All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
	arnd@arndb.de, hughd@google.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] x86, pkeys: add fault handling for PF_PK page fault bit
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 15:40:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160707144027.GX11498@techsingularity.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160707124720.6E0DC397@viggo.jf.intel.com>

On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 05:47:20AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> 
> From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
> 
> PF_PK means that a memory access violated the protection key
> access restrictions.  It is unconditionally an access_error()
> because the permissions set on the VMA don't matter (the PKRU
> value overrides it), and we never "resolve" PK faults (like
> how a COW can "resolve write fault).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

An access fault gets propgated as SEGV_PKUERR. What happens if glibc
does not recognise it?

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
	arnd@arndb.de, hughd@google.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] x86, pkeys: add fault handling for PF_PK page fault bit
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 15:40:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160707144027.GX11498@techsingularity.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160707124720.6E0DC397@viggo.jf.intel.com>

On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 05:47:20AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> 
> From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
> 
> PF_PK means that a memory access violated the protection key
> access restrictions.  It is unconditionally an access_error()
> because the permissions set on the VMA don't matter (the PKRU
> value overrides it), and we never "resolve" PK faults (like
> how a COW can "resolve write fault).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

An access fault gets propgated as SEGV_PKUERR. What happens if glibc
does not recognise it?

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-07 14:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 104+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-07 12:47 [PATCH 0/9] [REVIEW-REQUEST] [v4] System Calls for Memory Protection Keys Dave Hansen
2016-07-07 12:47 ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-07 12:47 ` [PATCH 1/9] x86, pkeys: add fault handling for PF_PK page fault bit Dave Hansen
2016-07-07 12:47   ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-07 14:40   ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2016-07-07 14:40     ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-07 15:42     ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-07 15:42       ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-07 12:47 ` [PATCH 2/9] mm: implement new pkey_mprotect() system call Dave Hansen
2016-07-07 12:47   ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-07 14:40   ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-07 14:40     ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-07 16:51     ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-07 16:51       ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-08 10:15       ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-08 10:15         ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-07 12:47 ` [PATCH 3/9] x86, pkeys: make mprotect_key() mask off additional vm_flags Dave Hansen
2016-07-07 12:47   ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-07 12:47 ` [PATCH 4/9] x86: wire up mprotect_key() system call Dave Hansen
2016-07-07 12:47   ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-07 12:47 ` [PATCH 5/9] x86, pkeys: allocation/free syscalls Dave Hansen
2016-07-07 12:47   ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-07 14:40   ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-07 14:40     ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-07 15:38     ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-07 15:38       ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-07 12:47 ` [PATCH 6/9] x86, pkeys: add pkey set/get syscalls Dave Hansen
2016-07-07 12:47   ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-07 14:45   ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-07 14:45     ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-07 17:33     ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-07 17:33       ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-08  7:18       ` Ingo Molnar
2016-07-08  7:18         ` Ingo Molnar
2016-07-08 16:32         ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-08 16:32           ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-08 16:32           ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-09  8:37           ` Ingo Molnar
2016-07-09  8:37             ` Ingo Molnar
2016-07-09  8:37             ` Ingo Molnar
2016-07-11  4:25             ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-11  4:25               ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-11  7:35               ` Ingo Molnar
2016-07-11  7:35                 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-07-11  7:35                 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-07-11 14:28                 ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-11 14:28                   ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-12  7:13                   ` Ingo Molnar
2016-07-12  7:13                     ` Ingo Molnar
2016-07-12 15:39                     ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-12 15:39                       ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-11 14:50                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-11 14:50                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-11 14:34               ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-11 14:34                 ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-11 14:34                 ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-11 14:45                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-11 14:45                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-11 15:48                   ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-11 15:48                     ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-12 16:32                     ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-12 16:32                       ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-12 17:12                       ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-12 17:12                         ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-12 22:55                         ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-12 22:55                           ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-13  7:56                       ` Ingo Molnar
2016-07-13  7:56                         ` Ingo Molnar
2016-07-13 18:43                         ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-13 18:43                           ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-14  8:07                           ` Ingo Molnar
2016-07-14  8:07                             ` Ingo Molnar
2016-07-18  4:43                             ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-18  4:43                               ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-18  9:56                               ` Ingo Molnar
2016-07-18  9:56                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-07-18 18:02             ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-18 18:02               ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-18 18:02               ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-18 20:12             ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-18 20:12               ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-18 20:12               ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-08 19:26         ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-08 19:26           ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-08 10:22       ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-08 10:22         ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-08 10:22         ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-07 12:47 ` [PATCH 7/9] generic syscalls: wire up memory protection keys syscalls Dave Hansen
2016-07-07 12:47   ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-07 12:47 ` [PATCH 8/9] pkeys: add details of system call use to Documentation/ Dave Hansen
2016-07-07 12:47   ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-07 12:47 ` [PATCH 9/9] x86, pkeys: add self-tests Dave Hansen
2016-07-07 12:47   ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-07 14:47 ` [PATCH 0/9] [REVIEW-REQUEST] [v4] System Calls for Memory Protection Keys Mel Gorman
2016-07-07 14:47   ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-07 14:47   ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-08 18:38 ` Hugh Dickins
2016-07-08 18:38   ` Hugh Dickins
2016-07-08 18:38   ` Hugh Dickins
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-06-09  0:01 [PATCH 0/9] [v3] " Dave Hansen
2016-06-09  0:01 ` [PATCH 1/9] x86, pkeys: add fault handling for PF_PK page fault bit Dave Hansen
2016-06-09  0:01   ` Dave Hansen
2016-06-07 20:47 [PATCH 0/9] [v2] System Calls for Memory Protection Keys Dave Hansen
2016-06-07 20:47 ` [PATCH 1/9] x86, pkeys: add fault handling for PF_PK page fault bit Dave Hansen
2016-06-07 20:47   ` Dave Hansen
2016-06-07 20:47   ` Dave Hansen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160707144027.GX11498@techsingularity.net \
    --to=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dave@sr71.net \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.