[PATCH -next] sctp: fix error return code in __sctp_connect()

[PATCH -next] sctp: fix error return code in __sctp_connect()

[Wei Yongjun]

From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>

Fix to return a negative error code from the error handling
case instead of 0, as returned elsewhere in this function.

Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
---
 net/sctp/socket.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
index dd21ae3..f631c5f 100644
--- a/net/sctp/socket.c
+++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
@@ -1119,9 +1119,10 @@ static int __sctp_connect(struct sock* sk,
 		/* Make sure the destination port is correctly set
 		 * in all addresses.
 		 */
-		if (asoc && asoc->peer.port && asoc->peer.port != port)
+		if (asoc && asoc->peer.port && asoc->peer.port != port) {
+			err = -EINVAL;
 			goto out_free;
-
+		}
 
 		/* Check if there already is a matching association on the
 		 * endpoint (other than the one created here).

[PATCH -next] sctp: fix error return code in __sctp_connect()

[Wei Yongjun]

From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>

Fix to return a negative error code from the error handling
case instead of 0, as returned elsewhere in this function.

Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
---
 net/sctp/socket.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
index dd21ae3..f631c5f 100644
--- a/net/sctp/socket.c
+++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
@@ -1119,9 +1119,10 @@ static int __sctp_connect(struct sock* sk,
 		/* Make sure the destination port is correctly set
 		 * in all addresses.
 		 */
-		if (asoc && asoc->peer.port && asoc->peer.port != port)
+		if (asoc && asoc->peer.port && asoc->peer.port != port) {
+			err = -EINVAL;
 			goto out_free;
-
+		}
 
 		/* Check if there already is a matching association on the
 		 * endpoint (other than the one created here).

Re: [PATCH -next] sctp: fix error return code in __sctp_connect()

[Neil Horman]

On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 09:02:28PM +0800, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
> 
> Fix to return a negative error code from the error handling
> case instead of 0, as returned elsewhere in this function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
> ---
>  net/sctp/socket.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
> index dd21ae3..f631c5f 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/socket.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
> @@ -1119,9 +1119,10 @@ static int __sctp_connect(struct sock* sk,
>  		/* Make sure the destination port is correctly set
>  		 * in all addresses.
>  		 */
> -		if (asoc && asoc->peer.port && asoc->peer.port != port)
> +		if (asoc && asoc->peer.port && asoc->peer.port != port) {
> +			err = -EINVAL;
>  			goto out_free;
> -
> +		}
>  
>  		/* Check if there already is a matching association on the
>  		 * endpoint (other than the one created here).
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
Actually, I think you can remove that entire if statement (as well as some
checks further down).  Looking at the net-next trees __sctp_connect, it appears
that asoc is set to NULL at the top of the function, and not assigned to
anything else until the call to sctp_association_new much farther down (line
1201).  That means the above if statement, as well as this:
 if (asoc2 && asoc2 != asoc) {
and this:
if (!asoc) {
will always be false, false, and true, respectively.

Regards
Neil

Re: [PATCH -next] sctp: fix error return code in __sctp_connect()

[Neil Horman]

On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 09:02:28PM +0800, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
> 
> Fix to return a negative error code from the error handling
> case instead of 0, as returned elsewhere in this function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
> ---
>  net/sctp/socket.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
> index dd21ae3..f631c5f 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/socket.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
> @@ -1119,9 +1119,10 @@ static int __sctp_connect(struct sock* sk,
>  		/* Make sure the destination port is correctly set
>  		 * in all addresses.
>  		 */
> -		if (asoc && asoc->peer.port && asoc->peer.port != port)
> +		if (asoc && asoc->peer.port && asoc->peer.port != port) {
> +			err = -EINVAL;
>  			goto out_free;
> -
> +		}
>  
>  		/* Check if there already is a matching association on the
>  		 * endpoint (other than the one created here).
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
Actually, I think you can remove that entire if statement (as well as some
checks further down).  Looking at the net-next trees __sctp_connect, it appears
that asoc is set to NULL at the top of the function, and not assigned to
anything else until the call to sctp_association_new much farther down (line
1201).  That means the above if statement, as well as this:
 if (asoc2 && asoc2 != asoc) {
and this:
if (!asoc) {
will always be false, false, and true, respectively.

Regards
Neil

Re: [PATCH -next] sctp: fix error return code in __sctp_connect()

[Vlad Yasevich]

On 04/03/2013 09:51 AM, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 09:02:28PM +0800, Wei Yongjun wrote:
>> From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
>>
>> Fix to return a negative error code from the error handling
>> case instead of 0, as returned elsewhere in this function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
>> ---
>>   net/sctp/socket.c | 5 +++--
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
>> index dd21ae3..f631c5f 100644
>> --- a/net/sctp/socket.c
>> +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
>> @@ -1119,9 +1119,10 @@ static int __sctp_connect(struct sock* sk,
>>   		/* Make sure the destination port is correctly set
>>   		 * in all addresses.
>>   		 */
>> -		if (asoc && asoc->peer.port && asoc->peer.port != port)
>> +		if (asoc && asoc->peer.port && asoc->peer.port != port) {
>> +			err = -EINVAL;
>>   			goto out_free;
>> -
>> +		}
>>
>>   		/* Check if there already is a matching association on the
>>   		 * endpoint (other than the one created here).
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
> Actually, I think you can remove that entire if statement (as well as some
> checks further down).  Looking at the net-next trees __sctp_connect, it appears
> that asoc is set to NULL at the top of the function, and not assigned to
> anything else until the call to sctp_association_new much farther down (line
> 1201).  That means the above if statement, as well as this:
>   if (asoc2 && asoc2 != asoc) {
> and this:
> if (!asoc) {
> will always be false, false, and true, respectively.

No, I don't think you can.  Consider a case of sctp_connectx() where 
each address specified in connectx has a different destination port.

First time through the loop, we'll create the association and set the 
peer.port.  The second time through the loop, we'll compare the that 
port to the port specified in the second address.  If the ports do not 
match, we need to stop.

-vlad
>
> Regards
> Neil
>

Re: [PATCH -next] sctp: fix error return code in __sctp_connect()

[Vlad Yasevich]

On 04/03/2013 09:51 AM, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 09:02:28PM +0800, Wei Yongjun wrote:
>> From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
>>
>> Fix to return a negative error code from the error handling
>> case instead of 0, as returned elsewhere in this function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
>> ---
>>   net/sctp/socket.c | 5 +++--
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
>> index dd21ae3..f631c5f 100644
>> --- a/net/sctp/socket.c
>> +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
>> @@ -1119,9 +1119,10 @@ static int __sctp_connect(struct sock* sk,
>>   		/* Make sure the destination port is correctly set
>>   		 * in all addresses.
>>   		 */
>> -		if (asoc && asoc->peer.port && asoc->peer.port != port)
>> +		if (asoc && asoc->peer.port && asoc->peer.port != port) {
>> +			err = -EINVAL;
>>   			goto out_free;
>> -
>> +		}
>>
>>   		/* Check if there already is a matching association on the
>>   		 * endpoint (other than the one created here).
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
> Actually, I think you can remove that entire if statement (as well as some
> checks further down).  Looking at the net-next trees __sctp_connect, it appears
> that asoc is set to NULL at the top of the function, and not assigned to
> anything else until the call to sctp_association_new much farther down (line
> 1201).  That means the above if statement, as well as this:
>   if (asoc2 && asoc2 != asoc) {
> and this:
> if (!asoc) {
> will always be false, false, and true, respectively.

No, I don't think you can.  Consider a case of sctp_connectx() where 
each address specified in connectx has a different destination port.

First time through the loop, we'll create the association and set the 
peer.port.  The second time through the loop, we'll compare the that 
port to the port specified in the second address.  If the ports do not 
match, we need to stop.

-vlad
>
> Regards
> Neil
>

Re: [PATCH -next] sctp: fix error return code in __sctp_connect()

[Vlad Yasevich]

On 04/03/2013 09:02 AM, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
>
> Fix to return a negative error code from the error handling
> case instead of 0, as returned elsewhere in this function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>

Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>

-vlad

> ---
>   net/sctp/socket.c | 5 +++--
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
> index dd21ae3..f631c5f 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/socket.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
> @@ -1119,9 +1119,10 @@ static int __sctp_connect(struct sock* sk,
>   		/* Make sure the destination port is correctly set
>   		 * in all addresses.
>   		 */
> -		if (asoc && asoc->peer.port && asoc->peer.port != port)
> +		if (asoc && asoc->peer.port && asoc->peer.port != port) {
> +			err = -EINVAL;
>   			goto out_free;
> -
> +		}
>
>   		/* Check if there already is a matching association on the
>   		 * endpoint (other than the one created here).
>

Re: [PATCH -next] sctp: fix error return code in __sctp_connect()

[Vlad Yasevich]

On 04/03/2013 09:02 AM, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
>
> Fix to return a negative error code from the error handling
> case instead of 0, as returned elsewhere in this function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>

Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>

-vlad

> ---
>   net/sctp/socket.c | 5 +++--
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
> index dd21ae3..f631c5f 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/socket.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
> @@ -1119,9 +1119,10 @@ static int __sctp_connect(struct sock* sk,
>   		/* Make sure the destination port is correctly set
>   		 * in all addresses.
>   		 */
> -		if (asoc && asoc->peer.port && asoc->peer.port != port)
> +		if (asoc && asoc->peer.port && asoc->peer.port != port) {
> +			err = -EINVAL;
>   			goto out_free;
> -
> +		}
>
>   		/* Check if there already is a matching association on the
>   		 * endpoint (other than the one created here).
>

Re: [PATCH -next] sctp: fix error return code in __sctp_connect()

[Neil Horman]

On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 10:52:16AM -0400, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> On 04/03/2013 09:51 AM, Neil Horman wrote:
> >On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 09:02:28PM +0800, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> >>From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
> >>
> >>Fix to return a negative error code from the error handling
> >>case instead of 0, as returned elsewhere in this function.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
> >>---
> >>  net/sctp/socket.c | 5 +++--
> >>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
> >>index dd21ae3..f631c5f 100644
> >>--- a/net/sctp/socket.c
> >>+++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
> >>@@ -1119,9 +1119,10 @@ static int __sctp_connect(struct sock* sk,
> >>  		/* Make sure the destination port is correctly set
> >>  		 * in all addresses.
> >>  		 */
> >>-		if (asoc && asoc->peer.port && asoc->peer.port != port)
> >>+		if (asoc && asoc->peer.port && asoc->peer.port != port) {
> >>+			err = -EINVAL;
> >>  			goto out_free;
> >>-
> >>+		}
> >>
> >>  		/* Check if there already is a matching association on the
> >>  		 * endpoint (other than the one created here).
> >>
> >>--
> >>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
> >>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> >>More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >>
> >Actually, I think you can remove that entire if statement (as well as some
> >checks further down).  Looking at the net-next trees __sctp_connect, it appears
> >that asoc is set to NULL at the top of the function, and not assigned to
> >anything else until the call to sctp_association_new much farther down (line
> >1201).  That means the above if statement, as well as this:
> >  if (asoc2 && asoc2 != asoc) {
> >and this:
> >if (!asoc) {
> >will always be false, false, and true, respectively.
> 
> No, I don't think you can.  Consider a case of sctp_connectx() where
> each address specified in connectx has a different destination port.
> 
> First time through the loop, we'll create the association and set
> the peer.port.  The second time through the loop, we'll compare the
> that port to the port specified in the second address.  If the ports
> do not match, we need to stop.
> 
> -vlad
Ah, you're right, I missed the while loop, apologies

Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>

> >
> >Regards
> >Neil
> >
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

Re: [PATCH -next] sctp: fix error return code in __sctp_connect()

[Neil Horman]

On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 10:52:16AM -0400, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> On 04/03/2013 09:51 AM, Neil Horman wrote:
> >On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 09:02:28PM +0800, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> >>From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
> >>
> >>Fix to return a negative error code from the error handling
> >>case instead of 0, as returned elsewhere in this function.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
> >>---
> >>  net/sctp/socket.c | 5 +++--
> >>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
> >>index dd21ae3..f631c5f 100644
> >>--- a/net/sctp/socket.c
> >>+++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
> >>@@ -1119,9 +1119,10 @@ static int __sctp_connect(struct sock* sk,
> >>  		/* Make sure the destination port is correctly set
> >>  		 * in all addresses.
> >>  		 */
> >>-		if (asoc && asoc->peer.port && asoc->peer.port != port)
> >>+		if (asoc && asoc->peer.port && asoc->peer.port != port) {
> >>+			err = -EINVAL;
> >>  			goto out_free;
> >>-
> >>+		}
> >>
> >>  		/* Check if there already is a matching association on the
> >>  		 * endpoint (other than the one created here).
> >>
> >>--
> >>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
> >>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> >>More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >>
> >Actually, I think you can remove that entire if statement (as well as some
> >checks further down).  Looking at the net-next trees __sctp_connect, it appears
> >that asoc is set to NULL at the top of the function, and not assigned to
> >anything else until the call to sctp_association_new much farther down (line
> >1201).  That means the above if statement, as well as this:
> >  if (asoc2 && asoc2 != asoc) {
> >and this:
> >if (!asoc) {
> >will always be false, false, and true, respectively.
> 
> No, I don't think you can.  Consider a case of sctp_connectx() where
> each address specified in connectx has a different destination port.
> 
> First time through the loop, we'll create the association and set
> the peer.port.  The second time through the loop, we'll compare the
> that port to the port specified in the second address.  If the ports
> do not match, we need to stop.
> 
> -vlad
Ah, you're right, I missed the while loop, apologies

Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>

> >
> >Regards
> >Neil
> >
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

Re: [PATCH -next] sctp: fix error return code in __sctp_connect()

[David Miller]

From: Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 21:02:28 +0800

> From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
> 
> Fix to return a negative error code from the error handling
> case instead of 0, as returned elsewhere in this function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>

Applied.

Re: [PATCH -next] sctp: fix error return code in __sctp_connect()

[David Miller]

From: Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 21:02:28 +0800

> From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
> 
> Fix to return a negative error code from the error handling
> case instead of 0, as returned elsewhere in this function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>

Applied.

[PATCH -next] sctp: fix error return code in sctp_init()

[weiyj_lk]

From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>

Fix to return a negative error code from the error handling
case instead of 0, as done elsewhere in this function.

Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
---
 net/sctp/protocol.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/sctp/protocol.c b/net/sctp/protocol.c
index 40022ee..3b56ae5 100644
--- a/net/sctp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/sctp/protocol.c
@@ -1479,7 +1479,8 @@ static __init int sctp_init(void)
 		INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&sctp_port_hashtable[i].chain);
 	}
 
-	if (sctp_transport_hashtable_init())
+	status = sctp_transport_hashtable_init();
+	if (status)
 		goto err_thash_alloc;
 
 	pr_info("Hash tables configured (bind %d/%d)\n", sctp_port_hashsize,

[PATCH -next] sctp: fix error return code in sctp_init()

[weiyj_lk]

From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>

Fix to return a negative error code from the error handling
case instead of 0, as done elsewhere in this function.

Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
---
 net/sctp/protocol.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/sctp/protocol.c b/net/sctp/protocol.c
index 40022ee..3b56ae5 100644
--- a/net/sctp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/sctp/protocol.c
@@ -1479,7 +1479,8 @@ static __init int sctp_init(void)
 		INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&sctp_port_hashtable[i].chain);
 	}
 
-	if (sctp_transport_hashtable_init())
+	status = sctp_transport_hashtable_init();
+	if (status)
 		goto err_thash_alloc;
 
 	pr_info("Hash tables configured (bind %d/%d)\n", sctp_port_hashsize,

Re: [PATCH -next] sctp: fix error return code in sctp_init()

[Xin Long]

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 11:08 PM,  <weiyj_lk@163.com> wrote:
> From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
>
> Fix to return a negative error code from the error handling
> case instead of 0, as done elsewhere in this function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
> ---
>  net/sctp/protocol.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/protocol.c b/net/sctp/protocol.c
> index 40022ee..3b56ae5 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/protocol.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/protocol.c
> @@ -1479,7 +1479,8 @@ static __init int sctp_init(void)
>                 INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&sctp_port_hashtable[i].chain);
>         }
>
> -       if (sctp_transport_hashtable_init())
> +       status = sctp_transport_hashtable_init();
> +       if (status)
>                 goto err_thash_alloc;
>
>         pr_info("Hash tables configured (bind %d/%d)\n", sctp_port_hashsize,
>
>
Acked-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>

Re: [PATCH -next] sctp: fix error return code in sctp_init()

[Xin Long]

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 11:08 PM,  <weiyj_lk@163.com> wrote:
> From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
>
> Fix to return a negative error code from the error handling
> case instead of 0, as done elsewhere in this function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
> ---
>  net/sctp/protocol.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/protocol.c b/net/sctp/protocol.c
> index 40022ee..3b56ae5 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/protocol.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/protocol.c
> @@ -1479,7 +1479,8 @@ static __init int sctp_init(void)
>                 INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&sctp_port_hashtable[i].chain);
>         }
>
> -       if (sctp_transport_hashtable_init())
> +       status = sctp_transport_hashtable_init();
> +       if (status)
>                 goto err_thash_alloc;
>
>         pr_info("Hash tables configured (bind %d/%d)\n", sctp_port_hashsize,
>
>
Acked-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>

Re: [PATCH -next] sctp: fix error return code in sctp_init()

[Neil Horman]

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 11:04:05AM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 11:08 PM,  <weiyj_lk@163.com> wrote:
> > From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
> >
> > Fix to return a negative error code from the error handling
> > case instead of 0, as done elsewhere in this function.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
> > ---
> >  net/sctp/protocol.c | 3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/sctp/protocol.c b/net/sctp/protocol.c
> > index 40022ee..3b56ae5 100644
> > --- a/net/sctp/protocol.c
> > +++ b/net/sctp/protocol.c
> > @@ -1479,7 +1479,8 @@ static __init int sctp_init(void)
> >                 INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&sctp_port_hashtable[i].chain);
> >         }
> >
> > -       if (sctp_transport_hashtable_init())
> > +       status = sctp_transport_hashtable_init();
> > +       if (status)
> >                 goto err_thash_alloc;
> >
> >         pr_info("Hash tables configured (bind %d/%d)\n", sctp_port_hashsize,
> >
> >
> Acked-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>

Re: [PATCH -next] sctp: fix error return code in sctp_init()

[Neil Horman]

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 11:04:05AM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 11:08 PM,  <weiyj_lk@163.com> wrote:
> > From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
> >
> > Fix to return a negative error code from the error handling
> > case instead of 0, as done elsewhere in this function.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
> > ---
> >  net/sctp/protocol.c | 3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/sctp/protocol.c b/net/sctp/protocol.c
> > index 40022ee..3b56ae5 100644
> > --- a/net/sctp/protocol.c
> > +++ b/net/sctp/protocol.c
> > @@ -1479,7 +1479,8 @@ static __init int sctp_init(void)
> >                 INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&sctp_port_hashtable[i].chain);
> >         }
> >
> > -       if (sctp_transport_hashtable_init())
> > +       status = sctp_transport_hashtable_init();
> > +       if (status)
> >                 goto err_thash_alloc;
> >
> >         pr_info("Hash tables configured (bind %d/%d)\n", sctp_port_hashsize,
> >
> >
> Acked-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>

Re: [PATCH -next] sctp: fix error return code in sctp_init()

[David Miller]

From: weiyj_lk@163.com
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 23:08:26 +0800

> From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
> 
> Fix to return a negative error code from the error handling
> case instead of 0, as done elsewhere in this function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>

Applied.

Re: [PATCH -next] sctp: fix error return code in sctp_init()

[David Miller]

From: weiyj_lk@163.com
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 23:08:26 +0800

> From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
> 
> Fix to return a negative error code from the error handling
> case instead of 0, as done elsewhere in this function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>

Applied.