All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek 1 <pavel@denx.de>
To: Nick Kralevich <nnk@google.com>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	"Roberts, William C" <william.c.roberts@intel.com>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com" 
	<kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"keescook@chromium.org" <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"jeffv@google.com" <jeffv@google.com>,
	"salyzyn@android.com" <salyzyn@android.com>,
	"dcashman@android.com" <dcashman@android.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Introduce mmap randomization
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 18:31:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160814163126.GA19472@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFJ0LnEZW7Y1zfN8v0_ckXQZn1n-UKEhf_tSmNOgHwrrnNnuMg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi!

> Inter-mmap randomization will decrease the predictability of later
> mmap() allocations, which should help make data structures harder to
> find in memory. In addition, this patch will also introduce unmapped
> gaps between pages, preventing linear overruns from one mapping to
> another another mapping. I am unable to quantify how much this will
> improve security, but it should be > 0.
> 
> I like Dave Hansen's suggestion that this functionality be limited to
> 64 bits, where concerns about running out of address space are
> essentially nil. I'd be supportive of this change if it was limited to
> 64 bits.

Yep, 64bits is easier. But notice that x86-64 machines do _not_ have
full 64bits of address space...

...and that if you use as much address space as possible, TLB flushes
will be slower because page table entries will need more cache.

So this will likely have performance implications even when
application does no syscalls :-(.

How do you plan to deal with huge memory pages support?

Best regards,
								Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Pavel Machek 1 <pavel@denx.de>
To: Nick Kralevich <nnk@google.com>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	"Roberts, William C" <william.c.roberts@intel.com>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com"
	<kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"keescook@chromium.org" <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"jeffv@google.com" <jeffv@google.com>,
	"salyzyn@android.com" <salyzyn@android.com>,
	"dcashman@android.com" <dcashman@android.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Introduce mmap randomization
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 18:31:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160814163126.GA19472@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFJ0LnEZW7Y1zfN8v0_ckXQZn1n-UKEhf_tSmNOgHwrrnNnuMg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi!

> Inter-mmap randomization will decrease the predictability of later
> mmap() allocations, which should help make data structures harder to
> find in memory. In addition, this patch will also introduce unmapped
> gaps between pages, preventing linear overruns from one mapping to
> another another mapping. I am unable to quantify how much this will
> improve security, but it should be > 0.
> 
> I like Dave Hansen's suggestion that this functionality be limited to
> 64 bits, where concerns about running out of address space are
> essentially nil. I'd be supportive of this change if it was limited to
> 64 bits.

Yep, 64bits is easier. But notice that x86-64 machines do _not_ have
full 64bits of address space...

...and that if you use as much address space as possible, TLB flushes
will be slower because page table entries will need more cache.

So this will likely have performance implications even when
application does no syscalls :-(.

How do you plan to deal with huge memory pages support?

Best regards,
								Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Pavel Machek 1 <pavel@denx.de>
To: Nick Kralevich <nnk@google.com>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	"Roberts, William C" <william.c.roberts@intel.com>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com"
	<kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"keescook@chromium.org" <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"jeffv@google.com" <jeffv@google.com>,
	"salyzyn@android.com" <salyzyn@android.com>,
	"dcashman@android.com" <dcashman@android.com>
Subject: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Introduce mmap randomization
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 18:31:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160814163126.GA19472@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFJ0LnEZW7Y1zfN8v0_ckXQZn1n-UKEhf_tSmNOgHwrrnNnuMg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi!

> Inter-mmap randomization will decrease the predictability of later
> mmap() allocations, which should help make data structures harder to
> find in memory. In addition, this patch will also introduce unmapped
> gaps between pages, preventing linear overruns from one mapping to
> another another mapping. I am unable to quantify how much this will
> improve security, but it should be > 0.
> 
> I like Dave Hansen's suggestion that this functionality be limited to
> 64 bits, where concerns about running out of address space are
> essentially nil. I'd be supportive of this change if it was limited to
> 64 bits.

Yep, 64bits is easier. But notice that x86-64 machines do _not_ have
full 64bits of address space...

...and that if you use as much address space as possible, TLB flushes
will be slower because page table entries will need more cache.

So this will likely have performance implications even when
application does no syscalls :-(.

How do you plan to deal with huge memory pages support?

Best regards,
								Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-08-14 16:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-26 18:22 [PATCH] [RFC] Introduce mmap randomization william.c.roberts
2016-07-26 18:22 ` [kernel-hardening] " william.c.roberts
2016-07-26 18:22 ` william.c.roberts
2016-07-26 18:22   ` [kernel-hardening] " william.c.roberts
2016-07-26 20:03   ` Jason Cooper
2016-07-26 20:03     ` [kernel-hardening] " Jason Cooper
2016-07-26 20:11     ` Roberts, William C
2016-07-26 20:11       ` [kernel-hardening] " Roberts, William C
2016-07-26 20:13     ` Roberts, William C
2016-07-26 20:13       ` [kernel-hardening] " Roberts, William C
2016-07-26 20:13       ` Roberts, William C
2016-07-26 20:59       ` Jason Cooper
2016-07-26 20:59         ` [kernel-hardening] " Jason Cooper
2016-07-26 20:59         ` Jason Cooper
2016-07-26 21:06         ` Roberts, William C
2016-07-26 21:06           ` [kernel-hardening] " Roberts, William C
2016-07-26 21:06           ` Roberts, William C
2016-07-26 21:44           ` Jason Cooper
2016-07-26 21:44             ` [kernel-hardening] " Jason Cooper
2016-07-26 21:44             ` Jason Cooper
2016-07-26 23:51             ` Dave Hansen
2016-07-26 23:51               ` [kernel-hardening] " Dave Hansen
2016-07-26 23:51               ` Dave Hansen
2016-08-02 17:17             ` Roberts, William C
2016-08-02 17:17               ` [kernel-hardening] " Roberts, William C
2016-08-02 17:17               ` Roberts, William C
2016-08-03 18:19               ` Roberts, William C
2016-08-03 18:19                 ` [kernel-hardening] " Roberts, William C
2016-08-03 18:19                 ` Roberts, William C
2016-08-02 17:15           ` Roberts, William C
2016-08-02 17:15             ` [kernel-hardening] " Roberts, William C
2016-08-02 17:15             ` Roberts, William C
2016-07-27 16:59         ` Nick Kralevich
2016-07-27 16:59           ` [kernel-hardening] " Nick Kralevich
2016-07-27 16:59           ` Nick Kralevich
2016-07-28 21:07           ` Jason Cooper
2016-07-28 21:07             ` [kernel-hardening] " Jason Cooper
2016-07-28 21:07             ` Jason Cooper
2016-07-29 10:10             ` [kernel-hardening] " Daniel Micay
2016-07-31 22:24               ` Jason Cooper
2016-07-31 22:24                 ` Jason Cooper
2016-08-01  0:24                 ` Daniel Micay
2016-08-02 16:57           ` Roberts, William C
2016-08-02 16:57             ` [kernel-hardening] " Roberts, William C
2016-08-02 16:57             ` Roberts, William C
2016-08-02 17:02             ` Nick Kralevich
2016-08-02 17:02               ` [kernel-hardening] " Nick Kralevich
2016-08-02 17:02               ` Nick Kralevich
2016-08-14 16:31           ` Pavel Machek 1 [this message]
2016-08-14 16:31             ` [kernel-hardening] " Pavel Machek 1
2016-08-14 16:31             ` Pavel Machek 1
2016-07-26 20:12   ` [kernel-hardening] " Rik van Riel
2016-07-26 20:17     ` Roberts, William C
2016-07-26 20:17       ` Roberts, William C
2016-07-26 20:17       ` Roberts, William C
2016-07-26 20:41   ` Nick Kralevich
2016-07-26 20:41     ` [kernel-hardening] " Nick Kralevich
2016-07-26 21:02     ` Roberts, William C
2016-07-26 21:02       ` [kernel-hardening] " Roberts, William C
2016-07-26 21:11       ` Nick Kralevich
2016-07-26 21:11         ` [kernel-hardening] " Nick Kralevich
2016-07-26 21:11         ` Nick Kralevich
2016-08-14 16:22   ` Pavel Machek
2016-08-14 16:22     ` [kernel-hardening] " Pavel Machek
2016-08-04 16:53 ` [kernel-hardening] " Daniel Micay
2016-08-04 16:55   ` Roberts, William C
2016-08-04 16:55     ` Roberts, William C
2016-08-04 17:10     ` Daniel Micay
2016-07-26 18:27 william.c.roberts
2016-07-26 19:26 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-07-26 19:57   ` Roberts, William C
2016-07-26 20:29     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-07-26 20:35       ` Roberts, William C

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160814163126.GA19472@amd \
    --to=pavel@denx.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dcashman@android.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=jeffv@google.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nnk@google.com \
    --cc=salyzyn@android.com \
    --cc=william.c.roberts@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.