All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/core: Do not preserve framebuffer on rmfb, v3.
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 12:42:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160412104208.GC2510@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1459423563-27558-1-git-send-email-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 01:26:03PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> It turns out that preserving framebuffers after the rmfb call breaks
> vmwgfx userspace. This was originally introduced because it was thought
> nobody relied on the behavior, but unfortunately it seems there are
> exceptions.
> 
> drm_framebuffer_remove may fail with -EINTR now, so a straight revert
> is impossible. There is no way to remove the framebuffer from the lists
> and active planes without introducing a race because of the different
> locking requirements. Instead call drm_framebuffer_remove from a
> workqueue, which is unaffected by signals.
> 
> Changes since v1:
> - Add comment.
> Changes since v2:
> - Add fastpath for refcount = 1. (danvet)
> 
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #v4.4+
> Fixes: 13803132818c ("drm/core: Preserve the framebuffer after removing it.")
> Testcase: kms_flip.flip-vs-rmfb-interruptible
> References: https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2016-March/102876.html
> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
> Cc: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

But definitely want a t-b from Thomas before applying, since he reported
this regression.
-Daniel

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
> index 55ffde5a3a4a..743bece1f579 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
> @@ -3434,6 +3434,18 @@ int drm_mode_addfb2(struct drm_device *dev,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +struct drm_mode_rmfb_work {
> +	struct work_struct work;
> +	struct drm_framebuffer *fb;
> +};
> +
> +static void drm_mode_rmfb_work_fn(struct work_struct *w)
> +{
> +	struct drm_mode_rmfb_work *arg = container_of(w, typeof(*arg), work);
> +
> +	drm_framebuffer_remove(arg->fb);
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * drm_mode_rmfb - remove an FB from the configuration
>   * @dev: drm device for the ioctl
> @@ -3474,7 +3486,22 @@ int drm_mode_rmfb(struct drm_device *dev,
>  	mutex_unlock(&dev->mode_config.fb_lock);
>  	mutex_unlock(&file_priv->fbs_lock);
>  
> -	drm_framebuffer_unreference(fb);
> +	/*
> +	 * drm_framebuffer_remove may fail with -EINTR on pending signals,
> +	 * so run this in a separate stack as there's no way to correctly
> +	 * handle this after the fb is already removed from the lookup table.
> +	 */
> +	if (atomic_read(&fb->refcount.refcount) > 1) {
> +		struct drm_mode_rmfb_work arg;
> +
> +		INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(&arg.work, drm_mode_rmfb_work_fn);
> +		arg.fb = fb;
> +
> +		schedule_work(&arg.work);
> +		flush_work(&arg.work);
> +		destroy_work_on_stack(&arg.work);
> +	} else
> +		drm_framebuffer_unreference(fb);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  
> -- 
> 2.1.0
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/core: Do not preserve framebuffer on rmfb, v3.
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 12:42:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160412104208.GC2510@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1459423563-27558-1-git-send-email-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 01:26:03PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> It turns out that preserving framebuffers after the rmfb call breaks
> vmwgfx userspace. This was originally introduced because it was thought
> nobody relied on the behavior, but unfortunately it seems there are
> exceptions.
> 
> drm_framebuffer_remove may fail with -EINTR now, so a straight revert
> is impossible. There is no way to remove the framebuffer from the lists
> and active planes without introducing a race because of the different
> locking requirements. Instead call drm_framebuffer_remove from a
> workqueue, which is unaffected by signals.
> 
> Changes since v1:
> - Add comment.
> Changes since v2:
> - Add fastpath for refcount = 1. (danvet)
> 
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #v4.4+
> Fixes: 13803132818c ("drm/core: Preserve the framebuffer after removing it.")
> Testcase: kms_flip.flip-vs-rmfb-interruptible
> References: https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2016-March/102876.html
> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
> Cc: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

But definitely want a t-b from Thomas before applying, since he reported
this regression.
-Daniel

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
> index 55ffde5a3a4a..743bece1f579 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
> @@ -3434,6 +3434,18 @@ int drm_mode_addfb2(struct drm_device *dev,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +struct drm_mode_rmfb_work {
> +	struct work_struct work;
> +	struct drm_framebuffer *fb;
> +};
> +
> +static void drm_mode_rmfb_work_fn(struct work_struct *w)
> +{
> +	struct drm_mode_rmfb_work *arg = container_of(w, typeof(*arg), work);
> +
> +	drm_framebuffer_remove(arg->fb);
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * drm_mode_rmfb - remove an FB from the configuration
>   * @dev: drm device for the ioctl
> @@ -3474,7 +3486,22 @@ int drm_mode_rmfb(struct drm_device *dev,
>  	mutex_unlock(&dev->mode_config.fb_lock);
>  	mutex_unlock(&file_priv->fbs_lock);
>  
> -	drm_framebuffer_unreference(fb);
> +	/*
> +	 * drm_framebuffer_remove may fail with -EINTR on pending signals,
> +	 * so run this in a separate stack as there's no way to correctly
> +	 * handle this after the fb is already removed from the lookup table.
> +	 */
> +	if (atomic_read(&fb->refcount.refcount) > 1) {
> +		struct drm_mode_rmfb_work arg;
> +
> +		INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(&arg.work, drm_mode_rmfb_work_fn);
> +		arg.fb = fb;
> +
> +		schedule_work(&arg.work);
> +		flush_work(&arg.work);
> +		destroy_work_on_stack(&arg.work);
> +	} else
> +		drm_framebuffer_unreference(fb);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  
> -- 
> 2.1.0
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-04-12 10:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-22  9:58 [PATCH] drm/core: Do not preserve framebuffer on rmfb, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2016-03-22 11:35 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2016-03-31 11:26 ` [PATCH] drm/core: Do not preserve framebuffer on rmfb, v3 Maarten Lankhorst
2016-04-11  7:30   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2016-04-12 10:42   ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2016-04-12 10:42     ` Daniel Vetter
2016-05-02  9:07     ` [REBASED PATCH] " Maarten Lankhorst
2016-05-02  9:07       ` Maarten Lankhorst
2016-05-03 12:01   ` [PATCH] " Thomas Hellstrom
2016-05-04 12:10     ` [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms: Add test for testing rmfb framebuffer removal handling Maarten Lankhorst
2016-05-05  9:11       ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-05-05 11:50         ` Daniel Vetter
2016-05-04 12:38     ` [PATCH] drm/core: Do not preserve framebuffer on rmfb, v4 Maarten Lankhorst
2016-05-05  9:07       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-05-05 11:51         ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160412104208.GC2510@phenom.ffwll.local \
    --to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thellstrom@vmware.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.