All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: rpeterso@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: iomap infrastructure and multipage writes V5
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 09:42:47 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160802234247.GO16044@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160731191900.GA29301@lst.de>

On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 09:19:00PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Now after spending this much time I've started wondering why we even
> reserve blocks in xfs_iomap_write_allocate - after all we've reserved
> space for the actual data blocks and the indlen worst case in
> xfs_bmapi_reserve_delalloc.  And in fact a little hack to drop that
> reservation seems to solve both the root cause (depleted reserved pool)
> and the cleanup mess.  I just haven't spend enought time to convince
> myself that it's actually safe, and in fact looking at the allocator
> makes me thing it only works by accident currently despite generally
> postive test results.
> 
> Here is the quick patch if anyone wants to chime in:
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> index 620fc91..67c317f 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> @@ -717,7 +717,7 @@ xfs_iomap_write_allocate(
>  
>  		nimaps = 0;
>  		while (nimaps == 0) {
> -			nres = XFS_EXTENTADD_SPACE_RES(mp, XFS_DATA_FORK);
> +			nres = 0; // XFS_EXTENTADD_SPACE_RES(mp, XFS_DATA_FORK);
>  
>  			error = xfs_trans_alloc(mp, &M_RES(mp)->tr_write, nres,
>  					0, XFS_TRANS_RESERVE, &tp);
> 

This solves the problem for me, and from history appears to be the
right thing to do. Christoph, can you send a proper patch for this?

Cheers,

Dave.

-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: rpeterso@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: iomap infrastructure and multipage writes V5
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 09:42:47 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160802234247.GO16044@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160731191900.GA29301@lst.de>

On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 09:19:00PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Now after spending this much time I've started wondering why we even
> reserve blocks in xfs_iomap_write_allocate - after all we've reserved
> space for the actual data blocks and the indlen worst case in
> xfs_bmapi_reserve_delalloc.  And in fact a little hack to drop that
> reservation seems to solve both the root cause (depleted reserved pool)
> and the cleanup mess.  I just haven't spend enought time to convince
> myself that it's actually safe, and in fact looking at the allocator
> makes me thing it only works by accident currently despite generally
> postive test results.
> 
> Here is the quick patch if anyone wants to chime in:
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> index 620fc91..67c317f 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> @@ -717,7 +717,7 @@ xfs_iomap_write_allocate(
>  
>  		nimaps = 0;
>  		while (nimaps == 0) {
> -			nres = XFS_EXTENTADD_SPACE_RES(mp, XFS_DATA_FORK);
> +			nres = 0; // XFS_EXTENTADD_SPACE_RES(mp, XFS_DATA_FORK);
>  
>  			error = xfs_trans_alloc(mp, &M_RES(mp)->tr_write, nres,
>  					0, XFS_TRANS_RESERVE, &tp);
> 

This solves the problem for me, and from history appears to be the
right thing to do. Christoph, can you send a proper patch for this?

Cheers,

Dave.

-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-08-02 23:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-01 14:44 iomap infrastructure and multipage writes V5 Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-01 14:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-01 14:44 ` [PATCH 01/14] fs: move struct iomap from exportfs.h to a separate header Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-01 14:44   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-01 14:44 ` [PATCH 02/14] fs: introduce iomap infrastructure Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-01 14:44   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-16 16:12   ` Jan Kara
2016-06-16 16:12     ` Jan Kara
2016-06-17 12:01     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-17 12:01       ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-20  2:29       ` Dave Chinner
2016-06-20  2:29         ` Dave Chinner
2016-06-20 12:22         ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-20 12:22           ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-01 14:44 ` [PATCH 03/14] fs: support DAX based iomap zeroing Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-01 14:44   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-01 14:44 ` [PATCH 04/14] xfs: make xfs_bmbt_to_iomap available outside of xfs_pnfs.c Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-01 14:44   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-01 14:44 ` [PATCH 05/14] xfs: reorder zeroing and flushing sequence in truncate Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-01 14:44   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-01 14:44 ` [PATCH 06/14] xfs: implement iomap based buffered write path Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-01 14:44   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-01 14:44 ` [PATCH 07/14] xfs: remove buffered write support from __xfs_get_blocks Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-01 14:44   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-01 14:44 ` [PATCH 08/14] fs: iomap based fiemap implementation Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-01 14:44   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-18 13:18   ` Andreas Grünbacher
2016-08-18 13:18     ` Andreas Grünbacher
2016-06-01 14:44 ` [PATCH 09/14] xfs: use iomap " Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-01 14:44   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-01 14:44 ` [PATCH 10/14] xfs: use iomap infrastructure for DAX zeroing Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-01 14:44   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-01 14:44 ` [PATCH 11/14] xfs: handle 64-bit length in xfs_iozero Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-01 14:44   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-01 14:44 ` [PATCH 12/14] xfs: use xfs_zero_range in xfs_zero_eof Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-01 14:44   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-01 14:44 ` [PATCH 13/14] xfs: split xfs_free_file_space in manageable pieces Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-01 14:44   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-01 14:44 ` [PATCH 14/14] xfs: kill xfs_zero_remaining_bytes Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-01 14:44   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-01 14:46 ` iomap infrastructure and multipage writes V5 Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-01 14:46   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-28  0:26 ` Dave Chinner
2016-06-28  0:26   ` Dave Chinner
2016-06-28 13:28   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-28 13:28     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-28 13:38     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-28 13:38       ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-30 17:22   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-30 17:22     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-30 23:16     ` Dave Chinner
2016-06-30 23:16       ` Dave Chinner
2016-07-18 11:14     ` Dave Chinner
2016-07-18 11:14       ` Dave Chinner
2016-07-18 11:18       ` Dave Chinner
2016-07-18 11:18         ` Dave Chinner
2016-07-31 19:19         ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-31 19:19           ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-01  0:16           ` Dave Chinner
2016-08-01  0:16             ` Dave Chinner
2016-08-02 23:42           ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2016-08-02 23:42             ` Dave Chinner
2017-02-13 22:31             ` Eric Sandeen
2017-02-14  6:10               ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-19  3:50       ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-19  3:50         ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-13 22:32 xfs-owner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160802234247.GO16044@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rpeterso@redhat.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.