From: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
<arnd@arndb.de>, <pinskia@gmail.com>,
<Prasun.Kapoor@caviumnetworks.com>, <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
<Nathan_Lynch@mentor.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<agraf@suse.de>, <klimov.linux@gmail.com>, <broonie@kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
<joseph@codesourcery.com>,
<christoph.muellner@theobroma-systems.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] all: s390: move wrapper infrastructure to generic headers
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:57:14 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160217135714.GB13549@yury-N73SV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160217082210.GA4175@osiris>
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 09:22:10AM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 11:41:56PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
> > > However I'll try to write an addon patch to your patch series. Maybe we can
> > > still get rid of compat_wrapper.c in a way which makes both of us happy.
> > > Also.. the idea with the alias names for compat wrappers does seem to have
> > > the disadvantage that it will pollute /proc/kallsyms for example.
> > >
> > > Anyway, I'm not sure if I will be able to come up with something this week
> > > though.
> >
> > Great, I'm looking forward...
>
> Hi Yuri,
>
> after playing around with this a bit I couldn't come up with a solution
> that I'm happy with, unfortunately.
>
> So in order to make some progress here I'd vote that we simply move the
> existing compat_wrapper.c from arch/s390 to common code like you did in
> your first approach and leave the existing SYSCALL macros alone.
>
> That will have hardly any effect to anybody else and your problem is
> solved while s390 still works.
>
> Does that make sense?
>
OK. This week I'll split v1 as I did with v2, and send it here. So
we'll have two versions, and so will start true elections. :)
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
arnd@arndb.de, pinskia@gmail.com,
Prasun.Kapoor@caviumnetworks.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
Nathan_Lynch@mentor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
agraf@suse.de, klimov.linux@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
joseph@codesourcery.com,
christoph.muellner@theobroma-systems.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] all: s390: move wrapper infrastructure to generic headers
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:57:14 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160217135714.GB13549@yury-N73SV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160217082210.GA4175@osiris>
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 09:22:10AM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 11:41:56PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
> > > However I'll try to write an addon patch to your patch series. Maybe we can
> > > still get rid of compat_wrapper.c in a way which makes both of us happy.
> > > Also.. the idea with the alias names for compat wrappers does seem to have
> > > the disadvantage that it will pollute /proc/kallsyms for example.
> > >
> > > Anyway, I'm not sure if I will be able to come up with something this week
> > > though.
> >
> > Great, I'm looking forward...
>
> Hi Yuri,
>
> after playing around with this a bit I couldn't come up with a solution
> that I'm happy with, unfortunately.
>
> So in order to make some progress here I'd vote that we simply move the
> existing compat_wrapper.c from arch/s390 to common code like you did in
> your first approach and leave the existing SYSCALL macros alone.
>
> That will have hardly any effect to anybody else and your problem is
> solved while s390 still works.
>
> Does that make sense?
>
OK. This week I'll split v1 as I did with v2, and send it here. So
we'll have two versions, and so will start true elections. :)
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: ynorov@caviumnetworks.com (Yury Norov)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] all: s390: move wrapper infrastructure to generic headers
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:57:14 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160217135714.GB13549@yury-N73SV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160217082210.GA4175@osiris>
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 09:22:10AM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 11:41:56PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
> > > However I'll try to write an addon patch to your patch series. Maybe we can
> > > still get rid of compat_wrapper.c in a way which makes both of us happy.
> > > Also.. the idea with the alias names for compat wrappers does seem to have
> > > the disadvantage that it will pollute /proc/kallsyms for example.
> > >
> > > Anyway, I'm not sure if I will be able to come up with something this week
> > > though.
> >
> > Great, I'm looking forward...
>
> Hi Yuri,
>
> after playing around with this a bit I couldn't come up with a solution
> that I'm happy with, unfortunately.
>
> So in order to make some progress here I'd vote that we simply move the
> existing compat_wrapper.c from arch/s390 to common code like you did in
> your first approach and leave the existing SYSCALL macros alone.
>
> That will have hardly any effect to anybody else and your problem is
> solved while s390 still works.
>
> Does that make sense?
>
OK. This week I'll split v1 as I did with v2, and send it here. So
we'll have two versions, and so will start true elections. :)
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-17 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-25 16:57 [PATCH 0/5] all: s390: make compat wrappers the generic solution Yury Norov
2016-01-25 16:57 ` Yury Norov
2016-01-25 16:57 ` Yury Norov
2016-01-25 16:57 ` Yury Norov
2016-01-25 16:57 ` [PATCH 1/5] all: s390: move wrapper infrastructure to generic headers Yury Norov
2016-01-25 16:57 ` Yury Norov
2016-01-25 16:57 ` Yury Norov
2016-01-25 18:10 ` kbuild test robot
2016-01-25 18:10 ` kbuild test robot
2016-01-25 18:10 ` kbuild test robot
2016-01-25 18:10 ` kbuild test robot
2016-01-28 12:16 ` Heiko Carstens
2016-01-28 12:16 ` Heiko Carstens
2016-01-28 16:31 ` Yury Norov
2016-01-28 16:31 ` Yury Norov
2016-01-28 16:31 ` Yury Norov
2016-02-01 11:42 ` Yury Norov
2016-02-01 11:42 ` Yury Norov
2016-02-01 11:42 ` Yury Norov
2016-02-02 7:39 ` Heiko Carstens
2016-02-02 7:39 ` Heiko Carstens
2016-02-02 15:43 ` Yury Norov
2016-02-02 15:43 ` Yury Norov
2016-02-02 15:43 ` Yury Norov
2016-02-02 16:08 ` Heiko Carstens
2016-02-02 16:08 ` Heiko Carstens
2016-02-02 19:54 ` Heiko Carstens
2016-02-02 19:54 ` Heiko Carstens
2016-02-02 20:41 ` Yury Norov
2016-02-02 20:41 ` Yury Norov
2016-02-02 20:41 ` Yury Norov
2016-02-03 8:01 ` Heiko Carstens
2016-02-03 8:01 ` Heiko Carstens
2016-02-17 8:22 ` Heiko Carstens
2016-02-17 8:22 ` Heiko Carstens
2016-02-17 13:57 ` Yury Norov [this message]
2016-02-17 13:57 ` Yury Norov
2016-02-17 13:57 ` Yury Norov
2016-01-25 16:57 ` [PATCH 2/5] all: declare new wrappers Yury Norov
2016-01-25 16:57 ` Yury Norov
2016-01-25 16:57 ` Yury Norov
2016-01-25 16:57 ` [PATCH 3/5] all: s390: redefine wrappers in generic code Yury Norov
2016-01-25 16:57 ` Yury Norov
2016-01-25 16:57 ` Yury Norov
2016-01-25 16:57 ` [PATCH 4/5] all: wrap getdents64 syscall Yury Norov
2016-01-25 16:57 ` Yury Norov
2016-01-25 16:57 ` Yury Norov
2016-01-25 16:57 ` [PATCH 5/5] all: introduce COMPAT_WRAPPER option and enable it for s390 Yury Norov
2016-01-25 16:57 ` Yury Norov
2016-01-25 16:57 ` Yury Norov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160217135714.GB13549@yury-N73SV \
--to=ynorov@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=Nathan_Lynch@mentor.com \
--cc=Prasun.Kapoor@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christoph.muellner@theobroma-systems.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
--cc=klimov.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pinskia@gmail.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.