All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
To: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] kexec_file: Generalize kexec_add_buffer.
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 09:58:53 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160616015853.GA4103@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3237367.XLxdnj8q4x@hactar>

On 06/15/16 at 01:21pm, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> Hello Dave,
> 
> Am Mittwoch, 15 Juni 2016, 15:33:02 schrieb Dave Young:
> > > @@ -472,14 +498,16 @@ int kexec_add_buffer(struct kimage *image, char
> > > *buffer, unsigned long bufsz,> 
> > >  	kbuf->top_down = top_down;
> > >  	
> > >  	/* Walk the RAM ranges and allocate a suitable range for the buffer */
> > > 
> > > -	if (image->type == KEXEC_TYPE_CRASH)
> > > -		ret = walk_iomem_res_desc(crashk_res.desc,
> > > -				IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_BUSY,
> > > -				crashk_res.start, crashk_res.end, kbuf,
> > > -				locate_mem_hole_callback);
> > > -	else
> > > -		ret = walk_system_ram_res(0, -1, kbuf,
> > > -					  locate_mem_hole_callback);
> > > +	if (image->type == KEXEC_TYPE_CRASH) {
> > > +		start = crashk_res.start;
> > > +		end = crashk_res.end;
> > > +	} else {
> > > +		start = 0;
> > > +		end = ULONG_MAX;
> > > +	}
> > 
> > For crashk_res, start and end is global, the non-crash values are
> > hard coded, thus it is not necessary to pass these two in arguments.
> > 
> > Moving above to arch_kexec_walk_mem will make it cleaner.
> 
> That's true. What about this version?
> 
> []'s
> Thiago Jung Bauermann
> IBM Linux Technology Center
> 
> 
>     kexec_file: Generalize kexec_add_buffer.
>     
>     Allow architectures to specify different memory walking functions for
>     kexec_add_buffer. Intel uses iomem to track reserved memory ranges,
>     but PowerPC uses the memblock subsystem.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>     Cc: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
>     Cc: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
>     Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org
>     Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/kexec.h b/include/linux/kexec.h
> index e8acb2b43dd9..9b02f907b40a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kexec.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kexec.h
> @@ -315,6 +315,8 @@ int __weak arch_kexec_apply_relocations_add(const Elf_Ehdr *ehdr,
>  					Elf_Shdr *sechdrs, unsigned int relsec);
>  int __weak arch_kexec_apply_relocations(const Elf_Ehdr *ehdr, Elf_Shdr *sechdrs,
>  					unsigned int relsec);
> +int __weak arch_kexec_walk_mem(unsigned int image_type, bool top_down,
> +			       void *data, int (*func)(u64, u64, void *));
>  void arch_kexec_protect_crashkres(void);
>  void arch_kexec_unprotect_crashkres(void);
>  
> diff --git a/kernel/kexec_file.c b/kernel/kexec_file.c
> index b6eec7527e9f..2d066c458222 100644
> --- a/kernel/kexec_file.c
> +++ b/kernel/kexec_file.c
> @@ -428,6 +428,29 @@ static int locate_mem_hole_callback(u64 start, u64 end, void *arg)
>  	return locate_mem_hole_bottom_up(start, end, kbuf);
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * arch_kexec_walk_mem - call func(data) on free memory regions
> + * @image_type:	kimage.type
> + * @top_down:	Start from the highest address?
> + * @data:	Argument to pass to @func.
> + * @func:	Function to call for each memory region.
> + *
> + * Return: The memory walk will stop when func returns a non-zero value
> + * and that value will be returned. If all free regions are visited without
> + * func returning non-zero, then zero will be returned.
> + */
> +int __weak arch_kexec_walk_mem(unsigned int image_type, bool top_down,
> +			       void *data, int (*func)(u64, u64, void *))
> +{

top_down is also not used?

Rethink about the argument name type should be better than image_type,
it is obvious in the comments and the code and simpler.

> +	if (image_type == KEXEC_TYPE_CRASH)
> +		return walk_iomem_res_desc(crashk_res.desc,
> +					   IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_BUSY,
> +					   crashk_res.start, crashk_res.end,
> +					   data, func);
> +	else
> +		return walk_system_ram_res(0, ULONG_MAX, data, func);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Helper function for placing a buffer in a kexec segment. This assumes
>   * that kexec_mutex is held.
> @@ -472,14 +495,8 @@ int kexec_add_buffer(struct kimage *image, char *buffer, unsigned long bufsz,
>  	kbuf->top_down = top_down;
>  
>  	/* Walk the RAM ranges and allocate a suitable range for the buffer */
> -	if (image->type == KEXEC_TYPE_CRASH)
> -		ret = walk_iomem_res_desc(crashk_res.desc,
> -				IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_BUSY,
> -				crashk_res.start, crashk_res.end, kbuf,
> -				locate_mem_hole_callback);
> -	else
> -		ret = walk_system_ram_res(0, -1, kbuf,
> -					  locate_mem_hole_callback);
> +	ret = arch_kexec_walk_mem(image->type, top_down, kbuf,
> +				   locate_mem_hole_callback);
>  	if (ret != 1) {
>  		/* A suitable memory range could not be found for buffer */
>  		return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
To: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] kexec_file: Generalize kexec_add_buffer.
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 09:58:53 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160616015853.GA4103@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3237367.XLxdnj8q4x@hactar>

On 06/15/16 at 01:21pm, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> Hello Dave,
> 
> Am Mittwoch, 15 Juni 2016, 15:33:02 schrieb Dave Young:
> > > @@ -472,14 +498,16 @@ int kexec_add_buffer(struct kimage *image, char
> > > *buffer, unsigned long bufsz,> 
> > >  	kbuf->top_down = top_down;
> > >  	
> > >  	/* Walk the RAM ranges and allocate a suitable range for the buffer */
> > > 
> > > -	if (image->type == KEXEC_TYPE_CRASH)
> > > -		ret = walk_iomem_res_desc(crashk_res.desc,
> > > -				IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_BUSY,
> > > -				crashk_res.start, crashk_res.end, kbuf,
> > > -				locate_mem_hole_callback);
> > > -	else
> > > -		ret = walk_system_ram_res(0, -1, kbuf,
> > > -					  locate_mem_hole_callback);
> > > +	if (image->type == KEXEC_TYPE_CRASH) {
> > > +		start = crashk_res.start;
> > > +		end = crashk_res.end;
> > > +	} else {
> > > +		start = 0;
> > > +		end = ULONG_MAX;
> > > +	}
> > 
> > For crashk_res, start and end is global, the non-crash values are
> > hard coded, thus it is not necessary to pass these two in arguments.
> > 
> > Moving above to arch_kexec_walk_mem will make it cleaner.
> 
> That's true. What about this version?
> 
> []'s
> Thiago Jung Bauermann
> IBM Linux Technology Center
> 
> 
>     kexec_file: Generalize kexec_add_buffer.
>     
>     Allow architectures to specify different memory walking functions for
>     kexec_add_buffer. Intel uses iomem to track reserved memory ranges,
>     but PowerPC uses the memblock subsystem.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>     Cc: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
>     Cc: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
>     Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org
>     Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/kexec.h b/include/linux/kexec.h
> index e8acb2b43dd9..9b02f907b40a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kexec.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kexec.h
> @@ -315,6 +315,8 @@ int __weak arch_kexec_apply_relocations_add(const Elf_Ehdr *ehdr,
>  					Elf_Shdr *sechdrs, unsigned int relsec);
>  int __weak arch_kexec_apply_relocations(const Elf_Ehdr *ehdr, Elf_Shdr *sechdrs,
>  					unsigned int relsec);
> +int __weak arch_kexec_walk_mem(unsigned int image_type, bool top_down,
> +			       void *data, int (*func)(u64, u64, void *));
>  void arch_kexec_protect_crashkres(void);
>  void arch_kexec_unprotect_crashkres(void);
>  
> diff --git a/kernel/kexec_file.c b/kernel/kexec_file.c
> index b6eec7527e9f..2d066c458222 100644
> --- a/kernel/kexec_file.c
> +++ b/kernel/kexec_file.c
> @@ -428,6 +428,29 @@ static int locate_mem_hole_callback(u64 start, u64 end, void *arg)
>  	return locate_mem_hole_bottom_up(start, end, kbuf);
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * arch_kexec_walk_mem - call func(data) on free memory regions
> + * @image_type:	kimage.type
> + * @top_down:	Start from the highest address?
> + * @data:	Argument to pass to @func.
> + * @func:	Function to call for each memory region.
> + *
> + * Return: The memory walk will stop when func returns a non-zero value
> + * and that value will be returned. If all free regions are visited without
> + * func returning non-zero, then zero will be returned.
> + */
> +int __weak arch_kexec_walk_mem(unsigned int image_type, bool top_down,
> +			       void *data, int (*func)(u64, u64, void *))
> +{

top_down is also not used?

Rethink about the argument name type should be better than image_type,
it is obvious in the comments and the code and simpler.

> +	if (image_type == KEXEC_TYPE_CRASH)
> +		return walk_iomem_res_desc(crashk_res.desc,
> +					   IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_BUSY,
> +					   crashk_res.start, crashk_res.end,
> +					   data, func);
> +	else
> +		return walk_system_ram_res(0, ULONG_MAX, data, func);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Helper function for placing a buffer in a kexec segment. This assumes
>   * that kexec_mutex is held.
> @@ -472,14 +495,8 @@ int kexec_add_buffer(struct kimage *image, char *buffer, unsigned long bufsz,
>  	kbuf->top_down = top_down;
>  
>  	/* Walk the RAM ranges and allocate a suitable range for the buffer */
> -	if (image->type == KEXEC_TYPE_CRASH)
> -		ret = walk_iomem_res_desc(crashk_res.desc,
> -				IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_BUSY,
> -				crashk_res.start, crashk_res.end, kbuf,
> -				locate_mem_hole_callback);
> -	else
> -		ret = walk_system_ram_res(0, -1, kbuf,
> -					  locate_mem_hole_callback);
> +	ret = arch_kexec_walk_mem(image->type, top_down, kbuf,
> +				   locate_mem_hole_callback);
>  	if (ret != 1) {
>  		/* A suitable memory range could not be found for buffer */
>  		return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
> 

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-16  1:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-14 14:59 [PATCH v2 0/9] kexec_file_load implementation for PowerPC Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-06-14 14:59 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-06-14 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] kexec_file: Remove unused members from struct kexec_buf Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-06-14 14:59   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-06-14 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] kexec_file: Generalize kexec_add_buffer Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-06-14 14:59   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-06-15  7:33   ` Dave Young
2016-06-15  7:33     ` Dave Young
2016-06-15 16:21     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-06-15 16:21       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-06-16  1:58       ` Dave Young [this message]
2016-06-16  1:58         ` Dave Young
2016-06-16 20:39         ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-06-16 20:39           ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-06-17  7:35           ` Dave Young
2016-06-17  7:35             ` Dave Young
2016-06-17 20:51             ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-06-17 20:51               ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-06-20  2:26               ` Dave Young
2016-06-20  2:26                 ` Dave Young
2016-06-20 16:01                 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-06-20 16:01                   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-06-14 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] kexec_file: Factor out kexec_locate_mem_hole from kexec_add_buffer Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-06-14 14:59   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-06-14 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] powerpc: Factor out relocation code from module_64.c to elf_util_64.c Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-06-14 14:59   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-06-14 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] powerpc: Generalize elf64_apply_relocate_add Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-06-14 14:59   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-06-14 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] powerpc: Add functions to read ELF files of any endianness Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-06-14 14:59   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-06-14 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] powerpc: Implement kexec_file_load Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-06-14 14:59   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-06-14 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] powerpc: Add support for loading ELF kernels with kexec_file_load Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-06-14 14:59   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-06-14 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] powerpc: Add purgatory for kexec_file_load implementation Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-06-14 14:59   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-06-16  5:48 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] kexec_file_load implementation for PowerPC Michael Ellerman
2016-06-16  5:48   ` Michael Ellerman
2016-06-16 19:55   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-06-16 19:55     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160616015853.GA4103@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com \
    --to=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.