From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, SH-Linux <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>, Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org>,
Prasun.Kapoor@caviumnetworks.com,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>,
rfranz@cavium.com, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>,
Steve Capper <steve.capper@linaro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>Marc Zyngier <m>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 3/8] dt, numa: adding numa dt binding implementation.
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 15:32:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160211153255.GR24726@rric.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqK5HV9yzBE+ANnTw26eVR7Dy+B8OkwQ-7WF8KDa86Fd9g@mail.gmail.com>
On 11.02.16 08:50:41, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 4:09 AM, Ganapatrao Kulkarni
> <gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com> wrote:
> > dt node parsing for numa topology is done using device property
> > numa-node-id and device node distance-map.
>
> How is it that powerpc doesn't need flat DT parsing for NUMA? Both
> arches are memblock based and the binding is similar IIRC, so you
> should be able to find a way to do this with the unflattened tree.
> Ideally, there should be some common code shared as well.
>
> Do you have a git tree with this series?
I have pushed it here for you:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rric/linux.git/log/?h=thunder/numa-v10
-Robert
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-metag <linux-metag@vger.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
<linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>, SH-Linux <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
"Leif Lindholm" <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>, <rfranz@cavium.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>,
Steve Capper <steve.capper@linaro.org>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>,
Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
"Kumar Gala" <galak@codeaurora.org>,
Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
Jon Masters <jonathan@jonmasters.org>,
<Prasun.Kapoor@caviumnetworks.com>,
"Ganapatrao Kulkarni" <gpkulkarni@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 3/8] dt, numa: adding numa dt binding implementation.
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 16:32:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160211153255.GR24726@rric.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqK5HV9yzBE+ANnTw26eVR7Dy+B8OkwQ-7WF8KDa86Fd9g@mail.gmail.com>
On 11.02.16 08:50:41, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 4:09 AM, Ganapatrao Kulkarni
> <gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com> wrote:
> > dt node parsing for numa topology is done using device property
> > numa-node-id and device node distance-map.
>
> How is it that powerpc doesn't need flat DT parsing for NUMA? Both
> arches are memblock based and the binding is similar IIRC, so you
> should be able to find a way to do this with the unflattened tree.
> Ideally, there should be some common code shared as well.
>
> Do you have a git tree with this series?
I have pushed it here for you:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rric/linux.git/log/?h=thunder/numa-v10
-Robert
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, SH-Linux <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>, Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org>,
Prasun.Kapoor@caviumnetworks.com,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>,
rfranz@cavium.com, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>,
Steve Capper <steve.capper@linaro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>Marc Zyngier <m>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 3/8] dt, numa: adding numa dt binding implementation.
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 16:32:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160211153255.GR24726@rric.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqK5HV9yzBE+ANnTw26eVR7Dy+B8OkwQ-7WF8KDa86Fd9g@mail.gmail.com>
On 11.02.16 08:50:41, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 4:09 AM, Ganapatrao Kulkarni
> <gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com> wrote:
> > dt node parsing for numa topology is done using device property
> > numa-node-id and device node distance-map.
>
> How is it that powerpc doesn't need flat DT parsing for NUMA? Both
> arches are memblock based and the binding is similar IIRC, so you
> should be able to find a way to do this with the unflattened tree.
> Ideally, there should be some common code shared as well.
>
> Do you have a git tree with this series?
I have pushed it here for you:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rric/linux.git/log/?h=thunder/numa-v10
-Robert
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-metag <linux-metag@vger.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
<linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>, SH-Linux <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
"Leif Lindholm" <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>, <rfranz@cavium.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>,
Steve Capper <steve.capper@linaro.org>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>,
Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
"Kumar Gala" <galak@codeaurora.org>,
Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
Jon Masters <jonathan@jonmasters.org>,
<Prasun.Kapoor@caviumnetworks.com>,
"Ganapatrao Kulkarni" <gpkulkarni@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 3/8] dt, numa: adding numa dt binding implementation.
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 16:32:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160211153255.GR24726@rric.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqK5HV9yzBE+ANnTw26eVR7Dy+B8OkwQ-7WF8KDa86Fd9g@mail.gmail.com>
On 11.02.16 08:50:41, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 4:09 AM, Ganapatrao Kulkarni
> <gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com> wrote:
> > dt node parsing for numa topology is done using device property
> > numa-node-id and device node distance-map.
>
> How is it that powerpc doesn't need flat DT parsing for NUMA? Both
> arches are memblock based and the binding is similar IIRC, so you
> should be able to find a way to do this with the unflattened tree.
> Ideally, there should be some common code shared as well.
>
> Do you have a git tree with this series?
I have pushed it here for you:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rric/linux.git/log/?h=thunder/numa-v10
-Robert
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-metag <linux-metag@vger.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, SH-Linux <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>,
rfranz@cavium.com, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>,
Steve Capper <steve.capper@linaro.org>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>,
Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
fenghua.yu@intel.com, James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
Jon Masters <jonathan@jonmasters.org>,
Prasun.Kapoor@caviumnetworks.com,
Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gpkulkarni@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 3/8] dt, numa: adding numa dt binding implementation.
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 16:32:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160211153255.GR24726@rric.localdomain> (raw)
Message-ID: <20160211153255.uZNTjhtnoZ43PgRkdAUy4wOBYwd17SKD7yoWMlJIPuo@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqK5HV9yzBE+ANnTw26eVR7Dy+B8OkwQ-7WF8KDa86Fd9g@mail.gmail.com>
On 11.02.16 08:50:41, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 4:09 AM, Ganapatrao Kulkarni
> <gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com> wrote:
> > dt node parsing for numa topology is done using device property
> > numa-node-id and device node distance-map.
>
> How is it that powerpc doesn't need flat DT parsing for NUMA? Both
> arches are memblock based and the binding is similar IIRC, so you
> should be able to find a way to do this with the unflattened tree.
> Ideally, there should be some common code shared as well.
>
> Do you have a git tree with this series?
I have pushed it here for you:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rric/linux.git/log/?h=thunder/numa-v10
-Robert
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com (Robert Richter)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v10 3/8] dt, numa: adding numa dt binding implementation.
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 16:32:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160211153255.GR24726@rric.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqK5HV9yzBE+ANnTw26eVR7Dy+B8OkwQ-7WF8KDa86Fd9g@mail.gmail.com>
On 11.02.16 08:50:41, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 4:09 AM, Ganapatrao Kulkarni
> <gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com> wrote:
> > dt node parsing for numa topology is done using device property
> > numa-node-id and device node distance-map.
>
> How is it that powerpc doesn't need flat DT parsing for NUMA? Both
> arches are memblock based and the binding is similar IIRC, so you
> should be able to find a way to do this with the unflattened tree.
> Ideally, there should be some common code shared as well.
>
> Do you have a git tree with this series?
I have pushed it here for you:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rric/linux.git/log/?h=thunder/numa-v10
-Robert
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, SH-Linux <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>, Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org>,
Prasun.Kapoor@caviumnetworks.com,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>,
rfranz@cavium.com, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>,
Steve Capper <steve.capper@linaro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>, Marc Zyngier <m>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 3/8] dt, numa: adding numa dt binding implementation.
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 15:32:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160211153255.GR24726@rric.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqK5HV9yzBE+ANnTw26eVR7Dy+B8OkwQ-7WF8KDa86Fd9g@mail.gmail.com>
On 11.02.16 08:50:41, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 4:09 AM, Ganapatrao Kulkarni
> <gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com> wrote:
> > dt node parsing for numa topology is done using device property
> > numa-node-id and device node distance-map.
>
> How is it that powerpc doesn't need flat DT parsing for NUMA? Both
> arches are memblock based and the binding is similar IIRC, so you
> should be able to find a way to do this with the unflattened tree.
> Ideally, there should be some common code shared as well.
>
> Do you have a git tree with this series?
I have pushed it here for you:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rric/linux.git/log/?h=thunder/numa-v10
-Robert
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, SH-Linux <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>, Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org>,
Prasun.Kapoor@caviumnetworks.com,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>,
rfranz@cavium.com, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>,
Steve Capper <steve.capper@linaro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>, Marc Zyngier <m>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 3/8] dt, numa: adding numa dt binding implementation.
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 16:32:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160211153255.GR24726@rric.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqK5HV9yzBE+ANnTw26eVR7Dy+B8OkwQ-7WF8KDa86Fd9g@mail.gmail.com>
On 11.02.16 08:50:41, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 4:09 AM, Ganapatrao Kulkarni
> <gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com> wrote:
> > dt node parsing for numa topology is done using device property
> > numa-node-id and device node distance-map.
>
> How is it that powerpc doesn't need flat DT parsing for NUMA? Both
> arches are memblock based and the binding is similar IIRC, so you
> should be able to find a way to do this with the unflattened tree.
> Ideally, there should be some common code shared as well.
>
> Do you have a git tree with this series?
I have pushed it here for you:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rric/linux.git/log/?h=thunder/numa-v10
-Robert
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-11 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 86+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-02 10:09 [PATCH v10 0/8] arm64, numa: Add numa support for arm64 platforms Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:21 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:09 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:09 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:09 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:09 ` [PATCH v10 1/8] arm64, numa: adding " Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:21 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:09 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:09 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:09 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:09 ` [PATCH v10 2/8] Documentation, dt, numa: dt bindings for numa Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:21 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:09 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:09 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:09 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:09 ` [PATCH v10 3/8] dt, numa: adding numa dt binding implementation Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:21 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:09 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:09 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:09 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 23:34 ` Rob Herring
2016-02-02 23:34 ` Rob Herring
2016-02-02 23:34 ` Rob Herring
2016-02-02 23:34 ` Rob Herring
2016-02-04 11:15 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-04 11:27 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-04 11:27 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-04 11:15 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-04 11:15 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-04 11:15 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-04 11:15 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-11 14:50 ` Rob Herring
2016-02-11 14:50 ` Rob Herring
2016-02-11 14:50 ` Rob Herring
2016-02-11 14:50 ` Rob Herring
2016-02-11 14:50 ` Rob Herring
2016-02-11 15:32 ` Robert Richter [this message]
2016-02-11 15:32 ` Robert Richter
2016-02-11 15:32 ` Robert Richter
2016-02-11 15:32 ` Robert Richter
2016-02-11 15:32 ` Robert Richter
2016-02-11 15:32 ` Robert Richter
2016-02-11 15:32 ` Robert Richter
2016-02-11 15:32 ` Robert Richter
2016-02-11 15:58 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-11 15:58 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-11 15:58 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-11 15:58 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-11 15:58 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-11 15:58 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-11 16:03 ` Rob Herring
2016-02-02 10:09 ` [PATCH v10 4/8] arm64, numa : Enable numa dt for arm64 platforms Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:21 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:09 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:09 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:09 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:09 ` [PATCH v10 5/8] arm64, dt, thunderx: Add initial dts for Cavium Thunderx in 2 node topology Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:21 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:09 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:09 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:09 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:09 ` [PATCH v10 6/8] arm64, mm, numa: Adding numa balancing support for arm64 Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:21 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:09 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:09 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:09 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:09 ` [PATCH v10 7/8] topology, cleanup: Avoid redefinition of cpumask_of_pcibus in asm header files Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:21 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:09 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:09 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:09 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:09 ` [PATCH v10 8/8] numa, mm, cleanup: remove redundant NODE_DATA macro from " Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:21 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:09 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:09 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-02 10:09 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-07 8:40 ` kbuild test robot
2016-02-07 8:40 ` kbuild test robot
2016-02-07 8:40 ` kbuild test robot
2016-02-07 8:40 ` kbuild test robot
2016-02-07 8:40 ` kbuild test robot
2016-02-02 11:26 ` [PATCH v10 0/8] arm64, numa: Add numa support for arm64 platforms Robert Richter
2016-02-02 11:26 ` Robert Richter
2016-02-02 11:26 ` Robert Richter
2016-02-02 11:26 ` Robert Richter
2016-02-02 11:26 ` Robert Richter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160211153255.GR24726@rric.localdomain \
--to=robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=Prasun.Kapoor@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
--cc=al.stone@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=msalter@redhat.com \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=rfranz@cavium.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=steve.capper@linaro.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.