All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* How stable is the blueoothd -E support?
@ 2016-04-01 20:25 Don Zickus
  2016-04-08 17:07 ` Marcel Holtmann
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Don Zickus @ 2016-04-01 20:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-bluetooth; +Cc: luiz.dentz

Hi,

I was wondering how stable the experimental interface was, namely the GATT
stuff.  I was thinking about convincing the Fedora folks to set it so folks
can build off of the API.  As that is the only way it seems to communicate
with my LE devices.

Any thoughts?

Cheers,
Don


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: How stable is the blueoothd -E support?
  2016-04-01 20:25 How stable is the blueoothd -E support? Don Zickus
@ 2016-04-08 17:07 ` Marcel Holtmann
  2016-04-11 14:15   ` Don Zickus
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Marcel Holtmann @ 2016-04-08 17:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Don Zickus; +Cc: linux-bluetooth, Luiz Augusto von Dentz

Hi Don,

> I was wondering how stable the experimental interface was, namely the GATT
> stuff.  I was thinking about convincing the Fedora folks to set it so folks
> can build off of the API.  As that is the only way it seems to communicate
> with my LE devices.

it should be rather stable actually. However there were some comments lately and we need to look into them. My goal was actually to remove the experimental flag for the GATT APIs in one of the next releases.

Regards

Marcel


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: How stable is the blueoothd -E support?
  2016-04-08 17:07 ` Marcel Holtmann
@ 2016-04-11 14:15   ` Don Zickus
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Don Zickus @ 2016-04-11 14:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marcel Holtmann; +Cc: linux-bluetooth, Luiz Augusto von Dentz

On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 10:07:51AM -0700, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> Hi Don,
> 
> > I was wondering how stable the experimental interface was, namely the GATT
> > stuff.  I was thinking about convincing the Fedora folks to set it so folks
> > can build off of the API.  As that is the only way it seems to communicate
> > with my LE devices.
> 
> it should be rather stable actually. However there were some comments lately and we need to look into them. My goal was actually to remove the experimental flag for the GATT APIs in one of the next releases.

Great!  I assume you have no intentions to change the API anymore, but that
would depend on the outcome of your investigation of said comments?

Do you think you will have that resolved after 2 months?  Trying to do some
planning.  No worries if you can't commit, just asking. :-)

Cheers,
Don

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-04-11 14:15 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-04-01 20:25 How stable is the blueoothd -E support? Don Zickus
2016-04-08 17:07 ` Marcel Holtmann
2016-04-11 14:15   ` Don Zickus

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.