All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	"Bjorn Helgaas"
	<bhelgaas-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-pci-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	"Thomas Petazzoni"
	<thomas.petazzoni-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
	"Jason Cooper" <jason-NLaQJdtUoK4Be96aLqz0jA@public.gmane.org>,
	"Scott Branden"
	<sbranden-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
	"Jon Mason" <jonmason-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
	"Jingoo Han" <jingoohan1-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	"Pratyush Anand"
	<pratyush.anand-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	rfi-g9ZBwUv/Ih/yUk5EbOjzuce+I+R0W71w@public.gmane.org,
	linux-renesas-soc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	"Simon Horman" <horms-/R6kz+dDXgpPR4JQBCEnsQ@public.gmane.org>,
	"Thierry Reding"
	<thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	"Tanmay Inamdar" <tinamdar-qTEPVZfXA3Y@public.gmane.org>,
	"Ray Jui" <rjui-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	"Ley Foon Tan" <lftan-EIB2kfCEclfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	"Michal Simek"
	<michal.simek-gjFFaj9aHVfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	"Sören Brinkmann"
	<soren.brinkmann-gjFFaj9aHVfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/25] PCI: Request host bridge window resources
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 18:34:27 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160607233427.GB4759@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3552943.lb56sJA8nL@wuerfel>

On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 03:25:46PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 7, 2016 8:11:05 AM CEST Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > 
> > > What do you think is the correct behavior here, should the driver only
> > > request the PIO range with parent=ioport_resource, or should it also
> > > request the MMIO window for the I/O ports with parent=iomem_resource?
> > > In the latter case, any idea how that can be generalized?
> > 
> > I think it should request both because I think iomem_resource should
> > contain everything in the memory map.  This would be required if we ever
> > did any significant reassignment of top-level devices, e.g., ACPI devices.
> 
> Ok. Should we try to pass the mmio resource for the I/O window to
> the devm_request_pci_bus_resources() function along with the other
> arguments then?

I think memory-mapped I/O port windows are different enough that maybe
we ought to handle them separately.  It seems like there are several
things related to setting up those windows (requesting the resource,
ioremapping it, allocating the CPU port number space, etc.), and maybe
if we keep this out, a pattern will emerge.

Maybe I should rename this to "devm_request_pci_host_windows()" or
something?

> As far as I can tell, it should not go into the resource list
> because it is not something the PCI core code should access the
> way it handles the other resources.

Right.

Bjorn

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	"Thomas Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
	"Jason Cooper" <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	"Scott Branden" <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
	"Jon Mason" <jonmason@broadcom.com>,
	"Jingoo Han" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
	"Pratyush Anand" <pratyush.anand@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rfi@lists.rocketboards.org,
	linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	"Simon Horman" <horms@verge.net.au>,
	"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	"Tanmay Inamdar" <tinamdar@apm.com>,
	"Ray Jui" <rjui@broadcom.com>,
	linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, "Ley Foon Tan" <lftan@altera.com>,
	"Michal Simek" <michal.simek@xilinx.com>,
	"Sören Brinkmann" <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/25] PCI: Request host bridge window resources
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 18:34:27 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160607233427.GB4759@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3552943.lb56sJA8nL@wuerfel>

On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 03:25:46PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 7, 2016 8:11:05 AM CEST Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > 
> > > What do you think is the correct behavior here, should the driver only
> > > request the PIO range with parent=ioport_resource, or should it also
> > > request the MMIO window for the I/O ports with parent=iomem_resource?
> > > In the latter case, any idea how that can be generalized?
> > 
> > I think it should request both because I think iomem_resource should
> > contain everything in the memory map.  This would be required if we ever
> > did any significant reassignment of top-level devices, e.g., ACPI devices.
> 
> Ok. Should we try to pass the mmio resource for the I/O window to
> the devm_request_pci_bus_resources() function along with the other
> arguments then?

I think memory-mapped I/O port windows are different enough that maybe
we ought to handle them separately.  It seems like there are several
things related to setting up those windows (requesting the resource,
ioremapping it, allocating the CPU port number space, etc.), and maybe
if we keep this out, a pattern will emerge.

Maybe I should rename this to "devm_request_pci_host_windows()" or
something?

> As far as I can tell, it should not go into the resource list
> because it is not something the PCI core code should access the
> way it handles the other resources.

Right.

Bjorn

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: "Thomas Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
	"Jason Cooper" <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	"Scott Branden" <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
	"Jon Mason" <jonmason@broadcom.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	"Pratyush Anand" <pratyush.anand@gmail.com>,
	"Sören Brinkmann" <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Ray Jui" <rjui@broadcom.com>,
	rfi@lists.rocketboards.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, "Simon Horman" <horms@verge.net.au>,
	"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	"Tanmay Inamdar" <tinamdar@apm.com>,
	"Jingoo Han" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Ley Foon Tan" <lftan@altera.com>,
	"Michal Simek" <michal.simek@xilinx.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/25] PCI: Request host bridge window resources
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 18:34:27 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160607233427.GB4759@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3552943.lb56sJA8nL@wuerfel>

On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 03:25:46PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 7, 2016 8:11:05 AM CEST Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > 
> > > What do you think is the correct behavior here, should the driver only
> > > request the PIO range with parent=ioport_resource, or should it also
> > > request the MMIO window for the I/O ports with parent=iomem_resource?
> > > In the latter case, any idea how that can be generalized?
> > 
> > I think it should request both because I think iomem_resource should
> > contain everything in the memory map.  This would be required if we ever
> > did any significant reassignment of top-level devices, e.g., ACPI devices.
> 
> Ok. Should we try to pass the mmio resource for the I/O window to
> the devm_request_pci_bus_resources() function along with the other
> arguments then?

I think memory-mapped I/O port windows are different enough that maybe
we ought to handle them separately.  It seems like there are several
things related to setting up those windows (requesting the resource,
ioremapping it, allocating the CPU port number space, etc.), and maybe
if we keep this out, a pattern will emerge.

Maybe I should rename this to "devm_request_pci_host_windows()" or
something?

> As far as I can tell, it should not go into the resource list
> because it is not something the PCI core code should access the
> way it handles the other resources.

Right.

Bjorn

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: helgaas@kernel.org (Bjorn Helgaas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 00/25] PCI: Request host bridge window resources
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 18:34:27 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160607233427.GB4759@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3552943.lb56sJA8nL@wuerfel>

On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 03:25:46PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 7, 2016 8:11:05 AM CEST Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > 
> > > What do you think is the correct behavior here, should the driver only
> > > request the PIO range with parent=ioport_resource, or should it also
> > > request the MMIO window for the I/O ports with parent=iomem_resource?
> > > In the latter case, any idea how that can be generalized?
> > 
> > I think it should request both because I think iomem_resource should
> > contain everything in the memory map.  This would be required if we ever
> > did any significant reassignment of top-level devices, e.g., ACPI devices.
> 
> Ok. Should we try to pass the mmio resource for the I/O window to
> the devm_request_pci_bus_resources() function along with the other
> arguments then?

I think memory-mapped I/O port windows are different enough that maybe
we ought to handle them separately.  It seems like there are several
things related to setting up those windows (requesting the resource,
ioremapping it, allocating the CPU port number space, etc.), and maybe
if we keep this out, a pattern will emerge.

Maybe I should rename this to "devm_request_pci_host_windows()" or
something?

> As far as I can tell, it should not go into the resource list
> because it is not something the PCI core code should access the
> way it handles the other resources.

Right.

Bjorn

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-07 23:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 129+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-06 23:04 [PATCH v1 00/25] PCI: Request host bridge window resources Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:04 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:04 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:04 ` [PATCH v1 01/25] PCI: Add devm_request_pci_bus_resources() Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:04   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:04   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:05 ` [PATCH v1 02/25] PCI: designware: Free bridge resource list on failure Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:05   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:05   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:05   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:05 ` [PATCH v1 03/25] PCI: designware: Request host bridge window resources Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:05   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:05   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:05 ` [PATCH v1 04/25] PCI: designware: Simplify host bridge window iteration Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:05   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:05   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:05 ` [PATCH v1 05/25] PCI: iproc: Request host bridge window resources Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:05   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:05   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:05 ` [PATCH v1 06/25] PCI: xgene: Free bridge resource list on failure Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:05   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:05   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:05   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:05 ` [PATCH v1 08/25] PCI: xilinx: " Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:05   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:05   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:05 ` [PATCH v1 09/25] PCI: xilinx: Request host bridge window resources Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:05   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:05   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:05 ` [PATCH v1 10/25] PCI: xilinx-nwl: Free bridge resource list on failure Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:05   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:05   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:06 ` [PATCH v1 11/25] PCI: xilinx-nwl: Request host bridge window resources Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:06   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:06   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:06   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:06 ` [PATCH v1 12/25] PCI: xilinx-nwl: Use dev_printk() when possible Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:06   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:06   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:06 ` [PATCH v1 13/25] PCI: altera: Request host bridge window resources with core function Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:06   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:06   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:06 ` [PATCH v1 14/25] PCI: altera: Simplify host bridge window iteration Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:06   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:06   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:06 ` [PATCH v1 15/25] PCI: generic: Free resource list close to where it's allocated Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:06   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:06   ` Bjorn Helgaas
     [not found]   ` <20160606230636.20936.29083.stgit-1RhO1Y9PlrlHTL0Zs8A6p/gx64E7kk8eUsxypvmhUTTZJqsBc5GL+g@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-20 16:56     ` Tyler Baker
2016-06-20 16:56       ` Tyler Baker
2016-06-20 16:56       ` Tyler Baker
2016-06-20 16:56       ` Tyler Baker
     [not found]       ` <CANMBJr41muA9mTNAa6MtWuMmeNLQxT4NjLe45=ExdFiH8vwzyw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-20 17:22         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-06-20 17:22           ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-06-20 17:22           ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-06-20 17:22           ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-06-21 15:14           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-21 15:14             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-21 15:14             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:06 ` [PATCH v1 16/25] PCI: generic: Request host bridge window resources with core function Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:06   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:06   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:06 ` [PATCH v1 17/25] PCI: generic: Simplify host bridge window iteration Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:06   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:06 ` [PATCH v1 18/25] PCI: mvebu: Request host bridge window resources with core function Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:06   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:07 ` [PATCH v1 19/25] PCI: rcar Gen2: Request host bridge window resources Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:07   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-21 10:41   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-06-21 10:41     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-06-21 14:26     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-21 14:26       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-21 14:26       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-21 14:26       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-21 15:41       ` Valentine Barshak
2016-06-21 15:41         ` Valentine Barshak
     [not found]         ` <20160621154100.GA4782-M4DtvfQ/ZS1MRgGoP+s0PdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-21 16:49           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-21 16:49             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-21 16:49             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-24 14:19             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-06-24 14:19               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-06-24 14:19               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-06-06 23:07 ` [PATCH v1 21/25] PCI: rcar: Simplify host bridge window iteration Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:07   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:07   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:07 ` [PATCH v1 22/25] PCI: tegra: Remove top-level resource from hierarchy Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:07   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:07 ` [PATCH v1 23/25] PCI: tegra: Request host bridge window resources with core function Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:07   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:07 ` [PATCH v1 24/25] PCI: versatile: " Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:07   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:07 ` [PATCH v1 25/25] PCI: versatile: Simplify host bridge window iteration Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:07   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:07   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-07  8:21 ` [PATCH v1 00/25] PCI: Request host bridge window resources Arnd Bergmann
2016-06-07  8:21   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-06-07 13:11   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-07 13:11     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-07 13:25     ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-06-07 13:25       ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-06-07 13:25       ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-06-07 23:34       ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2016-06-07 23:34         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-07 23:34         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-07 23:34         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-18 17:58     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-18 17:58       ` Bjorn Helgaas
     [not found] ` <20160606225630.20936.77349.stgit-1RhO1Y9PlrlHTL0Zs8A6p/gx64E7kk8eUsxypvmhUTTZJqsBc5GL+g@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-06 23:05   ` [PATCH v1 07/25] PCI: xgene: " Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:05     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:05     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:05     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:07   ` [PATCH v1 20/25] PCI: rcar: Request host bridge window resources with core function Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:07     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:07     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-06 23:07     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-10 19:00   ` [PATCH v1 00/25] PCI: Request host bridge window resources Duc Dang
2016-07-05  4:37     ` Duc Dang
2016-06-10 19:00     ` Duc Dang
2016-06-18 18:07   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-18 18:07     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-18 18:07     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-21 11:58     ` wangyijing
2016-06-21 11:58       ` wangyijing
2016-06-21 15:03       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-21 15:03         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-21 15:03         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-21 15:03         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-22  1:07         ` wangyijing
2016-06-22  1:07           ` wangyijing

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160607233427.GB4759@localhost \
    --to=helgaas-dgejt+ai2ygdnm+yrofe0a@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=horms-/R6kz+dDXgpPR4JQBCEnsQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=jason-NLaQJdtUoK4Be96aLqz0jA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=jingoohan1-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=jonmason-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=lftan-EIB2kfCEclfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-pci-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=michal.simek-gjFFaj9aHVfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=pratyush.anand-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=rfi-g9ZBwUv/Ih/yUk5EbOjzuce+I+R0W71w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=rjui-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=sbranden-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=soren.brinkmann-gjFFaj9aHVfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=tinamdar-qTEPVZfXA3Y@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.