All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jörn Engel" <joern@purestorage.com>
To: dingtianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>,
	Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Regression] Bonding no longer support tun-interfaces
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 14:21:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160808212112.GI22974@cork> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160808211530.GH22974@cork>

Redirected by Davem.

Is there a mailing list or a maintainer for regressions?  There used to
be, but I've been out of the loop for a while.

On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 02:15:30PM -0700, Jörn Engel wrote:
> This has been reported (and ignored) before:
> http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1407.2/03790.html
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89161
> 
> Regression was introduced by:
> 
> commit 00503b6f702e (refs/bisect/bad)
> Author: dingtianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
> Date:   Sat Jan 25 13:00:29 2014 +0800
> 
>     bonding: fail_over_mac should only affect AB mode at enslave and removal processing
>     
>     According to bonding.txt, the fail_over_ma should only affect active-backup mode,
>     but I found that the fail_over_mac could be set to active or follow in all
>     modes, this will cause new slave could not be set to bond's MAC address at
>     enslave processing and restore its own MAC address at removal processing.
>     
>     The correct way to fix the problem is that we should not add restrictions when
>     setting options, just need to modify the bond enslave and removal processing
>     to check the mode in addition to fail_over_mac when setting a slave's MAC during
>     enslavement. The change active slave processing already only calls the fail_over_mac
>     function when in active-backup mode.
>     
>     Thanks for Jay's suggestion.
>     
>     The patch also modify the pr_warning() to pr_warn().
>     
>     Cc: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
>     Cc: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
>     Cc: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
>     Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
>     Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> 
> Since I never needed bonding or tun-interfaces before, I come late to
> the party.  Some 6k lines have changed in the bonding driver since the
> regression got in two years ago.  So a simple revert is unlikely to lead
> to happiness.
> 
> But I absolutely need that functionality and would rather run a 3.13
> kernel than live with the regression.  dingtianhong, any suggestions?
> 
> Jörn
> 
> --
> It is a cliché that most clichés are true, but then, like most clichés,
> that cliché is untrue.
> -- Stephen Fry

Jörn

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-08-08 21:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-08 21:15 [Regression] Bonding no longer support tun-interfaces Jörn Engel
2016-08-08 21:15 ` Jörn Engel
2016-08-08 21:17 ` David Miller
2016-08-08 21:21 ` Jörn Engel [this message]
2016-08-08 21:48   ` [PATCH] bonding: Allow tun-interfaces as slaves Jörn Engel
2016-08-09  2:18     ` Ding Tianhong
2016-08-09  3:09       ` Jörn Engel
2016-08-09  5:29         ` zhuyj
2016-08-09 13:28           ` Ding Tianhong
2016-08-09 18:08             ` Jörn Engel
2016-08-09 19:06               ` David Miller
2016-08-09 21:10                 ` Jörn Engel
2016-08-09 23:51                   ` Jay Vosburgh
2016-08-10  1:06                     ` Ding Tianhong
2016-08-10  9:27                     ` Ding Tianhong
2016-08-10 17:41                       ` Jay Vosburgh
2016-08-11  1:20                         ` Ding Tianhong
2016-08-10 21:26                     ` Jörn Engel
2016-08-10 22:00                       ` Jörn Engel
2016-08-11  0:58                         ` Jay Vosburgh
2016-08-11  1:37                           ` Ding Tianhong
2016-08-11 18:24                           ` Jörn Engel
2016-08-29 22:49                             ` Jörn Engel
2016-08-30  1:44                             ` Ding Tianhong
2016-08-09  5:52         ` Ding Tianhong
2016-08-09 18:21         ` Jay Vosburgh
2016-08-09 18:40           ` Jörn Engel
2016-08-09 19:10             ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160808212112.GI22974@cork \
    --to=joern@purestorage.com \
    --cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dingtianhong@huawei.com \
    --cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.