[PATCH 1/2] asus-laptop: remove redundant initializers

[PATCH 1/2] asus-laptop: remove redundant initializers

[Giedrius Statkevičius]

Initializing rv to AE_OK is pointless because later function results are
assigned to them and only then the variable is used

Signed-off-by: Giedrius Statkevičius <giedrius.statkevicius@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c
index f2b5d0a..d86d42e 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c
@@ -771,7 +771,7 @@ static int asus_read_brightness(struct backlight_device *bd)
 {
 	struct asus_laptop *asus = bl_get_data(bd);
 	unsigned long long value;
-	acpi_status rv = AE_OK;
+	acpi_status rv;
 
 	rv = acpi_evaluate_integer(asus->handle, METHOD_BRIGHTNESS_GET,
 				   NULL, &value);
@@ -865,7 +865,7 @@ static ssize_t infos_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
 	int len = 0;
 	unsigned long long temp;
 	char buf[16];		/* enough for all info */
-	acpi_status rv = AE_OK;
+	acpi_status rv;
 
 	/*
 	 * We use the easy way, we don't care of off and count,
@@ -1265,7 +1265,7 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(ls_value);
 static int asus_gps_status(struct asus_laptop *asus)
 {
 	unsigned long long status;
-	acpi_status rv = AE_OK;
+	acpi_status rv;
 
 	rv = acpi_evaluate_integer(asus->handle, METHOD_GPS_STATUS,
 				   NULL, &status);
-- 
2.8.0

[PATCH 2/2] asus-laptop: remove unused variable

[Giedrius Statkevičius]

`out' was assigned value but it was never used so remove it

Signed-off-by: Giedrius Statkevičius <giedrius.statkevicius@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c
index d86d42e..39ddcee 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c
@@ -946,11 +946,8 @@ static ssize_t sysfs_acpi_set(struct asus_laptop *asus,
 			      const char *method)
 {
 	int rv, value;
-	int out = 0;
 
 	rv = parse_arg(buf, count, &value);
-	if (rv > 0)
-		out = value ? 1 : 0;
 
 	if (write_acpi_int(asus->handle, method, value))
 		return -ENODEV;
-- 
2.8.0

Re: [PATCH 2/2] asus-laptop: remove unused variable

[Darren Hart]

On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 11:20:01PM +0300, Giedrius Statkevičius wrote:
> `out' was assigned value but it was never used so remove it
> 
> Signed-off-by: Giedrius Statkevičius <giedrius.statkevicius@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c | 3 ---
>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c
> index d86d42e..39ddcee 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c
> @@ -946,11 +946,8 @@ static ssize_t sysfs_acpi_set(struct asus_laptop *asus,
>  			      const char *method)
>  {
>  	int rv, value;
> -	int out = 0;
>  
>  	rv = parse_arg(buf, count, &value);
> -	if (rv > 0)
> -		out = value ? 1 : 0;
>  
>  	if (write_acpi_int(asus->handle, method, value))

out is indeed unused, however the rv > 0 condition is relevant as <=0 will pass
value uninitialized to write_acpi_int.

-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center

Re: [PATCH 2/2] asus-laptop: remove unused variable

[Giedrius Statkevičius]

On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 08:21:21PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 11:20:01PM +0300, Giedrius Statkevičius wrote:
> > `out' was assigned value but it was never used so remove it
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Giedrius Statkevičius <giedrius.statkevicius@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c | 3 ---
> >  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c
> > index d86d42e..39ddcee 100644
> > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c
> > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c
> > @@ -946,11 +946,8 @@ static ssize_t sysfs_acpi_set(struct asus_laptop *asus,
> >  			      const char *method)
> >  {
> >  	int rv, value;
> > -	int out = 0;
> >  
> >  	rv = parse_arg(buf, count, &value);
> > -	if (rv > 0)
> > -		out = value ? 1 : 0;
> >  
> >  	if (write_acpi_int(asus->handle, method, value))
> 
> out is indeed unused, however the rv > 0 condition is relevant as <=0 will pass
> value uninitialized to write_acpi_int.
That's indeed a problem. Somehow I missed that :( Should I make a v2 to include
another patch that checks for rv < 0 or send it as an independent one?

Re: [PATCH 2/2] asus-laptop: remove unused variable

[Darren Hart]

On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 11:48:52AM +0300, Giedrius Statkevičius wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 08:21:21PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 11:20:01PM +0300, Giedrius Statkevičius wrote:
> > > `out' was assigned value but it was never used so remove it
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Giedrius Statkevičius <giedrius.statkevicius@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c | 3 ---
> > >  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c
> > > index d86d42e..39ddcee 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c
> > > @@ -946,11 +946,8 @@ static ssize_t sysfs_acpi_set(struct asus_laptop *asus,
> > >  			      const char *method)
> > >  {
> > >  	int rv, value;
> > > -	int out = 0;
> > >  
> > >  	rv = parse_arg(buf, count, &value);
> > > -	if (rv > 0)
> > > -		out = value ? 1 : 0;
> > >  
> > >  	if (write_acpi_int(asus->handle, method, value))
> > 
> > out is indeed unused, however the rv > 0 condition is relevant as <=0 will pass
> > value uninitialized to write_acpi_int.
> That's indeed a problem. Somehow I missed that :( Should I make a v2 to include
> another patch that checks for rv < 0 or send it as an independent one?
> 

Please just rewrite this one to do the right thing as a v2.

-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center

Re: [PATCH 2/2] asus-laptop: remove unused variable

[Darren Hart]

On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 11:48:52AM +0300, Giedrius Statkevičius wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 08:21:21PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 11:20:01PM +0300, Giedrius Statkevičius wrote:
> > > `out' was assigned value but it was never used so remove it
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Giedrius Statkevičius <giedrius.statkevicius@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c | 3 ---
> > >  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c
> > > index d86d42e..39ddcee 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c
> > > @@ -946,11 +946,8 @@ static ssize_t sysfs_acpi_set(struct asus_laptop *asus,
> > >  			      const char *method)
> > >  {
> > >  	int rv, value;
> > > -	int out = 0;
> > >  
> > >  	rv = parse_arg(buf, count, &value);
> > > -	if (rv > 0)
> > > -		out = value ? 1 : 0;
> > >  
> > >  	if (write_acpi_int(asus->handle, method, value))
> > 
> > out is indeed unused, however the rv > 0 condition is relevant as <=0 will pass
> > value uninitialized to write_acpi_int.
> That's indeed a problem. Somehow I missed that :( Should I make a v2 to include
> another patch that checks for rv < 0 or send it as an independent one?
> 

Sorry, my response was not clear. Please resend both patches as a v2, with the
first unchanged, and this one updated to do the right thing. This just makes
managing the patches as series simpler.

Thank you,

-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center