* [PATCH 1012/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
@ 2016-08-02 12:08 ` Baole Ni
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Baole Ni @ 2016-08-02 12:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tomi.valkeinen, plagnioj, m.chehab, gregkh, m.szyprowski,
kyungmin.park, k.kozlowski
Cc: linux-omap, linux-fbdev, linux-kernel, robdclark, airlied,
peter.ujfalusi, dan.carpenter, chuansheng.liu, baolex.ni,
oneukum
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
---
drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/dsi.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/dsi.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/dsi.c
index d63e598..f3711a7 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/dsi.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/dsi.c
@@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id dsi_of_match[];
#ifdef DSI_PERF_MEASURE
static bool dsi_perf;
-module_param(dsi_perf, bool, 0644);
+module_param(dsi_perf, bool, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
#endif
static inline struct dsi_data *dsi_get_dsidrv_data(struct platform_device *dsidev)
--
2.9.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1012/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
@ 2016-08-02 12:08 ` Baole Ni
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Baole Ni @ 2016-08-02 12:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tomi.valkeinen, plagnioj, m.chehab, gregkh, m.szyprowski,
kyungmin.park, k.kozlowski
Cc: linux-omap, linux-fbdev, linux-kernel, robdclark, airlied,
peter.ujfalusi, dan.carpenter, chuansheng.liu, baolex.ni,
oneukum
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
---
drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/dsi.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/dsi.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/dsi.c
index d63e598..f3711a7 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/dsi.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/dsi.c
@@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id dsi_of_match[];
#ifdef DSI_PERF_MEASURE
static bool dsi_perf;
-module_param(dsi_perf, bool, 0644);
+module_param(dsi_perf, bool, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
#endif
static inline struct dsi_data *dsi_get_dsidrv_data(struct platform_device *dsidev)
--
2.9.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-08-02 12:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-08-02 12:08 [PATCH 1012/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Baole Ni
2016-08-02 12:08 ` Baole Ni
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.