All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] armv8: s32v234: Introduce basic support for s32v234evb
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 12:53:52 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160419165352.GD13577@bill-the-cat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1459642206-20101-2-git-send-email-eddy.petrisor@gmail.com>

On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 03:10:06AM +0300, Eddy Petri?or wrote:

> Add initial support for NXP's S32V234 SoC and S32V234EVB board.
> 
> The S32V230 family is designed to support computation-intensive applications
> for image processing. The S32V234, as part of the S32V230 family, is a
> high-performance automotive processor designed to support safe
> computation-intensive applications in the area of vision and sensor fusion.
> 
> Code originally writen by:
> Original-signed-off-by: Stoica Cosmin-Stefan <cosminstefan.stoica@freescale.com>
> Original-signed-off-by: Mihaela Martinas <Mihaela.Martinas@freescale.com>
> Original-signed-off-by: Eddy Petri?or <eddy.petrisor@gmail.com>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eddy Petri?or <eddy.petrisor@gmail.com>

Interesting, thanks for the contribution.  Some comments:

[snip]
> +#ifndef CONFIG_SYS_DCACHE_OFF
> +
> +#define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_IRAM_BASE        0x3e800000UL
> +#define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_IRAM_SIZE        0x800000UL
> +#define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_DRAM_BASE1       0x80000000UL
> +#define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_DRAM_SIZE1       0x40000000UL
> +#define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_DRAM_BASE2       0xC0000000UL
> +#define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_DRAM_SIZE2       0x20000000UL
> +#define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_PERIPH_BASE      0x40000000UL
> +#define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_PERIPH_SIZE      0x40000000UL

We shouldn't use CONFIG_SYS here as it's not a config option.

[snip]
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/s32v234/generic.c
[snip]
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FSL_ESDHC
> +DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
> +#endif

No need to guard this.

[snip]
> +/* Dump some core clocks */
> +int do_s32v234_showclocks(cmd_tbl_t * cmdtp, int flag, int argc,
> +			  char *const argv[])
> +{
> +#if 0				/* Disable until the clock code will updated for S32V234 */

We should probably remove this then..

> +U_BOOT_CMD(clocks, CONFIG_SYS_MAXARGS, 1, do_s32v234_showclocks,
> +	   "display clocks", "");

And we're trying to not have commands in places other than cmd/

> +#ifdef CONFIG_FEC_MXC
> +void imx_get_mac_from_fuse(int dev_id, unsigned char *mac)
> +{
> +#if 0				/* b46902 */
> +	struct ocotp_regs *ocotp = (struct ocotp_regs *)OCOTP_BASE_ADDR;
> +	struct fuse_bank *bank = &ocotp->bank[4];
> +	struct fuse_bank4_regs *fuse =
> +	    (struct fuse_bank4_regs *)bank->fuse_regs;
> +
> +	u32 value = readl(&fuse->mac_addr0);
> +	mac[0] = (value >> 8);
> +	mac[1] = value;
> +
> +	value = readl(&fuse->mac_addr1);
> +	mac[2] = value >> 24;
> +	mac[3] = value >> 16;
> +	mac[4] = value >> 8;
> +	mac[5] = value;
> +#endif
> +}
> +#endif

If the FEC stuff doesn't work yet, lets just leave it out.

> +void reset_cpu(ulong addr)
> +{
> +#if 0				/* b46902 */
> +	struct src *src_regs = (struct src *)SRC_BASE_ADDR;
> +
> +	/* Generate a SW reset from SRC SCR register */
> +	writel(SRC_SCR_SW_RST, &src_regs->scr);
> +
> +	/* If we get there, we are not in good shape */
> +	mdelay(1000);
> +	printf("FATAL: Reset Failed!\n");
> +	hang();
> +#endif
> +};

Here and elsewhere, we should drop if 0'd code.  Can we not really do a
reset?

> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-s32v234/mc_me_regs.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-s32v234/mc_me_regs.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..4313140
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-s32v234/mc_me_regs.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,212 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright 2015 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of
> + * the License, or (at your option) any later version.

Here and anywhere else that was missed, please use SPDX tags.

[snip]
> diff --git a/board/freescale/s32v234evb/lpddr2.c b/board/freescale/s32v234evb/lpddr2.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..0bd5183
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/board/freescale/s32v234evb/lpddr2.c

This file, and a few other things too possibly, feel more like SoC
specific things rather than board specific things.  Further, especially
for the DDR parts, can we leverage arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/ddr.c perhaps
here? And move it into drivers/ddr/imx/ ?

> +static void setup_iomux_enet(void)
> +{
> +	/* TODO: Implement enet iomux when it is activated. */
> +}
> +
> +static void setup_iomux_i2c(void)
> +{
> +	/* TODO: Implement i2c iomux when it is activated. */
> +}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_USE_NAND
> +void setup_iomux_nfc(void)
> +{
> +	/*TODO: Implement nfc iomux when it is activated. */
> +}
> +#endif

We should leave out these TODO bits for now.

> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c b/drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c
> index ea5f4bf..d564022 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c
> @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ static int esdhc_setup_data(struct mmc *mmc, struct mmc_data *data)
>  	int timeout;
>  	struct fsl_esdhc_cfg *cfg = mmc->priv;
>  	struct fsl_esdhc *regs = (struct fsl_esdhc *)cfg->esdhc_base;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_FSL_LAYERSCAPE
> +#if defined(CONFIG_FSL_LAYERSCAPE) || defined(CONFIG_S32V234)
>  	dma_addr_t addr;
>  #endif
>  	uint wml_value;

Maybe we need to come up with a flag that says 64bit CPU and use that
here?  Thanks!

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20160419/6ebbbed3/attachment.sig>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-19 16:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-03  0:10 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] serial: Introduce linflex uart support Eddy Petrișor
2016-04-03  0:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] armv8: s32v234: Introduce basic support for s32v234evb Eddy Petrișor
2016-04-19 16:53   ` Tom Rini [this message]
2016-04-21 16:03     ` Eddy Petrișor
2016-04-21 16:28       ` Tom Rini
2016-04-04  3:22 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] serial: Introduce linflex uart support Bin Meng
2016-04-04 14:22   ` Eddy Petrișor
2016-04-05  1:43     ` Bin Meng
2016-04-27 22:07       ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 " Eddy Petrișor
2016-05-07 14:56         ` Bin Meng
2016-05-08  0:05           ` Eddy Petrișor
2016-04-27 21:39 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] Initial support for S32V234 - version 2 Eddy Petrișor
2016-04-27 21:39 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] serial: Introduce linflex uart support Eddy Petrișor
2016-04-27 21:39 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] armv8: s32v234: Introduce basic support for s32v234evb Eddy Petrișor
2016-04-27 22:07 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/2] Initial S32V234 support - version 2 (with notes now) Eddy Petrișor
2016-05-28  9:56   ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/2] Initial support for S32V234 - version 3 Eddy Petrișor
2016-05-28  9:56     ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/2] serial: Introduce linflex uart support Eddy Petrișor
2016-05-28  9:56     ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/2] armv8: s32v234: Introduce basic support for s32v234evb Eddy Petrișor
2016-05-28 10:10       ` Alexander Graf
2016-05-28 10:51     ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 0/2] Initial support for s32v234 Eddy Petrișor
2016-05-28 10:51       ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/2] serial: Introduce linflex uart support Eddy Petrișor
2016-05-28 10:51       ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 2/2] armv8: s32v234: Introduce basic support for s32v234evb Eddy Petrișor
2016-06-04 19:18     ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 0/2] Initial support for s32v234 Eddy Petrișor
2016-06-04 19:18       ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 1/2] serial: Introduce linflex uart support Eddy Petrișor
2016-06-04 19:18       ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 2/2] armv8: s32v234: Introduce basic support for s32v234evb Eddy Petrișor
2016-06-04 22:23       ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 0/2] Initial support for s32v234 Fabio Estevam
2016-06-04 23:59         ` Eddy Petrișor
2016-06-05  0:52           ` Fabio Estevam
2016-06-05  1:15             ` Eddy Petrișor
2016-06-05  0:42       ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v6 " Eddy Petrișor
2016-06-05  0:42         ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v6 1/2] serial: Introduce linflex uart support Eddy Petrișor
2016-06-19 14:10           ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v6, " Tom Rini
2016-06-19 20:41             ` Eddy Petrișor
2016-06-05  0:43         ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v6 2/2] armv8: s32v234: Introduce basic support for s32v234evb Eddy Petrișor
2016-06-19 14:10           ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v6, " Tom Rini
2016-06-19 20:51             ` Eddy Petrișor
2016-04-27 22:07 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 " Eddy Petrișor
2016-05-07 16:22   ` Alexander Graf
2016-05-07 23:59     ` Eddy Petrișor
2016-05-08  7:21       ` Alexander Graf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160419165352.GD13577@bill-the-cat \
    --to=trini@konsulko.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.