cpu_addr = res->start + entry->offset;
> +		length = res->end - res->start + 1;
> +
> +		if (res->flags & IORESOURCE_MEM) {
> +			res->start = cpu_addr;
> +			res->end = cpu_addr + length - 1;
> +		} else if (res->flags & IORESOURCE_IO) {
> +			resource_size_t pci_addr = res->start;
> +			unsigned long port;
> +
> +			if (pci_register_io_range(cpu_addr, length)) {
> +				resource_list_destroy_entry(entry);
> +				continue;
> +			}
> +
> +			port = pci_address_to_pio(cpu_addr);
> +			if (port == (unsigned long)-1) {
> +				resource_list_destroy_entry(entry);
> +				continue;
> +			}
> +
> +			res->start = port;
> +			res->end = port + length - 1;
> +			entry->offset = port - pci_addr;
> +
> +			if (pci_remap_iospace(res, cpu_addr) < 0)
> +				resource_list_destroy_entry(entry);
> +		}
> +	}
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static struct acpi_pci_root_ops acpi_pci_root_ops = {
> +	.init_info = pci_mmcfg_setup_map,
> +	.release_info = pci_mcfg_release_info,
> +	.prepare_resources = pci_acpi_root_prepare_resources,
> +};
> +
> +/* Root bridge scanning */
> +struct pci_bus *pci_acpi_scan_root(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
> +{
> +	int node = acpi_get_node(root->device->handle);
> +	int domain = root->segment;
> +	int busnum = root->secondary.start;
> +	struct acpi_pci_root_info *info;
> +	struct pci_host_bridge *bridge;
> +	struct pci_bus *bus, *child;
> +
> +	if (domain && !pci_domains_supported) {
> +		pr_warn("PCI %04x:%02x: multiple domains not supported.\n",
> +			domain, busnum);
> +		return NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	info = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL, node);
> +	if (!info) {
> +		dev_err(&root->device->dev,
> +			"pci_bus %04x:%02x: ignored (out of memory)\n",
> +			domain, busnum);
> +		return NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	acpi_pci_root_ops.pci_ops = pci_mcfg_get_ops(root);
> +	bus = acpi_pci_root_create(root, &acpi_pci_root_ops, info, root);
> +	if (!bus)
> +		return NULL;
		^^^
		Leaking memory here.

> +
> +	bridge = pci_find_host_bridge(bus);
> +	bridge->map_irq = pcibios_map_irq;

It would be nice to use map_irq for that, but Matthew's series seems
stuck in review mode, either we take that series on and make some
progress on it or you should add the irq mapping code to arm64 arch
code, *temporarily* :)

Also, we should claim resources here.

> +
> +	pci_bus_size_bridges(bus);
> +	pci_bus_assign_resources(bus);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * After the PCI-E bus has been walked and all devices discovered,
> +	 * configure any settings of the fabric that might be necessary.
> +	 */
> +	list_for_each_entry(child, &bus->children, node)
> +		pcie_bus_configure_settings(child);
> +
> +	return bus;
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_PCI_HOST_GENERIC_ACPI */
             ^^^
	     does not match the #ifdef

Lorenzo

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com (Lorenzo Pieralisi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V3 19/21] pci, acpi: Support for ACPI based generic PCI host controller init
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 11:58:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160119115815.GC5276@red-moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1452691267-32240-20-git-send-email-tn@semihalf.com>

On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 02:21:05PM +0100, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
> Because of two patch series:
> 1. Jiang Liu's common interface to support PCI host controller init
> 2. MMCONFIG refactoring (part of this patch set)
> now we can think about generic ACPI based PCI host controller init
> implementation out of arch/ directory.
> 
> These calls use information from MCFG table (PCI config space regions)
> and _CRS method (IO/irq resources) to initialize PCI hostbridge.
> 
> TBD: We are still not sure whether we should reassign resources
> after PCI bus enumeration or trust firmware to do all that work for
> us properly.

We should claim resources and assign unassigned ones. I put together a
patch for resource claiming instead of reinventing the wheel, waiting
for feedback:

https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/545669/

If we merge the code with no resources claiming, we may end up in
situations where claiming can trigger regressions so we won't be able
to do it anymore.

> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
> CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> CC: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> CC: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
> CC: Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>
> CC: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> Tested-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
> Tested-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/Kconfig    |   5 ++
>  drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 131 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 136 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> index c3664be..e315061 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> @@ -335,6 +335,11 @@ config ACPI_PCI_SLOT
>  	  i.e., segment/bus/device/function tuples, with physical slots in
>  	  the system.  If you are unsure, say N.
>  
> +config ACPI_PCI_HOST_GENERIC
> +	bool "Generic ACPI PCI host controller"
> +	help
> +	  Say Y here if you want to support generic ACPI PCI host controller.

You should add a proper description here.

> +
>  config X86_PM_TIMER
>  	bool "Power Management Timer Support" if EXPERT
>  	depends on X86
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> index a65c8c2..d483e2a 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
>  #include <linux/init.h>
>  #include <linux/types.h>
>  #include <linux/mutex.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>

We should move the IO space management to PCI core instead of having
it in OF core, code carrying out PIO mapping does not depend on OF
as far as I can see.

>  #include <linux/pm.h>
>  #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>  #include <linux/pci.h>
> @@ -514,6 +515,136 @@ static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_PCI_HOST_GENERIC
> +static int pcibios_map_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, u8 slot, u8 pin)
> +{
> +	if (pci_dev_msi_enabled(dev))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	acpi_pci_irq_enable(dev);
> +	return dev->irq;
> +}
> +
> +static void pci_mcfg_release_info(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci)
> +{
> +	pci_mmcfg_teardown_map(ci);
> +	kfree(ci);
> +}
> +
> +static int pci_acpi_root_prepare_resources(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci)
> +{
> +	struct list_head *list = &ci->resources;
> +	struct acpi_device *device = ci->bridge;
> +	struct resource_entry *entry, *tmp;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	flags = IORESOURCE_IO | IORESOURCE_MEM;
> +	ret = acpi_dev_get_resources(device, list,
> +				     acpi_dev_filter_resource_type_cb,
> +				     (void *)flags);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		dev_warn(&device->dev,
> +			 "failed to parse _CRS method, error code %d\n", ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	} else if (ret == 0)
> +		dev_dbg(&device->dev,
> +			"no IO and memory resources present in _CRS\n");
		^^^^
		what's the point in carrying on then ?

> +
> +	resource_list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, tmp, &ci->resources) {
> +		resource_size_t cpu_addr, length;
> +		struct resource *res = entry->res;
> +
> +		if (entry->res->flags & IORESOURCE_DISABLED)
> +			resource_list_destroy_entry(entry);
> +		else
> +			res->name = ci->name;
> +
> +		/* PCI -> CPU space translation */
> +		cpu_addr = res->start + entry->offset;
> +		length = res->end - res->start + 1;
> +
> +		if (res->flags & IORESOURCE_MEM) {
> +			res->start = cpu_addr;
> +			res->end = cpu_addr + length - 1;
> +		} else if (res->flags & IORESOURCE_IO) {
> +			resource_size_t pci_addr = res->start;
> +			unsigned long port;
> +
> +			if (pci_register_io_range(cpu_addr, length)) {
> +				resource_list_destroy_entry(entry);
> +				continue;
> +			}
> +
> +			port = pci_address_to_pio(cpu_addr);
> +			if (port == (unsigned long)-1) {
> +				resource_list_destroy_entry(entry);
> +				continue;
> +			}
> +
> +			res->start = port;
> +			res->end = port + length - 1;
> +			entry->offset = port - pci_addr;
> +
> +			if (pci_remap_iospace(res, cpu_addr) < 0)
> +				resource_list_destroy_entry(entry);
> +		}
> +	}
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static struct acpi_pci_root_ops acpi_pci_root_ops = {
> +	.init_info = pci_mmcfg_setup_map,
> +	.release_info = pci_mcfg_release_info,
> +	.prepare_resources = pci_acpi_root_prepare_resources,
> +};
> +
> +/* Root bridge scanning */
> +struct pci_bus *pci_acpi_scan_root(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
> +{
> +	int node = acpi_get_node(root->device->handle);
> +	int domain = root->segment;
> +	int busnum = root->secondary.start;
> +	struct acpi_pci_root_info *info;
> +	struct pci_host_bridge *bridge;
> +	struct pci_bus *bus, *child;
> +
> +	if (domain && !pci_domains_supported) {
> +		pr_warn("PCI %04x:%02x: multiple domains not supported.\n",
> +			domain, busnum);
> +		return NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	info = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL, node);
> +	if (!info) {
> +		dev_err(&root->device->dev,
> +			"pci_bus %04x:%02x: ignored (out of memory)\n",
> +			domain, busnum);
> +		return NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	acpi_pci_root_ops.pci_ops = pci_mcfg_get_ops(root);
> +	bus = acpi_pci_root_create(root, &acpi_pci_root_ops, info, root);
> +	if (!bus)
> +		return NULL;
		^^^
		Leaking memory here.

> +
> +	bridge = pci_find_host_bridge(bus);
> +	bridge->map_irq = pcibios_map_irq;

It would be nice to use map_irq for that, but Matthew's series seems
stuck in review mode, either we take that series on and make some
progress on it or you should add the irq mapping code to arm64 arch
code, *temporarily* :)

Also, we should claim resources here.

> +
> +	pci_bus_size_bridges(bus);
> +	pci_bus_assign_resources(bus);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * After the PCI-E bus has been walked and all devices discovered,
> +	 * configure any settings of the fabric that might be necessary.
> +	 */
> +	list_for_each_entry(child, &bus->children, node)
> +		pcie_bus_configure_settings(child);
> +
> +	return bus;
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_PCI_HOST_GENERIC_ACPI */
             ^^^
	     does not match the #ifdef

Lorenzo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-01-19 11:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 184+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-13 13:20 [PATCH V3 00/21] MMCONFIG refactoring and support for ARM64 PCI hostbridge init based on ACPI Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 13:20 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 13:20 ` [PATCH V3 01/21] x86, pci: Reorder logic of pci_mmconfig_insert() function Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 13:20   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 13:20   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 13:20 ` [PATCH V3 02/21] x86, pci, acpi: Move arch-agnostic MMCONFIG (aka ECAM) and ACPI code out of arch/x86/ directory Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 13:20   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 13:20 ` [PATCH V3 03/21] pci, acpi, mcfg: Provide generic implementation of MCFG code initialization Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 13:20   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 13:20 ` [PATCH V3 04/21] x86, pci: mmconfig_{32,64}.c code refactoring - remove code duplication Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 13:20   ` [PATCH V3 04/21] x86, pci: mmconfig_{32, 64}.c " Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 13:20 ` [PATCH V3 05/21] x86, pci, ecam: mmconfig_64.c becomes default implementation for ECAM driver Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 13:20   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 13:20   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 13:20 ` [PATCH V3 06/21] XEN / PCI: Remove the dependence on arch x86 when PCI_MMCONFIG=y Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 13:20   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 13:20   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 13:20 ` [PATCH V3 07/21] pci, acpi, mcfg: Provide default RAW ACPI PCI config space accessors Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 13:20   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 13:20   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 13:20 ` [PATCH V3 08/21] arm64, acpi: Use empty PCI config space accessors from mcfg.c file Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 13:20   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 13:20   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 13:20 ` [PATCH V3 09/21] pci, acpi, ecam: Add flag to indicate whether ECAM region was hot added or not Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 13:20   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 13:20   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 13:20 ` [PATCH V3 10/21] x86, pci: Cleanup platform specific MCFG data using previously added ECAM hot_added flag Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 13:20   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 13:20   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 13:20 ` [PATCH V3 11/21] pci, acpi: Move ACPI host bridge device companion assignment to core code Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 13:20   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-19 16:02   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-19 16:02     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-20 11:20     ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-20 11:20       ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-20 12:38       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-20 12:38         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-20 13:40         ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-20 13:40           ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-20 14:22           ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-20 14:22             ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-20 14:41             ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-20 14:41               ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-27 17:42               ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-27 17:42                 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-27 17:42                 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-13 13:20 ` [PATCH V3 12/21] x86, ia64, pci: Remove ACPI companion device from platform specific data Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 13:20   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 13:20 ` [PATCH V3 13/21] pci, acpi: Provide generic way to assign bus domain number Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 13:20   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-21 18:22   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-21 18:22     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-21 18:38     ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-21 18:38       ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-22 11:25       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-22 11:25         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-13 13:21 ` [PATCH V3 14/21] x86, ia64: Include acpi_pci_{add|remove}_bus to the default pcibios_{add|remove}_bus implementation Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 13:21   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-14 16:33   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-14 16:33     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-14 17:45     ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-14 17:45       ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 13:21 ` [PATCH V3 15/21] acpi, mcfg: Implement two calls that might be used to inject/remove MCFG region Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 13:21   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 13:21 ` [PATCH V3 16/21] x86, acpi, pci: Use equivalent function introduced in previous patch Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 13:21   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 13:21 ` [PATCH V3 17/21] acpi, mcfg: Add default PCI config accessors implementation and initial support for related quirks Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 13:21   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 13:21 ` [PATCH V3 18/21] ACPI, PCI: Refine the way to handle translation_offset for ACPI resources Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 13:21   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-14 12:13   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-14 12:13     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-14 12:13     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-19 12:20   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-19 12:20     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-19 12:20     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-25  9:52     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-25  9:52       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-25 16:57       ` Mark Salter
2016-01-25 16:57         ` Mark Salter
2016-01-25 16:57         ` Mark Salter
2016-01-28 10:23     ` Hanjun Guo
2016-01-28 10:23       ` Hanjun Guo
2016-01-13 13:21 ` [PATCH V3 19/21] pci, acpi: Support for ACPI based generic PCI host controller init Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 13:21   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-15  9:57   ` Hanjun Guo
2016-01-15  9:57     ` Hanjun Guo
2016-01-18  9:57     ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-18  9:57       ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-18  9:25   ` liudongdong (C)
2016-01-18  9:25     ` liudongdong (C)
2016-01-18  9:25     ` liudongdong (C)
2016-01-18 10:34     ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-18 10:34       ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-19 11:58   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2016-01-19 11:58     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-20 15:01     ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-20 15:01       ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 13:21 ` [PATCH V3 20/21] pci, acpi: Match PCI config space accessors against platfrom specific quirks Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 13:21   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-14 15:36   ` Mark Salter
2016-01-14 15:36     ` Mark Salter
2016-01-18 12:41     ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-18 12:41       ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-19  1:49       ` liudongdong (C)
2016-01-19  1:49         ` liudongdong (C)
2016-01-19  1:49         ` liudongdong (C)
2016-01-19  7:55         ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-19  7:55           ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-19  7:55           ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-19  8:52           ` liudongdong (C)
2016-01-19  8:52             ` liudongdong (C)
2016-01-19  8:52             ` liudongdong (C)
2016-01-19 19:54   ` [PATCH] pci, acpi: QDF2xxx 32 bit config space accessors Christopher Covington
2016-01-19 20:19     ` Christopher Covington
2016-02-05 16:00     ` [PATCH v2] acpi: pci: QDF2432 " Christopher Covington
2016-01-13 13:21 ` [PATCH V3 21/21] arm64, pci, acpi: Start using ACPI based PCI host bridge driver for ARM64 Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 13:21   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 15:24 ` [PATCH V3 00/21] MMCONFIG refactoring and support for ARM64 PCI hostbridge init based on ACPI Sinan Kaya
2016-01-13 15:24   ` Sinan Kaya
2016-01-13 15:27   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-13 15:27     ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-01-14 13:44 ` Graeme Gregory
2016-01-14 13:44   ` Graeme Gregory
2016-01-14 14:00   ` Catalin Marinas
2016-01-14 14:00     ` Catalin Marinas
2016-01-14 14:09     ` Mark Salter
2016-01-14 14:09       ` Mark Salter
2016-01-14 14:09       ` Mark Salter
2016-01-14 14:50       ` Catalin Marinas
2016-01-14 14:50         ` Catalin Marinas
2016-01-14 14:50         ` Catalin Marinas
2016-01-14 14:59         ` Mark Salter
2016-01-14 14:59           ` Mark Salter
2016-01-14 14:01   ` Mark Salter
2016-01-14 14:01     ` Mark Salter
2016-01-14 14:15     ` Graeme Gregory
2016-01-14 14:15       ` Graeme Gregory
2016-01-14 14:24       ` Mark Salter
2016-01-14 14:24         ` Mark Salter
2016-01-15 12:12         ` Graeme Gregory
2016-01-15 12:12           ` Graeme Gregory
2016-01-15 12:12           ` Graeme Gregory
2016-01-18 14:04           ` Graeme Gregory
2016-01-18 14:04             ` Graeme Gregory
2016-01-18 14:04             ` Graeme Gregory
2016-01-19 20:25             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-01-19 20:25               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-01-19 20:40               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-01-19 20:40                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-01-19 23:37                 ` Mark Salter
2016-01-19 23:37                   ` Mark Salter
2016-01-19 23:37                   ` Mark Salter
2016-01-14 15:29 ` Mark Salter
2016-01-14 15:29   ` Mark Salter
2016-01-14 15:38   ` Sinan Kaya
2016-01-14 15:38     ` Sinan Kaya
2016-01-14 16:12     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-14 16:12       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-14 16:38       ` Mark Salter
2016-01-14 16:38         ` Mark Salter
2016-01-14 16:38         ` Mark Salter
2016-01-14 17:07         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-14 17:07           ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-14 17:32           ` Mark Salter
2016-01-14 17:32             ` Mark Salter
2016-01-14 17:59             ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-14 17:59               ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-14 17:59               ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-14 18:44               ` Mark Salter
2016-01-14 18:44                 ` Mark Salter
2016-01-14 22:51   ` Jeremy Linton
2016-01-14 22:51     ` Jeremy Linton
2016-01-14 22:55 ` Jeremy Linton
2016-01-14 22:55   ` Jeremy Linton
2016-01-15 11:00 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-01-15 11:00   ` Hanjun Guo
2016-01-18 14:37   ` Hanjun Guo
2016-01-18 14:37     ` Hanjun Guo
2016-01-29  6:43 ` liudongdong (C)
2016-01-29  6:43   ` liudongdong (C)
2016-01-29  6:43   ` liudongdong (C)
2016-02-01 19:58 ` Duc Dang
2016-02-01 19:58   ` Duc Dang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160119115815.GC5276@red-moon \
    --to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
    --cc=Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
    --cc=jchandra@broadcom.com \
    --cc=jcm@redhat.com \
    --cc=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=msalter@redhat.com \
    --cc=mw@semihalf.com \
    --cc=okaya@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tn@semihalf.com \
    --cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.