From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>, <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org> Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@redhat.com> Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the powerpc tree with Linus' tree Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 10:35:07 +1000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20160629103507.52c60714@canb.auug.org.au> (raw) Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the powerpc tree got a conflict in: arch/powerpc/Kconfig between commit: 844e3be47693 ("powerpc/bpf/jit: Disable classic BPF JIT on ppc64le") from Linus' tree and commit: 156d0e290e96 ("powerpc/ebpf/jit: Implement JIT compiler for extended BPF") from the powerpc tree. I fixed it up (see below - I am not sure this entirely correct) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell diff --cc arch/powerpc/Kconfig index 0a9d439bcda6,ee82f9a09a85..000000000000 --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig @@@ -128,7 -128,8 +128,8 @@@ config PP select IRQ_FORCED_THREADING select HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE if SMP select HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS - select HAVE_CBPF_JIT if CPU_BIG_ENDIAN - select HAVE_CBPF_JIT if !PPC64 ++ select HAVE_CBPF_JIT if !PPC64 && CPU_BIG_ENDIAN + select HAVE_EBPF_JIT if PPC64 select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL select ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG select ARCH_HAS_GCOV_PROFILE_ALL
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@redhat.com> Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the powerpc tree with Linus' tree Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 10:35:07 +1000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20160629103507.52c60714@canb.auug.org.au> (raw) Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the powerpc tree got a conflict in: arch/powerpc/Kconfig between commit: 844e3be47693 ("powerpc/bpf/jit: Disable classic BPF JIT on ppc64le") from Linus' tree and commit: 156d0e290e96 ("powerpc/ebpf/jit: Implement JIT compiler for extended BPF") from the powerpc tree. I fixed it up (see below - I am not sure this entirely correct) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell diff --cc arch/powerpc/Kconfig index 0a9d439bcda6,ee82f9a09a85..000000000000 --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig @@@ -128,7 -128,8 +128,8 @@@ config PP select IRQ_FORCED_THREADING select HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE if SMP select HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS - select HAVE_CBPF_JIT if CPU_BIG_ENDIAN - select HAVE_CBPF_JIT if !PPC64 ++ select HAVE_CBPF_JIT if !PPC64 && CPU_BIG_ENDIAN + select HAVE_EBPF_JIT if PPC64 select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL select ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG select ARCH_HAS_GCOV_PROFILE_ALL
next reply other threads:[~2016-06-29 0:35 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2016-06-29 0:35 Stephen Rothwell [this message] 2016-06-29 0:35 ` linux-next: manual merge of the powerpc tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell 2016-06-29 5:24 ` Naveen N. Rao 2016-06-29 6:33 ` Michael Ellerman -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2021-08-15 22:27 Stephen Rothwell 2021-08-15 22:27 ` Stephen Rothwell 2018-08-14 23:19 Stephen Rothwell 2017-11-07 22:32 Stephen Rothwell 2017-10-30 12:51 Mark Brown 2017-11-13 5:37 ` Stephen Rothwell 2017-02-16 22:06 Stephen Rothwell 2016-05-01 23:50 Stephen Rothwell 2016-05-01 23:50 ` Stephen Rothwell 2014-05-29 2:04 Stephen Rothwell 2014-05-29 2:04 ` Stephen Rothwell 2009-12-08 23:49 Stephen Rothwell 2009-12-08 23:49 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20160629103507.52c60714@canb.auug.org.au \ --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \ --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \ --cc=cascardo@redhat.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \ --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \ --cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.