All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
	XFS Developers <xfs@oss.sgi.com>, jmoyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dax: move writeback calls into the filesystems
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 17:01:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160209160134.GA12245@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160209094353.GF9451@quack.suse.cz>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3957 bytes --]

On Tue 09-02-16 10:43:53, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Mon 08-02-16 12:55:24, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> wrote:
> > [..]
> > >> Setting aside the current block zeroing problem you seem to assuming
> > >> that DAX will always be faster and that may not be true at a media
> > >> level.  Waiting years for some applications to determine if DAX makes
> > >> sense for their use case seems completely reasonable.  In the meantime
> > >> the apps that are already making these changes want to know that a DAX
> > >> mapping request has not silently dropped backed to page cache.  They
> > >> also want to know if they successfully jumped through all the hoops to
> > >> get a larger than pte mapping.
> > >>
> > >> I agree it is useful to be able to force DAX on an unmodified
> > >> application to see what happens, and it follows that if those
> > >> applications want to run in that mode they will need functional
> > >> fsync()...
> > >>
> > >> I would feel better if we were talking about specific applications and
> > >> performance numbers to know if forcing DAX on application is a debug
> > >> facility or a production level capability.  You seem to have already
> > >> made that determination and I'm curious what I'm missing.
> > >
> > > I'm not setting any policy here at all.  This whole argument is
> > > based around the DAX mount option doing "global fs enable or
> > > silently turning it off" and the application not knowing about that.
> > >
> > > The whole point of having a persistent per-inode DAX flags is that
> > > it is a policy mechanism, not a policy.  The application can, if it
> > > is DAX aware, directly control whether DAX is used on a file or not.
> > > The application can even query and clear that persistent inode flag
> > > if it is configured not to (or cannot) use DAX.
> > >
> > > If the filesystem cannot support DAX, then we can error out attempts
> > > to set the DAX flag and then the app knows DAX is not available.
> > > i.e. the attempt to set policy failed. If the flag is set, then the
> > > inode will *always* use DAX - there is no "fall back to page cache"
> > > when DAX is enabled.
> > >
> > > If the applicaiton is not DAX aware, then the admin can control the
> > > DAX policy by manipulating these flags themselves, and hence control
> > > whether DAX is used by the application or not.
> > >
> > > If you think I'm dictating policy for DAX users and application,
> > > then you haven't understood anything I've previously said about why
> > > the DAX mount option needs to die before any of this is considered
> > > production ready. DAX is not an opaque "all or nothing" option. XFS
> > > will provide apps and admins with fine-grained, persistent,
> > > discoverable policy flags to allow admins and applications to set
> > > DAX policies however they see fit. This simply cannot be done if the
> > > only knob you have is a mount option that may or may not stick.
> > 
> > I agree the mount option needs to die, and I fully grok the reasoning.
> >   What I'm concerned with is that a system using fully-DAX-aware
> > applications is forced to incur the overhead of maintaining *sync
> > semantics, periodic sync(2) in particular,  even if it is not relying
> > on those semantics.
> 
> Let me somewhat correct this: IMO hard requirement is maintaining sync(2)
> semantics. Periodic writeback does not have any hard durability guarantees
> and we are free to ignore such requests in ->writepages() (that function
> has enough information in the writeback_control structure to differentiate
> between periodic writeback and data integrity sync) if we decide it is
> useful. Actually, we could do that even for 4.5.

Attached is a version of Ross' patch that will work for sync(2) and
fsync(2) and we won't flush caches during periodic writeback. The patch is
only compile-tested. Ross?

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

[-- Attachment #2: 0001-dax-move-writeback-calls-into-the-filesystems.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 6980 bytes --]

>From f7280a34d235031c5dbf3f5a345c4b64e452f097 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 00:19:13 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] dax: move writeback calls into the filesystems

Previously calls to dax_writeback_mapping_range() for all DAX filesystems
(ext2, ext4 & xfs) were centralized in filemap_write_and_wait_range().
dax_writeback_mapping_range() needs a struct block_device, and it used to
get that from inode->i_sb->s_bdev.  This is correct for normal inodes
mounted on ext2, ext4 and XFS filesystems, but is incorrect for DAX raw
block devices and for XFS real-time files.

Instead, call dax_writeback_mapping_range() directly from the filesystem
->writepages function so that it can supply us with a valid block
device. This also fixes DAX code to properly flush caches in response to
sync(2).

Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
 fs/block_dev.c      | 13 ++++++++++++-
 fs/dax.c            | 12 +++++++-----
 fs/ext2/inode.c     |  8 ++++++++
 fs/ext4/fsync.c     |  1 -
 fs/ext4/inode.c     |  4 ++++
 fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c   |  5 +++++
 include/linux/dax.h |  7 +++++--
 mm/filemap.c        | 12 ++++--------
 8 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c
index 39b3a174a425..271d38aa6cbb 100644
--- a/fs/block_dev.c
+++ b/fs/block_dev.c
@@ -1693,13 +1693,24 @@ static int blkdev_releasepage(struct page *page, gfp_t wait)
 	return try_to_free_buffers(page);
 }
 
+static int blkdev_writepages(struct address_space *mapping,
+			     struct writeback_control *wbc)
+{
+	if (dax_mapping(mapping)) {
+		struct block_device *bdev = I_BDEV(mapping->host);
+
+		return dax_writeback_mapping_range(mapping, bdev, wbc);
+	}
+	return generic_writepages(mapping, wbc);
+}
+
 static const struct address_space_operations def_blk_aops = {
 	.readpage	= blkdev_readpage,
 	.readpages	= blkdev_readpages,
 	.writepage	= blkdev_writepage,
 	.write_begin	= blkdev_write_begin,
 	.write_end	= blkdev_write_end,
-	.writepages	= generic_writepages,
+	.writepages	= blkdev_writepages,
 	.releasepage	= blkdev_releasepage,
 	.direct_IO	= blkdev_direct_IO,
 	.is_dirty_writeback = buffer_check_dirty_writeback,
diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c
index fc2e3141138b..2f4965214783 100644
--- a/fs/dax.c
+++ b/fs/dax.c
@@ -485,11 +485,10 @@ static int dax_writeback_one(struct block_device *bdev,
  * end]. This is required by data integrity operations to ensure file data is
  * on persistent storage prior to completion of the operation.
  */
-int dax_writeback_mapping_range(struct address_space *mapping, loff_t start,
-		loff_t end)
+int dax_writeback_mapping_range(struct address_space *mapping,
+		struct block_device *bdev, struct writeback_control *wbc)
 {
 	struct inode *inode = mapping->host;
-	struct block_device *bdev = inode->i_sb->s_bdev;
 	pgoff_t start_index, end_index, pmd_index;
 	pgoff_t indices[PAGEVEC_SIZE];
 	struct pagevec pvec;
@@ -500,8 +499,11 @@ int dax_writeback_mapping_range(struct address_space *mapping, loff_t start,
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(inode->i_blkbits != PAGE_SHIFT))
 		return -EIO;
 
-	start_index = start >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
-	end_index = end >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
+	if (!mapping->nrexceptional || wbc->sync_mode != WB_SYNC_ALL)
+		return 0;
+
+	start_index = wbc->range_start >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
+	end_index = wbc->range_end >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
 	pmd_index = DAX_PMD_INDEX(start_index);
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
diff --git a/fs/ext2/inode.c b/fs/ext2/inode.c
index 338eefda70c6..ee05e945f40c 100644
--- a/fs/ext2/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext2/inode.c
@@ -874,6 +874,14 @@ ext2_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter, loff_t offset)
 static int
 ext2_writepages(struct address_space *mapping, struct writeback_control *wbc)
 {
+#ifdef CONFIG_FS_DAX
+	if (dax_mapping(mapping)) {
+		return dax_writeback_mapping_range(mapping,
+						   mapping->host->i_sb->s_bdev,
+						   wbc);
+	}
+#endif
+
 	return mpage_writepages(mapping, wbc, ext2_get_block);
 }
 
diff --git a/fs/ext4/fsync.c b/fs/ext4/fsync.c
index 8850254136ae..b7136227d0f8 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/fsync.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/fsync.c
@@ -83,7 +83,6 @@ static int ext4_sync_parent(struct inode *inode)
  * What we do is just kick off a commit and wait on it.  This will snapshot the
  * inode to disk.
  */
-
 int ext4_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end, int datasync)
 {
 	struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host;
diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index 83bc8bfb3bea..19989c12187a 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -2450,6 +2450,10 @@ static int ext4_writepages(struct address_space *mapping,
 
 	trace_ext4_writepages(inode, wbc);
 
+	if (dax_mapping(mapping))
+		return dax_writeback_mapping_range(mapping, inode->i_sb->s_bdev,
+						   wbc);
+
 	/*
 	 * No pages to write? This is mainly a kludge to avoid starting
 	 * a transaction for special inodes like journal inode on last iput()
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
index 379c089fb051..fd0839278442 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
@@ -1208,6 +1208,11 @@ xfs_vm_writepages(
 	struct writeback_control *wbc)
 {
 	xfs_iflags_clear(XFS_I(mapping->host), XFS_ITRUNCATED);
+	if (dax_mapping(mapping)) {
+		return dax_writeback_mapping_range(mapping,
+				xfs_find_bdev_for_inode(mapping->host), wbc);
+	}
+
 	return generic_writepages(mapping, wbc);
 }
 
diff --git a/include/linux/dax.h b/include/linux/dax.h
index 818e45078929..05d7d043d3bd 100644
--- a/include/linux/dax.h
+++ b/include/linux/dax.h
@@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ static inline bool dax_mapping(struct address_space *mapping)
 {
 	return mapping->host && IS_DAX(mapping->host);
 }
-int dax_writeback_mapping_range(struct address_space *mapping, loff_t start,
-		loff_t end);
+
+struct writeback_control;
+
+int dax_writeback_mapping_range(struct address_space *mapping,
+		struct block_device *bdev, struct writeback_control *wbc);
 #endif
diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
index bc943867d68c..af3eec1a8c5e 100644
--- a/mm/filemap.c
+++ b/mm/filemap.c
@@ -446,7 +446,8 @@ int filemap_write_and_wait(struct address_space *mapping)
 {
 	int err = 0;
 
-	if (mapping->nrpages) {
+	if ((!dax_mapping(mapping) && mapping->nrpages) ||
+	    (dax_mapping(mapping) && mapping->nrexceptional)) {
 		err = filemap_fdatawrite(mapping);
 		/*
 		 * Even if the above returned error, the pages may be
@@ -482,13 +483,8 @@ int filemap_write_and_wait_range(struct address_space *mapping,
 {
 	int err = 0;
 
-	if (dax_mapping(mapping) && mapping->nrexceptional) {
-		err = dax_writeback_mapping_range(mapping, lstart, lend);
-		if (err)
-			return err;
-	}
-
-	if (mapping->nrpages) {
+	if ((!dax_mapping(mapping) && mapping->nrpages) ||
+	    (dax_mapping(mapping) && mapping->nrexceptional)) {
 		err = __filemap_fdatawrite_range(mapping, lstart, lend,
 						 WB_SYNC_ALL);
 		/* See comment of filemap_write_and_wait() */
-- 
2.6.2


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org>,
	XFS Developers <xfs@oss.sgi.com>, jmoyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dax: move writeback calls into the filesystems
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 17:01:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160209160134.GA12245@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160209094353.GF9451@quack.suse.cz>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3957 bytes --]

On Tue 09-02-16 10:43:53, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Mon 08-02-16 12:55:24, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> wrote:
> > [..]
> > >> Setting aside the current block zeroing problem you seem to assuming
> > >> that DAX will always be faster and that may not be true at a media
> > >> level.  Waiting years for some applications to determine if DAX makes
> > >> sense for their use case seems completely reasonable.  In the meantime
> > >> the apps that are already making these changes want to know that a DAX
> > >> mapping request has not silently dropped backed to page cache.  They
> > >> also want to know if they successfully jumped through all the hoops to
> > >> get a larger than pte mapping.
> > >>
> > >> I agree it is useful to be able to force DAX on an unmodified
> > >> application to see what happens, and it follows that if those
> > >> applications want to run in that mode they will need functional
> > >> fsync()...
> > >>
> > >> I would feel better if we were talking about specific applications and
> > >> performance numbers to know if forcing DAX on application is a debug
> > >> facility or a production level capability.  You seem to have already
> > >> made that determination and I'm curious what I'm missing.
> > >
> > > I'm not setting any policy here at all.  This whole argument is
> > > based around the DAX mount option doing "global fs enable or
> > > silently turning it off" and the application not knowing about that.
> > >
> > > The whole point of having a persistent per-inode DAX flags is that
> > > it is a policy mechanism, not a policy.  The application can, if it
> > > is DAX aware, directly control whether DAX is used on a file or not.
> > > The application can even query and clear that persistent inode flag
> > > if it is configured not to (or cannot) use DAX.
> > >
> > > If the filesystem cannot support DAX, then we can error out attempts
> > > to set the DAX flag and then the app knows DAX is not available.
> > > i.e. the attempt to set policy failed. If the flag is set, then the
> > > inode will *always* use DAX - there is no "fall back to page cache"
> > > when DAX is enabled.
> > >
> > > If the applicaiton is not DAX aware, then the admin can control the
> > > DAX policy by manipulating these flags themselves, and hence control
> > > whether DAX is used by the application or not.
> > >
> > > If you think I'm dictating policy for DAX users and application,
> > > then you haven't understood anything I've previously said about why
> > > the DAX mount option needs to die before any of this is considered
> > > production ready. DAX is not an opaque "all or nothing" option. XFS
> > > will provide apps and admins with fine-grained, persistent,
> > > discoverable policy flags to allow admins and applications to set
> > > DAX policies however they see fit. This simply cannot be done if the
> > > only knob you have is a mount option that may or may not stick.
> > 
> > I agree the mount option needs to die, and I fully grok the reasoning.
> >   What I'm concerned with is that a system using fully-DAX-aware
> > applications is forced to incur the overhead of maintaining *sync
> > semantics, periodic sync(2) in particular,  even if it is not relying
> > on those semantics.
> 
> Let me somewhat correct this: IMO hard requirement is maintaining sync(2)
> semantics. Periodic writeback does not have any hard durability guarantees
> and we are free to ignore such requests in ->writepages() (that function
> has enough information in the writeback_control structure to differentiate
> between periodic writeback and data integrity sync) if we decide it is
> useful. Actually, we could do that even for 4.5.

Attached is a version of Ross' patch that will work for sync(2) and
fsync(2) and we won't flush caches during periodic writeback. The patch is
only compile-tested. Ross?

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

[-- Attachment #2: 0001-dax-move-writeback-calls-into-the-filesystems.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 6980 bytes --]

>From f7280a34d235031c5dbf3f5a345c4b64e452f097 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 00:19:13 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] dax: move writeback calls into the filesystems

Previously calls to dax_writeback_mapping_range() for all DAX filesystems
(ext2, ext4 & xfs) were centralized in filemap_write_and_wait_range().
dax_writeback_mapping_range() needs a struct block_device, and it used to
get that from inode->i_sb->s_bdev.  This is correct for normal inodes
mounted on ext2, ext4 and XFS filesystems, but is incorrect for DAX raw
block devices and for XFS real-time files.

Instead, call dax_writeback_mapping_range() directly from the filesystem
->writepages function so that it can supply us with a valid block
device. This also fixes DAX code to properly flush caches in response to
sync(2).

Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
 fs/block_dev.c      | 13 ++++++++++++-
 fs/dax.c            | 12 +++++++-----
 fs/ext2/inode.c     |  8 ++++++++
 fs/ext4/fsync.c     |  1 -
 fs/ext4/inode.c     |  4 ++++
 fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c   |  5 +++++
 include/linux/dax.h |  7 +++++--
 mm/filemap.c        | 12 ++++--------
 8 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c
index 39b3a174a425..271d38aa6cbb 100644
--- a/fs/block_dev.c
+++ b/fs/block_dev.c
@@ -1693,13 +1693,24 @@ static int blkdev_releasepage(struct page *page, gfp_t wait)
 	return try_to_free_buffers(page);
 }
 
+static int blkdev_writepages(struct address_space *mapping,
+			     struct writeback_control *wbc)
+{
+	if (dax_mapping(mapping)) {
+		struct block_device *bdev = I_BDEV(mapping->host);
+
+		return dax_writeback_mapping_range(mapping, bdev, wbc);
+	}
+	return generic_writepages(mapping, wbc);
+}
+
 static const struct address_space_operations def_blk_aops = {
 	.readpage	= blkdev_readpage,
 	.readpages	= blkdev_readpages,
 	.writepage	= blkdev_writepage,
 	.write_begin	= blkdev_write_begin,
 	.write_end	= blkdev_write_end,
-	.writepages	= generic_writepages,
+	.writepages	= blkdev_writepages,
 	.releasepage	= blkdev_releasepage,
 	.direct_IO	= blkdev_direct_IO,
 	.is_dirty_writeback = buffer_check_dirty_writeback,
diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c
index fc2e3141138b..2f4965214783 100644
--- a/fs/dax.c
+++ b/fs/dax.c
@@ -485,11 +485,10 @@ static int dax_writeback_one(struct block_device *bdev,
  * end]. This is required by data integrity operations to ensure file data is
  * on persistent storage prior to completion of the operation.
  */
-int dax_writeback_mapping_range(struct address_space *mapping, loff_t start,
-		loff_t end)
+int dax_writeback_mapping_range(struct address_space *mapping,
+		struct block_device *bdev, struct writeback_control *wbc)
 {
 	struct inode *inode = mapping->host;
-	struct block_device *bdev = inode->i_sb->s_bdev;
 	pgoff_t start_index, end_index, pmd_index;
 	pgoff_t indices[PAGEVEC_SIZE];
 	struct pagevec pvec;
@@ -500,8 +499,11 @@ int dax_writeback_mapping_range(struct address_space *mapping, loff_t start,
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(inode->i_blkbits != PAGE_SHIFT))
 		return -EIO;
 
-	start_index = start >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
-	end_index = end >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
+	if (!mapping->nrexceptional || wbc->sync_mode != WB_SYNC_ALL)
+		return 0;
+
+	start_index = wbc->range_start >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
+	end_index = wbc->range_end >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
 	pmd_index = DAX_PMD_INDEX(start_index);
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
diff --git a/fs/ext2/inode.c b/fs/ext2/inode.c
index 338eefda70c6..ee05e945f40c 100644
--- a/fs/ext2/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext2/inode.c
@@ -874,6 +874,14 @@ ext2_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter, loff_t offset)
 static int
 ext2_writepages(struct address_space *mapping, struct writeback_control *wbc)
 {
+#ifdef CONFIG_FS_DAX
+	if (dax_mapping(mapping)) {
+		return dax_writeback_mapping_range(mapping,
+						   mapping->host->i_sb->s_bdev,
+						   wbc);
+	}
+#endif
+
 	return mpage_writepages(mapping, wbc, ext2_get_block);
 }
 
diff --git a/fs/ext4/fsync.c b/fs/ext4/fsync.c
index 8850254136ae..b7136227d0f8 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/fsync.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/fsync.c
@@ -83,7 +83,6 @@ static int ext4_sync_parent(struct inode *inode)
  * What we do is just kick off a commit and wait on it.  This will snapshot the
  * inode to disk.
  */
-
 int ext4_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end, int datasync)
 {
 	struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host;
diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index 83bc8bfb3bea..19989c12187a 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -2450,6 +2450,10 @@ static int ext4_writepages(struct address_space *mapping,
 
 	trace_ext4_writepages(inode, wbc);
 
+	if (dax_mapping(mapping))
+		return dax_writeback_mapping_range(mapping, inode->i_sb->s_bdev,
+						   wbc);
+
 	/*
 	 * No pages to write? This is mainly a kludge to avoid starting
 	 * a transaction for special inodes like journal inode on last iput()
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
index 379c089fb051..fd0839278442 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
@@ -1208,6 +1208,11 @@ xfs_vm_writepages(
 	struct writeback_control *wbc)
 {
 	xfs_iflags_clear(XFS_I(mapping->host), XFS_ITRUNCATED);
+	if (dax_mapping(mapping)) {
+		return dax_writeback_mapping_range(mapping,
+				xfs_find_bdev_for_inode(mapping->host), wbc);
+	}
+
 	return generic_writepages(mapping, wbc);
 }
 
diff --git a/include/linux/dax.h b/include/linux/dax.h
index 818e45078929..05d7d043d3bd 100644
--- a/include/linux/dax.h
+++ b/include/linux/dax.h
@@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ static inline bool dax_mapping(struct address_space *mapping)
 {
 	return mapping->host && IS_DAX(mapping->host);
 }
-int dax_writeback_mapping_range(struct address_space *mapping, loff_t start,
-		loff_t end);
+
+struct writeback_control;
+
+int dax_writeback_mapping_range(struct address_space *mapping,
+		struct block_device *bdev, struct writeback_control *wbc);
 #endif
diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
index bc943867d68c..af3eec1a8c5e 100644
--- a/mm/filemap.c
+++ b/mm/filemap.c
@@ -446,7 +446,8 @@ int filemap_write_and_wait(struct address_space *mapping)
 {
 	int err = 0;
 
-	if (mapping->nrpages) {
+	if ((!dax_mapping(mapping) && mapping->nrpages) ||
+	    (dax_mapping(mapping) && mapping->nrexceptional)) {
 		err = filemap_fdatawrite(mapping);
 		/*
 		 * Even if the above returned error, the pages may be
@@ -482,13 +483,8 @@ int filemap_write_and_wait_range(struct address_space *mapping,
 {
 	int err = 0;
 
-	if (dax_mapping(mapping) && mapping->nrexceptional) {
-		err = dax_writeback_mapping_range(mapping, lstart, lend);
-		if (err)
-			return err;
-	}
-
-	if (mapping->nrpages) {
+	if ((!dax_mapping(mapping) && mapping->nrpages) ||
+	    (dax_mapping(mapping) && mapping->nrexceptional)) {
 		err = __filemap_fdatawrite_range(mapping, lstart, lend,
 						 WB_SYNC_ALL);
 		/* See comment of filemap_write_and_wait() */
-- 
2.6.2


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
	"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	XFS Developers <xfs@oss.sgi.com>, Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	jmoyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>,
	Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dax: move writeback calls into the filesystems
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 17:01:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160209160134.GA12245@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160209094353.GF9451@quack.suse.cz>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3957 bytes --]

On Tue 09-02-16 10:43:53, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Mon 08-02-16 12:55:24, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> wrote:
> > [..]
> > >> Setting aside the current block zeroing problem you seem to assuming
> > >> that DAX will always be faster and that may not be true at a media
> > >> level.  Waiting years for some applications to determine if DAX makes
> > >> sense for their use case seems completely reasonable.  In the meantime
> > >> the apps that are already making these changes want to know that a DAX
> > >> mapping request has not silently dropped backed to page cache.  They
> > >> also want to know if they successfully jumped through all the hoops to
> > >> get a larger than pte mapping.
> > >>
> > >> I agree it is useful to be able to force DAX on an unmodified
> > >> application to see what happens, and it follows that if those
> > >> applications want to run in that mode they will need functional
> > >> fsync()...
> > >>
> > >> I would feel better if we were talking about specific applications and
> > >> performance numbers to know if forcing DAX on application is a debug
> > >> facility or a production level capability.  You seem to have already
> > >> made that determination and I'm curious what I'm missing.
> > >
> > > I'm not setting any policy here at all.  This whole argument is
> > > based around the DAX mount option doing "global fs enable or
> > > silently turning it off" and the application not knowing about that.
> > >
> > > The whole point of having a persistent per-inode DAX flags is that
> > > it is a policy mechanism, not a policy.  The application can, if it
> > > is DAX aware, directly control whether DAX is used on a file or not.
> > > The application can even query and clear that persistent inode flag
> > > if it is configured not to (or cannot) use DAX.
> > >
> > > If the filesystem cannot support DAX, then we can error out attempts
> > > to set the DAX flag and then the app knows DAX is not available.
> > > i.e. the attempt to set policy failed. If the flag is set, then the
> > > inode will *always* use DAX - there is no "fall back to page cache"
> > > when DAX is enabled.
> > >
> > > If the applicaiton is not DAX aware, then the admin can control the
> > > DAX policy by manipulating these flags themselves, and hence control
> > > whether DAX is used by the application or not.
> > >
> > > If you think I'm dictating policy for DAX users and application,
> > > then you haven't understood anything I've previously said about why
> > > the DAX mount option needs to die before any of this is considered
> > > production ready. DAX is not an opaque "all or nothing" option. XFS
> > > will provide apps and admins with fine-grained, persistent,
> > > discoverable policy flags to allow admins and applications to set
> > > DAX policies however they see fit. This simply cannot be done if the
> > > only knob you have is a mount option that may or may not stick.
> > 
> > I agree the mount option needs to die, and I fully grok the reasoning.
> >   What I'm concerned with is that a system using fully-DAX-aware
> > applications is forced to incur the overhead of maintaining *sync
> > semantics, periodic sync(2) in particular,  even if it is not relying
> > on those semantics.
> 
> Let me somewhat correct this: IMO hard requirement is maintaining sync(2)
> semantics. Periodic writeback does not have any hard durability guarantees
> and we are free to ignore such requests in ->writepages() (that function
> has enough information in the writeback_control structure to differentiate
> between periodic writeback and data integrity sync) if we decide it is
> useful. Actually, we could do that even for 4.5.

Attached is a version of Ross' patch that will work for sync(2) and
fsync(2) and we won't flush caches during periodic writeback. The patch is
only compile-tested. Ross?

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

[-- Attachment #2: 0001-dax-move-writeback-calls-into-the-filesystems.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 6980 bytes --]

>From f7280a34d235031c5dbf3f5a345c4b64e452f097 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 00:19:13 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] dax: move writeback calls into the filesystems

Previously calls to dax_writeback_mapping_range() for all DAX filesystems
(ext2, ext4 & xfs) were centralized in filemap_write_and_wait_range().
dax_writeback_mapping_range() needs a struct block_device, and it used to
get that from inode->i_sb->s_bdev.  This is correct for normal inodes
mounted on ext2, ext4 and XFS filesystems, but is incorrect for DAX raw
block devices and for XFS real-time files.

Instead, call dax_writeback_mapping_range() directly from the filesystem
->writepages function so that it can supply us with a valid block
device. This also fixes DAX code to properly flush caches in response to
sync(2).

Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
 fs/block_dev.c      | 13 ++++++++++++-
 fs/dax.c            | 12 +++++++-----
 fs/ext2/inode.c     |  8 ++++++++
 fs/ext4/fsync.c     |  1 -
 fs/ext4/inode.c     |  4 ++++
 fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c   |  5 +++++
 include/linux/dax.h |  7 +++++--
 mm/filemap.c        | 12 ++++--------
 8 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c
index 39b3a174a425..271d38aa6cbb 100644
--- a/fs/block_dev.c
+++ b/fs/block_dev.c
@@ -1693,13 +1693,24 @@ static int blkdev_releasepage(struct page *page, gfp_t wait)
 	return try_to_free_buffers(page);
 }
 
+static int blkdev_writepages(struct address_space *mapping,
+			     struct writeback_control *wbc)
+{
+	if (dax_mapping(mapping)) {
+		struct block_device *bdev = I_BDEV(mapping->host);
+
+		return dax_writeback_mapping_range(mapping, bdev, wbc);
+	}
+	return generic_writepages(mapping, wbc);
+}
+
 static const struct address_space_operations def_blk_aops = {
 	.readpage	= blkdev_readpage,
 	.readpages	= blkdev_readpages,
 	.writepage	= blkdev_writepage,
 	.write_begin	= blkdev_write_begin,
 	.write_end	= blkdev_write_end,
-	.writepages	= generic_writepages,
+	.writepages	= blkdev_writepages,
 	.releasepage	= blkdev_releasepage,
 	.direct_IO	= blkdev_direct_IO,
 	.is_dirty_writeback = buffer_check_dirty_writeback,
diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c
index fc2e3141138b..2f4965214783 100644
--- a/fs/dax.c
+++ b/fs/dax.c
@@ -485,11 +485,10 @@ static int dax_writeback_one(struct block_device *bdev,
  * end]. This is required by data integrity operations to ensure file data is
  * on persistent storage prior to completion of the operation.
  */
-int dax_writeback_mapping_range(struct address_space *mapping, loff_t start,
-		loff_t end)
+int dax_writeback_mapping_range(struct address_space *mapping,
+		struct block_device *bdev, struct writeback_control *wbc)
 {
 	struct inode *inode = mapping->host;
-	struct block_device *bdev = inode->i_sb->s_bdev;
 	pgoff_t start_index, end_index, pmd_index;
 	pgoff_t indices[PAGEVEC_SIZE];
 	struct pagevec pvec;
@@ -500,8 +499,11 @@ int dax_writeback_mapping_range(struct address_space *mapping, loff_t start,
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(inode->i_blkbits != PAGE_SHIFT))
 		return -EIO;
 
-	start_index = start >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
-	end_index = end >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
+	if (!mapping->nrexceptional || wbc->sync_mode != WB_SYNC_ALL)
+		return 0;
+
+	start_index = wbc->range_start >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
+	end_index = wbc->range_end >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
 	pmd_index = DAX_PMD_INDEX(start_index);
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
diff --git a/fs/ext2/inode.c b/fs/ext2/inode.c
index 338eefda70c6..ee05e945f40c 100644
--- a/fs/ext2/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext2/inode.c
@@ -874,6 +874,14 @@ ext2_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter, loff_t offset)
 static int
 ext2_writepages(struct address_space *mapping, struct writeback_control *wbc)
 {
+#ifdef CONFIG_FS_DAX
+	if (dax_mapping(mapping)) {
+		return dax_writeback_mapping_range(mapping,
+						   mapping->host->i_sb->s_bdev,
+						   wbc);
+	}
+#endif
+
 	return mpage_writepages(mapping, wbc, ext2_get_block);
 }
 
diff --git a/fs/ext4/fsync.c b/fs/ext4/fsync.c
index 8850254136ae..b7136227d0f8 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/fsync.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/fsync.c
@@ -83,7 +83,6 @@ static int ext4_sync_parent(struct inode *inode)
  * What we do is just kick off a commit and wait on it.  This will snapshot the
  * inode to disk.
  */
-
 int ext4_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end, int datasync)
 {
 	struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host;
diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index 83bc8bfb3bea..19989c12187a 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -2450,6 +2450,10 @@ static int ext4_writepages(struct address_space *mapping,
 
 	trace_ext4_writepages(inode, wbc);
 
+	if (dax_mapping(mapping))
+		return dax_writeback_mapping_range(mapping, inode->i_sb->s_bdev,
+						   wbc);
+
 	/*
 	 * No pages to write? This is mainly a kludge to avoid starting
 	 * a transaction for special inodes like journal inode on last iput()
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
index 379c089fb051..fd0839278442 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
@@ -1208,6 +1208,11 @@ xfs_vm_writepages(
 	struct writeback_control *wbc)
 {
 	xfs_iflags_clear(XFS_I(mapping->host), XFS_ITRUNCATED);
+	if (dax_mapping(mapping)) {
+		return dax_writeback_mapping_range(mapping,
+				xfs_find_bdev_for_inode(mapping->host), wbc);
+	}
+
 	return generic_writepages(mapping, wbc);
 }
 
diff --git a/include/linux/dax.h b/include/linux/dax.h
index 818e45078929..05d7d043d3bd 100644
--- a/include/linux/dax.h
+++ b/include/linux/dax.h
@@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ static inline bool dax_mapping(struct address_space *mapping)
 {
 	return mapping->host && IS_DAX(mapping->host);
 }
-int dax_writeback_mapping_range(struct address_space *mapping, loff_t start,
-		loff_t end);
+
+struct writeback_control;
+
+int dax_writeback_mapping_range(struct address_space *mapping,
+		struct block_device *bdev, struct writeback_control *wbc);
 #endif
diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
index bc943867d68c..af3eec1a8c5e 100644
--- a/mm/filemap.c
+++ b/mm/filemap.c
@@ -446,7 +446,8 @@ int filemap_write_and_wait(struct address_space *mapping)
 {
 	int err = 0;
 
-	if (mapping->nrpages) {
+	if ((!dax_mapping(mapping) && mapping->nrpages) ||
+	    (dax_mapping(mapping) && mapping->nrexceptional)) {
 		err = filemap_fdatawrite(mapping);
 		/*
 		 * Even if the above returned error, the pages may be
@@ -482,13 +483,8 @@ int filemap_write_and_wait_range(struct address_space *mapping,
 {
 	int err = 0;
 
-	if (dax_mapping(mapping) && mapping->nrexceptional) {
-		err = dax_writeback_mapping_range(mapping, lstart, lend);
-		if (err)
-			return err;
-	}
-
-	if (mapping->nrpages) {
+	if ((!dax_mapping(mapping) && mapping->nrpages) ||
+	    (dax_mapping(mapping) && mapping->nrexceptional)) {
 		err = __filemap_fdatawrite_range(mapping, lstart, lend,
 						 WB_SYNC_ALL);
 		/* See comment of filemap_write_and_wait() */
-- 
2.6.2


[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 121 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
	XFS Developers <xfs@oss.sgi.com>, jmoyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dax: move writeback calls into the filesystems
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 17:01:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160209160134.GA12245@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160209094353.GF9451@quack.suse.cz>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3957 bytes --]

On Tue 09-02-16 10:43:53, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Mon 08-02-16 12:55:24, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> wrote:
> > [..]
> > >> Setting aside the current block zeroing problem you seem to assuming
> > >> that DAX will always be faster and that may not be true at a media
> > >> level.  Waiting years for some applications to determine if DAX makes
> > >> sense for their use case seems completely reasonable.  In the meantime
> > >> the apps that are already making these changes want to know that a DAX
> > >> mapping request has not silently dropped backed to page cache.  They
> > >> also want to know if they successfully jumped through all the hoops to
> > >> get a larger than pte mapping.
> > >>
> > >> I agree it is useful to be able to force DAX on an unmodified
> > >> application to see what happens, and it follows that if those
> > >> applications want to run in that mode they will need functional
> > >> fsync()...
> > >>
> > >> I would feel better if we were talking about specific applications and
> > >> performance numbers to know if forcing DAX on application is a debug
> > >> facility or a production level capability.  You seem to have already
> > >> made that determination and I'm curious what I'm missing.
> > >
> > > I'm not setting any policy here at all.  This whole argument is
> > > based around the DAX mount option doing "global fs enable or
> > > silently turning it off" and the application not knowing about that.
> > >
> > > The whole point of having a persistent per-inode DAX flags is that
> > > it is a policy mechanism, not a policy.  The application can, if it
> > > is DAX aware, directly control whether DAX is used on a file or not.
> > > The application can even query and clear that persistent inode flag
> > > if it is configured not to (or cannot) use DAX.
> > >
> > > If the filesystem cannot support DAX, then we can error out attempts
> > > to set the DAX flag and then the app knows DAX is not available.
> > > i.e. the attempt to set policy failed. If the flag is set, then the
> > > inode will *always* use DAX - there is no "fall back to page cache"
> > > when DAX is enabled.
> > >
> > > If the applicaiton is not DAX aware, then the admin can control the
> > > DAX policy by manipulating these flags themselves, and hence control
> > > whether DAX is used by the application or not.
> > >
> > > If you think I'm dictating policy for DAX users and application,
> > > then you haven't understood anything I've previously said about why
> > > the DAX mount option needs to die before any of this is considered
> > > production ready. DAX is not an opaque "all or nothing" option. XFS
> > > will provide apps and admins with fine-grained, persistent,
> > > discoverable policy flags to allow admins and applications to set
> > > DAX policies however they see fit. This simply cannot be done if the
> > > only knob you have is a mount option that may or may not stick.
> > 
> > I agree the mount option needs to die, and I fully grok the reasoning.
> >   What I'm concerned with is that a system using fully-DAX-aware
> > applications is forced to incur the overhead of maintaining *sync
> > semantics, periodic sync(2) in particular,  even if it is not relying
> > on those semantics.
> 
> Let me somewhat correct this: IMO hard requirement is maintaining sync(2)
> semantics. Periodic writeback does not have any hard durability guarantees
> and we are free to ignore such requests in ->writepages() (that function
> has enough information in the writeback_control structure to differentiate
> between periodic writeback and data integrity sync) if we decide it is
> useful. Actually, we could do that even for 4.5.

Attached is a version of Ross' patch that will work for sync(2) and
fsync(2) and we won't flush caches during periodic writeback. The patch is
only compile-tested. Ross?

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

[-- Attachment #2: 0001-dax-move-writeback-calls-into-the-filesystems.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 0 bytes --]



  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-09 16:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-07  7:19 [PATCH 0/2] DAX bdev fixes - move flushing calls to FS Ross Zwisler
2016-02-07  7:19 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-07  7:19 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-07  7:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] dax: pass bdev argument to dax_clear_blocks() Ross Zwisler
2016-02-07  7:19   ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-07  7:19   ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-07 18:19   ` Dan Williams
2016-02-07 18:19     ` Dan Williams
2016-02-07 18:19     ` Dan Williams
2016-02-08  1:46     ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-08  1:46       ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-08  1:46       ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-08  4:29       ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-08  4:29         ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-08  4:29         ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-07 22:03   ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-07 22:03     ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-07 22:03     ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-08  1:44     ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-08  1:44       ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-08  1:44       ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-08  5:17       ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-08  5:17         ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-08  5:17         ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-08 15:34         ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-08 15:34           ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-08 15:34           ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-08 15:34           ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-07  7:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] dax: move writeback calls into the filesystems Ross Zwisler
2016-02-07  7:19   ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-07  7:19   ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-07  7:19   ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-07 19:13   ` Dan Williams
2016-02-07 19:13     ` Dan Williams
2016-02-07 19:13     ` Dan Williams
2016-02-07 21:50     ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-07 21:50       ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-07 21:50       ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-08  8:18       ` Dan Williams
2016-02-08  8:18         ` Dan Williams
2016-02-08  8:18         ` Dan Williams
2016-02-08  8:18         ` Dan Williams
2016-02-08 20:18         ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-08 20:18           ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-08 20:18           ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-08 20:55           ` Dan Williams
2016-02-08 20:55             ` Dan Williams
2016-02-08 20:55             ` Dan Williams
2016-02-08 20:58             ` Jeff Moyer
2016-02-08 20:58               ` Jeff Moyer
2016-02-08 20:58               ` Jeff Moyer
2016-02-08 20:58               ` Jeff Moyer
2016-02-08 22:05               ` Dan Williams
2016-02-08 22:05                 ` Dan Williams
2016-02-08 22:05                 ` Dan Williams
2016-02-09  9:43             ` Jan Kara
2016-02-09  9:43               ` Jan Kara
2016-02-09  9:43               ` Jan Kara
2016-02-09 16:01               ` Jan Kara [this message]
2016-02-09 16:01                 ` Jan Kara
2016-02-09 16:01                 ` Jan Kara
2016-02-09 16:01                 ` Jan Kara
2016-02-09 18:06                 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-09 18:06                   ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-09 18:06                   ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-09 18:06                   ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-08 18:31     ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-08 18:31       ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-08 18:31       ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-08 19:23       ` Dan Williams
2016-02-08 19:23         ` Dan Williams
2016-02-08 19:23         ` Dan Williams
2016-02-08 10:48   ` Jan Kara
2016-02-08 10:48     ` Jan Kara
2016-02-08 10:48     ` Jan Kara
2016-02-08 16:12     ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-08 16:12       ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-08 16:12       ` Ross Zwisler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160209160134.GA12245@quack.suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.com \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=willy@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.