[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] serial: Introduce linflex uart support

[Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>]

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 10:22 PM, Eddy Petri?or <eddy.petrisor@gmail.com> wrote:
> (- Eric, he left the company a little after he contributed to the linflex
> driver, so he's email is no longer valid)
>
> Pe 4 apr. 2016 6:22 a.m., "Bin Meng" <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> a scris:
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 8:10 AM, Eddy Petri?or <eddy.petrisor@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > From: Stoica Cosmin-Stefan <cosminstefan.stoica@freescale.com>
>> >
>> > The Linflex module is integrated on some NXP automotive SoCs part of the
>> > former
>> > Freescale portfolio, like S32V234, an
> [..]
>
>> > +static void linflex_serial_putc(const char c)
>> > +{
>> > +       if (c == '\n')
>> > +               serial_putc('\r');
>>
>> Please remove this \n \r handling.
>
> I will and retest, but without it we saw in the past the console not
> behaving correctly.
>

With driver model, this is no longer needed. For legacy drivers, yes,
it's needed.

> [..]
>
>> > --
>>
>> You should really start creating DM serial driver. Non-DM serial
>> driver is not going to be accepted.
>
> I see. Does that imply also SPL support? Our current vendor branch has no
> SPL support and we had no real need for it. On the other hand it is entirely
> possible I am misunderstanding what/if the SPL would benefit us.
>

No need to do SPL support if your board does not need SPL.

Regards,
Bin