Driver directory selection for Power Supply Status chip

Driver directory selection for Power Supply Status chip

[Thor Thayer]

Hi,

The Arria10 System Resource chip (A10SR) is a SPI based MFD implementing 
a GPIO expander, reset controller, and power supply monitoring. I'm not 
sure where the driver for the A10SR power monitoring driver should 
reside and I'm hoping someone can offer some advice.

I'd originally submitted the RFC to the HWMON list but the maintainer 
pointed out that it wasn't a good fit because the A10SR only indicates 
boolean power supply status - not the voltage level as required by HWMON.

I read that IIO acts as a bridge between IO and HWMON but I'm also not 
sure this fits those drivers (although I did find some power supply 
supervistors there). It isn't quite a power supply supervisor - the 
A10SR is a comparator instead of an Analog-to-Digital Converter.

One additional thing, the A10SR also had a number of enable bits for 
enabling devices external to Altera's SoC (but still on the development 
board). These don't quite fit into the reset controller framework but 
would seem to fit a MISC directory driver better.

If neither IIO or MISC is a good fit, can someone suggest a more 
appropriate place?

Thank you for your help,

Thor

Re: Driver directory selection for Power Supply Status chip

[Lars-Peter Clausen]

On 04/18/2016 06:14 PM, Thor Thayer wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The Arria10 System Resource chip (A10SR) is a SPI based MFD implementing a
> GPIO expander, reset controller, and power supply monitoring. I'm not sure
> where the driver for the A10SR power monitoring driver should reside and I'm
> hoping someone can offer some advice.
> 
> I'd originally submitted the RFC to the HWMON list but the maintainer
> pointed out that it wasn't a good fit because the A10SR only indicates
> boolean power supply status - not the voltage level as required by HWMON.
> 
> I read that IIO acts as a bridge between IO and HWMON but I'm also not sure
> this fits those drivers (although I did find some power supply supervistors
> there). It isn't quite a power supply supervisor - the A10SR is a comparator
> instead of an Analog-to-Digital Converter.
> 
> One additional thing, the A10SR also had a number of enable bits for
> enabling devices external to Altera's SoC (but still on the development
> board). These don't quite fit into the reset controller framework but would
> seem to fit a MISC directory driver better.
> 
> If neither IIO or MISC is a good fit, can someone suggest a more appropriate
> place?

How does the device work, does it generate an interrupt when the voltage
level goes below the threshold? I'd like to pass the ball back and say that
this sounds like something that should go into hwmon.

Re: Driver directory selection for Power Supply Status chip

[Thor Thayer]

On 04/18/2016 11:41 AM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 04/18/2016 06:14 PM, Thor Thayer wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The Arria10 System Resource chip (A10SR) is a SPI based MFD implementing a
>> GPIO expander, reset controller, and power supply monitoring. I'm not sure
>> where the driver for the A10SR power monitoring driver should reside and I'm
>> hoping someone can offer some advice.
>>
>> I'd originally submitted the RFC to the HWMON list but the maintainer
>> pointed out that it wasn't a good fit because the A10SR only indicates
>> boolean power supply status - not the voltage level as required by HWMON.
>>
>> I read that IIO acts as a bridge between IO and HWMON but I'm also not sure
>> this fits those drivers (although I did find some power supply supervistors
>> there). It isn't quite a power supply supervisor - the A10SR is a comparator
>> instead of an Analog-to-Digital Converter.
>>
>> One additional thing, the A10SR also had a number of enable bits for
>> enabling devices external to Altera's SoC (but still on the development
>> board). These don't quite fit into the reset controller framework but would
>> seem to fit a MISC directory driver better.
>>
>> If neither IIO or MISC is a good fit, can someone suggest a more appropriate
>> place?
>
> How does the device work, does it generate an interrupt when the voltage
> level goes below the threshold? I'd like to pass the ball back and say that
> this sounds like something that should go into hwmon.
>

Good question but no, there is no interrupt.

The chip is actually a power supply sequencer for bringing up the power 
supplies in the correct order. Since the sequence, timings, and 
thresholds are hard coded in the chip and can't be changed 
programatically, I assume it was decided that a power fail interrupt was 
not needed. However, the status of the power (OK/Fail) can be read from 
the chip.

I was directed to look at Documentation/hwmon/sysfs-interface which 
states the units are in millivolts and I didn't see any references to a 
boolean output so I'm leaning away from hwmon.

Thank you for your reply!

Re: Driver directory selection for Power Supply Status chip

[Jonathan Cameron]

On 18/04/16 20:43, Thor Thayer wrote:
> 
> 
> On 04/18/2016 11:41 AM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>> On 04/18/2016 06:14 PM, Thor Thayer wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The Arria10 System Resource chip (A10SR) is a SPI based MFD implementing a
>>> GPIO expander, reset controller, and power supply monitoring. I'm not sure
>>> where the driver for the A10SR power monitoring driver should reside and I'm
>>> hoping someone can offer some advice.
>>>
>>> I'd originally submitted the RFC to the HWMON list but the maintainer
>>> pointed out that it wasn't a good fit because the A10SR only indicates
>>> boolean power supply status - not the voltage level as required by HWMON.
>>>
>>> I read that IIO acts as a bridge between IO and HWMON but I'm also not sure
>>> this fits those drivers (although I did find some power supply supervistors
>>> there). It isn't quite a power supply supervisor - the A10SR is a comparator
>>> instead of an Analog-to-Digital Converter.
>>>
>>> One additional thing, the A10SR also had a number of enable bits for
>>> enabling devices external to Altera's SoC (but still on the development
>>> board). These don't quite fit into the reset controller framework but would
>>> seem to fit a MISC directory driver better.
>>>
>>> If neither IIO or MISC is a good fit, can someone suggest a more appropriate
>>> place?
>>
>> How does the device work, does it generate an interrupt when the voltage
>> level goes below the threshold? I'd like to pass the ball back and say that
>> this sounds like something that should go into hwmon.
>>
> 
> Good question but no, there is no interrupt.
> 
> The chip is actually a power supply sequencer for bringing up the
> power supplies in the correct order. Since the sequence, timings, and
> thresholds are hard coded in the chip and can't be changed
> programatically, I assume it was decided that a power fail interrupt
> was not needed. However, the status of the power (OK/Fail) can be
> read from the chip.
> 
> I was directed to look at Documentation/hwmon/sysfs-interface which
> states the units are in millivolts and I didn't see any references to
> a boolean output so I'm leaning away from hwmon.
That's one impressively uninformative output...  Hmm.
Not obvious where to put it - it doesn't fit in IIO really either.

Could report as a power supply?  There is 'health' support in there.
See Documentation/power/power_supply_class.txt
and include/linux/power_supply.h
though I'm not sure which type a fail on this would count as...
perhaps UNSPEC_FAILURE.

It's intended for batteries really - not sure how far you can stretch
that.

Cc'd linux-pm and maintainers.  Perhaps they will have a better idea!
> 
> Thank you for your reply!
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: Driver directory selection for Power Supply Status chip

[Jonathan Cameron]

On 18/04/16 20:43, Thor Thayer wrote:
> 
> 
> On 04/18/2016 11:41 AM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>> On 04/18/2016 06:14 PM, Thor Thayer wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The Arria10 System Resource chip (A10SR) is a SPI based MFD implementing a
>>> GPIO expander, reset controller, and power supply monitoring. I'm not sure
>>> where the driver for the A10SR power monitoring driver should reside and I'm
>>> hoping someone can offer some advice.
>>>
>>> I'd originally submitted the RFC to the HWMON list but the maintainer
>>> pointed out that it wasn't a good fit because the A10SR only indicates
>>> boolean power supply status - not the voltage level as required by HWMON.
>>>
>>> I read that IIO acts as a bridge between IO and HWMON but I'm also not sure
>>> this fits those drivers (although I did find some power supply supervistors
>>> there). It isn't quite a power supply supervisor - the A10SR is a comparator
>>> instead of an Analog-to-Digital Converter.
>>>
>>> One additional thing, the A10SR also had a number of enable bits for
>>> enabling devices external to Altera's SoC (but still on the development
>>> board). These don't quite fit into the reset controller framework but would
>>> seem to fit a MISC directory driver better.
>>>
>>> If neither IIO or MISC is a good fit, can someone suggest a more appropriate
>>> place?
>>
>> How does the device work, does it generate an interrupt when the voltage
>> level goes below the threshold? I'd like to pass the ball back and say that
>> this sounds like something that should go into hwmon.
>>
> 
> Good question but no, there is no interrupt.
> 
> The chip is actually a power supply sequencer for bringing up the
> power supplies in the correct order. Since the sequence, timings, and
> thresholds are hard coded in the chip and can't be changed
> programatically, I assume it was decided that a power fail interrupt
> was not needed. However, the status of the power (OK/Fail) can be
> read from the chip.
> 
> I was directed to look at Documentation/hwmon/sysfs-interface which
> states the units are in millivolts and I didn't see any references to
> a boolean output so I'm leaning away from hwmon.
That's one impressively uninformative output...  Hmm.
Not obvious where to put it - it doesn't fit in IIO really either.

Could report as a power supply?  There is 'health' support in there.
See Documentation/power/power_supply_class.txt
and include/linux/power_supply.h
though I'm not sure which type a fail on this would count as...
perhaps UNSPEC_FAILURE.

It's intended for batteries really - not sure how far you can stretch
that.

Cc'd linux-pm and maintainers.  Perhaps they will have a better idea!
> 
> Thank you for your reply!
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: Driver directory selection for Power Supply Status chip

[Guenter Roeck]

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 09:06:02PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On 18/04/16 20:43, Thor Thayer wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 04/18/2016 11:41 AM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> >> On 04/18/2016 06:14 PM, Thor Thayer wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> The Arria10 System Resource chip (A10SR) is a SPI based MFD implementing a
> >>> GPIO expander, reset controller, and power supply monitoring. I'm not sure
> >>> where the driver for the A10SR power monitoring driver should reside and I'm
> >>> hoping someone can offer some advice.
> >>>
> >>> I'd originally submitted the RFC to the HWMON list but the maintainer
> >>> pointed out that it wasn't a good fit because the A10SR only indicates
> >>> boolean power supply status - not the voltage level as required by HWMON.
> >>>
> >>> I read that IIO acts as a bridge between IO and HWMON but I'm also not sure
> >>> this fits those drivers (although I did find some power supply supervistors
> >>> there). It isn't quite a power supply supervisor - the A10SR is a comparator
> >>> instead of an Analog-to-Digital Converter.
> >>>
> >>> One additional thing, the A10SR also had a number of enable bits for
> >>> enabling devices external to Altera's SoC (but still on the development
> >>> board). These don't quite fit into the reset controller framework but would
> >>> seem to fit a MISC directory driver better.
> >>>
> >>> If neither IIO or MISC is a good fit, can someone suggest a more appropriate
> >>> place?
> >>
> >> How does the device work, does it generate an interrupt when the voltage
> >> level goes below the threshold? I'd like to pass the ball back and say that
> >> this sounds like something that should go into hwmon.
> >>
> > 
> > Good question but no, there is no interrupt.
> > 
> > The chip is actually a power supply sequencer for bringing up the
> > power supplies in the correct order. Since the sequence, timings, and
> > thresholds are hard coded in the chip and can't be changed
> > programatically, I assume it was decided that a power fail interrupt
> > was not needed. However, the status of the power (OK/Fail) can be
> > read from the chip.
> > 
> > I was directed to look at Documentation/hwmon/sysfs-interface which
> > states the units are in millivolts and I didn't see any references to
> > a boolean output so I'm leaning away from hwmon.
> That's one impressively uninformative output...  Hmm.

Please clarify what you mean with "impressively uninformative output".

FWIW, hwmon alarm attributes are boolean.

Thanks,
Guenter

> Not obvious where to put it - it doesn't fit in IIO really either.
> 
> Could report as a power supply?  There is 'health' support in there.
> See Documentation/power/power_supply_class.txt
> and include/linux/power_supply.h
> though I'm not sure which type a fail on this would count as...
> perhaps UNSPEC_FAILURE.
> 
> It's intended for batteries really - not sure how far you can stretch
> that.
> 
> Cc'd linux-pm and maintainers.  Perhaps they will have a better idea!
> > 
> > Thank you for your reply!
> > -- 
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

Re: Driver directory selection for Power Supply Status chip

[Thor Thayer]

Hi Guenter,

On 04/18/2016 06:50 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 09:06:02PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> On 18/04/16 20:43, Thor Thayer wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 04/18/2016 11:41 AM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>>>> On 04/18/2016 06:14 PM, Thor Thayer wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> The Arria10 System Resource chip (A10SR) is a SPI based MFD implementing a
>>>>> GPIO expander, reset controller, and power supply monitoring. I'm not sure
>>>>> where the driver for the A10SR power monitoring driver should reside and I'm
>>>>> hoping someone can offer some advice.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd originally submitted the RFC to the HWMON list but the maintainer
>>>>> pointed out that it wasn't a good fit because the A10SR only indicates
>>>>> boolean power supply status - not the voltage level as required by HWMON.
>>>>>
>>>>> I read that IIO acts as a bridge between IO and HWMON but I'm also not sure
>>>>> this fits those drivers (although I did find some power supply supervistors
>>>>> there). It isn't quite a power supply supervisor - the A10SR is a comparator
>>>>> instead of an Analog-to-Digital Converter.
>>>>>
>>>>> One additional thing, the A10SR also had a number of enable bits for
>>>>> enabling devices external to Altera's SoC (but still on the development
>>>>> board). These don't quite fit into the reset controller framework but would
>>>>> seem to fit a MISC directory driver better.
>>>>>
>>>>> If neither IIO or MISC is a good fit, can someone suggest a more appropriate
>>>>> place?
>>>>
>>>> How does the device work, does it generate an interrupt when the voltage
>>>> level goes below the threshold? I'd like to pass the ball back and say that
>>>> this sounds like something that should go into hwmon.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Good question but no, there is no interrupt.
>>>
>>> The chip is actually a power supply sequencer for bringing up the
>>> power supplies in the correct order. Since the sequence, timings, and
>>> thresholds are hard coded in the chip and can't be changed
>>> programatically, I assume it was decided that a power fail interrupt
>>> was not needed. However, the status of the power (OK/Fail) can be
>>> read from the chip.
>>>
>>> I was directed to look at Documentation/hwmon/sysfs-interface which
>>> states the units are in millivolts and I didn't see any references to
>>> a boolean output so I'm leaning away from hwmon.
>> That's one impressively uninformative output...  Hmm.
>
> Please clarify what you mean with "impressively uninformative output".
>
> FWIW, hwmon alarm attributes are boolean.
>
> Thanks,
> Guenter
>

Thank you for pointing out the alarms - I missed that but they would 
fit. I'll investigate further.

Thanks!

>> Not obvious where to put it - it doesn't fit in IIO really either.
>>
>> Could report as a power supply?  There is 'health' support in there.
>> See Documentation/power/power_supply_class.txt
>> and include/linux/power_supply.h
>> though I'm not sure which type a fail on this would count as...
>> perhaps UNSPEC_FAILURE.
>>
>> It's intended for batteries really - not sure how far you can stretch
>> that.
>>
>> Cc'd linux-pm and maintainers.  Perhaps they will have a better idea!
>>>
>>> Thank you for your reply!
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>

Re: Driver directory selection for Power Supply Status chip

[Thor Thayer]

Hi Guenter,

On 04/18/2016 06:50 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 09:06:02PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> On 18/04/16 20:43, Thor Thayer wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 04/18/2016 11:41 AM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>>>> On 04/18/2016 06:14 PM, Thor Thayer wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> The Arria10 System Resource chip (A10SR) is a SPI based MFD implementing a
>>>>> GPIO expander, reset controller, and power supply monitoring. I'm not sure
>>>>> where the driver for the A10SR power monitoring driver should reside and I'm
>>>>> hoping someone can offer some advice.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd originally submitted the RFC to the HWMON list but the maintainer
>>>>> pointed out that it wasn't a good fit because the A10SR only indicates
>>>>> boolean power supply status - not the voltage level as required by HWMON.
>>>>>
>>>>> I read that IIO acts as a bridge between IO and HWMON but I'm also not sure
>>>>> this fits those drivers (although I did find some power supply supervistors
>>>>> there). It isn't quite a power supply supervisor - the A10SR is a comparator
>>>>> instead of an Analog-to-Digital Converter.
>>>>>
>>>>> One additional thing, the A10SR also had a number of enable bits for
>>>>> enabling devices external to Altera's SoC (but still on the development
>>>>> board). These don't quite fit into the reset controller framework but would
>>>>> seem to fit a MISC directory driver better.
>>>>>
>>>>> If neither IIO or MISC is a good fit, can someone suggest a more appropriate
>>>>> place?
>>>>
>>>> How does the device work, does it generate an interrupt when the voltage
>>>> level goes below the threshold? I'd like to pass the ball back and say that
>>>> this sounds like something that should go into hwmon.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Good question but no, there is no interrupt.
>>>
>>> The chip is actually a power supply sequencer for bringing up the
>>> power supplies in the correct order. Since the sequence, timings, and
>>> thresholds are hard coded in the chip and can't be changed
>>> programatically, I assume it was decided that a power fail interrupt
>>> was not needed. However, the status of the power (OK/Fail) can be
>>> read from the chip.
>>>
>>> I was directed to look at Documentation/hwmon/sysfs-interface which
>>> states the units are in millivolts and I didn't see any references to
>>> a boolean output so I'm leaning away from hwmon.
>> That's one impressively uninformative output...  Hmm.
>
> Please clarify what you mean with "impressively uninformative output".
>
> FWIW, hwmon alarm attributes are boolean.
>
> Thanks,
> Guenter
>

Thank you for pointing out the alarms - I missed that but they would 
fit. I'll investigate further.

Thanks!

>> Not obvious where to put it - it doesn't fit in IIO really either.
>>
>> Could report as a power supply?  There is 'health' support in there.
>> See Documentation/power/power_supply_class.txt
>> and include/linux/power_supply.h
>> though I'm not sure which type a fail on this would count as...
>> perhaps UNSPEC_FAILURE.
>>
>> It's intended for batteries really - not sure how far you can stretch
>> that.
>>
>> Cc'd linux-pm and maintainers.  Perhaps they will have a better idea!
>>>
>>> Thank you for your reply!
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>

Re: Driver directory selection for Power Supply Status chip

[Jonathan Cameron]

On 19 April 2016 00:50:15 BST, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 09:06:02PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> On 18/04/16 20:43, Thor Thayer wrote:
>> > 
>> > 
>> > On 04/18/2016 11:41 AM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>> >> On 04/18/2016 06:14 PM, Thor Thayer wrote:
>> >>> Hi,
>> >>>
>> >>> The Arria10 System Resource chip (A10SR) is a SPI based MFD
>implementing a
>> >>> GPIO expander, reset controller, and power supply monitoring. I'm
>not sure
>> >>> where the driver for the A10SR power monitoring driver should
>reside and I'm
>> >>> hoping someone can offer some advice.
>> >>>
>> >>> I'd originally submitted the RFC to the HWMON list but the
>maintainer
>> >>> pointed out that it wasn't a good fit because the A10SR only
>indicates
>> >>> boolean power supply status - not the voltage level as required
>by HWMON.
>> >>>
>> >>> I read that IIO acts as a bridge between IO and HWMON but I'm
>also not sure
>> >>> this fits those drivers (although I did find some power supply
>supervistors
>> >>> there). It isn't quite a power supply supervisor - the A10SR is a
>comparator
>> >>> instead of an Analog-to-Digital Converter.
>> >>>
>> >>> One additional thing, the A10SR also had a number of enable bits
>for
>> >>> enabling devices external to Altera's SoC (but still on the
>development
>> >>> board). These don't quite fit into the reset controller framework
>but would
>> >>> seem to fit a MISC directory driver better.
>> >>>
>> >>> If neither IIO or MISC is a good fit, can someone suggest a more
>appropriate
>> >>> place?
>> >>
>> >> How does the device work, does it generate an interrupt when the
>voltage
>> >> level goes below the threshold? I'd like to pass the ball back and
>say that
>> >> this sounds like something that should go into hwmon.
>> >>
>> > 
>> > Good question but no, there is no interrupt.
>> > 
>> > The chip is actually a power supply sequencer for bringing up the
>> > power supplies in the correct order. Since the sequence, timings,
>and
>> > thresholds are hard coded in the chip and can't be changed
>> > programatically, I assume it was decided that a power fail
>interrupt
>> > was not needed. However, the status of the power (OK/Fail) can be
>> > read from the chip.
>> > 
>> > I was directed to look at Documentation/hwmon/sysfs-interface which
>> > states the units are in millivolts and I didn't see any references
>to
>> > a boolean output so I'm leaning away from hwmon.
>> That's one impressively uninformative output...  Hmm.

It's not an alarm on anything in particular but rather simply means 'something is wrong somewhere in the power supply startup'.

>
>Please clarify what you mean with "impressively uninformative output".
>
>FWIW, hwmon alarm attributes are boolean.
>
>Thanks,
>Guenter
>
>> Not obvious where to put it - it doesn't fit in IIO really either.
>> 
>> Could report as a power supply?  There is 'health' support in there.
>> See Documentation/power/power_supply_class.txt
>> and include/linux/power_supply.h
>> though I'm not sure which type a fail on this would count as...
>> perhaps UNSPEC_FAILURE.
>> 
>> It's intended for batteries really - not sure how far you can stretch
>> that.
>> 
>> Cc'd linux-pm and maintainers.  Perhaps they will have a better idea!
>> > 
>> > Thank you for your reply!
>> > -- 
>> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
>linux-iio" in
>> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> 
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.