* [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] rpi: fix up Model B entries
@ 2016-01-29 8:35 Lubomir Rintel
2016-02-08 20:47 ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot,v2] " Tom Rini
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Lubomir Rintel @ 2016-01-29 8:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
The P5 header was not present on "Model B" any board prior to Revision 2.0,
there's no need for a separate device tree.
Also, it looks like "rev2" is incorrectly used to only cover the 512MiB
memory models; there also were 256MiB 2.0 boards.
I don't have all of the boards to check this, I'm following this table:
http://elinux.org/RPi_HardwareHistory#Board_Revision_History
Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@v3.sk>
---
Changes since v1:
- The comment chaned to use less tentative language
- Add a sign-off
- Cc Tom
board/raspberrypi/rpi/rpi.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board/raspberrypi/rpi/rpi.c b/board/raspberrypi/rpi/rpi.c
index 4b80d7b..b344362 100644
--- a/board/raspberrypi/rpi/rpi.c
+++ b/board/raspberrypi/rpi/rpi.c
@@ -110,28 +110,28 @@ static const struct rpi_model rpi_models_new_scheme[] = {
static const struct rpi_model rpi_models_old_scheme[] = {
[0x2] = {
- "Model B (no P5)",
- "bcm2835-rpi-b-i2c0.dtb",
+ "Model B",
+ "bcm2835-rpi-b.dtb",
true,
},
[0x3] = {
- "Model B (no P5)",
- "bcm2835-rpi-b-i2c0.dtb",
+ "Model B",
+ "bcm2835-rpi-b.dtb",
true,
},
[0x4] = {
- "Model B",
- "bcm2835-rpi-b.dtb",
+ "Model B rev2",
+ "bcm2835-rpi-b-rev2.dtb",
true,
},
[0x5] = {
- "Model B",
- "bcm2835-rpi-b.dtb",
+ "Model B rev2",
+ "bcm2835-rpi-b-rev2.dtb",
true,
},
[0x6] = {
- "Model B",
- "bcm2835-rpi-b.dtb",
+ "Model B rev2",
+ "bcm2835-rpi-b-rev2.dtb",
true,
},
[0x7] = {
--
2.5.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [U-Boot,v2] rpi: fix up Model B entries
2016-01-29 8:35 [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] rpi: fix up Model B entries Lubomir Rintel
@ 2016-02-08 20:47 ` Tom Rini
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tom Rini @ 2016-02-08 20:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 09:35:52AM +0100, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> The P5 header was not present on "Model B" any board prior to Revision 2.0,
> there's no need for a separate device tree.
>
> Also, it looks like "rev2" is incorrectly used to only cover the 512MiB
> memory models; there also were 256MiB 2.0 boards.
>
> I don't have all of the boards to check this, I'm following this table:
> http://elinux.org/RPi_HardwareHistory#Board_Revision_History
>
> Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@v3.sk>
Applied to u-boot/master, thanks!
--
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20160208/90013c5b/attachment.sig>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-02-08 20:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-01-29 8:35 [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] rpi: fix up Model B entries Lubomir Rintel
2016-02-08 20:47 ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot,v2] " Tom Rini
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.