* [PATCH net] sctp: fix rcu usage on proc listing
@ 2016-01-19 21:59 Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2016-01-19 22:02 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2016-01-19 21:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: Vlad Yasevich, Neil Horman, Xin Long
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
commit 39f66a7dce32 ("sctp: apply rhashtable api to sctp procfs")
removed a rcu_read_lock() too much at sctp_remaddr_seq_show().
Fixes: 39f66a7dce32 ("sctp: apply rhashtable api to sctp procfs")
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
---
net/sctp/proc.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/sctp/proc.c b/net/sctp/proc.c
index dfa7eeccb5373053f460f1026a58e4a2ba015a69..4fdf4387910696492ba568b1096dd12e8e7221e2 100644
--- a/net/sctp/proc.c
+++ b/net/sctp/proc.c
@@ -491,6 +491,7 @@ static int sctp_remaddr_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
tsp = (struct sctp_transport *)v;
assoc = tsp->asoc;
+ rcu_read_lock();
list_for_each_entry_rcu(tsp, &assoc->peer.transport_addr_list,
transports) {
if (tsp->dead)
@@ -543,6 +544,7 @@ static int sctp_remaddr_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
seq_printf(seq, "\n");
}
+ rcu_read_unlock();
return 0;
}
--
2.5.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net] sctp: fix rcu usage on proc listing
2016-01-19 21:59 [PATCH net] sctp: fix rcu usage on proc listing Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
@ 2016-01-19 22:02 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2016-01-19 22:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: Vlad Yasevich, Neil Horman, Xin Long, linux-sctp
[just cc'ing linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org]
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 07:59:03PM -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
>
> commit 39f66a7dce32 ("sctp: apply rhashtable api to sctp procfs")
> removed a rcu_read_lock() too much at sctp_remaddr_seq_show().
>
> Fixes: 39f66a7dce32 ("sctp: apply rhashtable api to sctp procfs")
> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
> ---
> net/sctp/proc.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/proc.c b/net/sctp/proc.c
> index dfa7eeccb5373053f460f1026a58e4a2ba015a69..4fdf4387910696492ba568b1096dd12e8e7221e2 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/proc.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/proc.c
> @@ -491,6 +491,7 @@ static int sctp_remaddr_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
> tsp = (struct sctp_transport *)v;
> assoc = tsp->asoc;
>
> + rcu_read_lock();
> list_for_each_entry_rcu(tsp, &assoc->peer.transport_addr_list,
> transports) {
> if (tsp->dead)
> @@ -543,6 +544,7 @@ static int sctp_remaddr_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
>
> seq_printf(seq, "\n");
> }
> + rcu_read_unlock();
>
> return 0;
> }
> --
> 2.5.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net] sctp: fix rcu usage on proc listing
@ 2016-01-19 22:02 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2016-01-19 22:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: Vlad Yasevich, Neil Horman, Xin Long, linux-sctp
[just cc'ing linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org]
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 07:59:03PM -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
>
> commit 39f66a7dce32 ("sctp: apply rhashtable api to sctp procfs")
> removed a rcu_read_lock() too much at sctp_remaddr_seq_show().
>
> Fixes: 39f66a7dce32 ("sctp: apply rhashtable api to sctp procfs")
> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
> ---
> net/sctp/proc.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/proc.c b/net/sctp/proc.c
> index dfa7eeccb5373053f460f1026a58e4a2ba015a69..4fdf4387910696492ba568b1096dd12e8e7221e2 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/proc.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/proc.c
> @@ -491,6 +491,7 @@ static int sctp_remaddr_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
> tsp = (struct sctp_transport *)v;
> assoc = tsp->asoc;
>
> + rcu_read_lock();
> list_for_each_entry_rcu(tsp, &assoc->peer.transport_addr_list,
> transports) {
> if (tsp->dead)
> @@ -543,6 +544,7 @@ static int sctp_remaddr_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
>
> seq_printf(seq, "\n");
> }
> + rcu_read_unlock();
>
> return 0;
> }
> --
> 2.5.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net] sctp: fix rcu usage on proc listing
2016-01-19 22:02 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
@ 2016-01-20 1:07 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2016-01-20 1:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: Vlad Yasevich, Neil Horman, Xin Long, linux-sctp
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 08:02:30PM -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> > --- a/net/sctp/proc.c
> > +++ b/net/sctp/proc.c
> > @@ -491,6 +491,7 @@ static int sctp_remaddr_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
> > tsp = (struct sctp_transport *)v;
> > assoc = tsp->asoc;
> >
> > + rcu_read_lock();
should have used rcu_read_lock_bh() here, will send a v2 tomorrow.
> > list_for_each_entry_rcu(tsp, &assoc->peer.transport_addr_list,
> > transports) {
> > if (tsp->dead)
> > @@ -543,6 +544,7 @@ static int sctp_remaddr_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
> >
> > seq_printf(seq, "\n");
> > }
> > + rcu_read_unlock();
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> > --
> > 2.5.0
> >
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net] sctp: fix rcu usage on proc listing
@ 2016-01-20 1:07 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2016-01-20 1:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: Vlad Yasevich, Neil Horman, Xin Long, linux-sctp
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 08:02:30PM -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> > --- a/net/sctp/proc.c
> > +++ b/net/sctp/proc.c
> > @@ -491,6 +491,7 @@ static int sctp_remaddr_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
> > tsp = (struct sctp_transport *)v;
> > assoc = tsp->asoc;
> >
> > + rcu_read_lock();
should have used rcu_read_lock_bh() here, will send a v2 tomorrow.
> > list_for_each_entry_rcu(tsp, &assoc->peer.transport_addr_list,
> > transports) {
> > if (tsp->dead)
> > @@ -543,6 +544,7 @@ static int sctp_remaddr_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
> >
> > seq_printf(seq, "\n");
> > }
> > + rcu_read_unlock();
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> > --
> > 2.5.0
> >
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net] sctp: fix rcu usage on proc listing
2016-01-20 1:07 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
@ 2016-01-21 13:05 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2016-01-21 13:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: Vlad Yasevich, Neil Horman, Xin Long, linux-sctp
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 11:07:20PM -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 08:02:30PM -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> > > --- a/net/sctp/proc.c
> > > +++ b/net/sctp/proc.c
> > > @@ -491,6 +491,7 @@ static int sctp_remaddr_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
> > > tsp = (struct sctp_transport *)v;
> > > assoc = tsp->asoc;
> > >
> > > + rcu_read_lock();
>
> should have used rcu_read_lock_bh() here, will send a v2 tomorrow.
Please just drop this one, no change is actually needed.
rhashtable_walk_start() already puts the rcu_read_lock() in there and
disabling bh is not necessary. Thanks.
> > > list_for_each_entry_rcu(tsp, &assoc->peer.transport_addr_list,
> > > transports) {
> > > if (tsp->dead)
> > > @@ -543,6 +544,7 @@ static int sctp_remaddr_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
> > >
> > > seq_printf(seq, "\n");
> > > }
> > > + rcu_read_unlock();
> > >
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > > --
> > > 2.5.0
> > >
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net] sctp: fix rcu usage on proc listing
@ 2016-01-21 13:05 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2016-01-21 13:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: Vlad Yasevich, Neil Horman, Xin Long, linux-sctp
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 11:07:20PM -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 08:02:30PM -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> > > --- a/net/sctp/proc.c
> > > +++ b/net/sctp/proc.c
> > > @@ -491,6 +491,7 @@ static int sctp_remaddr_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
> > > tsp = (struct sctp_transport *)v;
> > > assoc = tsp->asoc;
> > >
> > > + rcu_read_lock();
>
> should have used rcu_read_lock_bh() here, will send a v2 tomorrow.
Please just drop this one, no change is actually needed.
rhashtable_walk_start() already puts the rcu_read_lock() in there and
disabling bh is not necessary. Thanks.
> > > list_for_each_entry_rcu(tsp, &assoc->peer.transport_addr_list,
> > > transports) {
> > > if (tsp->dead)
> > > @@ -543,6 +544,7 @@ static int sctp_remaddr_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
> > >
> > > seq_printf(seq, "\n");
> > > }
> > > + rcu_read_unlock();
> > >
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > > --
> > > 2.5.0
> > >
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-01-21 13:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-01-19 21:59 [PATCH net] sctp: fix rcu usage on proc listing Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2016-01-19 22:02 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2016-01-19 22:02 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2016-01-20 1:07 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2016-01-20 1:07 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2016-01-21 13:05 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2016-01-21 13:05 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.